What is the name of a significant detail that is a means. Literature teacher takes the exam

You probably thought that we would talk about some extraordinary people with special properties. This is how we usually see pop and movie stars, famous politicians, scientists, clairvoyants and others. No, we will talk about truly special people - the foundation of all humanity. The idea of ​​writing this article was not born yesterday, but the impetus was reading Maria Gribova’s article “Ordinary People”. What the author writes about cannot leave most of the readers indifferent. I was moved to tears.

I immediately remembered my grandparents - simple rural workers. I remembered their faces, furrowed with deep wrinkles, so dear and kind; their cracked, calloused, but so gentle palms. And eyes with such light! - the light of true wisdom and truth of life...

I often think: what good have they seen in their lives? They worked all the time - from dawn to dusk, without demanding any rewards or honors. All the burdens of formation fell on their shoulders Soviet power. Entire villages and villages of them were destroyed during the Holodomor. It was they who won the bloodiest and most terrible Great War in the history of mankind. Patriotic War, millions dying from fascist bullets and shells in order to save our lives. It was they who restored the entire national economy destroyed by the war and gave birth to children - as many as God will give! - without fear of any difficulties, and raised worthy people. And they didn’t need money, positions, basic amenities of life, or pickles.

SPECIAL PEOPLE are those who do not have their own “I”, but have “WE”. They are “like everyone else”, “so that everything is like people”, “as the team says.” These are people with a muscle vector. Only during training system-vector psychology I learned about such people from Yuri Burlan. There are 38% of them in our general unconscious psyche. These are the most peaceful, conflict-free, flexible people. This is the salt of the earth. This is the living mass of all humanity. This is life itself in the human body.

People with a muscle vector are people of the earth. Only they truly feel the earth alive. They are tightly tied to native land, to your small homeland. For them, the taste of water from their well or an apple from their garden is special. A muscular woman is always a mother-heroine with a horde of children. At the age of 16-17 she is already physical level twists it - I really want to give birth! She went to mow with her belly, the time came - she abandoned the scythe, gave birth under a haystack, finished the mow and took the child home. What power! And she manages the child so deftly, as if she had already nursed a dozen.

One of my grandmothers had 8 children, but four died in early age. I remember my grandmother’s garden, in which there were many apple trees. When the early apples appeared, we, the grandchildren, would pick them and take them to treat grandma. But she refuses. “Grandma, why don’t you like apples?” I ask. “Granddaughter, I love you very much,” he answers. “Only before the Savior I can’t eat them. Four of my little children died. In the other world, God goes and distributes apples to children on the Savior. And if I eat it before the Savior, he won’t give it to mine, he will say: “But your mother pig ate your apples.” And only a sad smile on her face and not a single tear in her eyes. God gave - God took, what can you do! And then I cried at night, imagining the children in the other world without the apples that their mother ate. As muscular people are taught, this is how they live: without arguing, without discussing, without sticking out. The main thing is to be like people, to be like everyone else.

All people relate to death differently in accordance with their vector set: some are terribly afraid of death, others even desire it. You can learn about these amazing features at the training on system-vector psychology by Yuri Burlan. And only muscular people take death calmly. They prepare for death ahead of time, so that everything is humane, according to the correct ritual.
So my grandmother always had everything prepared in advance for death. I remember my grandmother was in the garden, and we, grandchildren, were hot in the house. Things to do? - climb into the closet, dress up in dresses and have a concert. Cousin I got to the mysterious bundle in the very depths of the closet, untied it, and there, among the scarves, bedspreads and towels - a simple black dress. Not understanding what kind of dress it was, my sister put it on, painted her lips with red lipstick and let’s dance - it’s a concert! And then grandma comes in...

I will never forget the rage that distorted her kindest face. She, who never punishes us, spanked her sister so much that everyone was scared. Everyone roared in unison, and grandma was with us. Now I only know why she had such a reaction to the innocent trick of the children: you cannot encroach on the holy of holies of a muscular man - something that is prepared for death. So the treasured bundle for death always lay in the closet. Then suddenly someone died in the village, but did not prepare for death, and the grandmother gave away her bundle. Then I collected a new one again. I don’t even know how many of these nodules changed - my grandmother lived to be almost 90 years old. And up to last day worked. And I kept trying to persuade her to rest, I felt so sorry for her. Back then I couldn’t even imagine that hard, monotonous work on the ground, at a machine, on a conveyor belt is the greatest pleasure for people with a muscle vector!

Now, I hope you also understand that pop and movie stars and others like them are not special. The simplest people are special. If it weren’t for them, people without pretensions, we wouldn’t exist - so smart, self-sufficient and always dissatisfied with everything.

Where is humanity going now, driving these special people to the cities? The short answer is to extinction and degradation. This especially affects post-Soviet countries, where the majority of the population has a urethral-muscular mentality. They destroy the village, and with it they destroy the very healthy part of humanity (both mentally and physically) - people with a muscle vector. The Russian village is also drinking itself to death. But these are separate, very deep topics.

What simply shocks me about the system-vector psychology of Yuri Burlan? From some small episode of life, realized systematically, you can write an entire systematic novel. What deep layers this knowledge reveals in all areas of life!

I dedicate this article with great gratitude to millions of our ancestors and their descendants - special ordinary people on which the whole world rests. Without them there will be nothing on Earth!

I want that when we meet a working person, we would not turn up our noses, would not express our mental and material superiority, but would say to him a simple human “THANK YOU” for his work, which most of us are no longer capable of.

The article was written based on training materials on

The examination paper on literature consists of 3 parts.

• Part 1 includes an analysis of a fragment of an epic, or lyroepic, or dramatic work: 7 tasks with a short answer (B1-B7), requiring the writing of a word, or a combination of words, or a sequence of numbers, and 2 tasks with a detailed answer (C1-C2), in the amount of 5-10 sentences.
• Part 2 includes analysis lyrical work: 5 tasks with a short answer (B8-B12) and 2 tasks with a detailed answer in the amount of 5-10 sentences (C3-C4). When completing tasks C1-C4, try to formulate a direct, coherent answer to the question posed, avoiding lengthy introductions and characteristics, observing the norms of speech. The indication of the volume of detailed answers in parts 1 and 2 is conditional; The assessment of the answer depends on its content.
• Part 3 includes 3 tasks, from which you need to choose only ONE and give a detailed, reasoned answer to it in the genre of an essay on literary theme of at least 200 words.

When completing tasks with a detailed answer, rely on the author’s position, formulate your point of view, use theoretical and literary concepts to analyze the work.

The duration of the Unified State Examination in literature is 4 hours (240 minutes). We recommend spending no more than 2 hours to complete the tasks of parts 1 and 2, and 2 hours for part 3.

Answers on Unified State Exam forms are written clearly and legibly in bright black ink. You can use gel, capillary or fountain pens.

When completing assignments, you can use a draft, but the entries in it will not be taken into account when grading the work.

We advise you to complete the tasks in the order in which they are given. To save time, skip a task that you cannot complete immediately and move on to the next one. If you have time left after completing all the work, you can return to the missed tasks.

The points you receive for completed tasks are summed up. Try to complete as many tasks as possible and gain greatest number points.

Part 1

Read the fragment of the work below and complete tasks B1-B7; C1, C2.

“Here we are at home,” said Nikolai Petrovich, taking off his cap and shaking his hair. - The main thing is now to have dinner and rest.
“It’s really not bad to eat,” Bazarov remarked, stretching, and sank down onto the sofa.
- Yes, yes, let's have dinner, have dinner quickly. - Nikolai Petrovich stamped his feet for no apparent reason. - By the way, Prokofich.
A man of about sixty entered, white-haired, thin and dark, wearing a brown tailcoat with copper buttons and a pink scarf around his neck. He grinned, walked up to Arkady's handle and, bowing to his guest, retreated to the door and put his hands behind his back.
“Here he is, Prokofich,” began Nikolai Petrovich, “he has finally come to us... What? how do you find it?
- IN in the best possible way, sir“, - said the old man and grinned again, but immediately frowned his thick eyebrows. - Would you like to set the table? - he said impressively.
- Yes, yes, please. But won’t you go to your room first, Evgeny Vasilich?
- No, thank you, there is no need. Just order my suitcase to be stolen there and these clothes,” he added, taking off his robe.
- Very good. Prokofich, take their overcoat. (Prokofich, as if in bewilderment, took Bazarov’s “clothes” with both hands and, raising it high above his head, walked away on tiptoe.) And you, Arkady, will you go to your room for a minute?
“Yes, we need to clean ourselves,” answered Arkady and was about to go to the door, but at that moment a man of average height, dressed in a dark English suit, a fashionable low tie and patent leather ankle boots, Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, entered the living room. He looked about forty-five years old: his short-cropped White hair shone with a dark shine, like new silver; his face, bilious, but without wrinkles, unusually regular and clean, as if carved with a thin and light incisor, showed traces of remarkable beauty; The light, black, oblong eyes were especially beautiful. The whole appearance of Arkadiev's uncle, graceful and thoroughbred, retained youthful harmony and that desire upward, away from the earth, which for the most part disappears after the twenties.
Pavel Petrovich took his trousers out of his pocket beautiful hand with long pink nails, - a hand that seemed even more beautiful from the snowy whiteness of the sleeve, fastened with a single large opal, and handed it to his nephew. Having previously performed the European “shake hands,” he kissed him three times, in Russian, that is, touched his cheeks with his fragrant mustache three times, and said: “Welcome.”
Nikolai Petrovich introduced him to Bazarov: Pavel Petrovich slightly tilted his flexible figure and smiled slightly, but did not offer his hand and even put it back in his pocket.
“I already thought that you wouldn’t come today,” he spoke in a pleasant voice, swaying courteously, twitching his shoulders and showing his beautiful white teeth. - Did something happen on the road?
“Nothing happened,” answered Arkady, “so, we hesitated a little.”

(I.S. Turgenev, “Fathers and Sons.”)

The answer to tasks B1-B7 is a word, or a phrase, or a sequence of numbers. Enter the answers first into the text of the work, and then transfer them to answer form No. 1 to the right of the number of the corresponding task, starting from the first cell, without spaces, commas or other additional characters. Write each letter (number) in a separate box in accordance with the samples given in the form.

Q1 Name literary direction, in line with which the work of I.S. developed. Turgenev and whose principles were embodied in “Fathers and Sons”.

Q2 What genre does the work of I.S. belong to? Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"?

Answer: ___________________________.

Q3 What is the name of a means of characterizing a character that is based on a description of his appearance (“He looked about forty-five years old...”)?

Answer: ___________________________.

Q4 Establish a correspondence between the characters appearing in this fragment and their future fate.
For each position in the first column, select the corresponding position from the second column.

Write down your answer in numbers in the table and transfer it to answer form No. 1.

Q5 What is it called? significant detail, which is a means artistic characteristics(for example, the Bazarovsky robe and the English suite of Pavel Petrovich, noted by the author)?

Answer: ___________________________.

B6 Senior Kirsanov and Bazarov are presented in opposition from the first pages of the work. What is the name of the technique of sharp contrast used in a work of art?

Answer: ___________________________.

Q7 At the beginning of the above fragment, the characters communicate with each other, exchanging remarks. What is the name of this type speeches?

Answer: ___________________________.

To complete tasks C1 and C2, use answer form No. 2. First write down the task number, and then give a direct, coherent answer to the question (approximate volume - 5-10 sentences).
Rely on the author’s position and, if necessary, express your point of view. Justify your answer based on the text of the work.
When completing task C2, give at least two comparison positions (a comparison position is considered to indicate the author and title of the work of art with the obligatory justification for your choice; you can give two works of the same author as comparison positions, with the exception of the author whose work is considered in the task).

C1 How is the main conflict of the work outlined in this episode of Fathers and Sons?

C2 Which works of Russian classics depict the conflict between representatives different generations and in what ways can these works be compared with Turgenev’s “Fathers and Sons”?

Part 2

Read the work below and complete tasks B8-B12; C3, C4.

Again, like in the golden years,
Three worn out harnesses flutter,
And the painted knitting needles knit
Into loose ruts...

Russia, poor Russia,
I want your gray huts,
Your songs are windy to me -
Like the first tears of love!

I don't know how to feel sorry for you
And I carefully carry my cross...
Which sorcerer do you want?
Give me your robber beauty!

Let him lure and deceive, -
You won’t be lost, you won’t perish,
And only care will cloud
Your beautiful features...

Well? One more concern -
The river is noisier with one tear,
And you are still the same - forest and field,
Yes, the patterned board goes up to the eyebrows...

And the impossible is possible
The long road is easy
When the road flashes in the distance
An instant glance from under a scarf,
When it rings with guarded melancholy
The dull song of the coachman!..

(A.A. Blok, 1908)

The answer to tasks B8-B12 is a word, or a phrase, or a sequence of numbers. Enter the answers first into the text of the work, and then transfer them to answer form No. 1 to the right of the number of the corresponding task, starting from the first cell, without spaces, commas or other additional characters. Write each letter (number) in a separate box in accordance with the samples given in the form.

AT 8 Name the modernist poetic movement of the early 20th century, one of prominent representatives which was A.A. Block.

Answer: ___________________________.

AT 9 Indicate the stanza number (ordinal number in nominative case), in which the poet uses anaphora.

Answer: ___________________________.

AT 10 Indicate the technique the author resorts to in the lines:

I want your gray huts,
Your songs are windy to me -
Like the first tears of love!

Answer: ___________________________.

AT 11 Select three titles from the list below artistic means and the techniques used by the poet in the fourth stanza of this poem.

1) hyperbole
2) inversion
3) irony
4) epithet
5) sound recording

Enter the corresponding numbers in the table in ascending order and transfer them to answer form No. 1.

AT 12 Indicate the size in which A.A.’s poem is written. Block “Russia” (without indicating the number of stops).

Answer: ___________________________.

To complete tasks C3 and C4, use answer form No. 2.
First write down the number of the task, and then give a direct, coherent answer to the question (approximate volume - 5-10 sentences).
Rely on the author’s position and, if necessary, express your point of view. Justify your answer based on the text of the work. When completing task C4, give at least two comparison positions (a comparison position is considered to indicate the author and title of the work of art with the obligatory justification for your choice; you can give two works of the same author as comparison positions, with the exception of the author whose work is considered in the task).
Write down your answers clearly and legibly, following the rules of speech.

C3 What feeling is imbued with the poet’s appeal to Russia?

C4 In what works of Russian poets is the image of Russia created and what are their similarities and differences with the poem by A.A. Blok?

Part 3

To complete the task of part 3, select only ONE of the proposed essay topics (C5.1, C5.2, C5.3).
In answer form No. 2, indicate the number of the topic you have chosen, and then write an essay on this topic in a volume of at least 200 words (if the essay is less than 150 words, then it is scored 0 points).
Rely on the author's position and formulate your point of view. Argument your theses based on literary works (in an essay on lyrics, you must analyze at least three poems).
Use literary theoretical concepts to analyze the work.
Think over the composition of your essay.
Write your essay clearly and legibly, observing the norms of speech.

C5.1 As in the poem by M.Yu. Lermontov's "Mtsyri" reflects the clash of dreams with reality?

C5.2 What is the meaning of comparing the images of Katerina and Varvara? (Based on the play “The Thunderstorm” by A.N. Ostrovsky.)

C5.3 As in the prose of M.A. Bulgakov's theme is revealed moral choice person? (Based on the novel " White Guard"or "The Master and Margarita".)

Evaluation system for examination work in literature

For the correct answer to tasks B1-B12, 1 point is given, for an incorrect answer or no answer - 0 points.

Answers to tasks B1-B12

Criteria for checking and assessing the completion of tasks with a detailed answer

Assessment of the completion of tasks C1 and C3, which require writing a detailed answer in the amount of 5-10 sentences

The indication of volume is conditional; the assessment of the answer depends on its content (if the examinee has deep knowledge, he can answer in a larger volume; with the ability to accurately formulate his thoughts, the examinee can answer quite fully in a smaller volume).

*It is acceptable to indicate two works by the same author, with the exception of the author whose work is considered in the assignment.

Assessment of the completion of tasks C5.1, C5.2, C5.3,
requiring writing a detailed, reasoned answer in the genre
essays of at least 200 words

Among the five criteria by which an essay is assessed, the first criterion (content aspect) is the main one. If, when checking the work, the expert gives 0 points according to the first criterion, the task of part 3 is considered unfulfilled and is not checked further. For four others (2, 3, 4, 5) in the “Protocol for checking answers to tasks” of form No. 2, 0 points are given.

The score for the first position of the assessment of the assignment of part 3 is put in column 7 of the protocol, for the second position - in column 8, for the third - in column 9, for the fourth - in column 10, and for the fifth - in column 11.

When assessing the completion of tasks in Part 3, you should take into account the volume of the written essay. A minimum length of 200 words is recommended for examinees. If the essay contains less than 150 words (the word count includes all words, including function words), then such work is considered incomplete and is scored 0 points.

When the essay is from 150 to 200 words limit quantity errors for each point level do not change.

"The artistic world of Dostoevsky" - Spiritual development Dostoevsky. Illustrations for the novel “White Nights”. Engineering castle in St. Petersburg. Older brother. The beginning of literary activity. Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. Path. Exile to Siberia. Human society. The ritual of execution of the Petrashevites. Reading was strictly prohibited. Mariinsky Hospital for the Poor.

"Dostoevsky's Petersburg" - Raskolnikov House. Petersburg by Dostoevsky. Sennaya Square. Raskolnikov climbs the stairs of his house many times. Dostoevsky gazed intently and incessantly at the streets. For Dostoevsky Petersburg. Petersburg in the novel “Crime and Punishment”. A.G. Dostoevskaya in the fields. Petersburg in literature.

“Dostoevsky White Nights Lesson” - Problematic question. something created by the imagination, mentally imagined. According to the dictionary of Ozhegov S.I. "Petersburg Chronicle". Dream. Film "White Nights" (based on work of the same name F.M. Dostoevsky). Lesson topic: The image of a dreamer in the story by F.M. Dostoevsky "White Nights". Vocabulary work. F.M. Dostoevsky.

“Biography of Dostoevsky” - 1859 - returned to St. Petersburg and resumed literary activity. M.D. Isaeva is the first wife of F.M. Dostoevsky. A.G. Dostoevskaya is the writer’s second wife. 1844 - Fedor retired and took up literary activity. 1875 - novel "The Teenager". Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. 1847 - Dostoevsky becomes a member of the revolutionary circle of M.V. Petrashevsky.

“The Life and Work of Dostoevsky” - N.V. Gogol, Novokuznetsk. Which work of F. M. Dostoevsky was published in N. A. Nekrasov’s “Petersburg Collection”? By the highest decree, Dostoevsky was returned to the Governing Senate hereditary nobility. 1858 – submits his resignation. In which cities are there museums of F. M. Dostoevsky? F. M. Dostoevsky.

“Dostoevsky Poor people” - If you give it away, you won’t be happy. Literary criticism. I received 500 silver rubles from Muscovites. Lesson objectives. Will be out by May. V.N. Maikov. “Dear brother. You've probably been waiting for my letter, dear brother. Firstly, they won’t read it, and if they read it, it will be in six months. But this is a different story: a censor is not hired for less than a month.

“Here we are at home,” said Nikolai Petrovich, taking off his cap and shaking his hair. “The main thing is now to have dinner and rest.”

“It’s really not bad to eat,” Bazarov remarked, stretching, and sank onto the sofa.

- Yes, yes, let's have dinner, have dinner quickly. – Nikolai Petrovich stamped his feet for no apparent reason.

- By the way, Prokofich.

A man of about sixty entered, white-haired, thin and dark, wearing a brown tailcoat with copper buttons and a pink scarf around his neck. He grinned, walked up to Arkady’s handle and, bowing to the guest, retreated to the door and put his hands behind his back.

“Here he is, Prokofich,” began Nikolai Petrovich, “he has finally come to us... What? how do you find it?

“In the best possible way, sir,” said the old man and grinned again, but immediately frowned his thick eyebrows. – Would you like to set the table? – he said impressively.

- Yes, yes, please. But won’t you go to your room first, Evgeny Vasilich?

- No, thank you, there is no need. Just order my suitcase to be stolen there and these clothes,” he added, taking off his robe.

- Very good. Prokofich, take their overcoat. (Prokofich, as if in bewilderment, took Bazarov’s “clothes” with both hands and, raising it high above his head, walked away on tiptoe.) And you, Arkady, will you go to your room for a minute?

“Yes, we need to clean ourselves,” Arkady answered and was about to go to the door, but at that moment a man of average height, dressed in a dark English suit, a fashionable low tie and patent leather ankle boots, Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, entered the living room. He looked about forty-five years old: his short-cropped gray hair shone with a dark shine, like new silver; his face, bilious, but without wrinkles, unusually regular and clean, as if carved with a thin and light incisor, showed traces of remarkable beauty; The light, black, oblong eyes were especially beautiful. The whole appearance of Arkady's uncle, graceful and thoroughbred, retained youthful harmony and that desire upward, away from the earth, which for the most part disappears after the twenties.

Pavel Petrovich took his beautiful hand with long pink nails from the pocket of his trousers - a hand that seemed even more beautiful from the snowy whiteness of the sleeve, fastened with a single large opal, and gave it to his nephew. Having previously performed the European “shake hands,” he kissed him three times, in Russian, that is, touched his cheeks with his fragrant mustache three times, and said: “Welcome.”

Nikolai Petrovich introduced him to Bazarov: Pavel Petrovich slightly tilted his flexible figure and smiled slightly, but did not offer his hand and even put it back in his pocket.

“I already thought that you wouldn’t come today,” he spoke in a pleasant voice, swaying courteously, twitching his shoulders and showing his beautiful white teeth. - Did something happen on the road?

“Nothing happened,” answered Arkady, “so, we hesitated a little.”

Question 5:

What is the name of a significant detail that is a means
artistic characteristics (for example, noted by the author
Bazarov's robe and Pavel Petrovich's English suite)?

Explanation:

To answer this question, first read the question carefully, there is a hint in the question “ significant detail that is a means artistic characteristics ". Knowing the terminology given in the codifier will help you answer this question.

Answer: detail

KIM Unified State Exam 2016 (early period)

-...Nil Pavlych, and Nil Pavlych! How did he, the gentleman who was reported just now, shoot himself on Petersburgskaya?
“Svidrigailov,” someone from the other answered hoarsely and indifferently.
rooms.
Raskolnikov shuddered.
- Svidrigailov! Svidrigailov shot himself! - he cried.
- How! Do you know Svidrigailov?
- Yes... I know... He arrived recently...
- Well, yes, I recently arrived, lost my wife, a man of behavior
forgotten, and suddenly shot himself, and it was so scandalous that it’s impossible to imagine...
left it in my notebook a few words that he dies in his right mind and asks not to blame anyone for his death. This one, they say, had money.
How do you want to know?
- I... know... my sister lived in their house as a governess...
- Ba, ba, ba... Yes, you can tell us about him. And you had no idea?
- I saw him yesterday... he... drank wine... I didn’t know anything.
Raskolnikov felt as if something had fallen on him and he
crushed.
“You seem to have turned pale again.” We have such a stale spirit here...
“Yes, I have to go,” muttered Raskolnikov, “sorry,
worried...
- Oh, for mercy's sake, as much as you like! The pleasure was delivered and I'm glad
declare...
Ilya Petrovich even extended his hand.
- I just wanted... I went to Zametov...
“I understand, I understand, and it was a pleasure.”
“I’m... very glad... goodbye, sir...” Raskolnikov smiled.
He came out, he rocked. His head was spinning. He couldn't feel if he was standing. He began to walk down the stairs, resting his right hand against the wall.
It seemed to him that some janitor, with a book in his hand, pushed him, climbing up to meet him in the office, that some little dog was baying and barking somewhere on the lower floor, and that some woman threw a rolling pin at it and screamed. He went downstairs and went out into the yard. Here in the courtyard, not far from the exit, stood Sonya, pale and completely dead, and looked at him wildly, wildly. He stopped in front of her. Something sick and exhausted
Something desperate was expressed in her face. She clasped her hands.
An ugly, lost smile squeezed out on his lips. He stood there, grinned, and turned upstairs, back to the office. Ilya Petrovich sat down and rummaged through some papers. The one standing in front of him
the very man who had just pushed Raskolnikov while climbing the stairs.
- A-ah-ah? You again! Did you leave anything?.. But what happened to you?
Raskolnikov, with pale lips and a fixed gaze, quietly approached him, walked up to the table itself, rested his hand on it, wanted to say something, but could not; Only some incoherent sounds were heard.
- You feel sick, chair! Here, sit on the chair, sit down! Water!
Raskolnikov sank into a chair, but did not take his eyes off his face very
unpleasantly surprised Ilya Petrovich. Both looked at each other for a minute and waited. They brought water.
“It’s me...” Raskolnikov began.
– Drink some water.
Raskolnikov drew back the water with his hand and said quietly, deliberately, but clearly:
It was I who killed the old official woman and her sister Lizaveta with an ax
and robbed.
Ilya Petrovich opened his mouth. They came running from all sides.
Raskolnikov repeated his testimony.
(F.M. Dostoevsky, “Crime and Punishment”)

How preparing for the Unified State Exam in Literature turned into a quest with an unpredictable ending for students and teachers

Text: Natalya Lebedeva
Photo: Profi.ru

There are only a few months left before final exams. Those who have chosen humanities faculties will have to take the test. What difficulties do well-read children face in the exam when they distinguish between stanza, anaphora and oxymoron? Why do questions from the question-answer series have no place in the literature exam? And do you need to read all the works on the list to get the maximum score? These and other questions are answered by the author of numerous textbooks and literature guides, associate professor of Moscow State Pedagogical University Elena Poltavets.

Elena Yuryevna, do you think that the knowledge that is given at school is enough to successfully pass the Unified State Exam in literature?

Elena Poltavets: Knowledge and schools are different. It happens that knowledge is given, but for various reasons they do not take it; it happens that knowledge is imposed, but what is imposed cannot be tied down by any strings. Knowledge can only be acquired through one’s own efforts and made into an integral part of one’s inner world. He also said that good reader mixes a drop of his own blood into the work.

A modern applicant, motivated to take the exam, will find everything he needs in the library, the Internet and, of course, additional questions to the teacher. But the paradox is that the better a conscientious student learns what stage directions, anaphora, inversion, lyric epic, oxymoron, alliteration, assonance and all other elements are, knowledge of which is required in the “List of Content Elements” and “List of Requirements for the Level of Graduates” , the greater the likelihood of lowering exam scores.

How is this possible?!

Elena Poltavets: A simple example, in demo version There is an assignment for the poem “Russia”, in which you need to indicate “the number of the stanza in which the poet uses anaphora.” A student who has read at least short article"Anaphora" in the dictionary literary terms, will find the anaphora, but not the stanza. If only because the list of “elements of content” does not include the term “stanza” (but this is not so scary: the developers of CIMs are sure that a schoolchild cannot help but know this). Another thing is worse: the sixth stanza of the proposed poem, containing anaphora, is not a stanza, but a strophoid, so a diligent applicant who, before the exam, repeated, in addition to the term “anaphora,” also the term “strophe,” will be confused.

Another example is a question about the novel: “What is the name of a significant detail that is a means of artistic characterization (for example, Bazarov’s robe and Pavel Petrovich’s English suite noted by the author)?” The implied answer is “detail.” But in theory, “detail” and “detail” are distinguished as terms.

In my opinion, the main Unified State Exam problem- conceptual inconsistency of test CMMs, and indeed any unambiguous tasks in the “question-answer” mode in the discipline “literature”. Incorrect question situation “What is the name of the detail...?”- this is a trap for a smart applicant. Especially if he thinks about whether the symbolism of the details and their opposition are meant. He could write about all this in an essay, but not in a line that could fit no more than a dozen letters.

But in the Unified State Examination in literature, tasks have already appeared where you need to write detailed answers of 5-10 sentences.

Elena Poltavets: This is no longer a trap, but downright a “set-up”, and a very serious one. The demo shows an episode of the first meeting Bazarova And Pavel Kirsanova(Chapter four of the novel “Fathers and Sons”, from the words of Nikolai Petrovich “Here we are at home” to Arkady’s remark: “So, we hesitated a little”). The question is: “How does this episode of Fathers and Sons outline the main conflict of the work?” It seems that the poster of this question has not read the great novel. Because the main conflict of the novel is not outlined either in the antithesis of the robe and the English suite mentioned in the episode, or even in the opposition of generations, or in the ideological disputes that unfold in the novel almost before the duel episode, but lies in the conflict of the “passionate, rebellious heart” of the human and the grave as the tragic fate of all flesh among the eternal “indifferent nature.” Awareness of one’s spiritual uniqueness and understanding of one’s doom for loneliness is what brings together the former antagonists after the duel - Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov - and contrasts them with all the other characters. Good teacher or the tutor will, of course, read one of the greatest works world literature.

Elena Poltavets: I’ll start right away with an example. Assignment based on the same novel “Fathers and Sons”: “Establish a correspondence between the characters and their future fate. (Characters: , Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov, Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov. Fate: he is wounded in a duel, marries Odintsova’s sister, dies of a serious illness, marries Fenichka.”) An applicant who has not read the novel at all can complete this task, provided that he is familiar with a brief retelling the plot, and not even the plot, but only the ending of the novel.

Other tasks that could be considered as testing knowledge of the text, in exam version no, and this is understandable: do not turn exam questions into jokes: “What did the pig eat under the window of the house: a) nectarines; b) bananas; c) avocado...” The “text test” idea, popular in the past, failed. Because there is no point in asking the name of the main character of the novel, and there is no reason to inquire whether the applicant remembers the name of the dog that an elderly relative did not like so much Odintsova in the novel "Fathers and Sons".

Tasks of an overly general nature: naming works that “depict the conflict between representatives of different generations” and comparing these works with Turgenev’s novel or naming about the Motherland also do not really allow one to demonstrate knowledge of the text of the works. It is proposed to limit the answer to 5-10 sentences. And what works do not “display the conflict of generations”?

So it turns out that even an applicant who is familiar only with a brief retelling of the works can cope with the 16 tasks of the first part. Please also keep in mind that the list of works of art, the reading of which is supposedly required, is excessively extensive, especially in the part, which provokes the student’s bewilderment: “I still won’t have time, I won’t remember, it’s not worth reading.”

How objective are the evaluation criteria? After all, it was precisely for the sake of objectivity and equalization of chances that the Unified State Exam was introduced.

Elena Poltavets: This is the most interesting thing. The tasks of the first part that seem suitable for an objective assessment (knows - does not know) are not so. Here is the task: “Indicate the meter in which the poem is written, without indicating the number of feet.” Let's assume that all test takers indicated correctly. They received equal points. But some also know footness, some know the semantic halo, and some have determined the semantics of pyrrhic feet. And where can an applicant show this knowledge?

And in general, this is a strange approach: the first part requires knowledge of terms, and the second part requires writing an essay. As if knowledge of terms is not necessary for writing an essay.

Applicants often ask: “How many terms can there be in good essay? I’ll answer: in a 4-hour project - no less than 50-60, or even 70. Because the plot, the conflict, the image, the landscape, the detail, the stage directions, the anaphora, and the size, in general, everything what is listed in " elements of content", and much more - this is the tool with which the author of the essay analyzes the work.

How many quotes? Well, let's say 70-80. Because there is absolutely no need to waste time quoting an entire stanza when you can point out that anaphora (“when”) and alliteration (on “r” and “s”) in the same poem by Blok “Russia” create an image of eternity and remind of keyword(if the applicant knows about anagramming, he will highlight the anagram “Russia”). Here are already three quotes in one sentence of the essay.

But the essay has already been returned - the final essay is in December. And all the schoolchildren write an essay for the Unified State Exam in the Russian language...

Elena Poltavets: “Final” “essay” with a focus on “meta-subject matter”, reasoning about life, “a view and something”, preferably with the involvement of “extra-program” literary works And life experience for high school students - this is, of course, useful, but also harmful at the same time. If only because the preparation of this “exam” and responsibility for it are entrusted to the same long-suffering school vocabulary specialist. And because no essay, the “topics” of which sound pathetic and demagogic and invites one to speak out for all that is good against all that is bad, can replace an essay exam in literature. Just as reasoning about why you need to know mathematics will not replace knowledge of at least the multiplication tables.

The presence of several essay options (mandatory “final” and optional) led to a blurring of the goals and objectives of each exam and disorientation of examinees. The requirements for the “final” “essay” learned by the student prevent him (and the teacher) from switching to the analysis of a work of art as an aesthetic phenomenon, which is required in an essay on a literary topic. And thanks to the final essay, all high school students quickly learn that piece of art- that's just it visual illustration to some simple worldly wisdom and that understanding a work comes down to more or less successfully using it as “material” for “argumentation” of common truths.

"Who can you call true friend?”, “Is it possible to change a dream?”, “What role can a person play in a person’s destiny? cowardly act? And these topics for discussion are intended for seventeen-year-olds, who, it seems, should have already read Turgenev, and? It seems to me that such topics could only be proposed to ten-year-old fourth-graders, and even then with a feeling of some awkwardness...

Do I understand correctly that the most correct thing would be to return to that essay that we all used to write in graduate school?

Elena Poltavets: I am sure that the essay exam for school graduates should be returned. This should be the final creative work, allowing the graduate to reveal his knowledge and his, as it is fashionable to say, creativity. The same - on entrance exam to the university.

Many complain that schoolchildren copy all sorts of “golden” and “diamond” essays from collections, download them from the Internet... But no Unified State Exam and no police measures will prevent this. And there is nothing reprehensible in the collections of “exemplary” essays in themselves, just like in the catalogs of, say, hairstyles that we leaf through while waiting in line at the hairdresser. Another thing is that not every haircut and not every dress will suit a particular person or at least please them from an aesthetic point of view.

My high school students received assignments to write a review of essays from the “golden collection” and discussed these essays. But no one cheated when they had to hand in their work. If only because there was nowhere to copy: each student was given an individual topic and, at the same time, one that was not found either in the “collections” or on the Internet. And a kaleidoscope of quotations from articles and prefaces to reveal the topic of the essay certainly could not replace the logic of the original work.

What do you think an ideal literature exam should look like?

Elena Poltavets: An essay on one of the selected literary topics. That is, devoted to the analysis of the creativity/work of one or more authors listed in the exam program. Neither “free” nor problem-free “quote” topics are suitable for the exam. This should be an exam on the school discipline “literature”, and not on sensitivity, impressionability, kindness of heart, moral maturity, civic responsibility and other admirable qualities, which, however, school lessons they don't teach.