Genre and literary direction. Literary trends and methods

In ancient times, Rus' did not know literature. The artistic word existed only in oral form: legends were told about wise princes and brave warriors, legends about the gods, everyday and fairy tales. Ritual songs were sung at holidays, weddings and funerals. No one intended to write down folklore works: they knew them by heart, listened to them many times throughout their lives, and narrated and sang them themselves.

Since the 10th century, writing has been used exclusively for business purposes.

Since 988, when the Grand Duke of Kiev Vladimir Svyatoslavich proclaimed Christianity the state religion in Rus', the need arose to distribute books. Ancient books they were written on parchment, bound in wooden bindings, covered in leather, with the obligatory clasps: without them, the book with thick leather pages would constantly open.

So, after the adoption of Christianity, books appeared in Rus'. In the middle of the 11th century, a completely special genre of historical narration was born in Rus' - the chronicle. In the Old Russian language, the word “summer” meant not only the season of the year, but also the year itself. Each new entry in the chronicle began with the words “in the summer...” - hence the name of the genre.

At the beginning of the 12th century, the monk of the Kiev-Pechersk Monastery Nestor creates new edition chronicle, which we call “The Tale of Bygone Years” from its first words. He begins his story with information about the origin of the Slavs, then tells about the territory of the Russian land, about the tribes that inhabited it in ancient times and their customs, talks about the founding of Kiev and the first Russian princes from the Rurik dynasty: about the brave warrior Oleg the Prophet, Prince Igor, killed by the Drevlyans for excessive greed, to his wise and cruel wife Olga, about the glorious Svyatoslav Igorevich. Further, the “Tale of Bygone Years” tells about Vladimir Svyatoslavich and the adoption of Christianity by Russia, about the treachery of Vladimir’s adopted son, Svyatopolk, who began to exterminate his half-brothers, about the victory over him and the glorious reign of Yaroslav the Wise.



Nestor has topics that are especially important. He persistently pursues the idea of ​​the need for peace between the princes: after all, they are all relatives by blood, they all come from Prince of Kyiv Igor.

According to O. Tvorogov

FROM “THE TALE OF BYE YEARS”

Here are the stories of past years, where the Russian land came from, who became the first to reign in Kyiv and how the Russian land arose.

SETTLEMENT OF THE SLAVS

So let's begin this story.

The Slavs settled along the Danube, where the Ugric and Bulgarian lands are now. And from those Slavs the Slavs spread throughout the land and began to be called by the places where they settled. So, some came and settled on a river named Morava and were called Moravians, while others were called Czechs. And here are the same Slavs: white Croats and Serbs. When the Volochs attacked the Danube Slavs and settled among them and began to oppress them, the Slavs went north and settled on the Vistula. They were called Poles, and from those Poles came the Poles.

Some Slavs came and settled along the Dnieper and were called Polyans, and others - Drevlyans, because they settled in the forests, and still others settled between Pripyat and Dvina and were called Dregovichi, others settled along the Dvina and were called Polochans, after the river that flows into the Dvina and is called Polota. The same Slavs who settled near Lake Ilmen called themselves by their own name - Slovenes - and built a city and called it Novgorod. And others settled along the Desna, and the Seim, and the Sula and were called northerners. And so I broke up Slavic people, and after his name the letter was called “Slavic”.

CUE, CHEEK and HOREB

The Polyans lived separately and were governed by their own clans. And there were three brothers: one named Kiy, the other - Shchek and the third - Khoriv, ​​and their sister was Lybid. Kiy sat on the mountain where Borichev is now transported, and Shchek sat on the mountain that is now called Shchekovitsa, and Khoriv on the third mountain, which was nicknamed Khorivitsa after him. And they built a city in the name of their elder brother and called it Kiev. There was a forest and a large forest all around the city, and they caught animals there. And those men were wise and intelligent, and they were called Polyans, from them Polyans are still in Kyiv.

Some, ignorant, say that Kiy was a carrier; At that time, Kyiv had transportation from the other side of the Dnieper, which is why they said: “For transportation, to Kyiv.” If Kiy had been a ferryman, he would not have gone to Constantinople. And this Kiy reigned in his family, and he went to the king - we just don’t know which king, but, they say, this king gave him great honors. Kiy, returning to his city of Kyiv, ended his life here, and his brothers, Shchek and Khoriv, ​​and their sister Lybid died immediately.

TRIBUTE TO THE KHAZARS

After death three brothers The Drevlyans and other surrounding people began to oppress the glades. And the Khazars found them on these mountains in the forests and said:

Pay us tribute.

The clearing conferred and gave a sword each from the smoke. And the Khazars took the swords to their prince and to their elders and said to them:

Well, we have found a new tribute.

They also asked:

They answered:

In the forest on the mountains, above the Dnieper River.

The Khazar elders asked again:

What did they give?

They showed swords.

And the elders said:

This is not a good tribute, to the prince. We found her with weapons that were sharp only on one side - sabers, but these weapons had double-edged weapons - swords. The day will come when they will collect tribute from us and from other lands.

And everything came true: the Russian princes still rule the Khazars to this day.

Retelling by T. Mikhelson

Nestor the chronicler. Sculptor M. M.Antokolsky. 1890

Questions and tasks

1. What events were reflected in the chronicles?

2. Retell the article about ancient Russian literature.

3. What historical events are told in excerpts from The Tale of Bygone Years?

4. How to explain the names of the texts included in it?

5. Read another passage “In praise of Prince Yaroslav and books”:

“Yaroslav loved books, reading them often both at night and during the day. And he gathered many scribes, and they translated from Greek into Slavic. And they copied many books, and faithful people learn from them and enjoy the divine teaching. It’s as if someone plowed the land, and another sowed it, while others now eat food that never fails: his father Vladimir plowed the land and softened it, that is, he enlightened it with baptism, but Yaroslav sowed in bookish words the hearts of faithful people, and we reap by accepting book teaching.”

How do you understand this text? Explain the words “enjoy”, “unfailing”, “sown with bookish words”, “reaping the teaching of the book”.

6. Retell one of the passages from “The Tale of Bygone Years” using old words and expressions, for example:

So let's begin this story;

The smoke hit the sword;

Russian princes own it.

In Ancient Rus' story They called chronicles, and sometimes lives - written stories about the lives of saints.

Chronicles- monuments of historical writing and literature of Ancient Rus'. The narration in them was carried out year by year in chronological order. The story about the events of each year began with the words “in the summer...” - hence the name “chronicle”.

For you, curious ones

A handwritten book is a manuscript in the form of separate notebooks, sewn together and bound. The notebook was sewn to belts, which, in turn, were attached to wooden binding boards (hence the phrase: “read a book from board to board”). The outside of the boards was covered with leather or some kind of fabric or covered with frames. The spine of the binding in Ancient Rus' was made flat or rounded. Leather ties or clasps were attached to the bindings.

The printed book was first published in China in the first half of the 11th century. In Europe, printing dates back to the 40s of the 15th century, when Johann Gutenberg published the Bible, and the first Slavic printed books were published in 1491. The first accurately dated book in Moscow - “The Apostle” - was printed in 1564 by Ivan Fedorov and Pyotr Mstislavets.

"Apostle". 1564 Frontispiece

Monument to Cyril and Methodius on Slavyanskaya Square in Moscow. Sculptor V. M. Klykov. 1992

Creators Slavic alphabet brothers Cyril (c. 827-869) and Methodius (c. 815-885) - educators, preachers of Christianity, the first translators of liturgical books from Greek into Church Slavonic.

In honor of Saints Cyril and Methodius on May 24 at Slavic countries Days of Slavic Literature and Culture are held.

Meet some special terms related to book publishing. Now you can talk about the book and its features.

Cover- cover of a brochure, magazine or book.

Binding- hard cover of the book.

Flyleaf- a double sheet of paper connecting the book block with the binding cover.

Frontispiece- a page with an image placed on the left half of the first spread of the book, the right side of which is occupied by the title page. The frontispiece is an illustration of the entire work.

Title page- title page of the publication containing information about the book.

Title turnover- reverse side title page, which contains information about the book and annotation.

annotation- brief information about the contents of the publication (books, brochures, articles).

Output- information about the book (usually on the last page), which indicates the year of publication, circulation, address of the publisher and printing house.

Circulation- number of copies of the publication.

From the fables of the peoples of the world.

AESOP

The name of Aesop is mentioned in ancient Greek literature in 440-430 BC. It, like the image of Aesop himself, is overgrown with legends. Nothing is known for certain about Aesop. We don't even know if he was a historical figure. According to legends, he was an old man, a participant in feasts, and a wise interlocutor. He is a slave, but smarter than free citizens, ugly (“the belly is distended, the head is like a cauldron, snub-nosed, with dark skin, crippled, humming..."), but taller than the handsome men. His appearance did not at all correspond to the ideas of the aristocrats about the ideal person.

The fable in his mouth is a weapon for protecting the oppressed people from the nobility. But since direct attacks against the rulers were dangerous, Aesop chose the allegorical genre, the form of fable. He seems to entertain listeners with an oral story, but his goal is to convey the rules that are followed in society and at home, to teach life lessons. true stories and cases.

Hence the name - Aesopian language - allegorical language, under the guise of entertainment, jokes, it is used for ridicule and instruction. Aesop's fables - oral jokes - teachings. Aesop was and is considered the founder of the fable genre, the discoverer, and the inventor of fable plots.

All subsequent fabulists (Phaedrus, La Fontaine, Krylov, etc.) used plots first introduced into literature by Aesop. Since he sought to both entertain and instruct, the fable can be called a fictional, entertaining and instructive story.

According to M.L. Gasparov

THE RAVEN AND THE FOX

The raven took away a piece of meat and sat down on a tree. The fox saw it and wanted to get this meat. She stood in front of the Raven and began to praise him: he was great and handsome, and could become a king over the birds better than others, and he would, of course, if he also had a voice. The Raven wanted to show her that he had a voice; He released the meat and croaked in a loud voice. And the Fox ran up, grabbed the meat and said: “Eh, Raven, if you also had a mind in your head, you wouldn’t need anything else to reign.”

The fable is appropriate against an unreasonable person.

FOX AND GRAPES

The hungry Fox saw a grapevine with hanging grapes and wanted to get to them, but she couldn’t; and, walking away, she said to herself: “They are still green!”

It’s the same with people: others cannot succeed because they lack the strength, but they blame circumstances for this.

Translation by M.L. Gasparova

Questions and tasks

1. Make an outline for an article about Aesop and prepare a detailed answer to it.

2. How did you understand the statement of M.L. Gasparov that the fable in the hands of Aesop is “a weapon for protecting the oppressed people from the nobility”?

3. What does the expression “Aesopian language” mean? Define the concept of “allegory”.

4. What is the moral of Aesop's fables you read?

Jean de La Fontaine (1621-1695)

Jean de La Fontaine was a French fabulist who lived during the reign of Louis XIV. He is the author of several collections of fairy tales, which were admired by the philosopher and writer Voltaire. But the most significant and remarkable of all that he created are his fables.

Lafontaine retold already familiar stories in new way, but nevertheless turned out to be the creator of original, unique fables. The main thing for him is a narrative full of life, movement, actions, feelings, speeches. The moral comes from his story.

FOX AND GRAPES

The Gascon fox, or perhaps the Norman fox

(They say different things)

Dying of hunger, I suddenly saw above the gazebo

Grapes, so visibly green,

In ruddy skin!

Our friend was glad to feast on them,

Yes, he could not reach him and said: “He is green -

Let all the rabble feed on it!”

Well, isn't this better than idly complaining?

Translation by M.L. Gasparova

Questions and tasks

2. The fables of Aesop and Jean de La Fontaine in the textbook are given in translation by M.L. Gasparova. How does the translation of the last fable differ from the previous two?

3. What word in La Fontaine’s fable “The Fox and the Grapes” seemed unexpected to you? Find synonyms for it.

4. Compare the fables of the fabulists on the theme “The Fox and the Grapes.” What are the similarities? What is the difference? Let us take as an example the reasoning of literary critic V.I. Korovina.

The literary art of Ancient Rus' originates in the Middle Ages and dates back to the end of the 10th and the first years of the 11th century. This time is so far from us that it is difficult for a person living now to understand the unique book and cultural world. In order to penetrate into it, you need to know the history, religion, and peculiarities of the aesthetic ideas of the people of that time.

With the adoption of Christianity, Orthodoxy as state religion, which came to us from Byzantium through the lands of the southern Slavs, mainly through Bulgaria, books appeared in Ancient Rus' - church-service and narrative-historical. They were written in Church Slavonic. This is how Ancient Rus' became familiar with Greek and Pan-Slavic Orthodox writing and culture.

The basis of Church Slavonic texts was the system religious ideas about the world, according to which God is the Creator of all things. When starting his work, the writer of that time, whose image was embodied by Pushkin in the chronicler Pimen in the tragedy “Boris Godunov,” first of all enlisted the support of God, asking Him in his prayers to help him in the work he was undertaking. Old Russian literature described various historical events- campaigns of princes, battles against the Pechenegs and Polovtsians, battles of princes for the Kiev throne.

The medieval writer knew well the reason for the events that took place: for him they were all manifestations of God's will. Old Russian literature is distinguished by its high spirituality. Her main interest is focused on the life of the human soul, on education and improvement moral principle in a person, while the external, objective, recedes into the background. Just as in an icon the entire foreground is occupied by the face and eyes (the face is the light of the soul, the eyes are the entrance to inner world and reflection of inner light), and in literature the ancient Russian writer glorifies eternally valuable spiritual qualities - mercy, modesty, unselfishness, sincerity and openness.

Old Russian literature was exclusively historical in nature. She didn't allow fiction. This allowed academician D. S. Likhachev to call her style “the style of monumental historicism.” Fiction is allowed into ancient Russian texts no earlier than the 17th century, when secular literature began to take shape.

The medieval writer is not interested private person with his purely earthly worries, sorrows and joys. He is busy with events of national scale and significance, and therefore the focus of his attention is on princes, boyars, governors, and clergy of high rank. They are in historical light on two levels - real-historical and religious-symbolic. Ancient people in Rus' believed that Prince Vladimir baptized Rus' and that there were black demons, with wings and tails, tempting them to do bad things.

The ancient Russian scribe could not write, “listening indifferently to good and evil.” He passionately and openly expressed his political and moral positions. Another feature ancient Russian literature lies in the fact that she always observes etiquette - the etiquette of the world order, the etiquette of behavior and the etiquette of words. According to D.S. Likhachev, the writer of that time clearly understood “how this or that course of events should have taken place,” “how the actor", "What words should a writer use to describe what is happening." Everything had its own order, its own order, which could not be violated. Therefore, in the monuments there are a lot of “ common places" The Old Russian writer valued the general, repetitive, and easily recognizable and avoided everything unusual, particular, and accidental. That is why the abundant citations from various sources that medieval books resorted to are evidence of high education, erudition and culture. But this does not mean that the writer could not take advantage of different written and oral traditions, which is what makes “The Tale of Igor’s Campaign” different.

The content and aesthetics of ancient Russian literature are embodied in a unique system of genres. Each genre was directly related to practical life and served its own area of ​​activity. Chronicle writing was caused by the state's need to have its own written history. The genres of liturgical literature (Prologue, Apostle, Book of Hours, etc.) were intended for sending church services(requirements) and rituals. Feats of arms were depicted in military stories. Traveling with different purposes- on the move. Descriptions of the lives of saints or princes are in the lives, which also had their own differences. Each genre had its own canon 1. Written literature developed epic genres(story, legend), lyrical (word, teaching), lyric-epic (life). There was a strict hierarchy among the genres: the main genre was considered Holy Bible, followed by hymnography and “words” interpreting Scripture and explaining the meaning of Christian holidays, then the lives of the saints. In the 17th century, Old Russian literature was enriched with poetic forms, the genres of satire and drama, and the life of the saint developed into a story of an everyday or memoir-autobiographical nature.

Old Russian literature, spanning seven centuries, has gone through a long and impressive path of development. Her first period- XI - first third of the XII century, when there were two centers in Ancient Rus' - Kyiv and Novgorod. This period is distinguished by the relative unity of literature and is generally characterized as a period of apprenticeship. main idea works - the superiority of Christianity over paganism ("The Tale of Bygone Years", "The Life of Theodosius of Pechersk", "The Sermon on Law and Grace" by Metropolitan Hilarion, "The Walk" by Abbot Daniel, "The Teaching" by Vladimir Monomakh).

Second period- second third of the 12th - first third of the 13th century. This period is characterized by the appearance regional literature centers (Vladimir, Rostov, Smolensk, Galich, Polotsk, Turov). The main works are “The Lay of Igor’s Host”, the Kiev-Pechersk Patericon, “The Lay” by Kirill of Turov, “Prayer” by Daniil Zatochnik.

Third period- tragic, associated with the Mongol-Tatar invasion and the fight against it (second third of the 13th - end of the 14th century). One theme dominates here - heroic, coupled with faith in national revival.

The fourth period- the end of the XIV-XV century - the time of rise national identity, manifested in the idea of ​​​​gathering lands, in the formation of a moral ideal. This was reflected in the lives of the saints written by Epiphanius the Wise.

Fifth period- the era of the Moscow centralized state (late XV-XVI centuries). It is characterized by the merging of regional literatures into all-Russian ones. Journalism reaches an extraordinary flowering here. The main works are “The Tale of Peter and Fevronia of Murom” by Ermolai-Erasmus, “Walking across the Three Seas” by Afanasy Nikitin, “The Great “Cheti-Minea””, “Domostroy”, correspondence of Ivan the Terrible with Andrei Kurbsky. The sixth period is a time of troubles, a clash of old and new principles of writing. This period is divided into two segments: from the beginning to the 60s of the 17th century and from the 60s to the end of the 17th century. In the first segment, the old method of depicting reality is destroyed and updated genre system. In the second segment, literature is divided into democratic and official. Attention to the person becomes common, and the autobiographical principle intensifies. Main works - “The Tale of Shemyakin court", "The Tale of Ersha Ershovich", "The Life of Archpriest Avvakum".

The seventeenth century completes the history of ancient Russian literature with its inherent unified principles. After this, the history of secular fiction opens from the 18th century.

Questions and tasks

  1. What was the basis of Church Slavonic texts and what distinguished Old Russian literature?
  2. What genres of ancient Russian literature existed and which of them are familiar to you from previous classes?
  3. What works of ancient Russian literature do you know from courses in grades 5, 6, 7, 8? Name the heroes of previously studied works of ancient Russian literature. Tell us about one of them.
  4. What periods did ancient Russian literature go through in its development?
  5. Re-read and write an article about ancient Russian literature, compose detailed plan text.

1 Canon - strict rules and norms.

  1. Ancient literature is filled with deep patriotic content, the heroic pathos of serving the Russian land, state, and homeland.
  2. The main theme of ancient Russian literature is world history and the meaning of human life.
  3. Ancient literature glorifies the moral beauty of the Russian person, capable of sacrificing what is most precious for the sake of the common good - life. It expresses a deep belief in the power, the ultimate triumph of good and the ability of man to elevate his spirit and defeat evil.
  4. A characteristic feature of Old Russian literature is historicism. The heroes are mainly historical figures. Literature strictly follows fact.
  5. A feature of the artistic creativity of the ancient Russian writer is the so-called “ literary etiquette" This is a special literary and aesthetic regulation, the desire to subordinate the very image of the world to certain principles and rules, to establish once and for all what and how should be depicted.
  6. Old Russian literature appears with the emergence of the state, writing and is based on book Christian culture and developed forms of oral poetic creativity. At this time, literature and folklore were closely connected. Literature often perceived plots, artistic images, visual arts folk art.
  7. The originality of ancient Russian literature in the depiction of the hero depends on the style and genre of the work. In relation to styles and genres, it is reproduced in monuments ancient literature hero, ideals are formed and created.
  8. In ancient Russian literature, a system of genres was defined, within which the development of original Russian literature began. The main thing in their definition was the “use” of the genre, the “practical purpose” for which this or that work was intended.
  9. The traditions of Old Russian literature are found in the works of Russian writers of the 18th-20th centuries.

TEST QUESTIONS AND TASKS

  1. How does Academician D.S. characterize Likhachev ancient Russian literature? Why does he call it “one grandiose whole, one colossal work”?
  2. What does Likhachev compare ancient literature with and why?
  3. What are the main advantages of ancient literature?
  4. Why would the artistic discoveries of literature of subsequent centuries be impossible without the works of ancient literature? (Think about what qualities of ancient literature were adopted by Russian literature of modern times. Give examples from works of Russian classics known to you.)
  5. What did Russian poets and prose writers value and adopt from ancient literature? What did A.S. write about her? Pushkin, N.V. Gogol, A.I. Herzen, L.N. Tolstoy, F.M. Dostoevsky, D.N. Mamin-Sibiryak?
  6. What does ancient literature write about the benefits of books? Give examples of “praise of books” known in ancient Russian literature.
  7. Why were ideas about the power of words high in ancient literature? What were they connected with, what did they rely on?
  8. What is said about the word in the Gospel?
  9. What do writers compare books to and why; why are books rivers, sources of wisdom, and what do the words mean: “if you diligently look for wisdom in the books, you will find great benefit for your soul”?
  10. Name the monuments of ancient Russian literature known to you and the names of their scribes.
  11. Tell us about the method of writing and the nature of ancient manuscripts.
  12. Name historical background the emergence of ancient Russian literature and its specific features in contrast to modern literature.
  13. What is the role of folklore in the formation of ancient literature?
  14. Using vocabulary and reference material, briefly retell the history of the study of ancient monuments, write down the names of the scientists involved in their research and the stages of study.
  15. What is the image of the world and man in the minds of Russian scribes?
  16. Tell us about the depiction of man in ancient Russian literature.
  17. Name the themes of ancient literature, using vocabulary and reference material, characterize its genres.
  18. List the main stages in the development of ancient literature.

Read also the articles in the section “ National identity ancient literature, its origin and development."

Literature, like no other type of creative human activity, is connected with social and historical life people, being a bright and imaginative source of its reflection. Fiction develops along with society, in a certain historical sequence, and we can say that it is a direct example artistic development civilization. Each historical era is characterized by certain moods, views, attitudes and worldviews, which inevitably manifest themselves in literary works.

A common worldview, supported by common artistic principles creation of a literary work separate groups writers, forms various literary trends. It is worth saying that the classification and identification of such trends in the history of literature is very conditional. Writers, creating their works in different historical eras, did not even suspect that literary scholars would, over the years, classify them as belonging to any literary movement. Nevertheless, for the convenience of historical analysis in literary criticism, such a classification is necessary. It helps to understand more clearly and structuredly the complex processes of the development of literature and art.

Main literary trends

Each of them is characterized by the presence of a number famous writers, who are united by a clear ideological and aesthetic concept set out in theoretical works, and general view on the principles of creation work of art or artistic method, which, in turn, acquires historical and social traits, inherent in a certain direction.

In the history of literature, it is customary to distinguish the following main literary trends:

Classicism. It was formed as an artistic style and worldview by the 17th century. It is based on a passion for ancient art, which was taken as a role model. Striving to achieve simplicity of perfection, like antique samples, the classicists developed strict canons of art, such as the unity of time, place and action in drama, which had to be strictly followed. Literary work was emphatically artificial, reasonably and logically organized, rationally constructed.

All genres were divided into high genres (tragedy, ode, epic), which glorified heroic events and mythological stories, and low - depicting the everyday life of people of the lower classes (comedy, satire, fable). The classicists preferred drama and created a lot of works specifically for the theatrical stage, using not only words, but also visual images to express ideas, in a certain way constructed plot, facial expressions and gestures, scenery and costumes. The entire seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries passed under the shadow of classicism, which was replaced by another direction after the destructive power of the French.

Romanticism is a comprehensive concept that has powerfully manifested itself not only in literature, but also in painting, philosophy and music, and in each European country it had its own specific features. Romantic writers were united by a subjective view of reality and dissatisfaction with the surrounding reality, which forced them to construct different pictures of the world that lead away from reality. Heroes romantic works- powerful, extraordinary personalities, rebels who challenge the imperfections of the world, universal evil and die in the struggle for happiness and universal harmony. Unusual Heroes and unusual life circumstances, fantastic worlds and unrealistically strong deep experiences, writers conveyed with the help of certain language their works were very emotional, sublime.

Realism. The pathos and elation of romanticism was replaced by this direction, the main principle of which was the depiction of life in all its earthly manifestations, very real typical heroes in real typical circumstances. Literature, according to realist writers, was supposed to become a textbook of life, so heroes were depicted in all aspects of personality manifestation - social, psychological, historical. The main source influencing a person, shaping his character and worldview, becomes environment, real life circumstances with which the heroes constantly come into conflict due to deep contradictions. Life and images are given in development, showing a certain trend.

Literary directions reflect the most general parameters and features of artistic creativity in a certain historical period development of society. In turn, within any direction, several movements can be distinguished, which are represented by writers with similar ideological and artistic attitudes, moral and ethical views, and artistic and aesthetic techniques. Thus, within the framework of romanticism there were such movements as civil romanticism. Realist writers were also adherents of various movements. In Russian realism it is customary to distinguish philosophical and sociological movements.

Literary movements and movements are a classification created within the framework of literary theories. It is based on philosophical, political and aesthetic views eras and generations of people at a certain historical stage development of society. However, literary trends can go beyond just one historical era, therefore they are often identified with an artistic method common to a group of writers who lived in different times, but expressing similar spiritual and ethical principles.

2) Sentimentalism
Sentimentalism is a literary movement that recognized feeling as the main criterion of human personality. Sentimentalism arose in Europe and Russia approximately simultaneously, in the second half of the 18th century, as a counterweight to the rigid classical theory that was dominant at that time.
Sentimentalism was closely associated with the ideas of the Enlightenment. He gave priority to the manifestations of human spiritual qualities, psychological analysis, and sought to awaken in the hearts of readers an understanding of human nature and love for it, along with a humane attitude towards all the weak, suffering and persecuted. The feelings and experiences of a person are worthy of attention regardless of his class affiliation - the idea of ​​​​universal equality of people.
The main genres of sentimentalism:
story
elegy
novel
letters
trips
memoirs

England can be considered the birthplace of sentimentalism. Poets J. Thomson, T. Gray, E. Jung tried to awaken in readers a love for the surrounding nature, depicting simple and peaceful rural landscapes in their works, sympathy for the needs of poor people. A prominent representative of English sentimentalism was S. Richardson. He put psychological analysis in the first place and attracted the attention of readers to the fate of his heroes. Writer Laurence Stern preached humanism as highest value person.
In French literature, sentimentalism is represented by the novels of Abbé Prevost, P. C. de Chamblen de Marivaux, J.-J. Rousseau, A. B. de Saint-Pierre.
IN German literature– works by F. G. Klopstock, F. M. Klinger, J. V. Goethe, I. F. Schiller, S. Laroche.
Sentimentalism came to Russian literature with translations of the works of Western European sentimentalists. The first sentimental works of Russian literature can be called “Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow” by A.N. Radishchev, “Letters of a Russian Traveler” and “ Poor Lisa» N.I. Karamzin.

3)Romanticism
Romanticism originated in Europe in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. as a counterbalance to the previously dominant classicism with its pragmatism and adherence to established laws. Romanticism, in contrast to classicism, promoted deviations from the rules. The prerequisites for romanticism lie in the Great French Revolution of 1789-1794, which overthrew the power of the bourgeoisie, and with it - bourgeois laws and ideals.
Romanticism, like sentimentalism, great attention paid attention to a person’s personality, his feelings and experiences. Main conflict Romanticism was about the confrontation between the individual and society. Against the backdrop of scientific and technological progress and an increasingly complex social and political system, there was a spiritual devastation of the individual. Romantics sought to attract the attention of readers to this circumstance, to provoke a protest in society against lack of spirituality and selfishness.
The Romantics became disillusioned with the world around them, and this disappointment is clearly visible in their works. Some of them, such as F. R. Chateaubriand and V. A. Zhukovsky, believed that a person cannot resist mysterious forces, must submit to them and not try to change his destiny. Other romantics, such as J. Byron, P. B. Shelley, S. Petofi, A. Mickiewicz, and the early A. S. Pushkin, believed that it was necessary to fight the so-called “world evil” and contrasted it with the strength of the human spirit.
The inner world of the romantic hero was full of experiences and passions; throughout the entire work, the author forced him to struggle with the world around him, duty and conscience. Romantics depicted feelings in their extreme manifestations: high and passionate love, cruel betrayal, despicable envy, base ambition. But the romantics were interested not only in the inner world of man, but also in the mysteries of existence, the essence of all living things, perhaps that is why there is so much mystical and mysterious in their works.
In German literature, romanticism was most clearly expressed in the works of Novalis, W. Tieck, F. Hölderlin, G. Kleist, E. T. A. Hoffmann. English romanticism is represented by the works of W. Wordsworth, S. T. Coleridge, R. Southey, W. Scott, J. Keats, J. G. Byron, P. B. Shelley. In France, romanticism appeared only in the early 1820s. The main representatives were F. R. Chateaubriand, J. Stael, E. P. Senancourt, P. Mérimée, V. Hugo, J. Sand, A. Vigny, A. Dumas (father).
On the development of Russian romanticism big influence had the Great French Revolution and the Patriotic War of 1812. Romanticism in Russia is usually divided into two periods - before and after the Decembrist uprising in 1825. Representatives of the first period (V.A. Zhukovsky, K.N. Batyushkov, A.S. Pushkin period southern exile), believed in the victory of spiritual freedom over everyday life, but after the defeat of the Decembrists, executions and exiles, the romantic hero turns into an outcast and misunderstood by society, and the conflict between the individual and society becomes insoluble. Prominent representatives of the second period were M. Yu. Lermontov, E. A. Baratynsky, D. V. Venevitinov, A. S. Khomyakov, F. I. Tyutchev.
Main genres of romanticism:
Elegy
Idyll
Ballad
Novella
Novel
Fantastic story

Aesthetic and theoretical canons of romanticism
The idea of ​​two worlds is a struggle between objective reality and subjective worldview. In realism this concept is absent. The idea of ​​dual worlds has two modifications:
escape into the world of fantasy;
travel, road concept.

Hero concept:
the romantic hero is always an exceptional person;
the hero is always in conflict with the surrounding reality;
the hero's dissatisfaction, which manifests itself in the lyrical tone;
aesthetic determination towards an unattainable ideal.

Psychological parallelism is the identity of the hero’s internal state with the surrounding nature.
Speech style of a romantic work:
extreme expression;
the principle of contrast at the composition level;
abundance of symbols.

Aesthetic categories of romanticism:
rejection of bourgeois reality, its ideology and pragmatism; the romantics denied a value system that was based on stability, hierarchy, a strict value system (home, comfort, Christian morality);
cultivating individuality and artistic worldview; reality rejected by romanticism was subject to subjective worlds based on creative imagination artist.


4) Realism
Realism is a literary movement that objectively reflects the surrounding reality using the artistic means available to it. The main technique of realism is the typification of facts of reality, images and characters. Realist writers place their heroes in certain conditions and show how these conditions influenced the personality.
While romantic writers were concerned about the discrepancy between the world around them and their inner worldview, a realist writer is interested in how the world influences personality. The actions of the heroes of realistic works are determined by life circumstances, in other words, if a person lived in a different time, in a different place, in a different socio-cultural environment, then he himself would be different.
The foundations of realism were laid by Aristotle in the 4th century. BC e. Instead of the concept of “realism”, he used the concept of “imitation”, which is close in meaning to him. Realism was then revived during the Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment. In the 40s 19th century in Europe, Russia and America, realism replaced romanticism.
Depending on the meaningful motives recreated in the work, there are:
critical (social) realism;
realism of characters;
psychological realism;
grotesque realism.

Critical realism focused on the real circumstances that influence a person. Examples of critical realism are the works of Stendhal, O. Balzac, C. Dickens, W. Thackeray, A. S. Pushkin, N. V. Gogol, I. S. Turgenev, F. M. Dostoevsky, L. N. Tolstoy, A. P. Chekhov.
Characteristic realism, on the contrary, showed a strong personality who can fight against circumstances. Psychological realism paid more attention to the inner world and the psychology of heroes. The main representatives of these varieties of realism are F. M. Dostoevsky, L. N. Tolstoy.

In grotesque realism, deviations from reality are allowed; in some works, deviations border on fantasy, and the greater the grotesque, the more strongly the author criticizes reality. Grotesque realism was developed in the works of Aristophanes, F. Rabelais, J. Swift, E. Hoffmann, in the satirical stories of N.V. Gogol, the works of M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin, M.A. Bulgakov.

5) Modernism

Modernism is a set of artistic movements that promoted freedom of expression. Modernism originated in Western Europe in the second half of the 19th century. as a new form of creativity, opposed to traditional art. Modernism manifested itself in all types of art - painting, architecture, literature.
The main distinguishing feature of modernism is its ability to change the world around us. The author does not seek to realistically or allegorically depict reality, as was the case in realism, or the inner world of the hero, as was the case in sentimentalism and romanticism, but depicts his own inner world and his own attitude to the surrounding reality, expresses personal impressions and even fantasies.
Features of modernism:
denial of the classical artistic heritage;
a declared discrepancy with the theory and practice of realism;
focus on the individual, not the social person;
increased attention to the spiritual, rather than the social sphere of human life;
focus on form at the expense of content.
The largest movements of modernism were impressionism, symbolism and art nouveau. Impressionism sought to capture a moment as the author saw or felt it. In this author’s perception, the past, present and future can be intertwined; what is important is the impression that an object or phenomenon has on the author, and not this object itself.
Symbolists tried to find a secret meaning in everything that happened, endowing familiar images and words with mystical meaning. The Art Nouveau style promoted the rejection of regular geometric shapes and straight lines in favor of smooth and curved lines. Art Nouveau manifested itself especially clearly in architecture and applied arts.
In the 80s 19th century a new trend of modernism - decadence - was born. In the art of decadence, a person is placed in unbearable circumstances, he is broken, doomed, and has lost his taste for life.
The main features of decadence:
cynicism (nihilistic attitude towards universal human values);
eroticism;
tonatos (according to Z. Freud - the desire for death, decline, decomposition of personality).

In literature, modernism is represented by the following movements:
Acmeism;
symbolism;
futurism;
imagism.

Most prominent representatives modernism in literature are the French poets C. Baudelaire, P. Verlaine, Russian poets N. Gumilev, A. A. Blok, V. V. Mayakovsky, A. Akhmatova, I. Severyanin, English writer O. Wilde, American writer E. Poe, Scandinavian playwright G. Ibsen.

6) Naturalism

Naturalism is the name of a movement in European literature and art that emerged in the 70s. XIX century and especially widely developed in the 80-90s, when naturalism became the most influential movement. Theoretical background A new movement was given by Emile Zola in his book “The Experimental Novel”.
End of the 19th century (especially the 80s) marks the flourishing and strengthening of industrial capital, developing into financial capital. This corresponds, on the one hand, high level technology and increased exploitation, on the other - the growth of self-awareness and class struggle of the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is turning into a reactionary class, fighting a new revolutionary force - the proletariat. The petty bourgeoisie fluctuates between these main classes, and these fluctuations are reflected in the positions of the petty bourgeois writers who adhere to naturalism.
The main requirements made by naturalists for literature: scientific, objective, apolitical in the name of “universal truth.” Literature should be at the level modern science, must be imbued with scientific character. It is clear that naturalists base their works only on science that does not deny the existing social system. Naturalists make the basis of their theory mechanistic natural-scientific materialism of the type of E. Haeckel, G. Spencer and C. Lombroso, adapting the doctrine of heredity to the interests of the ruling class (heredity is declared the cause of social stratification, giving advantages to some over others), the philosophy of positivism of Auguste Comte and petty-bourgeois utopians (Saint-Simon).
By objectively and scientifically demonstrating the shortcomings of modern reality, French naturalists hope to influence the minds of people and thereby bring about a series of reforms in order to save the existing system from the impending revolution.
The theorist and leader of French naturalism, E. Zola included G. Flaubert, the Goncourt brothers, A. Daudet and a number of other lesser-known writers in the natural school. Zola considered the French realists: O. Balzac and Stendhal to be the immediate predecessors of naturalism. But in fact, none of these writers, not excluding Zola himself, was a naturalist in the sense in which Zola the theorist understood this direction. Naturalism, as the style of the leading class, was temporarily embraced by writers very heterogeneous both in artistic method and in belonging to various class groupings. It is characteristic that the unifying point was not the artistic method, but rather the reformist tendencies of naturalism.
Followers of naturalism are characterized by only partial recognition of the set of demands put forward by the theorists of naturalism. Following one of the principles of this style, they start from others, differing sharply from each other, representing both different social trends and different artistic methods. Whole line followers of naturalism accepted its reformist essence, without hesitation discarding even such a typical requirement for naturalism as the requirement of objectivity and accuracy. This is what the German “early naturalists” did (M. Kretzer, B. Bille, W. Belsche and others).
Under the sign of decay and rapprochement with impressionism, naturalism began to develop further. Arose in Germany somewhat later than in France, German naturalism was a predominantly petty-bourgeois style. Here, the decomposition of the patriarchal petty bourgeoisie and the intensification of capitalization processes are creating more and more new cadres of the intelligentsia, which do not always find application for themselves. Disillusionment with the power of science is becoming more and more widespread among them. Hopes for resolving social contradictions within the framework of the capitalist system are gradually being crushed.
German naturalism, as well as naturalism in Scandinavian literature, represents entirely a transitional stage from naturalism to impressionism. Thus, the famous German historian Lamprecht, in his “History of the German People,” proposed calling this style “physiological impressionism.” This term is subsequently used by a number of historians of German literature. Indeed, all that remains of the naturalistic style known in France is a reverence for physiology. Many German nature writers do not even try to hide their bias. At its center there is usually some problem, social or physiological, around which the facts that illustrate it are grouped (alcoholism in Hauptmann’s “Before Sunrise”, heredity in Ibsen’s “Ghosts”).
The founders of German naturalism were A. Goltz and F. Schlyaf. Their basic principles are set out in Goltz's brochure "Art", where Goltz states that "art tends to become nature again, and it becomes it in accordance with the existing conditions of reproduction and practical application." The complexity of the plot is also denied. The place of the eventful novel of the French (Zola) is taken by a short story or short story, extremely poor in plot. The main place here is given to the painstaking transmission of moods, visual and auditory sensations. The novel is also being replaced by drama and poetry, which French naturalists viewed extremely negatively as a “kind of entertaining art.” Particular attention is paid to the drama (G. Ibsen, G. Hauptmann, A. Goltz, F. Shlyaf, G. Suderman), in which intensively developed action is also denied, only the catastrophe and the recording of the experiences of the heroes are given ("Nora", "Ghosts", "Before Sunrise", "Master Elze" and others). Subsequently, naturalistic drama is reborn into impressionistic, symbolic drama.
In Russia, naturalism did not receive any development. They were called naturalistic early works F. I. Panferova and M. A. Sholokhova.

7) Natural school

Under natural school literary criticism understands the direction that arose in Russian literature in the 40s. 19th century This was an era of increasingly aggravated contradictions between the serfdom and the growth of capitalist elements. Followers natural school in their works they tried to reflect the contradictions and moods of that time. The term “natural school” itself appeared in criticism thanks to F. Bulgarin.
The natural school in the expanded use of the term, as it was used in the 40s, does not denote a single direction, but is a largely conditional concept. The natural school included writers as diverse in their class basis and artistic appearance as I. S. Turgenev and F. M. Dostoevsky, D. V. Grigorovich and I. A. Goncharov, N. A. Nekrasov and I. I. Panaev.
Most common features, on the basis of which the writer was considered to belong to the natural school, were the following: socially significant topics that covered a wider circle than even the circle social observations(often in the “low” strata of society), a critical attitude towards social reality, realism of artistic expression, which fought against the embellishment of reality, aesthetics, and romantic rhetoric.
V. G. Belinsky highlighted the realism of the natural school, asserting the most important feature of the “truth” and not the “false” of the image. The natural school does not appeal to ideal, fictitious heroes, but to the “crowd,” to the “mass,” to ordinary people and, most often, to people of “low rank.” Common in the 40s. all sorts of “physiological” essays satisfied this need to reflect a different, non-noble life, even if only in a reflection of the external, everyday, superficial.
N. G. Chernyshevsky especially sharply emphasizes as the most essential and main feature of the “literature of the Gogol period” its critical, “negative” attitude to reality - “literature of the Gogol period” is here another name for the same natural school: specifically to N. V. Gogol - auto RU " Dead souls", "The Inspector General", "Overcoat" - as the founder of the natural school, V. G. Belinsky and a number of other critics erected it. Indeed, many writers ranked as part of the natural school experienced a powerful influence various sides creativity of N.V. Gogol. In addition to Gogol, the writers of the natural school were influenced by such representatives of the Western European petty bourgeois and bourgeois literature, like C. Dickens, O. Balzac, George Sand.
One of the movements of the natural school, represented by the liberal, capitalizing nobility and the social strata adjacent to it, was distinguished by the superficial and cautious nature of its criticism of reality: this was either harmless irony in relation to certain aspects of noble reality or a noble-limited protest against serfdom. The range of social observations of this group was limited to the manor’s estate. Representatives of this trend of the natural school: I. S. Turgenev, D. V. Grigorovich, I. I. Panaev.
Another current of the natural school relied primarily on the urban philistinism of the 40s, which was disadvantaged, on the one hand, by the still tenacious serfdom, and on the other, by growing industrial capitalism. A certain role here belonged to F. M. Dostoevsky, the author of a number of psychological novels and stories ("Poor People", "The Double" and others).
The third movement in the natural school, represented by the so-called “raznochintsy”, ideologists of revolutionary peasant democracy, gives in its work the clearest expression of the tendencies that were associated by contemporaries (V.G. Belinsky) with the name of the natural school and opposed the noble aesthetics. These tendencies manifested themselves most fully and sharply in N. A. Nekrasov. A. I. Herzen (“Who is to blame?”), M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin (“A Confused Case”) should also be included in this group.

8) Constructivism

Constructivism is an artistic movement that originated in Western Europe after the First World War. The origins of constructivism lie in the thesis German architect G. Semper, who argued that the aesthetic value of any work of art is determined by the correspondence of its three elements: the work, the material from which it is made, and the technical processing of this material.
This thesis, which was subsequently adopted by functionalists and functionalist constructivists (L. Wright in America, J. J. P. Oud in Holland, W. Gropius in Germany), brings to the fore the material-technical and material-utilitarian side of art and, in essence, the ideological side of it is emasculated.
In the West, constructivist tendencies during the First World War and post-war period expressed themselves in a variety of directions, more or less “orthodox” interpretation of the main thesis of constructivism. Thus, in France and Holland, constructivism was expressed in “purism”, in “machine aesthetics”, in “neoplasticism” (iso-art), and in the aestheticizing formalism of Corbusier (in architecture). In Germany - in the naked cult of the thing (pseudo-constructivism), the one-sided rationalism of the Gropius school (architecture), abstract formalism (in non-objective cinema).
In Russia, a group of constructivists appeared in 1922. It included A. N. Chicherin, K. L. Zelinsky, I. L. Selvinsky. Constructivism was initially a narrowly formal movement, highlighting the understanding of a literary work as a construction. Subsequently, the constructivists freed themselves from this narrow aesthetic and formal bias and put forward much broader justifications for their creative platform.
A. N. Chicherin moved away from constructivism, a number of authors grouped around I. L. Selvinsky and K. L. Zelinsky (V. Inber, B. Agapov, A. Gabrilovich, N. Panov), and in 1924 a literary center was organized Constructivists (LCC). In its declaration, the LCC primarily proceeds from the statement of the need for art to participate as closely as possible in the “organizational onslaught of the working class,” in the construction of socialist culture. This is where constructivism aims to saturate art (in particular, poetry) with modern themes.
The main theme, which has always attracted the attention of constructivists, can be described as follows: “Intelligentsia in revolution and construction.” Dwelling with special attention on the image of the intellectual in the civil war (I. L. Selvinsky, “Commander 2”) and in construction (I. L. Selvinsky “Pushtorg”), constructivists first of all put forward in a painfully exaggerated form its specific weight and significance under construction. This is especially clear in Pushtorg, where the exceptional specialist Poluyarov is contrasted with the mediocre communist Krol, who prevents him from working and drives him to suicide. Here the pathos of the work technique as such obscures the main social conflicts modern reality.
This exaggeration of the role of the intelligentsia finds its theoretical development in the article of the main theorist of constructivism Cornelius Zelinsky “Constructivism and Socialism”, where he considers constructivism as a holistic worldview of the era transition to socialism, as a condensed expression in the literature of the period being experienced. At the same time, again, the main social contradictions of this period, Zelinsky is replaced by the struggle between man and nature, the pathos of naked technology, interpreted outside of social conditions, outside of the class struggle. These erroneous positions of Zelinsky, which caused a sharp rebuff from Marxist criticism, were far from accidental and with great clarity revealed the social nature of constructivism, which is easy to outline in the creative practice of the entire group.
The social source feeding constructivism is, undoubtedly, that layer of the urban petty bourgeoisie, which can be designated as a technically qualified intelligentsia. It is no coincidence that in the work of Selvinsky (who is the most prominent poet of constructivism) of the first period, the image of a strong individuality, a powerful builder and conqueror of life, individualistic in its very essence, characteristic of the Russian bourgeois pre-war style, is undoubtedly revealed.
In 1930, the LCC disintegrated, and in its place the “Literary Brigade M. 1” was formed, declaring itself an organization transitional to RAPP (Russian Association proletarian writers), which sets as its task the gradual transition of fellow travelers to the rails of communist ideology, to the style of proletarian literature and condemns the previous mistakes of constructivism, although preserving its creative method.
However, the contradictory and zigzag nature of constructivism’s progress towards the working class makes itself felt here too. This is evidenced by Selvinsky’s poem “Declaration of the Poet’s Rights.” This is confirmed by the fact that the M. 1 brigade, having existed for less than a year, also disbanded in December 1930, admitting that it had not resolved the tasks set for itself.

9)Postmodernism

Postmodernism translated from German language literally means "that which follows modernism". This literary movement appeared in the second half of the 20th century. It reflects the complexity of the surrounding reality, its dependence on the culture of previous centuries and the information saturation of our time.
Postmodernists were not happy that literature was divided into elite and mass literature. Postmodernism opposed all modernity in literature and denied mass culture. The first works of postmodernists appeared in the form of detective, thriller, and fantasy, behind which serious content was hidden.
Postmodernists believed that high art had ended. To move forward, you need to learn how to properly use the lower genres of pop culture: thriller, western, fantasy, science fiction, erotica. Postmodernism finds its source in these genres new mythology. Works become aimed at both the elite reader and the undemanding public.
Signs of postmodernism:
using previous texts as potential for own works (a large number of quotes, you cannot understand a work if you do not know the literature of previous eras);
rethinking elements of the culture of the past;
multi-level text organization;
special organization of text (game element).
Postmodernism questioned the existence of meaning as such. On the other hand, the meaning of postmodernist works is determined by its inherent pathos - criticism of mass culture. Postmodernism tries to erase the boundary between art and life. Everything that exists and has ever existed is text. Postmodernists said that everything had already been written before them, that nothing new could be invented and they could only play with words, take ready-made (already once thought up or written by someone) ideas, phrases, texts and assemble works from them. This makes no sense, because the author himself is not in the work.
Literary works are like a collage, composed of disparate images and united into a whole by the uniformity of technique. This technique is called pastiche. This Italian word translates as medley opera, and in literature it refers to the juxtaposition of several styles in one work. At the first stages of postmodernism, pastiche is a specific form of parody or self-parody, but then it is a way of adapting to reality, a way of showing the illusory nature of mass culture.
Associated with postmodernism is the concept of intertextuality. This term was introduced by Y. Kristeva in 1967. She believed that history and society can be considered as a text, then culture is a single intertext that serves as an avant-text (all texts that precede this one) for any newly appearing text, while individuality is lost here text that dissolves in quotes. Modernism is characterized by quotational thinking.
Intertextuality– the presence of two or more texts in the text.
Paratext– the relationship of the text to the title, epigraph, afterword, preface.
Metatextuality– these can be comments or a link to the pretext.
Hypertextuality– ridicule or parody of one text by another.
Archtextuality– genre connection of texts.
Man in postmodernism is depicted in a state of complete destruction (in this case, destruction can be understood as a violation of consciousness). There is no character development in the work; the image of the hero appears in a blurred form. This technique is called defocalization. It has two goals:
avoid excessive heroic pathos;
to take the hero into the shadow: the hero does not come to the fore, he is not needed at all in the work.

Prominent representatives of postmodernism in literature are J. Fowles, J. Barth, A. Robbe-Grillet, F. Sollers, H. Cortazar, M. Pavich, J. Joyce and others.