The decline of morality and ethics among Russian women. Morality and ethics of modern girls

The decayed and distorted West with all its might is also pulling us down into the abyss of animal life and lower astral habits and interests. If we do not understand the destructiveness of this, we will also turn into simple, intelligent animals...

Every adult free man chooses his own path. A child comes into this world clean, with eyes wide open. He cannot yet choose his own path; he is not yet familiar with our world. We show him this path: mom, dad, society. What a way do we show our children?

Corruption and corruption of minor children, discrimination against the institution of family is the fundamental policy of our state. Silencing this policy, while exposing the existing crazy picture without (with) limits, is dooming the people to blind, desperate extinction. And our people need to know this course of the state, because... this knowledge will provide guidelines and will be able to mobilize people to fight for their property - children. And while propaganda of debauchery flows in a continuous stream, no one will be able to prove otherwise. Because the state pursues either a policy of corruption or a policy of preventing corruption. There cannot be a third.

Virginity, morality, purity of children are core values, which are treasured by every state thinking about the future. And only a crazy state will destroy these values and allow this to happen to its children. Or a state ruled by enemies of its own people.

Why do people allow themselves to be treated this way? A people who have always been invincible to their enemies? And the trail of glory of the victories of our ancestors still saves the lives of sailors. Somali pirates, upon seeing the USSR flag, often refuse to seize the ship, realizing that the ship is guarded by the Russians. And it doesn’t matter how many Russians there are. They know one thing: Russians don't give up, they will fight until their last breath. So what happened to our people? Why do we live under the influence of a sleeping pill, why have we allowed ourselves to be blinded, covering this blindness with a deadly stereotype: “We have no right to prevent others from doing what they want”?

We are deceived by the stereotype of mirage freedom.

And people’s reaction to that never ceases to amaze important information, which those who have already understood where “the legs grow” are trying to convey to them. Basically, initially the information is not perceived and is rejected with the conviction: “This cannot be!” People don't believe, or rather, I would even say, don't want to believe their own eyes. Because any such information received makes you think. And almost everyone understands that this is true. And people who allow themselves not just to listen, but hear, begin to respond to this information with actions. And this is already work, and this hearing can radically change your life. And it won't be easy. That's why units allow themselves exactly hear.

After all, we quite often hear the phrase: “It’s best not to know this, but to just live. It’s easier this way.” I've heard this myself more than once. Yes, I agree it’s easier this way. But then, when warnings about certain events turn into statements of facts, few people think that everything could have been prevented by showing minimal courage and making a decision hear. But even more shocking is the reluctance to see obvious And flagrant.

No one is surprised by the rapidly increasing number of teenagers drinking alcohol on every corner, smoking on an already uncontrollable scale and swearing without hesitation. No one is surprised that the age of these same teenagers, who lead early, often ugly sex life. Society is getting used to this. This becomes the norm of our life. This is taken for granted.

Sometimes someone can become indignant at the blatant depravity of youth, throwing out a few condemning words, and things do not go further than this indignation. And only after seeing how corruption touches them own children, some parents often begin to sound the alarm. But many parents simply don’t notice this. I would even say - don't want to notice. I witnessed a conversation two six year old children in kindergarten. I will describe this case:

A boy sits on a bench and a girl comes up to him, sits down next to him, and, like a real adult coquette, hugs him by the shoulders, saying languidly seductive in a voice:

- I want sex with you.

The boy moves away from her, tries to escape from her embrace and says in a far from childish voice:

- I don't want sex with you.

The girl repeated this phrase three times, approaching from different directions, she simply circled around him. And the boy also repeated his phrase three times. At the same time, he did not look like a wary child who did not understand what they wanted from him. Apparently, he had some of his own associations with this word.

Why has our society come to the point where such talk six year olds began to be accepted calmly? Some parents even find such conversations quite funny. They rejoice at how grown-up their children are. Tell me, how can zombie parents raise free children? Who can they educate? The same zombies as themselves! They instill in their children the information that they themselves are bombarded with every day.

Our children are massively influenced by cartoons that put non-childish images in their heads, and films with sex scenes, which influence and form sexually active children at a young age. I will give the result of one psychological study.

Most girls are six years old already view themselves as sexual objects. An experiment was conducted using paper dolls. This made it possible to find out the attitude of girls 6-9 years old to the issue of sexuality. So, two dolls were dressed in sexy attractive ways, and the rest were in loose clothes. Participants in the experiment had to choose a doll that looked like themselves, a doll that they would like to be like, and a doll associated with popular girl At school. Of the 60 participants, 68% chose a sexy doll when asked how they themselves wanted to look. 72% admitted: this doll is more popular. According to the head of the study, in the child's mind, sexuality was closely linked to popularity.

The subconscious of our children is being zombified by debauchery at an ever younger age.

Walking with my child on the playground, I have repeatedly heard many mothers say that they will adapt their children to new conditions using very original methods. They themselves plan to give alcohol to drink, they themselves plan to treat their children to their first cigarette, and they themselves will tell their children, as early as possible, how to use contraceptives. They are guided by the statement: “Let him be like everyone else, I don’t want my son (my daughter) to stand out in any way. I will help my child to be as everybody to make it easier for him." This is theirs main mistake.

According to the results of many studies, it becomes clear that children whose parents themselves offered to try the “taste” modern life, are many times more vulnerable to the propagated molestation. The state creates only appearance of care about the future of the nation, about the morality of children. There is an open supposed “propaganda” of morality and a hidden, sinister propaganda of depravity. This is the genocide of our people, invisible to the majority of the population.

AND one more fact, confirming the policy of corruption of children by the state, or more precisely, by those who are hiding behind it. in autumn small town in the Kyiv region visited a mobile children's Luna Park, as usual, located in the city park. Passing by I was shocked next picture. Most of the attractions featured aggressive pictures of boys and girls, and half-naked girls. Moreover, these girls had certain intimate parts of their bodies openly visible. Some song was playing English language, while the number of words "sex" In this song, to some extent, even me was zombified. I just couldn't get this song out of my head for a while.

Now think about it. Who looked at these pictures and listened to the music? Little children under 5 years old! No one paid attention to the pictures, no one looked closely at them, except these little children. They looked wide with open eyes at the images and bounced in their strollers. But we know how music and illustrated material influence the formation of children’s horizons and their knowledge of the world, and how dangerous is this for them?. Where did the city authorities look when giving permission to place such an amusement park? After all, children are the most defenseless against information; it easily enters their subconscious, shaping their worldview. And then after 10 years, parents will have difficulty recognizing their children when their children begin to practically apply all the acquired skills in their lives.

We also know how full the Internet is erotic content, and how accessible the Internet is to children now. The period of formation of sexuality is childhood and adolescence. Considering the easy availability of such information and the unformed children's psyche, think how much we can destroy sexuality and cripple children for the rest of their lives.

Is our society is deteriorating at a rapid rate. Each generation is more degraded than the previous one, and this acceleration is increasing at an unimaginable rate. We must think not only about ourselves, about our soul, but also about other people, about our Motherland, about our people. AND our debt– to save the nation from destruction, from extinction, to protect our property, our children. This is the duty to the Motherland, to our ancestors who shed blood for our land, for us, for our lives. Thanks to their feat, we live. And this is also our duty to future generations, who will either hate us, dying out like the last goyim, or will be proud of us.

By allowing our children to be destroyed, we we destroy life itself, we are destroying ourselves, our Motherland. If our children do not exist, there will be neither us nor the memory of us as a people. And the descendants of those whom we allow ourselves to destroy now will despise our distorted descendants, ridiculing and spitting on them as descendants of the “great Rus”.

This is one of the most provocative and difficult chapters in my book to accept. But I am not afraid of accusations of chauvinism and misogyny, because I have long been known as such, I will risk encroaching on the myth of the “moral purity of women” and express my thought directly and unambiguously: “morality, as a personality characteristic, generally speaking, is not characteristic of a woman.” I am well aware that this chapter will make most women furious and hysterical.

I am not saying that every woman is immoral in her behavior, but I am saying that the very concept of morality is most often incomprehensible to her.

There are “moral” men, and there are immoral ones. And the woman does not understand the formulation of this problem AT ALL. She is excluded from this plane, she is OUTSIDE. Well, like a cat.

There are no moral or immoral women. Women exist OUTSIDE of morality, they are not subject to it.

What does the concept of morality primarily mean? The presence of conscience, firm concepts of good and evil, an internal desire for truth and justice, concern for the public good - categories whose super value is unconditionally accepted by a moral person.

We call the formalization of these qualities at the level of social, interpersonal connections and public attitudes morality.

Good and evil. For a woman, these categories are flattened to personal acceptance or rejection. By goodness, she often means restraint, non-aggression, ostentatious disposition, smiling, and helpfulness. In general, good is what is pleasant and beneficial. First of all, to the woman herself. Good “simply” does not exist for a woman.

Evil in her concept is the antipode of the above. So, a woman says: “You are evil” when she did not get what she wanted from a man; “I’m kind,” she thinks while lisping with the cat.

As for good and evil in general, you are unlikely to meet a woman who seriously comprehends these categories abstracted from a specific situation.

Simply put, well, she won’t rack her brains about whether her action is moral or not. But here are the questions she will definitely ask herself:

- is this beneficial for me?
- What will happen to me for this, won’t I lose, won’t I be punished?
- how will this affect the relationships of other people towards me, especially those on whom I depend or need?

The very system of coordinates “moral-immoral” lies OUTSIDE the understanding and worldview of a woman, is perceived by a woman as something abstruse, artificial, superfluous.

But a woman knows how to PRESENT morality. Which, more often than not, she does, but only as long as it benefits her. A woman is a chameleon, she masterfully mimics when she is interested in it.

What could this benefit be?

Attracting a potential man, formally complying with his intuitive concept of what a woman should be
- some social status, ostentatious decency, "decency"
- direct self-interest
- the possibility of manipulation using categories, the meaning of which a woman does not accept

A woman KNOWS the rules of morality and ethics in relationships with people (they are voiced when raising a girl), but does not understand their meaning, essence and significance. Morality for a woman is the necessary “coloring” of the chameleon in CERTAIN CASES, a kind of formal ritual, the implementation of which she takes upon herself as necessary. But as soon as this attire ceases to be beneficial, the woman simply does what she needs.

Modern life, almost completely freed from the pressure on women of moral laws, confirms the COMPLETE ABSENCE of an internal moral core in women, as a structure underlying personality. Speaking about this, I do not blame women for this at all, they are who they are. But men should always remember this feature of women.

I go even further: and argue that morality INTERFERES with the main natural program of a woman, i.e., receiving and subordinating the resources of a man. It is for this reason that it is not reliably instilled in her: no matter what educational measures were taken in a woman’s childhood, if the game of morality is not beneficial to her, then the woman will not think about this topic. If there is no external moral influence from the level of society, family, laws, church, then we have a female who goes headlong to achieve her goals.

“Men came up with morality and also this... expediency - women would never have come up with this,” she says loudly, knowing that I am rushing after her.”

Zakhar Prilepin "Shadow of a cloud on the other shore"

It was men who nurtured the institution of moral laws of society. Of course, this does not mean that all men are highly moral. But most often they accept these laws for consideration, and a certain moral choice is made - between “right” and “wrong”. But women don’t ask these questions AT ALL.

An exaggerated example to reinforce: almost all men know what an honest word is and most of them keep it or try to do so. They know the price this word and experience remorse and shame when they fail to keep their promises. For women, the vast majority of them, a promise means absolutely NOTHING. These are just words that were “thrown in” when needed, and forgotten when not needed. Note that we are not talking about suppressing conscience! Just honesty and sticking to your guns honestly actually mean NOTHING to women. These are ephemeral, abstract concepts.

Nowadays it is often repeated that a woman is a social being, actually meaning by this the sociability of women and the ability to establish and build relationships with people. But these relationships usually do not rise above the level of mother, girlfriends, lover, husband, work colleagues, in other words, the “inner circle”, people in the woman’s sphere of direct interest. Morality in the female understanding, or rather its visual picture, the external side, serves precisely these relationships.

Conversely, male morality arose at the dawn of history as a means of universal intra- and intercommunity communication, serving the needs of the emerging diversified social production. To put it simply, people needed universal intangible values and general norms, rules of behavior accepted by the majority of people to facilitate production and trade relations, laws to approve the trustful coordination of joint actions. To kill a fellow tribesman for no reason is evil, to deceive a partner in a primitive business is evil, to take away someone else’s property or wife is evil. It was then that such concepts as reputation and business ethics arose.

It was then that religion arose as an institution for maintaining morality, while the formidable super-hierarch gods were accepted and revered as the main measure of people’s actions, their correctness or incorrectness.

Judeo-Christian civilization erected a pedestal for altruism and established service to the public interest as one of the highest virtues.

The progress of the human race was colossal: men, who came out of the caves and received moral standards that were universal for all, were able to create a prototype of separate (diversified) social production and trade, albeit still in the form of natural exchange of goods!

So-and-so was engaged in the manufacture of arrowheads and exchanged them for bread baked by so-and-so; one community or clan exchanged the fish they caught for skins obtained by their neighbors. Honesty in such transactions and the cooperation of men in “slaughtering the mammoth” formed the basis of the emerging moral norms. Man realized public (clan, clan, community) interest and developed laws to protect it, which became beneficial for everyone to observe together.

The first inter-clan and inter-community military alliances appeared. Societies grew larger, adopting universal norms of behavior.

Of course, I am exaggerating greatly for the sake of clarity, I am not a historian, I do not indicate exactly when, where and how this happened, it is important for me to convey the essence, the principle itself: the institution of moral values should have appeared for the purposes of the public good, peaceful coexistence, industrial progress and family protection and private property.

Then the people came out of the caves... but the women did NOT come out of the caves. Their sphere of competence remained the home, family life, the birth and upbringing of offspring.

Social communications? Husband, children, neighbors in the "wigwams". The means of these communications are the ability to understand internal state other people, psychological adjustment, cunning, manipulation, intrigue.

They, women, are the main one life task So what remained was the search, attraction and attachment of a strong and preying male, redistribution of resources within the family in favor of themselves and offspring, exchanging “love” and care for the man’s home for them. Men developed and complicated universal moral norms, being their creators, bearers and guardians, overthrowers, but for women, in essence, nothing has changed: the tasks are the same. Moreover, the morality inculcated by men came into conflict with the main biological task of women.

If you look at the history of Mankind and women from this angle, it will become absolutely clear that the formation and strengthening of civilizations was accompanied by the mandatory suppression and curbing of harmful and destructive female instincts. A woman, her very inner essence, contradicts moral norms, in particular, the Judeo-Christian Civilization. Our ancestors understood this very well and did not allow women to participate in the priesthood and judicial functions. What a pity that this wisdom, developed and carried through centuries and millennia of Human History, is so frivolously trampled upon!

"How so?" - the reader will ask me, “After all, we have been taught to perceive a woman as a standard of moral purity.”

Yes, a woman may well behave in accordance with moral principles, just as a cat does not always steal sour cream. Especially when I'm full.

Men themselves, alas, tend to invent some “ moral purity" women. And this, among other things, lies our craving for harmony: we try to endow a creature of angelic appearance with those personality traits that, according to our inner conviction, should be inherent in it. We subconsciously strive for perfection and completeness and speculatively “finish” a woman. At the same time, the possibility of objective perception and analysis of a woman’s qualities is blocked by sensuality and romanticization.

Most often, the painful, in our time almost inevitable, resolution of the conflict between reality and the fictional morality of a woman leads a man into a state of shock.

King Shlomo (Solomon) wrote:

" I found one righteous man among a thousand, but among a thousand women I did not find one."

(Ecclesiastes 7:1-29)

One way or another, even the smartest representatives of modern times guessed about the pressing animal essence of a woman, although they did not dare to announce their discovery loudly and decisively.

Andrei Prozorov, the hero of the play “Three Sisters” by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, admits with sadness:

“A wife is a wife. She is honest, decent, well, kind, but at the same time there is something in her that reduces her to a small, blind, sort of rough animal. In any case, she is not human."

Anton Pavlovich himself, in one of his letters to his friend and publisher Alexei Suvorin, writes:

“Women are most unsympathetic because of their injustice and the fact that justice, it seems, is not organically characteristic of them. Humanity instinctively did not let them near social activities; God willing, it will reach this point with its mind. IN peasant family The man is smart, reasonable, fair, and God-fearing, but the woman—God forbid!”

Cesare Lombroso in his book " The woman is a criminal and a prostitute" to explain the immoral and criminal behavior of women prefers to talk about “moral insanity” as a kind of personality defect, illness, thus asserting in it exceptions to the rule. Poor Mr. Lombroso! In his naivety of his still romantic age, he assumed the immorality of women as isolated deviations from the norm, he conducted an outstanding study of the varieties of such deviations for his time, but he did not have the courage to assume simple thought about a woman’s lack of morality as such.

To justify Lombroso, I admit that he did not demand so much from female morality, defining the “normal female type", based on two qualities: maternal feeling and modesty.

It is precisely in the absence of an internal moral core in women that lies the answer to those numerous cases of shock among men.

I am certainly not a model of morality, although I have aspirations for this. And I will say with all frankness that such concepts as “honesty”, “passionarity”, “altruism”, “truth”, “friendship”, “mutual assistance”, “decency” are not an empty phrase for me, but the subject of my thoughts and constant internal work. So among women, their absolute majority, the very formulation of this task is absent - don’t get me wrong: it DOESN’T CONCERN or INTEREST them.

The story “I went on vacation” from the women's forum.

I returned from vacation three weeks ago. My friend and I were in Turkey in the city of Kemer. How many stories have I heard about fiery and hot nights in this beautiful country, but I was traveling with full confidence that this would not affect me, since I was married. I was happy for my friend that she could have a blast here!! We lay by the sea for two days and on the third day we decided to go shopping in the city. And there I met him!! Modest and speaks Russian very well. At first he gave me his business card like come again, but we chatted and chatted and in the end he said give me your phone number to the disco, let's go to the disco in the evening.) and I gave it!! And in general, away we go!! Dates, night walks, night cafes with Turkish cuisine and a lot of sex!!! Upon arrival home, we correspond every day, either just SMS or Facebook, we don’t see each other on Skype due to the time difference and it works up to 24 hours. I came home myself, but my soul remained there!! I dream about Türkiye almost every night! My husband knows almost everything, but his behavior simply amazed me, he didn’t do anything, didn’t yell... asked if I was divorcing him for now?? She said no and calmed down!! Indifference? And having arrived in my native Murmansk, I decided to go and live in Turkey!! Well, I don’t want to live in Russia and freeze my butt! My Turkish boy doesn’t know that I’m going to move, he only knows that I’m coming in September for three weeks, and I’m just going to resolve the issue with a residence permit, I want to open my own business there, Turkish is not a problem! Very scary!!! But there is only one life!! And no matter how my relationship with the Turkish guy turns out, I want to go to Turkey!! Sea Sun!!!

I read 700+ comments from women. The ladies wrote so much: ridicule, wishes of happiness, calls to come to their senses and accusations of stupidity.

But I did not find a single, I emphasize: NOT A SINGLE comment assessing her actions in the context of morality and decency.

NOT ONE comment condemning meanness towards the husband, and, possibly, children.

And NOT ONE woman condemned the whore and called the abomination an abomination.

Why was morality wrongly attributed to women? If you answer in one word - yes, they were punished more strictly. From childhood, a woman was given quite strict limits on behavior approved by her parents, society, and husband.

Strict parental upbringing, subsequent marriage with clearly defined responsibilities, the concept of which was instilled in childhood and supported by society and the church, strictly regulated a woman’s life. And society harshly punished draft dodgers; just remember Anna Karenina.

Just a hundred years ago, a woman who entered into an illicit premarital relationship, which became the property of society, was with a high probability simply deprived of her chances of a decent marriage.

Adultery was condemned and punished quite significantly even a hundred years ago. I'm not talking about ancient times, when cheaters were simply thrown off a cliff onto rocks.

One way or another, patriarchal civilization had no illusions about a woman’s own inner virtue and relied on strict guidelines and regulation of her behavior.

Nowadays, most of the restraining factors have collapsed and we have what we have.

the postulate can be used or, on the contrary, consigned to oblivion, depending on its profitability to current situation and the moment;

The imperative is presented either as “age-old folk wisdom” or as a universal principle, the truth of which cannot be questioned;

Once applied, the imperative is cut off from the scope of applicability. Let’s say, let’s take the imperative “a woman should not be beaten” - what if we're talking about about the bitch rushing at your child or the scoundrel who hit her husband?

Most women, wittingly or unwittingly, try to replace true moral principles and impose their understanding of good and bad on a man. Some of these typical womanish dogmas have already become firmly ingrained into the social fabric of consciousness. This womanish pseudo-morality, an exaggerated set of dogmas beneficial to women, is drilled into men from childhood. And this happens most often due to either the complete absence of paternal upbringing, or its weakening, the total feminization of educational practices. As a result of this, a man grows up, deprived of independence of moral thinking and understanding of true moral values, male destiny and goals, capable of operating only in the limited space of tendentious womanish imperatives. Such a man is a ready object for manipulation and female domination. At ABF this type of man was called “ALEN”.

Feminists are very fond of calling past centuries “female slavery,” but it is enough to look at the women of our time to understand: our ancestors were absolutely right when they applied strict regulations on female behavior.

Do you, reader, personally know many women who would be tormented by remorse? Not by their ostentatious declaration, not by regret for the loss of a man, not by annoyance for missed material benefits and a damaged reputation, but by conscience.

Please note that the degradation of moral concepts and institutions of society is closely correlated with the process of matriarchal decay. A decent, normal person is now considered not to be the owner of strong moral principles, a developed mind, an honest, fair, sincere, seeking, kind person, but the owner of a thick purse, a consumer person, one whose motives are based on the desire to acquire and spend as much as possible . It was these traits that began to dominate in determining a person’s status in society and his position in the “table of ranks.” It is based on a woman’s worldview, pseudo-morality, which consists in the motto “take as much as possible and give nothing in return.” Matriarchal degradation is not only widespread chaos among women, but also an extremely dangerous loss moral guidelines society.

What conclusion I want to offer men:

Never be deceived by the mystical decency of a woman, do not rely on her morality in exactly the same way as you do not rely on the decency of your neighbor’s cat or the monkey at the zoo. Know how to separate the window dressing of “demo mode” from a woman’s true motives. Think with your UPPER head and judge ONLY by your actions. Don’t invent your own fairy tale about “a woman’s decency” - it never existed and does not exist.

D. Seleznev, 2012

Corrupt women and you will destroy the Nation...

The virgin purity of a girl is the health of the People... The daughter of a prostitute will be a prostitute... The son of a prostitute also does not have the correct energy spectrum. But he cannot make up for it with anything and commits suicide. In addition to semen from sexual partners, a woman takes and transmits various diseases that burn her from the inside, pre-age her and kill her...

This information is intended only for those girls and boys, young parents who want to have full-fledged and healthy children, who want their Family to last for a long time, all their descendants to be happy in family life, and in their old age their children looked after them without taking away their pension for drugs. Homosexuals, lesbians and prostitutes, please do not read this material, because they have already erased from Life not only themselves, but also all their children, if they happen to have them, and have also erased them from life, i.e. They have already made all their grandchildren and great-grandchildren physical deformities. If someone thinks that for them children are not the main thing in life, that “free” women and men should live without family worries and worries, then they don’t have to read this material either.

Aggression of the Dark Forces

Most main idea, which we want to convey to the reader, is that direct aggression is currently being carried out on Earth Dark Forces. All efforts of Aliens on Earth are aimed at the destruction of genetically healthy and morally pure White People. The simplest and most effective way to destroy the White Race is to force them to refuse modern descendants Slavs and Aryans from the commandments of the Gods and Ancestors, from observing the laws on the purity of the Family and Blood (Laws of RITA). In this regard, the Aliens have come very far. Blind adherence to all kinds of “freedoms” of speech, press, “human rights”, “universal human values” and other fashionable phrases, alien to the Slavic-Aryan peoples, led to modern people through egocentrism, permissiveness, sexual promiscuity and perversion to their degradation and degeneration. What actually happened in the game of “freedom”, in one of the so-called “freest” states, with the health of the nation, with the morality of the people, can be seen from the following examples.

The media often cite examples of a well-fed and prosperous life in America. They use a certain “American way” of life as an example. Many young people strive for America, considering it almost earthly Paradise. Is this so? America provides the clearest example of the depravity of morals, where up to 30% of the population are homosexuals and lesbians. It is for them that the American “paradise” was created.

Immorality in the USA

The consequences of freedom (of morals, speech) and respect for human rights turned out to be dramatic for the United States: there are 55 million drug addicts in America alone. The picture of decline is complemented by another figure: for various reasons, half of the working-age population here does not work. But what is especially impressive is the intellectual decline: half of the adult population in the United States is unable to even write a letter. 44 million American adults are unable to calculate how much money is spent on purchases at the supermarket, compare differences in food costs, or obtain information from text placed on back side a simple form. Today in America, according to the world-famous Dr. Kinsey, 37 million (!) Americans need psychiatric help. More than half of all hospital beds in the United States are occupied by the mentally ill.

Against the background of such a large-scale decline in the morality and health of the nation in the United States, a “demand” for virgins appeared, perceived as defensive reaction society towards degeneration, which is approaching Americans with terrifying speed. According to the Americans, this is the first step towards restoring the genetic health of the nation. It was predetermined by the increasing number of degenerate surprises that Nature presented to the Americans on their anti-natural path. The weakening of morals to the level at which girls who have worked up before marriage subsequently produce drug addicts, perverts, the disabled, and the mentally ill, threatens Americans (like many other nations) not only with complete degradation, but also, according to the Laws of Nature, with complete self-destruction of the “free” itself. nation in the world.

Consequences of immorality

Evidence of the degeneration of a nation in case of non-compliance with morality and the laws of Nature was given back in the 19th century by the world’s famous scientist Lombroso, who examined the genealogical “books” of many famous and ordinary people. He proved: positive characteristics parents (especially intellectual and spiritual data) are inherited in much to a lesser extent than negative ones. Moreover, the latter are transmitted, including diseases, in progressive forms. As for alcohol, Lombroso cites typical example“... from one drunkard founder, Max Uke, over the course of seventy-five years, came two hundred thieves and murderers, two hundred and eighty unfortunate people who suffered from blindness, idiocy, consumption, ninety prostitutes and three hundred children who died prematurely...”.

Lombroso gives many examples of the complete disappearance of noble families in just two centuries. Thus, out of 487 families classified as the Berne bourgeoisie, only 168 remained. At the same time, those families whose members married noble heiresses who had more than enough time for entertainment, including sexual ones, were mostly subject to disappearance. And such examples confirming the connection different forms promiscuity with the birth of inferior offspring, a huge number.

America, having despised moral and Natural Laws, received phenomena of degeneration on an alarming scale. That is why the demand for virgins was born here, because the time has come to save the nation. But population degeneration affected not only America. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the world's population was 20% white. And today it is only 6.8% of the 6 billion population. The clearest example disappearance of the White race on Earth. The terrible phenomena of degeneration have already made themselves felt in Russia during the heyday of “democracy”, or rather, permissiveness. If three years ago there were only 30 thousand drug addicts in Russia, today there are already 5 million. The clan of thieves, rapists, and perverts is growing alarmingly quickly, whose unfavorable heredity is rapidly increasing it.

The Cause of the Degeneration of the White Race

The reason for the degeneration and terrifying degradation of the White Race lies on the surface public life. Violation of RITA Laws, i.e. Heavenly Laws on the Purity of Family and Blood. Actually, “RITA” is a Rune denoting the Code of Laws on the Purity of Family and Blood. The Slavs and Aryans themselves called this Code the Heavenly Laws. All Slavic-Aryan Clans have lived according to the RITA Laws since ancient times. People who violated the RITA Laws were declared outside the Community and relegated to the caste of untouchables (outcasts). They were driven out of the Communities. This is where, for example, the word gypsies came from - “tse ganims”, “tsegane”. What is the reason for such a harsh attitude of the Slavs towards their relatives who violated the RITA Laws? And what are these RITA Laws?

In reality, the RITA Laws, as such, are in the form of a complete written set of some rules, norms, etc. does not exist. But the Laws, both orally and in writing, were transmitted in the Clans of the Slavs and Aryans from generation to generation in the form of commandments of the Gods, moral rules and requirements emanating from parents when raising children, norms of behavior for community members, rules for conducting rituals, ceremonies, holidays, etc. P. All RITA Laws are based on the laws of God, Nature and the laws of heredity, which no one can cancel. The purpose of the RITA laws is to give people of the Clans of the Great Race the knowledge to preserve and increase the Clans on Earth, to follow the laws of Nature, and not contradict them, not violate them, thereby, with the help of knowledge, protect their Clans from degradation of the Moral, Spiritual, Mental and Physical .

Following the Laws of RITA means that everything that God and Nature created in man is all natural, everything is harmonious for existence in the world of Revealing. And any deviation in anything from the Laws of RITA will inevitably, sooner or later, lead to the deterioration of the Family and even its degeneration, be it incest or short haircut at the girl's. There are also Tribal laws that give Rasichs knowledge about a person’s life from birth to death in the Tribunal and in the Community, with relatives and strangers. Ancestral laws and the RITA Laws are interconnected and help a person live correctly throughout his life.

Historical examples

Let's consider historical examples. Our Ancestors and the ancestors of other peoples knew and used these laws in their lives. In the Slavic-Aryan Vedas and in any religious teaching of the world, be it the Torah, the Bible, the Koran, there is a mention of such a phenomenon as the transfer of heredity. This is what the Slavic-Aryan Vedas say: “Do not allow Foreigners to your daughters, for they will seduce your daughters, and corrupt their pure Souls, and destroy the Blood of the Great Race, for the first man with his daughter leaves images of the Spirit and Blood... Foreign images of Blood the Light Spirit is expelled from the children of men, and the mixing of Blood leads to destruction and this Race, degenerating, perishes, not having healthy offspring, for there will be no one inner strength, which kills all illnesses and diseases...” (Santiya Vedas of Perun. First Circle. Santiya 8, shlokas 11-12). According to this Sacred text The first man in a girl’s life leaves his Image inside the woman - this psychological and often physical portrait of the child she will give birth to. And the health and usefulness of future children depends only on this first man.

The Bible, chapter 38, v. 8-9 of the Book of Genesis, also talks about the Jews’ knowledge of the genetic law of transmission of the Image of the Spirit and Blood. Those. From the above examples it follows that even in very distant times this phenomenon was known to many peoples on Earth. In the Middle Ages, feudal lords introduced the rule of “right of first wedding night" Before the first wedding night, the girl to be married was brought to the feudal lord, who deprived her of her virginity, thereby passing on to her his Image of the Spirit and Blood, making her future children look like himself. But what was known even to the biblical Onan about the transfer of the Image of the first man is not known now to many scientists, not to mention ordinary people.

Telegony

Now the Greek name is used to denote the Laws of RITA - telegony (telelegy). For some people whose brains are not filled with so-called “universal human values,” telegony is a figurative and the only designation for the phenomenon of transmission of heredity from generation to generation.

The phenomenon of telegony was again discovered in the 19th century in England by Charles Darwin's friend Lord Marton, who, influenced by his friend's ideas, decided to study biology. He crossed a purebred English mare with a zebra stallion. There were no offspring, but then, after a while, when he crossed her with an English stallion, the mare gave birth to an “English” foal, but with obvious traces of stripes on the rump, like a zebra. Lord Marton called this phenomenon telegony.

One of the first researchers of telegony were Charles Darwin's contemporaries, Professors Flint and Ladentek. They conducted many experiments on birds and animals. Professor Ladentek described telegony in detail in the Book “The Individual, Evolution, Heredity and Neo-Darwinists” (M., 1899). The 24th chapter of this work is called: “Telegony or the appearance of the first male.” Until the 1960s, scientists different countries There have been many studies that have found that the telegony effect extends to humans.

According to the phenomenon of telegony, the first man in the life of a virgin leaves his Image of Spirit and Blood. All subsequent men give the woman only seed, but she gives birth to the children of the first man who gave her the Image of the Spirit and Blood on long years. Moreover, it turned out that they are inherited not only external signs the first sexual partner, but - in certain cases - also his illnesses, in particular, sexually transmitted diseases, mental illnesses, blood diseases, etc. As soon as this became scientifically established, all research and publications on the problem of telegony were classified, and in everyday life and means mass media Telegony began to be called “pseudoscience.”

Contemporary proof of the phenomenon of the “first male” is the broadcast of the television program “My Family” in 2000, which was watched with tender sympathy by all of Russia. We were told how a Slavic woman initially lived with a black man, and then married a Slavic man and gave birth to his first child, who had black skin. Television presented this to us as a miracle. In fact, according to Slavic laws, that woman committed a crime.

Interracial "marriages"

RITA laws prohibit interracial “marriages” Slavic peoples with Negroid, Mongoloid, Semitic, etc. peoples. The ancestors understand perfectly well that the mixing of Blood with the above-mentioned peoples necessarily leads to degradation, diseases (AIDS), and degeneration of the entire branch of the mixed Family. The reason is a decrease in the body's resistance to various diseases and a decrease in immunity.

Among the Slavs, new Family unions were created only between representatives of Various Slavic Clans. Marriages between Kinsmen were prohibited and unnatural. Therefore, Christianization was not only informational sabotage in Ancient Rus', but also a genetic experiment. Mixed marriages were sanctified by the Christian Church. Responsibility for deformed children and incest was shifted to Christ. Catholics are allowed, for example, marriages between first cousins. The Christian Church in Rus' allows marriages between second and fourth cousins. “Old Believers” allow marriages between seven cousins. Judaism allows marriage between relatives. The Old Believers, following the Laws of RITA, prohibit any kindred marriages, as this ultimately leads to the degeneration of the Family. From childhood, the Slavs had in their minds that the Will of the Gods could not be violated; the bride was taken only from another Family, another Vesi (region). Each Family was unique in its own way. Neighboring Clans lived in friendship, since marriage within one Clans is impossible. When enemies attacked, no one left their neighbors in trouble, for where would a son get a bride if the neighboring Family was destroyed by foreigners?

Healthy heredity was preserved by our Ancestors due to the fact that one of the most important conditions for its creation is the virgin purity of the bride, as well as the understanding that you will not get good offspring from a wandering girl. The fallen girl was considered spoiled, unworthy of marriage.

Take care of honor from a young age

Since ancient times in Rus' it has been said: “Take care of Honor from a young age.” On Slavic lands the concept of a virgin was the concept of the Image of Purity and purity. The groom’s parents had the first question for the girl’s parents: “Is your girl clean?” Not in the sense of whether she washed herself in the bathhouse. The groom's parents were interested in whether the girl was a virgin, whether she carried the image of another man, whether anyone in their family had serious illnesses? They learned all this so that full-fledged offspring would be born into their Family. In America, before marriage, the bride and groom are required to donate blood to check the compatibility of their blood, to check for the presence of unhealthy heredity and AIDS. But medicine is powerless in the face of the RITA Laws and the consequences of their violations.

Nowadays, propaganda of debauchery among youth is increasing day by day. IN modern schools High school virgins are looked at by their ultra-modern classmates as “black sheep”, they laugh at them, calling them fools and other bad words. Schoolgirls free from morality boast among themselves about who has changed partners and how many, who has “slept” with which of their peers. Unfortunately, they do not know the Laws of RITA, and these Laws state that “a man gives a woman the Gift of Motherhood.” Ignorant youth do not yet think about children, so young men do not perceive their sexual partners as the mother of their children. And when a child is born unwanted by a young man, the mother of the child is not endowed with the Gift of Motherhood. She does not feel the need for maternal care, love, affection for the child. Therefore, now some young mothers leave their children directly in maternity hospitals. The young woman's soul becomes empty. A young woman begins to drink, use drugs, and leave home for a “walk” in search of adventure and a casual partner. In the old days, such a girl was called “walking”.

But how does virgin purity affect the health of generations? Our ancestors knew the answer to this question; they had before their eyes examples of bad offspring being born from a wandering woman. Therefore, a morally fallen girl was considered spoiled, unworthy of marriage.

Debauchery and other vices, I hope you already understand what’s what. Here I would like to touch upon the topic of what to do next and what values should be inherent in a free person?

Today, unfortunately, most of people don’t understand what a family is and how to create one. First of all, I would like to turn to our goddesses (beregins), guardians of Slavic, Russian beauty. Every girl in the family is the basis future family, and with upbringing, high spiritual qualities are implanted in her, which should manifest themselves in purity of thoughts. By the time a girl is ready to get married and have children, she must reach a certain level and absorb everything necessary knowledge to fulfill their responsibilities in the family. Such a girl reveals herself like The Scarlet Flower, and such beauty gives rise to high poetry in the minds of real men. Looking at such a girl, you can understand and repeat the poems of A.S. Pushkin:

I remember a wonderful moment:
You appeared before me,
Like a fleeting vision
Like a genius of pure beauty.

The colorful covers of magazines and the depraved black stuff from the screens impose on us, from childhood, a perverted understanding of what beauty really is. What is beauty? Of course, looks come into play here. important role... but is not decisive. And in order to understand this, you don’t have to go far, let’s just look around us.

We often see how our girls, in order to attract the attention of men, expose the intimate parts of their bodies, thereby awakening the low, animal instincts. If a girl evokes sexual fantasies in a man, then with this behavior the woman is able to keep the man for one night. For real beautiful woman in a man it evokes associations with loving wife, with his friend, with the mother of his children. By her behavior, a woman should evoke a desire to devote her entire life to her alone, to protect her.

Can a union between two people be based on physical attraction to each other?

IN wildlife a male, having mated with one female, looks for another, they are not connected by anything more. A person at the development level does the same. When a man doesn’t have his woman next to him, he looks for another one. And often after such a relationship, the woman is left alone with the children, because within the family it is impossible to enjoy each other’s body forever, it gets boring.

A family is never created on animal instincts, because in order to create a real, human family, people must love each other, there must be a kinship of souls, a union of two hearts.

So, in order to be beautiful, it is very important to develop spiritual and moral beauty in yourself. Such beauty cannot be put on display, and a person with high morality cannot be determined by appearance. It’s high time for you and me to get rid of imposed, false and stereotypical thinking and stop making conclusions about people based on their appearance. Every person is recognized by his deeds - said our wise ancestors

Our ancestors, the Slavic-Aryans, instilled respect for girls in the process. A man was, first of all, a protector and a reliable support for a woman. There was no talk of assault; it was considered a humiliating and serious sin. Men were raised to be warriors from childhood, and if necessary, he could go off to fight enemies. In such cases, the wives remained at home waiting for their loved one. Here I would like to quote an excerpt from the poem “Ruslan and Lyudmila”, after Lyudmila was kidnapped by Chernomor, she wakes up in his castle and...

Three maidens of wonderful beauty,
In light and pretty clothes
They appeared to the princess and approached
And they bowed to the ground.
Then with silent steps
One came closer;
To the princess with airy fingers
Braided a golden braid
With art, which is not new these days,
And she wrapped herself in a crown of pearls
The circumference of the pale forehead.
Behind her, modestly bowing his gaze,
Then another one approached;
Azure, lush sundress
Dressed Lyudmila's slender figure;
Golden curls covered themselves,
Both chest and shoulders are young
A veil as transparent as fog.
The envious veil kisses
Beauty worthy of heaven
And the shoes lightly compress
Two legs, miracle of miracles.
The princess is the last maiden
Pearl Belt delivers.
Meanwhile, the invisible singer
He sings happy songs to her.
Alas, neither the stones of the necklace,
Not a sundress, not a row of pearls,
Not a song of flattery or fun
Her souls are not glad;
In vain the mirror draws
Her beauty, her outfit:
Downcast, motionless gaze,
She is silent, she is sad.

From this passage, a very important feature in Lyudmila is clearly visible, which personifies Russian beauty. She would never trade her lover for anything. material values. And no matter how Chernomor seduces her, nothing takes away Lyudmila’s longing for her betrothed.

How to choose a life partner to start a family?

A true family is created once and for all, therefore it is very important to meet in life worthy person. No one and nothing can ever destroy a strong family union, not even separation, since such people are bound together by pure Love. Such high feelings when conceiving a child enhance the energy surge, and the channel through which the essence enters the fertilized egg reaches more high levels planets. And from the book of academician Nikolai Levashov, we know that the higher the level of development of an entity, the higher the planetary level at which it (the entity) is located during the time between periodic incarnations into physical bodies.

The consequences of moral corruption of parents have a very serious impact on the health and development of the child. Therefore, a family union, first of all, should be based on love, and a correct understanding of this feeling must be instilled in a person from childhood. Our ancestors, for example, conveyed high morality in fairy tales, which are still preserved today, but if this continues, then soon there will be no one to read them...

This is one of the most provocative and difficult chapters of my book to accept. But I am not afraid of accusations of chauvinism and misogyny, because I have long been known as such, I will risk encroaching on the myth of the “moral purity of women” and will express my thoughts directly and unambiguously: “ Morality, as a personality characteristic, generally speaking, is not characteristic of a woman».

I am well aware that this chapter will make most women furious and hysterical.

Here it is necessary to make a very important remark explaining the essence of my statement.

I do not believe that every woman is always immoral in her behavior, but I say that the very concept of morality is most often incomprehensible to her.

There are “moral” men, and there are immoral ones. And the woman does not understand the formulation of this problem AT ALL. She is excluded from this plane, she is OUTSIDE. Well, like a cat.

There are no moral or immoral women. Women exist OUTSIDE of morality, they are not subject to it.

We call the formalization of these qualities at the level of social, interpersonal connections and public attitudes morality.

Evil in her concept is the antipode of the above. So, a woman says: “You are evil” when she did not get what she wanted from a man; “I’m kind,” she thinks while lisping with the cat.

As for good and evil in general, you are unlikely to meet a woman who seriously comprehends these categories abstracted from a specific situation.

Simply put, well, she won’t rack her brains about whether her action is moral or not. But here are the questions she will definitely ask herself:

- is this beneficial for me?
- What will happen to me for this, won’t I lose, won’t I be punished?
- how will this affect the relationships of other people towards me, especially those on whom I depend or need?

The very system of coordinates “moral-immoral” lies OUTSIDE the understanding and worldview of a woman, is perceived by a woman as something abstruse, artificial, superfluous.

But a woman knows how to PRESENT morality. Which, more often than not, she does, but only as long as it benefits her. A woman is a chameleon; she masterfully mimics when she is interested in achieving a goal, when it is beneficial.

What could this benefit be?

Attracting a potential man, formally complying with his intuitively captured concept of what a woman should be;
- a certain social status, ostentatious decency, “decency”;
- direct self-interest;
- the ability to manipulate using categories, deep meaning which the woman does not accept;

A woman KNOWS the formal rules of morality and ethics of relationships with people (they are usually voiced when raising a girl by parents, school, and elders), but does not understand their meaning, essence and significance. Morality for a woman is the necessary “coloring” of the chameleon in CERTAIN CASES, a kind of formal ritual, the implementation of which she takes upon herself as necessary. But as soon as this attire ceases to be beneficial, the woman simply does what she needs.

Modern life, almost completely freed from pressure on women moral laws, confirms the COMPLETE ABSENCE of an internal moral core in women, as a structure underlying personality. Speaking about this, I do not blame women for this at all, they are who they are. But men should always remember this feature of women.

“Men came up with morality and also this... expediency - women would never have come up with this,” she says loudly, knowing that I am rushing after her.”

Zakhar Prilepin, "The Shadow of a Cloud on the Other Shore"

Judeo-Christian civilization erected a pedestal for altruism and established service to the public interest as one of the highest virtues.

Unnatural from the point of view of some modern psychologists male friendship has an ancient and solid foundation in the form of male cooperation and mutual assistance between hunters and warriors.

The first inter-clan and inter-community military alliances appeared. Societies grew larger, adopting universal norms of behavior.

Of course, I am exaggerating greatly for clarity, I am not a historian, I do not indicate exactly when, where and how this happened, it is important for me to convey the essence, the principle itself: institution moral values was obliged to appear for the purposes of the public good, peaceful coexistence, industrial progress and the protection of family and private property.

Then people left the caves... but the women did not come out of the caves. Their sphere of competence remained the home, family life, the birth and upbringing of offspring.

Social communications? Husband, children, neighbors in the "wigwams". The means of these communications are the ability to understand the internal state of other people, psychological adjustment, cunning, manipulation, intrigue.

For women, their main life task remained the search, attraction and attachment of a strong and preying male, redistribution of resources within the family in favor of themselves and offspring, exchanging “love” and care for the man’s home for them. Men developed and complicated universal moral norms, being their creators, bearers and guardians, overthrowers, but for women, in essence, nothing has changed: the tasks are the same. Moreover, the morality inculcated by men came into conflict with the main biological task of women.

If you look at the history of Mankind and women from this angle, it will become absolutely clear that the formation and strengthening of civilizations was accompanied by the mandatory suppression and curbing of harmful and destructive female instincts. The woman herself inner essence, contradicts the moral norms, in particular, of the Judeo-Christian Civilization. Our ancestors understood this very well and did not allow women to participate in the priesthood and judicial functions. What a pity that this wisdom, developed and carried through centuries and millennia of Human History, is so frivolously trampled upon!

"How so?" - the reader will ask me, “After all, we have been taught to perceive a woman as a standard of moral purity.” This is one of the most dangerous myths that a young man faces in life.

Yes, a woman may well behave in accordance with moral principles, just as a cat does not always steal sour cream. Especially when I'm full.

Men themselves, alas, tend to invent a certain “moral purity” of a woman. And this, among other things, lies our craving for harmony: we try to endow a creature of angelic appearance with those personality traits that, according to our inner conviction, should be inherent in it. We subconsciously strive for perfection and completeness and speculatively “finish” a woman. At the same time, the possibility of objective perception and analysis of a woman’s qualities is blocked by sensuality and romanticization.

Most often, the painful, in our time almost inevitable, resolution of the conflict between reality and the fictional morality of a woman leads a man into a state of shock.

King Shlomo (Solomon) wrote three thousand years ago: " I found one righteous man among a thousand, but among a thousand women I did not find one."

(Ecclesiastes 7:1-29)

Andrei Prozorov, the hero of the play “Three Sisters” by Anton Pavlovich Chekhov, admits with sadness:

“A wife is a wife. She is honest, decent, well, kind, but at the same time there is something in her that reduces her to a small, blind, sort of rough animal. In any case, she is not human."

Anton Pavlovich himself, in one of his letters to his friend and publisher Alexei Suvorin, writes:

“Women are most unsympathetic because of their injustice and the fact that justice, it seems, is not organically characteristic of them. Humanity instinctively kept them away from social activities; God willing, it will reach this point with its mind. In a peasant family, the man is smart, reasonable, fair, and God-fearing, but the woman—God forbid!”

Cesare Lombroso in his book " The woman is a criminal and a prostitute" to explain the immoral and criminal behavior of women prefers to talk about “moral insanity” as a kind of personality defect, illness, thus asserting in it exceptions to the rule. Poor Mr. Lombroso! In his naivety of his still romantic age, he assumed the immorality of women as isolated deviations from the norm, he conducted an outstanding study of the varieties of such deviations for his time, but he did not have the courage to suggest the simple idea that women are not characterized by morality as such.

To justify Lombroso, I admit that he did not demand so much from female morality, defining the “normal female type”, based on two qualities: maternal feeling and modesty.

The story “I went on vacation” from the women's forum.

I returned from vacation three weeks ago. My friend and I were in Turkey in the city of Kemer. I heard so many stories about fiery and hot nights in this beautiful country, but I went with full confidence that this would not affect me, since I was married. I was happy for my friend that she could have a blast here!! We lay by the sea for two days and on the third day we decided to go shopping in the city. And there I met him!! Modest and speaks Russian very well. At first he gave me his business card like come again, but we chatted and chatted and in the end he said give me your phone number to the disco, let's go to the disco in the evening.) and I gave it!! And in general, away we go!! Dates, night walks, night cafes with Turkish cuisine and a lot of sex!!! Upon arrival home, we correspond every day, either just SMS or Facebook, we don’t see each other on Skype due to the time difference and it works up to 24 hours. I came home myself, but my soul remained there!! I dream about Türkiye almost every night! My husband knows almost everything, but his behavior simply amazed me, he didn’t do anything, didn’t yell... asked if I was divorcing him for now?? She said no and calmed down!! Indifference? And having arrived in my native Murmansk, I decided to go and live in Turkey!! Well, I don’t want to live in Russia and freeze my butt! My Turkish boy doesn’t know that I’m going to move, he only knows that I’m coming in September for three weeks, and I’m just going to resolve the issue of a residence permit, I want to open my own business there, Turkish is not a problem! Very scary!!! But there is only one life!! And no matter how my relationship with the Turkish guy turns out, I want to go to Turkey!! Sea Sun!!!

I read 700+ comments from women. The ladies wrote so much: ridicule, wishes of happiness, calls to come to their senses and accusations of stupidity.

But I did not find any, I emphasize: NO ONE