Fedoseev R.V. Main trends in the economic development of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries

1. Factors and conditions for entrepreneurial activity of the nobility

Penza province of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

1.1. Natural-geographical position and economic state of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

1.2 Quantitative composition, social structure and internal corporate activities of the nobility of the Penza province of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

2. Noble credit institutions and land ownership in the Penza province in the post-reform period.

2.1. Labor prices, land rent and mobilization of land ownership in the Penza province of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

2.2. Noble credit institutions of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

3. Noble entrepreneurship of the Penza province of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

3.1. The development of field farming and livestock farming in the noble households of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

3.2. Noble commercial and industrial entrepreneurship in the Penza province of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic "Noble economy of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries: from estates to economy"

The relevance of the topic is determined by the independent significance that the noble economy had for the entire agricultural development of the country. In Russian historical science, there has traditionally been an opinion based on Lenin’s conclusions about the state and prospects for the development of the noble economy, its agrarian evolution along the so-called “Prussian path”. Currently, ideologized and one-sided approaches to the study of the nobility's economy are undergoing a fair revision, so it is interesting to try to analyze how the evolution of agricultural and industrial production actually took place among the nobility using the example of individual provinces, where the nobility traditionally maintained its position during this period. One of these provinces was Penza.

The study of the agrarian history of Russia still remains one of the leading topics in Russian historical science. The problem of the history of the noble economy today is inseparable from the solution of major theoretical issues agrarian historiography. It is rightfully considered as one of the main elements of the agrarian system as a whole.

The most important feature of Russian history in the second half of the 19th century was the agrarian reforms, which had a great public resonance due to the protracted nature of the reforms and the fact that the reforms affected the most significant part of Russian society - the rural population, including noble farmers.

Hence, it is very important to determine the level of the state of the noble economy on earth and to explore its economic potential. Moreover, throughout the entire post-reform period, representatives of the noble class were the main owners of the private land fund, and it was they who mediated the most important processes, both in the system of land ownership and land use. Considering the agrarian nature of the Russian economy in the post-reform period, changes in the area of ​​the noble land fund were directly related to the ongoing economic changes in the country as a whole.

Attention to a comprehensive view of the upper class is increasing due to the revival of interest in local history. Local studies, in the complex of solving socio-economic problems of individual classes of post-reform Russia, contribute to clarifying and concretizing general trends and patterns. On the other hand, a regional approach when considering various aspects of class issues contributes to the deepening and expansion of specific historical research.

Thus, the study of the agrarian evolution of the Russian Empire is one of priority tasks modern Russian historiography. This acquires particular significance when analyzing turning points, which is the post-reform period. It is in such eras, when socio-economic and political guidelines change, that classes have to look for their place in the new surrounding realities. Among the least studied social groups refers to the nobility, despite its dominant role in the class structure of Russian society, since traditionally over the past seventy years priority has been given to the study of the proletariat and peasantry.

The object of the study is agricultural and industrial production within the framework of the noble economy of the Penza province in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries.

The subject of the study is the least studied, in our opinion, factors of quantitative and national composition, legal status, the specifics of economic and entrepreneurial activities, as well as land use and the movement of land ownership of the nobles of the province.

The chronological scope of the study covers the period from the early 60s. XIX century, that is, from the time of the peasant reform until

1907, that is, before the start of the Stolypin reforms. This period includes a pronounced process of evolution of the noble economy from semi-feudal to capitalist.

The territorial scope of the work includes the territory of the Penza province, typical of the Volga region, with a pronounced agricultural specialization and a predominantly rural population.

Historiography. Analysis of the evolution of the noble economy was one of the most controversial issues in Russian agrarian historiography.

When studying the landowner economy of the Penza province of this period, it is possible, with a certain degree of convention, to identify a number of stages showing varying degrees of interest in this issue and the main directions of research:

1. pre-revolutionary historiography;

2. Soviet historiography;

3. modern Russian historiography.

Each of these periods has specific features and stages. But to form an objective assessment of the problem under consideration, a comprehensive consideration of all periods is necessary.

The specifics of the historical development of pre-revolutionary Russia were largely determined by the agrarian nature of its economy. Therefore, the question of the evolution of the noble economy, ways and possibilities for the development of domestic agriculture became one of the most important in the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Pre-revolutionary historiography is represented mainly by the works of noble historians and publicists, as a result of which most studies are characterized by subjectivity. In general, noble historiography, while noting changes in the position of the nobility after 1861, tended to exaggerate the consequences of the Great Reforms in relation to the socio-economic positions of the upper class.

Issues of the noble household were the subject of fierce polemics between various socio-political movements. The main issues around which the discussions took place boiled down to two problems: the role and place of the upper class in the economic and political life of Russia after the reforms and its future.

The first stage of pre-revolutionary historiography, dating back to the 1860s - 1870s, was characterized by the absence of special works on the history of the post-reform position of the nobility. In the first post-reform years, the published works on this problem had economic-recommendatory and statistical-research aspects; most of them had a journalistic style and were rarely of a generalizing nature.

A notable phenomenon in the historiography of this period was journalism, which laid the foundation for the division of researchers of the nobility into liberal-minded and conservatives, and reflected the views of representatives of various strata of Russian society on the fundamental changes that took place in agrarian relations. The authors of the liberal movement tried to theoretically substantiate the advantages of hired labor in agriculture, and when in some noble households the introduction of machines and hired labor did not quickly produce the expected results, publicists explained this by the lack of loans, the low quality of equipment, etc. However, the fact that the reforms carried out seriously influenced the position of the nobility, shaking its economic, class-political positions, no one doubted.

Representatives of the conservative trend, represented mainly by articles and pamphlets of a journalistic nature, disputed the validity of the studies carried out in the 60s. XIX century reforms and insisted on the need for state support for noble land ownership. Political issues came to the fore, prevailing over economic ones. It should be noted that a number of works in this direction contain useful information about the structure of the class, its increasing heterogeneity, etc.

Descriptions of large noble farms discussed the first experiences of large-scale use of agricultural machinery and hired workers, and the introduction of multi-field crop rotations. The question was also raised about the role and nature of rent, as well as its consequences for the further development of noble households. It was noted that mining reduces the profitability of estates and is an obstacle to their progress. Descriptions of estates where the economic viability of the mining system was proven did not become widespread, even despite the fact that in the first post-reform years, mining was the main form of farming on noble estates1.

In the historiography of the 70s. XIX century practically no attention was paid to the noble household. In the works of A.V. Romanovich-Slavatinsky, M.T. Yablochkov, R.A. Fadeev, A. Golovacheva, the main topic was the economic situation of individual large estates; they studied predominantly the pre-reform position of the nobility, rather than the post-reform one.

Thus, in many works of this period there was an opinion about the fallacy and ineffectiveness of the reforms carried out, and the point of view about the need to take measures to support the nobility was defended. Most of the authors considered the lack of cheap loans, low quality of equipment and the small share of the use of civilian labor to be the reason for the unfavorable position of the upper class. As a consequence of this, the ruin of noble landowners and the loss of a monopoly in local government bodies.

The second stage of pre-revolutionary historiography on the issues under consideration can be attributed to the 1880s. XIX - early XX centuries, when trends in the development of noble land ownership were clearly defined, zemstvo statisticians conducted a comprehensive survey of medium and large estates and published the results of land ownership censuses. In conditions when new post-reform relations became a reality in the agricultural sector, the question arose about the development of the noble economy.

Issues related to the movement of land ownership began to be considered and systematized. In this regard, it has been repeatedly noted that the nobility was not only the main seller, but also one of the largest buyers of land4. Many publicists (I.D. Kashkarov, N.P. Semenov, D. Orlov) spoke out in favor of state regulation of mobilization processes in land ownership, for the restoration of the monopoly of the nobles in local government, and as a result, for the strengthening of the class system in the country5.

In works devoted to the economic situation in agriculture, the higher agricultural culture of the noble economy was noted, compared to the peasant economy, and its capitalist evolution was recognized6. As in the works of the previous stage, issues related to the 7th reform of 1861 and its impact on the situation in the agricultural sector were considered.

By the end of the 19th century. In pre-revolutionary historiography, the Marxist direction began to develop, associated mainly with the works of V. I. Ulyanov (Lenin). V.I. Lenin attached great importance to the agrarian question, studying it mainly from the standpoint of political struggle rather than economic interaction8. It was the political aspects that had highest value when determining the place of the noble economy, while its progressive role in the process of formation and development of capitalist relations in agriculture was reduced to a minimum.

Nevertheless, in the work “The Development of Capitalism in Russia” V.I. Lenin resorted to a multilateral examination of the landowner economy, analyzing its capitalist evolution, pointed out the contradictions that had formed: on the one hand, the noble economy was the foundation for capitalist production, on the other hand, it was a factor holding back the bourgeois development of the countryside9.

And although at the regional level during this period issues devoted to noble households were studied extremely rarely, it is still possible to highlight two works related to the economic situation of the nobles of the Penza province. In particular, in the work of A.D. Ryabinin and K.F. Stahl10, when considering noble households, the difficulties of introducing the local nobility to technical and agronomic achievements after the reform of 1861 were shown. According to the authors, this was due to the lack of the required amount of funds. The study by V.P. Semenov11, despite the fact that the main emphasis is on geographical information and demographic description of the region, still contains valuable economic descriptions of the noble estates of the Penza province. With their help, you can get acquainted with all levels of production in the economies of large noble landowners.

Summarizing the consideration of pre-revolutionary historiography devoted to the noble economy, it should be noted that positive traits The works of this stage can be attributed to the fact that they contain valuable observations and facts related to the activities of noble assemblies, charity, the heterogeneity of the composition of the class of its structure, the mobilization of land ownership and the capitalist evolution of farms. For the first time in scientific literature, the main problems facing the nobility were clearly formulated and specific ways to solve them were proposed. In general, noble historiography, noting changes in the position of the nobleman in the post-reform era, in our opinion, was inclined to exaggerate the consequences of bourgeois transformations in relation to the socio-economic and political positions of the nobility.

Soviet historiography continued to study the post-reform development of the nobility, but from a new perspective. This was due to a changed methodological approach to the study of this problem. The works of this period, influenced by Marxist ideology, are characterized by the study of individual, mainly economic, issues of the functioning of the noble household in the post-reform period.

During this period of study of the noble economy of the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries, there was a gradual change in the nature of agrarian issues; if in the early years the focus was on issues related to the development of capitalism, then by the 50s. attention was already paid to the level of capitalization of relations in the agrarian sector of the post-reform period13. And for a comprehensive consideration of this issue it was necessary to have more in-depth study noble economy not only in the context of economic relations taking place in the village, but also as an independent sector of agricultural production. However, until the mid-1950s. the problems of the economic situation of the upper class were practically not considered.

But if at the all-Russian level the noble economy was studied in the context of the class struggle in the countryside, then at the regional level there was practically no research on this topic. Local historians (A.L. Khvoshchev, S.P. Petrov) studied mainly the socio-economic situation of the peasant population; the nobility was only partially touched upon in brief historical reviews14. Some materials on the noble household can be found in general works on the history of Mordovia of this period15.

At the next stage of studying the noble household of the period under study, which can be designated as the late 1950s - 1960s. A number of works are being published devoted to the study of general trends in the development of agrarian relations in the post-reform countryside16. And although the position of the upper class was not the subject of a special study, questions were nevertheless considered about the structure and location of noble land ownership, about its share in the system of private and national land funds. However, during this period, the previously created image of the nobility as a decaying class was not questioned, although many authors came to the idea of ​​​​the significant weight and influence of the nobility in the agrarian sphere of the post-reform village.

Most historians agreed that the knowledge of the noble economy was poor, so by the end of the 1960s. There was a need to create works entirely devoted to the landowner's economy.

The first such work was the monograph by A. M. Anfimov “Large

1 7 landowner's farm European Russia(end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century)". In it, the author subjected a comprehensive analysis to the composition of the noble landowners, examined the system of running the noble household, their commercial and industrial entrepreneurship, agriculture and forestry, as well as the processes of lending and land mobilization. And although, in his opinion, at the beginning of the 20th century. Agrarian relations continued to have a semi-serf character; he still recognized the capitalist nature of the evolution of agricultural production of noble households.

The main ideas of A. M. Anfimova continued to be developed in her research by L. P. Minarik, recognizing the semi-serf nature of large noble land ownership and land use; at the same time, she did not deny the presence of large capitalist economies with significant amounts of agricultural and industrial production in a small part of noble households18 .

During this period, works of a regional nature continued to appear. A number of studies devoted to both the problems of agriculture and capitalist relations in the post-reform villages of Mordovia contain a lot of information on the issues under consideration19. Local authors also paid attention to the industrial development of the province 20 as a whole.

In the 1970s the trend in studying the nature of agricultural evolution continues. Many authors (M. L. Goryushkin, N. M. Druzhinin, P. G. Ryndzyunsky, etc.) come to the idea of ​​​​the mutual influence of peasant and landowner ho

91 farms Generalizing works continue to be published on the reform of 1861 and its significance for the subsequent development of capitalist relations in agriculture22.

Particularly noteworthy is the research of N.A. Proskuryakova23, in which she concluded that the processes of land reduction among nobles of various categories took place at different rates, and that the nobility played the greatest role in the environment of private land ownership. She also drew attention to the fact that the decline in the role of noble lands in the general land fund occurred faster in value, and in quantity - much slower.

It must be said that during this period most of the research was carried out on the basis of materials from the late XIX - early XX. New approach in the study of the agrarian system began to be developed in his works by I. D. Kovalchenko24. He argued that the study of the processes of capitalization of the landed estates should be carried out not from the end of the 19th century, but from the beginning of the post-reform period. In considering issues related to the nature of the agricultural capitalist market, he, together with other researchers, began to actively use mathematical methods for processing mass sources. This made it possible to process a large amount of information related to the formation of the agricultural market, in which a significant role was assigned to the noble economy25.

A great achievement of this period was the appearance of A.P. Korelin’s general work “The Nobility in Post-Reform Russia.

1861-1904." . His monograph is a work on the study of the composition, number, legal and economic status, and corporate organization of the upper class in the post-reform period. In it, the author analyzed the forms of organization of the estate, the competence of the activities of noble corporate bodies, the participation of the nobility in business activities and local government bodies. For the first time, the activities of noble assemblies were analyzed.

In his opinion, the process of economic ruin of the nobility was associated not only with the large volume of debts accumulated even before the reform, but also with the inability of the nobility to adapt to new capitalist conditions. At the same time, the fact was recognized that the nobility at the end of the 19th century. retained a significant part of the material base and class privileges, which allowed it to occupy a special place in the socio-political structure of post-reform society.

Consideration of certain important issues related to the economic and political positions of the upper class is contained in a number of monographs devoted to the study of related or more general problems.

In this context, the monograph by Yu. B. Solovyov28, dedicated to the policy of the autocracy towards the nobility in the second half of the 19th century, is of particular interest. Analyzing the relationship between the autocracy and the nobility, the author showed the increasing processes of internal differentiation of the class. He pointed out the clear relationship between the economic status of a nobleman and his political status.

During this period, regional historiography continued to develop, represented mainly by works devoted to agrarian history and the development of small industry in the Middle Volga region29.

In the 1980s At the all-Russian level, one can note a decline in interest in the problems of the noble household. And although some problems of capitalist evolution in agriculture of the post-reform period continued to be considered, practically no comprehensive studies were carried out. In the context of the topic being studied, we can highlight the work of B. N. Mironov, in which, considering the movement of grain prices, the author also dwelled on the factors that influenced the development of agrarian relations30.

But, perhaps, the greatest significance in the study of the noble economy was the next work of A.P. Korelin, “Agricultural Credit in Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries”31. In it, the author subjected a comprehensive analysis to all types of large and medium-sized loans for landowners, as well as peasant credit. Considering the mortgage loan, the researcher came to the conclusion that it contributed to the capitalist mobilization of land, its concentration in the hands of the most economically strong farms, which thereby accelerated the process of capitalist restructuring of agriculture32.

The achievements of Soviet historians in the study of the agrarian system were summarized in several historiographical reviews, both by all-Russian and Volga researchers33. Among them, it is necessary to note the work of a team of authors headed by I. D. Kovalchenko, which showed the close relationship between the study of the entire system of agrarian relations and the study of the socio-economic system of the landed estates34.

If at the all-Russian level interest in agricultural issues has been falling, then at the regional level there has been a surge of interest in this topic. Of the published works, perhaps the most significant are the monographs by A. S. Kabytov and N. L. Klein35.

The monograph by P. S. Kabytov is devoted to the analysis of agrarian relations in the Volga region in the pre-October twenty years, but for many indicators a comparison is given for a longer period of time. The book raises a wide range of socio-economic issues affecting both noble and peasant households. Comparing them, the author drew attention to the fact that the nobility, while remaining the largest owner of land and despite its decline, continued to farm more extensively, which led to a steady decline in its role in agricultural production.

The conclusions of P. S. Kabytov on the agrarian development of the Volga region during the period of imperialism largely echo the conclusions of N. L. Klein. While noting some positive changes in agricultural production in the region, the author still believes that progress in agriculture was still limited.

During this period, agrarian relations, and as an integral part of them, the noble economy began to be examined more closely by local researchers. Among local history works, collections appear devoted to the socio-economic development of the Penza region36.

In general, Soviet historiography of the evolution of the noble economy of the late 19th - early 20th centuries. attributed to the nobility a negative image of the exploiters of the working people and the brakes on the capitalist evolution of the countryside.

Modern Russian historiography of the issues under consideration is characterized by a synthesis of the achievements of pre-revolutionary and Soviet researchers. The absence of ideological approaches allowed us to take a fresh look at the agrarian development of the post-reform period. A large number of works appear (V.V. Zverev, A.P. Kavelin, S.A. Nikolsky) devoted to capitalist relations in agriculture37. For the most part, the authors supported the opinion about the crisis that had developed in the agricultural sector of that time. In works directly devoted to the nobility, when analyzing various aspects of the economy, representatives of the highest. The 38th class shows an opinion about their crisis situation.

Issues related to the development of bread continue to be considered

39 " 40 ny market, the relationship of the upper class with the authorities, as well as the formation of credit institutions41. Particularly noteworthy here is the work of N. A. Proskuryakova on the study of the development of the mortgage loan system42. In them, the author, based on a large number of mass statistical and archival data, examines a wide range of issues characterizing the activities of public and private land banks.Using traditional and quantitative methods of analyzing mass data, she shows the influence of mortgages on the bourgeois-agrarian evolution of Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries.

Studies are appearing that examine the mentality of the local nobility, its class structure and social position43. A large amount of material on the socio-economic development of the upper class can be found in the two-volume work of B. N. Mironov dedicated to the social history of Russia44. Considering the evolution of the social structure of the nobility, the author came to the conclusion about its gradual rationalization and transformation from community to society. In general, the work examines the history of the nobility through the prism of the formation of the rule of law and civil society.

Many modern publications pay closer attention to certain aspects of the life of the nobility. Thus, some studies consider the nobility in the context of studying rural noble estates45. The study “Noble and merchant rural estates in Russia in the 16th - 20th centuries”46 contains materials about various behavioral stereotypes of the provincial nobility and ways of adapting to the new post-reform era. It also does not ignore the economic aspects of the estate life of landowners.

Works of the modern period make it possible to more fully trace the economic and social evolution of the upper class, to objectively assess the degree and scale of changes in its economic and socio-political status.

The study of the post-reform nobility continues at the regional and local levels. The interest of historians is attracted by the local study of agrarian relations and the economic situation of the Volga region noble economy of the period under review47. A great contribution to the study of the position of the Volga region nobility in the post-reform period was made by P. I. Savelyev48. Analyzing the state of the landed estates of the Volga provinces, including Penza, the researcher pointed out the uneven development of the estates of the landed nobility in the region. Considering the peculiarities of land use, changes in the structure of noble land ownership and the influence of debt to credit institutions on the capitalization of the noble household, he comes to the conclusion about their viability and the possibility of timely adaptation to the prevailing conditions of the post-reform era.

Volga region researchers pay much attention to the development of regional markets49. A significant contribution to the study of the number and quantitative composition of the Volga region nobility was made by S. D. Morozov, who based his research on the First General Census of the Russian Empire50.

A large number of works on the history of the nobility of the Penza province, in our opinion, indicates that in modern local history, more and more attention has also been paid to the local nobility. Thus, a significant amount of material on the socio-economic status of the nobility is contained in works on the history of individual republics and regions51. In particular, the articles by O. I. Mariskin “Social structure

C "y tour and social mobility of the population. Nobility", and V. M. Arsentieva "The Evolution of the Noble Economy: From Estates to Economy"53, available in the work "History of Mordovia", contain a large amount of valuable information regarding numbers, national, legal position, economic and entrepreneurial activities of the nobility on the territory of Mordovia.

Many works reveal the history of the nobility of the province at the level of the history of noble estates, individual villages, as well as its prominent representatives or clans54. A lot of material on the history of the nobility of the province, including the period under study, is in the “Penza Encyclopedia”55. In particular, the articles contained in it reveal issues related to the history of the Penza nobility, its individual families and class organization.

Traditions in the study of the Penza nobility through the prism of its outstanding representatives were also developed by the famous Penza local historian A.V. Tyustin56. His works are characterized by a close interweaving of the history of the Penza province with the history of individual noble families (Bakhmetyevs, Arapovs, Shakhovskys, etc.). He paid much attention to Penza governors and leaders of the nobility, examining in detail their biographies and social status.

However, in our opinion, his most valuable work in terms of studying the economic situation of the Penza nobility is the monograph “For the good of the fatherland: from the history of entrepreneurship in the Penza province”58. It contains a large amount of data, both on the economic status of individual families and the nobility as a whole. Considering the noble economy of the province, he came to the conclusion about the dominant role of agricultural production in it, and he rightly attributed the specific features of noble enterprise to the fact that it was carried out within the boundaries of the estate.

At the present stage, a positive perception of the nobility clearly prevails in regional historiography. The problems associated with individual representatives of the upper class of the province and their estate life are examined in sufficient detail. At the same time, the development of the noble economy of the post-reform period and the characteristics of their agricultural production and industry remain poorly studied.

Thus, an analysis of historiography on these issues showed that the study of the nobility's economy was carried out mainly on the basis of materials from the late 19th - early 20th centuries, and practically no studies were conducted on the position of the nobility in the first years after the reform. And for the most complete analysis of the evolution of the noble economy of the post-reform period, it is necessary to consider this time period, within which the prerequisites for its further evolution were formed. At the local level, the development of the noble economy of the Penza province was not at all the subject of special research; it was considered mainly in the context of the study of corporate organization or other related and narrowly focused problems. The lack of multifaceted works on this issue in regional historiography makes a comprehensive study of the aspect we have chosen relevant.

The purpose of this work is a comprehensive study of the evolution of the noble economy of the Penza province in the post-reform period. To achieve the research goals, it is necessary to solve the following problems:

Explore the dynamics of the number and composition of the nobility, characterize its legal and economic stratification;

Identify and consider the main trends in the evolution of the noble economy after the reform of February 19, 1961 and until the beginning of the 20th century;

Analyze the economic activities of the nobles of the province, including their agricultural and entrepreneurial areas of activity;

Determine the ratio of working-class and capitalist methods of farming on the estates of nobles;

Consider the dynamics of changes in noble land ownership in the province;

Determine the nature and size of land lease in noble households.

The source base for the study consists of various unpublished and published sources. Archival materials are represented by documents stored mainly in the funds of the State Archive of the Penza Region (SAPO) and the Central State Archive of the Republic of Mordovia (CSA RM).

The GAPO funds contain a large amount of material about the situation of the nobility in the post-reform period. The fund of the noble deputy assembly (f. 196) contains information about the corporate organization of the nobility, general lists and personal affairs of nobles, receipts and expenditure books of the noble treasury, lists of provincial leaders of the nobility, as well as some information about noble land ownership59.

The greatest amount of information about the structure of noble estates, their economic activities and the profit received from this, as well as the number of mortgaged estates is contained in the fund of the Penza branch of the Noble Bank (f. 14). Although the information presented in the appraisers' reports contains mainly information concerning the most economically backward estates, in our opinion, it is very informative in terms of economic indicators characterizing the state and evolution of noble estates60.

A variety of information is also contained in the personal funds of the nobles (f. 461 of the Vladykins), (f. 462 of the Vilegorskys), (f. 393 of the Arapovs). They contain their property inventories, correspondence, diaries, etc.

In the Central State Administration of the Republic of Moldova, information concerning the economic activities of nobles is contained in the funds of zemstvo administrations, and also partly in the funds of noble guardianships. A large amount of information regarding the number of landowners' estates, indicating the amount of land in them, forms of farming, places of sale of products, productivity, number of distilleries and prices for civilian labor in the Saransk district is contained in the fund of the Saransk district police department (f. 21)61.

In the funds of the Saransk city orphanage court (f. 17), Saransk office of district police officers (f. 34), Saransk district zemstvo government (f. 56), Krasnoslobodsk district zemstvo government (f. 46), Saransk district marshal of the nobility (f. 29 ), contains information about industrial and commercial enterprises, types of land leases, grain harvests on landowners' estates, the appointment of landowners' estates for auction, lists of landowners, as well as a description of some estates found

62 under noble guardianship.

When analyzing the legal status of the nobility special meaning have legislative acts contained in Volume IX of the Code of Laws of the Russian Empire concerning the rights of nobles to participate in the affairs of the Noble Assembly, in noble elections, etc. The laws contained there make it possible to more fully trace the evolution of the legal status of the nobility of the period under review.

When considering issues of the quantitative composition of the nobility of the province, the “First General Census of the Russian Empire of 1897”64 is of great importance. The unified program according to which the census was carried out made it possible to determine the number of hereditary and personal nobles of the Penza province and to give a general idea of ​​the national composition of the upper class.

To determine the dynamics of land ownership of nobles, as well as average land prices in the province, “Materials on statistics of the movement of land ownership in Russia”65 were used. The data they contain allows us to dynamically trace the sequence of changes in the area of ​​noble land ownership, the number of transactions related to land, its average county prices, as well as the amount of land bought and sold by nobles.

A variety of information concerning various aspects of the noble economy of the Penza province is available in special publications of the Central Statistical Committee66. The statistical timetables contain a large amount of information with which you can consider issues related to the amount of mortgaged land in credit institutions, the amount of land in the personal property of nobles by size of ownership, payment for hiring civilian workers, rent for land, the number of population, and so on. same with various issues of livestock farming and industry among the nobility.

Some information regarding the noble industry is contained in the “Data Collections on the Factory Industry of Russia”67. They examine the existing industrial production in the province, indicating the number of factories and factories, their annual production amount and the number of products produced, as well as the number of workers in them.

Thus, a comprehensive consideration of the specified source base and its analysis allows us to fully solve the research objectives.

Methodological basis. In the process of conducting research, it is necessary to be guided by the latest theoretical and methodological approaches and conceptual directions presented in modern literature. The work used methods that orient the researcher towards a holistic coverage of the processes and phenomena being studied in their relationship and interaction with other phenomena, and thereby warns him against one-sidedness, incompleteness and limited results. This required the expansion of traditional (formational) methodological settings, widespread until recently in historical and economic research, and their correct combination with the modernization approach.

The theory of modernization developed within the framework of a special - “progressive” - style of thinking, the methodology of which is based on the assumption that history is moving towards the heights of progress through overcoming diversity social order towards a single, rationally organized future. At the same time, modernization was seen as a process covering different aspects of social life: from economics to culture.

For Russia, the “theory of modernization” was embodied in the concepts according to which Russia, due to a number of external and internal reasons, “delayed” its development in comparison with the advanced countries of Western Europe. In an effort to eliminate the “lag,” the Russian state from time to time resorted to a policy of modernizing the country “from above” and revolutions “from below,” which determined the choice of paths for the country’s social development in the 19th - 20th centuries.

Methods such as quantitative, structural-systemic approach, problem-chronological, comparative-historical, and complex analysis are designed to look at many problems that have already become traditional and sufficiently studied from a new perspective, as well as to identify new ones that are practically not touched upon in historiography. At the same time, this allows us to reveal in more depth and in more detail the specifics of the noble household, its specialization, while taking into account internal and external connections. When analyzing the internal structure of the nobility's economy, a comprehensive, holistic and systematic examination of the nobility, taking into account all the conditions and spheres of its production and economic activity, were fundamental.

Scientific novelty The research is that the work was the first to comprehensively study the agricultural and industrial activities of the nobility of the Penza province. The features of land ownership and land use, forms of entrepreneurial activity of this social group are more fully considered.

Based on materials from the Penza province, the social composition of the nobility, its intra-verbal stratification, legal status, as well as the influence of the national factor on the development of the noble economy and land ownership in the region under study have been studied.

Based on a set of sources, the structure of the noble corporate organization of the province and the directions of its activities are described and analyzed. In addition, the composition of provincial noble assemblies and the range of issues resolved by them were studied.

The practical significance lies in the fact that the materials and conclusions presented in it can be used for further research of this issue, when writing general works of local history, teaching aids and methodological developments on the history of the Penza nobility.

The following provisions are submitted for defense:

1. Natural and climatic conditions and social factors determined the features of the capitalist evolution of the noble economy of the Penza province.

2. The districts of the Penza province differed significantly in the quantitative and national composition of the nobility.

3. Throughout the entire period under study, noble land ownership accounted for the majority of the entire private land fund of the province, surpassing all other land owners combined.

4. As a result of the reforms, there was a significant decrease in both the amount of land in the personal property of nobles and the total number of estates belonging to them.

5. In the processes of mobilization of land resources of the nobility, a significant role was played by the activities of the Noble Bank, which issued loans secured by land and acted as an intermediary in transactions related to its purchase and sale.

6. The majority of large noble farms in the region under study were characterized by a diversified structure, associated mainly with the production and processing of agricultural products, focused on the commodity market.

7. When managing the estates of the nobles of the Penza province of the period under review, labor and capitalist methods of production were closely intertwined.

8. The unprofitability of own land cultivation contributed to the rapid development of rental relations among the noble landowners of the province.

Approbation of results. The main provisions of the study were discussed at the II international scientific conference “Industrial Heritage” in Gus-Khrustalny, the international scientific and practical conference “Problems of the development of regional society” in Saransk, at the XXXIV Ogarev Readings, X and XI scientific conferences of young scientists and graduate students and students of Moscow State University. N.P. Ogareva 2005 and 2006, and are also reflected in 5 publications.

Research structure. In accordance with the set goals and objectives, the work consists of an introduction, three sections, a conclusion and a list of references, sources and applications.

Notes

1 Bazhanov, A. Experiences in farming with civilian labor / A. Bazhanov. - St. Petersburg, 1861; A step forward or the surest path for landowners to improve their well-being. - St. Petersburg, 1861.

2 Romanovich-Slavatinsky, A.V. Nobility in Russia from the beginning of the 18th century to the abolition of serfdom / A.V. Romanovich-Slavatinsky. - St. Petersburg, 1870; Yablochkov, M. T. History of the nobility in Russia / M. T. Yablochkov. - St. Petersburg, 1876; Fadeev, R. A. What should we do? Russian society in the present and future / R. A. Fadeev. - M., 1874; Golovacheva, A. Issues of state economy / A. Golovacheva. - St. Petersburg, 1873.

3 Vorontsov, V.V. The fate of capitalism in Russia / V.V. Vorontsov. - St. Petersburg, 1882; Terpigorev, S.N. Essays on the ruin of the landowners / S.N. Terpigorev. - St. Petersburg, 1881; Abaza, M.A. Why did the local nobility become bankrupt and impoverished and is it possible to raise it and revive it? / M. A. Abaza.-SPb., 1896.

4 Svyatlovsky, V.V. Mobilization of land ownership in Russia / V.V. Svyatlovsky. - St. Petersburg, 1911; Rubakin, N. A. Russia in numbers / N. A. Rubakin. - St. Petersburg, 1912; Loganov G. Statistics of land ownership in European Russia. By district / G. Loganov. -SPb., 1906.

5 Kashkarov, I. D. Noble affairs / I. D. Kashkarov. - St. Petersburg, 1888; It's him. The modern purpose of the Russian nobleman. - St. Petersburg, 1885; Semenov, N. P. Our nobility / N. P. Semenov. - St. Petersburg, 1899; Orlov, D. Tasks and goals of our nobility / D. Orlov. -SPb., 1893; Planson, A. A. About the nobility in Russia. Current state of the issue /

A. A. Planson. - St. Petersburg, 1893; Pazukhin, A. D. Current state Russia and the class question / A. D. Pazukhin. - M., 1886.

6 Gurevich, N. Economic situation of the Russian village / N. Gurevich. - M., 1896; Finn-Enataevsky, A. Modern economy of Russia. (1890-1910) / A. Finn-Enataevsky. - St. Petersburg, 1911.

7 Ivanyukov, I. I. The fall of serfdom in Russia. / I. I. Ivanyukov. - St. Petersburg, 1903; Dzhanshiev, G. A. The era of great reforms. / G. A. Dzhanashiev. - St. Petersburg, 1892, about

Lenin, V.I. The agrarian question in Russia at the end of the 19th century Complete. Collection Op. - T. 17. /

V. I. Lenin.-M., 1967.

9 Lenin, V.I. Development of capitalism in Russia. Full Collection Op. - T. 3. / V.I. Lenin. -M., 1967.

10 Materials for geography and statistics of Russia, collected by officers General Staff. Penza province. Compiled by K. F. Stahl, edited by A. Ryabinin. - T. 17: in 2 parts. - T. 1. - T. 2. - St. Petersburg, 1867.

11 Russia. A complete geographical description of our fatherland. A reference and travel book for Russian people / Ed. V. P. Semenova. In 19 vols. T. II. Central Russian black earth region. St. Petersburg, 1902.

Gaister, A. Agriculture of capitalist Russia. From the reform of 1861 to the reform of 1905 / A. Gaister. - M., 1928; Shestakov, A.V. Capitalization of Russian agriculture. (From the reform of 1861 to the war of 1914) / A. V. Shestakov. - M., 1924; Chernyshev, I.V. Agriculture of pre-war Russia and the USSR / I.V. Chernyshov. - M, -L., 1926.

13 Khromov, P. A. Economic development of Russia in the XIX - XX centuries. / P. A. Khromov. - M., 1950; Karnaukhova, E. S. Distribution of agriculture in Russia during the period of capitalism (1860-1914) / E. S. Karnaukhova. -M., 1951.

14 Khvoshchev, A. L. Essays on the history of the Penza region / A. L. Khvoshchev. - Penza, 1922; Petrov, S. P. Penza: Brief historical sketch / S. P. Petrov. - Penza, 1955.

15 Kotkov, K. A. The development of capitalism in Mordovia after the abolition of serfdom / K. A. Kotkov, I. M. Korsakov // Notes of the Moscow Research Institute of Economics. - 1955. - No. 17; Samarkin V.I. Mordovia in the post-reform period / V.I. Samarkin // Notes of the Moscow Research Institute of Lyonology and Economics. - Vol. 9. -Saransk, 1947.

16 Dubrovsky, S. M. On the question of the level of development of capitalism in Russian agriculture and the nature of the class struggle in the countryside during the period of imperialism. (Two social wars) / S. M. Dubrovsky // Features of the agrarian system of Russia during the period of imperialism. - M., 1962. - P. 5 - 44; Anfimov, A. M. Land lease in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. / A. M. Anfimov. - M., 1961; It's him. The Prussian path of development of capitalism in agriculture and its features in Russia // Questions of history. - 1963. - No. 2; Gindin, I. F. The demands of the nobility and the financial and economic policy of the tsarist government in 1880 - 1890. / I. F. Gindin, M. Ya. Gefter // Historical archive. -1957. - No. 4. - P. 122 - 155; Druzhinin, N. M. Liquidation of the feudal system in the Russian landowner village (1862 - 1882) / N. M. Druzhinin // Questions of history. -1968. - No. 2; Pershin, P. N. Agrarian revolution in Russia. Book 1. From reform to revolution / P. N. Pershin. - M., 1966; Zayonchkovsky, P. A. Abolition of serfdom in Russia / P. A. Zayonchkovsky. - M., 1968.

Anfimov, A. M. Large landowner economy of European Russia (late XIX - early XX centuries) / A. M. Anfimov. - M., 1969.

Minarik, JI. P. Economic characteristics of the largest land owners in Russia con. XIX - early XX centuries Land ownership, land use, economic system / L. P. Minarik.-M., 1971.

19 Danilov, G. G. From the history of agriculture in Mordovia / G. G. Danilov. - Saransk, 1964; Firstov, I. I. On the issue of land lease in post-reform Mordovia / I. I. Firstov // Scientific notes of Moscow State University. N. P. Ogareva: Series historical sciences. -Saransk, 1961.

20 Sumerin, P. G. Industry of the Penza province in the pre-revolutionary period (1851 - 1913) / P. G. Sumerin // Scientific notes of the PSPU. Vol. 5. - Penza, 1958. I

Goryushkin, M. JI. The development of capitalism in breadth and the nature of agrarian-economic evolution in Russia during the period of imperialism / M. JI. Goryushkin // History of the USSR. - 1974. - No. 2. - P. 49 - 70; Druzhinin, N. M. The influence of peasant reforms on the economy of the Russian village / N. M. Druzhinin // History of the USSR. - 1975. - No. 5. - P. 22 - 41; Ryndzyunsky, P. G. Post-reform landownership and capitalism / P. G. Ryndzyunsky // Questions of the history of capitalist Russia. The problem of diversity. - Sverdlovsk, 1972. - P. 57 - 70; Tarnovsky, K. N. Problems of agrarian-capitalist evolution of Russia. (On the discussion about the ways of development of capitalism in agriculture) / K. N. Tarnovsky // History of the USSR. - 1970. - No. 3. - P. 60 - 78; It's him. Problems of the agrarian history of Russia during the period of capitalism in Soviet historiography // Problems of the socio-economic history of Russia. - M., 1971. - P. 264 -311.

22 Dubrovsky, S. M. Agriculture and the peasantry of Russia during the period of imperialism. / S. M. Dubrovsky. - M., 1975; Druzhinin, N. M. Russian village at a turning point. / N. M. Druzhinin. - M., 1978; It's him. Landowner farming after the reform of 1861 // Historical notes. T. 89. - M., 1972; Ryndzyunsky, P. G. Establishment of capitalism in Russia. 1850-1880 / P. G. Ryndzyunsky. - M., 1978.

23 Proskuryakova, N. A. Location and structure of noble land ownership in European Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. / N. A. Proskuryakova // History of the USSR. - 1973. - No. 1; It's her. Noble land ownership in European Russia in 1877 - 1905. - M., 1973.

24 Kovalchenko, I. D. The relationship between peasant and landowner farming in agricultural production in capitalist Russia / I. D. Kovalchenko // Problems of the socio-economic history of Russia. - M., 1971. - P. 171 -194.

25 Kovalchenko, I. D. Agrarian market and the nature of the agrarian system of capitalist Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. / I. D. Kovalchenko // History of the USSR. - 1973. - No. 2. -S. 42 - 74; Kovalchenko, I. D. All-Russian agricultural market of the 18th - early 20th centuries. Experience of quantitative analysis / I. D. Kovalchenko, L. V. Milov. - M., 1974.

26 Korelin, A.P. Nobility in post-reform Russia 1861 - 1904. Composition, number, corporate organizations / A. P. Korelin. - M., 1979.

27 Laverychev, V. Ya. The big bourgeoisie in post-reform Russia. 1861 - 1900 / V. Ya. Laverychev. - M., 1974; Shepelev, L. E. Tsarism and the bourgeoisie in the second half

XIX century / L. E. Shepelev. - L., 1973; Zayonchkovsky, P. A. Russian autocracy at the end of the 19th century P. A. Zayonchkovsky. - M., 1970; Nifontov, A. S. Grain production in Russia in the second half of the 19th century. Based on the annual statistics of harvests in European Russia / A. S. Nifontov. - M., 1974.

Solovyov, Yu. B. Autocracy and nobility at the end of the 19th century / Yu. B. Solovyov. -L., 1973.

Smykov, Yu. I. Some problems of the agrarian history of the Middle Volga region during the period of capitalism / Yu. I. Smykov // Questions of the agrarian history of the Middle Volga region: Pre-October period. - Yoshkar-Ola, 1978. - P. 73 - 81; Klein, N. L. Small industry of the Middle Volga region at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. / N. L. Klein // Questions of the history of capitalist Russia. The problem is multi-layer™. - Sverdlovsk, 1972. - P. 346 - 363. 30 Mironov, B. N. Bread prices in Russia for two centuries (XVIII - XIX centuries) / B. N. Mironov.-L., 1985. l 1

Korelin, A.P. Agricultural credit in Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. /

A. P. Korelin. - M., 1988. 32 Ibid. P. 33.

Tarasyuk, D. A. Land ownership of post-reform Russia: source study based on the census of 1877 - 1878. / D. A. Tarasyuk. - M., 1981; Litvak, B. G. Essays on source studies of mass documentation of the 19th - early 20th centuries. / B. G. Litvak. -M., 1979; Smykov, Yu. I. Srvetskaya historiography of the agrarian history of the Middle Volga region during the period of capitalism / Yu. I. Smykov // Soviet historiography of the agrarian history of the USSR until 1917 - Chisinau, 1978; Historiography and sources on the agrarian history of the middle Volga region. - Saransk, 1981.

34 Kovalchenko, I. D. Socio-economic structure of the landowner economy of European Russia in the era of capitalism. Sources and methods of study / I. D. Kovalchenko, N. B. Selunskaya, B. M. Litvakov. - M., 1982.

35 Kabytov, P. S. Agrarian relations in the Volga region during the period of imperialism (1900 -1917) / P. S. Kabytov. - Saratov, 1982; Klein, N. L. Economic development of the Volga region in the late XIX - early XX centuries. On the question of the prerequisites for the bourgeois-democratic revolution in Russia / N. L. Klein. - Saratov, 1981.

36 Penza region of the 18th century. - 1917; Documents and materials. - Penza, 1980; Penza region 1861 - 1917 Socio-economic development. - Saratov - Penza, 1980.

37 Zverev, V.V. Capitalism and post-reform development of the Russian village (1870 - early 1890s of the 19th century) / V.V. Zverev. - M., 1999; Kovalchenko, I. D. Agrarian system of Russia in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. / I. D. Kovalchenko. - M., 2004; Nikolsky, S. A. Agrarian course of Russia: Worldview of reformers and practice of agrarian reforms in socio-historical, economic and philosophical contexts. / S. A. Nikolsky. - M., 2003; Nikonov, A. A. Spiral of a centuries-old drama: Agrarian science and policy of Russia (UUN - XX centuries) / A. A. Nikonov. - M., 1995; Ryazanov, V. T. Economic development of Russia. Reforms and the Russian economy in the 18th - 20th centuries. /

B. T. Ryazanov. - St. Petersburg, 1998.

38 Kabytova, E. P. The crisis of the Russian nobility / E. P. Kabytova. - Samara, 1997; Selunskaya, N. B. Production and technical level and hired labor in peasant and landowner farms of European Russia / N. B. Selunskaya // Agrarian evolution of Russia and the USA in the 19th - early 20th centuries.-M., 1991.-S. 153 - 173.

39 Aliev, E. G. On the history of the grain market in Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. / E. G. Aliev // Economic history of Russia: problems, searches, solutions. Vol. 9. - M., - Volgograd, 2001; Belozertsev, A.G. Grain farming in Russia (1865 - 1997): historical and economic essay / A.G. Belozertsev. - M., 1999.

40 Barinova, E. P. Power and the landed nobility in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century / E. P. Barinova. - Samara, 2002; Solovyov, Yu. B. Autocracy, nobility and the problem of rapprochement with the peasantry at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century. / Yu. B. Solovyov // Reforms or revolution? Russia 1861 - 1917. Materials of the international colloquium of historians. -SPb., 1992.

41 Dyakin, V. S. Money for agriculture in 1892 - 1914. Agricultural credit in the economic policy of tsarism / V. S. Dyakin. - St. Petersburg, 1997.

42 Proskuryakova, N. A. Banking cycle of the earth in Russia / N. A. Proskuryakova // Materials of scientific readings in memory of academician I. D. Kovalchenko. - M., 1997; It's her. State Noble Land Bank and its borrowers. // Rural Russia XIX - early XX century / rep. Editor A.P. Korelin. - M., 2004. - P. 190 - 227; It's her. Land banks of the Russian Empire. - M., 2002.

43 Barinova, E. P. The mentality of the Russian local nobleman / E. P. Barinova // Bulletin of Samara State University (humanitarian issue). - Samara, 2001. - No. 1.(19); Savelyev, P.I. Agrarian mentality of the Russian nobility / P.I. Savelyev // Social and political movement in Russia XIX - XX centuries. - Samara, 1994; Ivanova, N. A. Class structure of Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. / N. A. Ivanova, V. P. Zheltova. - M., 2004.

44 Mironov, B. N. Social history of Russia during the imperial period (XVIII - XX centuries): Genesis of personality, democratization of the family, civil society and the rule of law. T. 1 - 2. / B. N. Mironov. - St. Petersburg, 2000.

45 Demina, G. V. Mir noble estate as a mirror of the life of society / G. V. Demina // Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 8. History. - M., 1996. - No. 6.

46 Noble and merchant rural estate in Russia XVI - XX centuries: Historical essays. - M., 2001.

47 Morozov, S. D. Nobility of the Volga region at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. / S. D. Morozov // Noble Bulletin. 1997. - No. 4/5; Bibin, M. A. Nobility on the eve of the fall of tsarism in Russia / M. A. Bibin. - Saransk, 2000.

48 Savelyev, P. I. Paths of agrarian capitalism in Russia in the 19th century. (Based on materials from the Volga region) / P. I. Savelyev. - Samara, 1994; It's him. Regional processes in the agrarian development of Russia // Imperial structure of Russia in the regional dimension (XIX - early XX centuries). - M., 1997; It's him. "Farmer's way" in the agricultural development of Russia at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. // Scientific readings in memory of academician I. D. Kovalchenko: Materials. -M., 1997.

49 Goncharenko, L. N. Labor market in the Volga region in the second half of the 19th century: formation and functioning / L. N. Goncharenko // Volga region in the system of the all-Russian market: history and modernity: Materials of a scientific conference. - Cheboksary, 2000; Tagirova, N. F. State regulation of the grain market in the Middle Volga at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century / N. F. Tagirova // Actual problems teaching Russian history at universities in Russia and the USA. - Samara, 1998; It's her. Market of the Volga region at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. // The imperial system of Russia in the regional dimension (XIX - early XX centuries). - M., 1997; It's her. Market of the Volga region (second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries). - M., 1999.

50 Morozov, S. D. Population of the Volga region at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries / S. D. Morozov. - M., 1996; It's him. The population of Russia at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries // Domestic History. -1999.-No. 4.

51 History of the Penza region from the second half of the 19th century to the present day. / ed. A. S. Kasimova. - Penza, 2000; History of Mordovia: From the era of great reforms to the great Russian revolution / ed. N. M. Arsentieva, V. A. Yurchenkova. - Saransk, 2005.

Mariskin O.I. Social structure and social mobility of the population. Nobility / O. I. Mariskin // History of Mordovia From the era of great reforms to the great Russian revolution / ed. N. M. Arsentieva, V. A. Yurchenkova. - Saransk, 2005.

53 Arsentiev V. M. Evolution of the noble economy: from estates to economy / V. M. Arsentiev // History of Mordovia From the era of great reforms to the great Russian revolution / ed. N. M. Arsentieva, V. A. Yurchenkova. - Saransk, 2005.

54 Plotnikova, Yu. A. The noble family of the Obukhovs in the history of the Penza region / Yu. A. Plotnikova // Penza temporary book of antiquity lovers. - 1995. - No. 11; Ancient landowner estates (Zubrilovka, Nadezhdino, Ruzaevka, Ramzai, State Garden) // Heritage. - Penza, 1994; Tyustin, A.V. The village of Lomovka, Penza province in the destinies of the Russian nobility / A.V. Tyustin // Zemstvo. Archive of provincial history of Russia. -1995. -No. 3; Chernyavskaya, E. N. Noble estates of the Penza region / E. N. Chernyavskaya // Zemstvo. Archive of provincial history of Russia. - 1995. - No. 5; Bystrenin, V.P. Letters from the Penza village V.P. Bystrenin // Zemstvo. Archive of provincial history of Russia. - 1994. -No. 4.

55 Penza Encyclopedia / Ch. ed. K. D. Vishnevsky. - M., 2001.

56 Tyustin, A.V. Penza nobility: Historical sketch / A.V. Tyustin. - Penza, 2001; He is Penza of the nobility // Provincial city of Penza at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. / ed. S. I. Shchukina. - Penza, 2001;

57 Same. Penza governors. - Penza, 2001; It's him. Penza provincial leaders of the nobility. - Penza, 2001.

58 Same. For the good of the fatherland: from the history of entrepreneurship in the Penza province. -M., 2004.

59 See eg. GAPO, f. 196, op. 1, no. 1575, 1759,2434.

60 See e.g. GAPO, f. 14, op. 1, no. 245, 1641a, 1644.

61 See eg. TsGA RM, f. 21, op. 1, d.5,8, 14,34.

62 See eg. TsGA RM, f. 17, op. 1, d. 121, f. 29, op. 1, d. 31, f. 34, op. 1, d. 19, f. 56, op. 1, building 2.

63 See eg. Code of Laws of the Russian Empire. Laws about states. T. IX. - St. 70 - 71, 80-82,94-96,103-115,151 - 153.

64 The first general census of the Russian Empire. 1897 T. XXX. Penza province. - St. Petersburg, 1903.

65 See eg. Materials on statistics of land ownership movements in Russia. Purchase and sale of land in European Russia. Vol. XVII. - St. Petersburg, 1909., Issue. XXI. - St. Petersburg, 1906., Issue. XXII.-SPb., 1913.

66 See eg. Statistical timebook of the Russian Empire. Ser. III. Vol. 5, 8, 10 - 11., Land Tenure Statistics 1905 Vol. 22. Penza province. - St. Petersburg, 1906.

67 See eg. Compendium of data on the factory industry in Russia for 1888. -SPb., 1891, for 1893.-SPb., 1896, for 1897.-SPb., 1900.

Conclusion of the dissertation on the topic "National History", Fedoseev, Roman Vasilievich

CONCLUSION

For the development of the noble economy and the economy in general, the geographical and natural-climatic environment formed in the study area is of no small importance. As the study showed, by geographical location, climatic features, the composition of the soil and the large proportion of the rural population in the Penza province created all the prerequisites for the development of agriculture and related industries in the noble economy. And although bread production in the region was most developed, nevertheless, mainly low-value varieties of bread were produced here. The lack of a developed transport infrastructure and the relative remoteness of sales markets made commercial bread production, especially with the loss of serf labor, an unprofitable activity. Only held at the end of the 19th century. railways, contributed to increasing the profitability of agriculture.

The reform of 1861 affected the role played by the nobility in the province. The post-reform period became a turning point in the fate of the entire noble class. The changes that took place in the intra-class structure, changes in the status and legal status of the ruling class could not have any effect on the noble society and the noble economy.

The number of nobles in the population structure of the province was the smallest, less than one percent. And although during the second half of the 19th century. their number increased by the beginning of the 20th century. they continued to make up a tiny part of the province's population. In terms of the number of hereditary and personal nobility in the province, equality was maintained, the latter only slightly prevailing. This applied to most counties, only in one were the hereditary nobles noticeably outnumbering personal ones. In the gender structure of the nobility, women had a slight majority in all counties.

In terms of national composition, the nobility of the province was also heterogeneous. In addition to having a majority of Russians, the nobles of the province were represented by a significant number of the Tatar population, as well as an insignificant number of Polish, German and Mordovian.

The hereditary nobility of the province, as well as in Russia as a whole, was also divided into six groups according to its origin. The most numerous in the province were hereditary nobles of ancient families or those who were part of the nobility at the time of publication of the Charter, in 1785, for at least 100 years, and nobles who received their rank from the sovereign - II and III parts of the genealogical book, they accounted for 2/3 from all hereditary nobles.

Traditionally, among the nobility, hereditary nobles had the greatest rights, but during the post-reform period these rights began to be abolished and by the beginning of the 20th century. the nobility in legal status approached other classes. This concerned not only the political and economic, but also the personal rights of the nobles.

At the same time, the rights of the noble corporate organization, which was not controlled by the provincial administration and resolved issues of both class character and local self-government, essentially exercising local power, did not undergo changes and were even expanded to some extent. The corporate organization also received significant financial rights, in particular, to acquire and alienate property, enter into contracts and enter into obligations.

During the post-reform period, district and provincial noble assemblies continued to function. They resolved issues related to the life of noble society, the selection of officials of noble self-government, establishing the amount of monetary fees for their needs, collecting donations for victims of various disasters, and a number of others. Despite the importance of the issues being resolved, participation in provincial assemblies, both regular and extraordinary, was accepted by all nobles who had the right to do so. Thus, the transformation of the social and legal status of the nobles of the province and their corporate organization took place in the general mainstream of social changes in Russia.

It is also necessary to formulate some conclusions regarding the relations that developed in the sphere of noble land ownership. After the reform, the nobles of the Penza province experienced an acute shortage of labor, so the share of the use of civilian labor in the first decade was insignificant, in addition, the hiring fee was not always recouped by the products produced. In this regard, share and share methods of cultivating land are becoming widespread in noble households. great application The development system also received.

The province was characterized by the frequent interweaving of these methods, which in turn had many shortcomings that influenced the emergence and wide spread in the households of noble landowners of methods for generating income that were not directly related to their own cultivation of the land. Various types of land lease were widespread, and although rental prices fluctuated significantly across counties, it was still used in varying amounts in almost all noble households. In addition, rental prices during the period of time under study were constantly growing, thereby allowing the nobles to receive a stable income.

The importance of land relations for the noble household is also due to the fact that throughout the entire post-reform period, noble land ownership made up the majority of all private land ownership. And despite the fact that the amount of land owned by the nobles decreased significantly (from 1861 to 1905 by almost 1/3), its amount (62%) exceeded the amount of land owned by any other class in the province.

An interesting fact is that although the land ownership of the nobles decreased significantly, this had almost no effect on the structure of land holdings. As in the middle of the 19th century. in 1905, the largest amount of land was concentrated in the hands of large landed nobles, almost 75%, the number of which continued to remain at about 14% of the total number of noble landowners. The small nobility, although numerically dominant, had at its disposal a smaller portion of the land, which affected the development of their farms, which were not much different from the farms of wealthy peasants.

The districts of the province differed significantly in the amount of land owned by the nobles. Thus, at the beginning of the century, the richest landholding of the nobility, the Gorodishchensky district, exceeded the most “non-noble” one, Krasno-Slobodsky, by almost 25 times. At the same time, the decrease in the amount of land had practically no effect on the economic situation of the nobles; this was due to the constant rise in land prices of the post-reform period. By the beginning of the 20th century. land prices increased almost fivefold, while its quantity decreased only by 40%, in many ways, which is why the Penza nobility, as well as the nobility of Russia as a whole, even benefited financially.

In the first post-reform years, landowners experienced an acute need for money, so the establishment of a land loan system was of great importance for the development of the noble economy of the province during this period. About a third of Penza noble landowners used the services of those who launched their activities here in the 1870s. non-state land banks and mutual guarantee societies, which were very popular and received huge profits from this. However, the nobles of the province received loans on conditions that were not the most favorable for themselves, which negatively affected their already unstable financial situation. All this led to the fact that in the mid-1880s. almost half of all land owned by the nobles of the province was pledged in land banks.

The way out of this situation was the creation of a state mortgage loan represented by the Noble Bank, which provided loans to nobles on preferential terms, which began vigorous activity in the province at the end of 1885. The mortgage loan was much more profitable than a private one; in case of non-payment of the debt, landowners could apply for various delays, deferments and re-pledges. Thanks to this, by the beginning of the 20th century. Almost half of the noble landowners of the province took advantage of loans issued by the Noble Bank, but, despite all the charity of the loan, a significant part of the borrowers were never able to pay off their debts; their estates were sold at auction or remained at the disposal of the bank.

In agricultural production for the landowners of the province in post-reform times, the most important task that arose as a result of the loss of free labor was the problem of increasing the marketability of their farm.

During this period, the most common farming system remained three-field, which corresponded to the primitive level of agricultural technology on estates; however, in some of the most capitalized farms there was a gradual transition from three-field to multi-field.

In the post-reform period, agricultural machines began to be used on the estates of large noble landowners, but their number was small, and their use was not always profitable.

The goal of increasing marketability was also to increase yields by introducing organic and mineral fertilizers to the fields. But in most farms this has not become widespread due to the underdevelopment of livestock farming, in the case of organic fertilizers, and the high cost of delivery, in the case of mineral fertilizers.

Therefore, in the Penza province, the most reliable and widespread way to increase marketability was to increase the sown area.

Availability almost everywhere fertile soil contributed to the development of commercial cultivation of bread on landowners' farms, mainly winter rye and oats. But low prices for bread and, as a result, the unprofitability of running your own farm led in the second half of the 19th century. to the reduction of the noble farmers' own arable land, and only by the end of the century, thanks to changed market conditions, this decline was stopped.

Other branches of field farming, such as growing seeds, vegetables, orchards, with some exceptions, have not received much development.

Livestock farming on the farms of the majority of nobles did not become significantly widespread in the province. Traditionally, greater attention paid to agricultural production had a negative impact on the development of livestock farming; there was a lack of pastures and hayfields. The development of such livestock sectors as cattle breeding, pig farming and poultry farming was associated primarily with home consumption, while commercial livestock farming was developed only in some large farms.

Among noble livestock breeding, sheep breeding, which was a very profitable industry, became most widespread, along with horse breeding, which was traditionally developed in the Penza province. And although the peasant reform had a negative impact on its development, this area of ​​the noble economy relatively quickly overcame the decline and subsequently continued to actively develop. Many large economies had flocks of thousands of Merino sheep, as well as other valuable breeds of sheep, which provided significant profits. Horse breeding was practically not affected at all by the crisis that befell most noble households in the post-reform period. This industry, largely thanks to the high purchase prices specifically set by the government, developed dynamically throughout the entire period under study. At the noble stud farms, stallions, trotters, English racing horses, mixed breeds and, less commonly, heavy draft horses were bred.

Changes that occurred in society as a result of the reforms of the 1860s -1870s. had a strong impact on the development of noble entrepreneurship. The transition to civilian labor led to the virtual destruction of some types of noble industry in the province; industries such as sugar and cloth gradually lost their importance.

The position of the nobles in distilling also weakened, although this type of business continued to be one of the most widespread among the nobles of the province; the loss, as a result of the reform, of the monopoly in this industry forced many owners to rent out factories or even sell them to other segments of the population. For the most part, bearing traces of the long rule of serfdom, which was reflected in the organization of production, noble enterprises were inferior to similar enterprises of other segments of the population and often survived only thanks to the favor of the government.

Nevertheless, in many, mainly large farms, industrial entrepreneurship has become widespread. It was connected mainly with the processing of agricultural products, and less often, with the use of resources located on the estates. One of the characteristic features characteristic of large noble farms in the province was their versatility. The owners of such estates were engaged in almost everything that could bring profit.

Thus, the agrarian evolution of noble households in the Penza province occurred at different rates. The increased economic stratification within the ruling class led to the fact that among the small and middle-class nobility of the province, the restructuring of farms on a capitalist basis was greatly delayed, only some of them by the beginning of the 20th century. had capitalist features, most of them, in terms of the development of their agriculture, more closely resembled large peasant farms.

A different situation arose among the large landed nobility, who, thanks to their enormous land ownership, were less susceptible to the crisis phenomena of the post-reform period and were able to obtain sufficient capital to rebuild their farms. In this regard, by the beginning of the 20th century. their estates turned into technically equipped large capitalist economies, based on free labor and with market-oriented production.

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Historical Sciences Fedoseev, Roman Vasilievich, 2007

1. Archival documents.

2. State Archive of the Penza Region (GAPO)

3. F. 5. Office of the Penza Governor. Op. 1. D. 7012. F. 14. Penza branch of the Noble Bank. Op. 1. D. 245, 1641 a, 1644. F. 196. Penza provincial noble deputy assembly. Op. 1. D. 1575,1759, 1828, 2000 a, 2434.

4. F. 210. Nikolo-Pestrovskaya patrimonial office of the princes Bakhmetyev and Obolensky. Op. 1. D. 118.

5. F. 374. Penza department of the Russian beekeeping society. Op. 1. D. 2. F. 461. Vladykins. Op. 1. D. 11. F. 462. Vilyegorsky. Op. 1. D. 13.

6. Central State Archive of the Republic of Mordovia (CSA RM)

7. F.17. Saransk City Orphan's Court. Op. 1. D. 121.

8. F. 21. Saransk district police department. Op. 1. D. 5, 8,14, 34.

9. F. 29. Saransk district leader of the nobility. Op. 1. D. 31.

10. F. 34. Saransk office of district police officers. Op. 1. D. 19.

11. F. 46. Krasnoslobodskaya district zemstvo government. Op. 1. D. 3.

12. F. 56. Saransk district zemstvo government. Op. 1. D. 2.

13. Statistical collections and materials.

14. Address calendar and memorial book of the Penza province. Penza: type. lips gov., 1884 - 96 p.

15. Weinberg L. B. Materials on the history of Penza and neighboring provinces. / L. B. Weinberg. Penza: lips. type. 1889. - 27 p.

16. Movement of land ownership of hereditary nobles from 1861 to 1897. Appendix to the report of the State Noble Land Bank for 1896. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Central Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1898. - 73 p.

17. Noble land bank. Tables for the report of the State Noble Land Bank. SPb.: type. lips stat. someone, b. g. 390s.

18. Documents and materials on the history of the Mordovian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic In 4 volumes. Saransk: MNIYALI, 1939 - 1940 - T. I. - 434 e.; T.I. - 350 units; T. III. - Part I. -340 p.

19. Report of the Highest approved Commission to study the current situation of agriculture and rural productivity in Russia. SPb.: type. lips stat. com, 1873. - 34 p.

20. Report of the Provincial Marshal of the Nobility D. Gevlich, on the state of noble land ownership in the Penza province by 1902. Penza, B. izdat, b. g. - 3 s.

21. Estates accepted as collateral by the State Noble Land Bank for 1892. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Central Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1894. Issue. III. - 146 p.

22. Materials for the geography and statistics of Russia, collected by officers of the General Staff. Penza province. Compiled by Steel, edited by A. Ryabinin. SPb.: type. dep. Gene. pcs., 1867. - 589 p.

23. Materials for studying the current situation of land ownership and agricultural industry in Russia. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1880.-316 p.

24. Materials for the history of the city of Penza (Note from the archives of the provincial government). Penza: lips. typ., 1888. - 8 p.

25. Materials on the history of agriculture of the USSR. M.: 1952. - 630 p.

26. Materials on the history of agriculture and peasantry. M.: 1980. -276 p.

27. Materials on statistics of land ownership movements in Russia. Vol. XVII. Purchase and sale of land in European Russia in 1902. St. Petersburg: type. M.P.S., 1909.-68 p.

28. Materials on statistics of land ownership movements in Russia. Vol. XXI. Purchase and sale of land in European Russia in 1906. St. Petersburg: type. M.P.S., 1912.-73 p.

29. Materials on statistics of land ownership movements in Russia. Issue XXII. Purchase and sale of land in European Russia in 1907. St. Petersburg: type. M.P.S., 1913.-80 p.

30. Review of the Penza province for 1872. Appendix to the most humble report of the Penza Governors. Penza: type. provincial government, 1873.

31. Review of the Penza province for 1902. Appendix to the most humble report of the Penza Governors. Penza: type. provincial government, 1903.

32. Memorial book of the Penza province for 1864. Penza: Type. Penza provincial government, 1864. - 206 p.

33. Memorable book of the Penza province for 1868-1869. Penza: Type. Penza provincial government, 1869.-371 p.

34. Memorable book of the Penza province for 1870. Penza: Type. Penza provincial government, 1871. - 176 p.

35. The first general census of the Russian Empire. 1897 T. XXX. Penza province. Ed. N. A. Troinitsky St. Petersburg: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, - 1903.

36. Land ownership of European Russia 1877-1878. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1898.-322 p.

37. Collection of historical, geographical and statistical data on the Penza province for 1869. Penza: Penza Provincial Statistical Committee, 1870. - 75 p.

38. Collection of information on Russia. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1890. - 270 p.

39. Collection of data on the purchase and sale of lands in 45 provinces of European Russia for the thirty years of 1863-1892. - b. m., b. g. - 135 p.

40. Compendium of data on the factory industry in Russia for 1893 - St. Petersburg: type. V. Kirshbaum, 1896. 68 p.

41. Compendium of data on the factory industry in Russia for 1897 - St. Petersburg: type. V. Kirshbaum, 1900. 192 p.

42. Code of laws of the Russian Empire: Laws on states. St. Petersburg: 1899. T. IX.

43. Lists of noble families included in the genealogical books of the Penza province by 1902. Penza: type. lips ed., 1901. - 32 p.

44. Lists of populated places of the Russian Empire. According to information from 1864. -T. XXX. Penza province. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1869. - 119 p.

45. Lists of hereditary nobles who owned populated estates in the Penza province in 1785 and noble landowners as of January 1, 1902 - Penza: type. lips ed., 1902. - 116 p.

46. ​​Reference book of the Penza province for 1893. Penza: 1893. -160 p.

47. Reference book on the Penza province for 1894. Penza: 1894. -88 p.

48. Land tenure statistics 1905. Vol. 22. Penza province. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1906. 52 p.

49. Statistical temporary book of the Russian Empire. Series III. Vol. 5. Reduced redemption payment. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1886. - 128 p. Statistical timebook of the Russian Empire. Series III. Vol. 8. - St. Petersburg: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1885.-294 p.

50. Statistical temporary book of the Russian Empire. Series III. Vol. 10. Land ownership of European Russia 1877 1878 - St. Petersburg: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1886.-147 p.

51. Statistical temporary book of the Russian Empire. Series III. Vol. I.-SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1886. -544 p.

52. Statistical collection of information on land credit in Russia. T. II. - St. Petersburg: type. stat. com, 1891. 437 p.

53. Statistical collection of information on land credit in Russia. T. III. - St. Petersburg: type. stat. com, 1893. 502 p.

54. Proceedings of local committees on the needs of the agricultural industry. T. XXIX. Penza province. St. Petersburg: printing house of V. Kirshbaum, 1903.-232 p.

55. Economic statistical data on estates mortgaged to the Mutual Land Loan Society from 1863 to 1880. SPb.: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1880.-498 p.

56. Digital data on land ownership in European Russia. - St. Petersburg: ed. CSK Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1897. 47 p.

57. Articles, monographs, studies.

58. Abaza, M.A. Why did the local nobility become bankrupt and impoverished and is it possible to raise it and revive it? / M. A. Abaza. SPb.: type. A. Rabinovich and TsKrayz, 1896-16 p.

59. Abramov, V.K. Mordovian people (1897 1939) / V.K. Abramov. - Saransk: publishing house, Mordov. University, 1996. - 412 p.

60. Aliev, E. G. On the history of the grain market in Russia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. / E. G. Aliev // Economic history of Russia: problems, searches, solutions. - Vol. 9. - M., Volgograd: 2001.

61. Ananich, B. N. Great reforms in Russia: 1856 1877. / B. N. Anan-ich // Questions of history. - 1996. -No. 10.

62. Antonova, S. I. Materials of legislation of the period of capitalism as a historical source. / S. I. Antonova. M.: ed. Moscow University, 1976. - 49 p.

63. Anfimov, A. M. Land lease in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. / A. M. Anfimov. M.: Nauka, 1961. - 208 p.

64. Anfimov A. M. Large landowner economy of European Russia (late XIX - early XX centuries) / A. M. Anfimov. - M.: Nauka, 1969. - 394 p.

65. Anfimov, A. M. Lenin and the problems of agrarian capitalism / A. M. An-fimov // History of the USSR. 1969. - No. 4.

66. Anfimov, A. M. Some issues of the organization and economics of large landowners in Russia (Late XIX - early XX century) / A. M. Anfimov.-M.: Nauka, 1966.-238 p.

67. Anfimov, A. M. The Prussian path of development of capitalism in agriculture and its features in Russia / A. M. Anfimov // Questions of history. -1963.-No. 2.

68. Arsentiev, V.M. Theory and practice of economic zoning of the Middle Volga region / V.M. Arsentiev, O.I. Mariskin // Regionalology. -2004.-No. 2.

69. Arsentiev, N. M. State participation in the organization of social assistance to the peasantry at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. / N. M. Arsentiev, T. V. Eferina // Regional and global: historical and humanitarian aspect. - Saransk: Mordov publishing house. University, 2004.

70. Bazhanov, A. Experiments in farming with civilian labor / A. Bazhanov. -SPb.: ed. Derviena, 1861. 192 p.

71. Baratynsky, H. E. From the province (On the situation of noble estates) - St. Petersburg: type. Mesnick and Riemann, 1887. 97 p.

72. Baratynsky, N. E. Indivisible noble plots / N. E. Baratynsky // Russian Bulletin. -1888. -No. 5.

73. Barinova, E. P. The mentality of the Russian local nobleman / E. P. Barinova // Bulletin of Samara State University (humanitarian issue). 2001. - No. 1 (19).

74. Becker, S. The myth of the Russian nobility: Nobility and privileges of the last period of imperial Russia / S. Becker. / Translation from English by Boris Pinksner. M.: New Literary Review. 2004. - 344 p.

75. Belozertsev, A.G. Grain farming in Russia (1865-1997): historical and economic essay / A.G. Belozertsev. M.: 1999. - 224 p.

76. Bibin, M. A. Nobility on the eve of the fall of tsarism in Russia / M. A. Bibin. Saransk: Saransk Cooperative Institute, 2000. - 267 p.

77. Blosfeldt, G. Collection of laws on the nobility / G. Blosfeldt. St. Petersburg: B. publishing house, 1901.-467 p.

78. Blossfeldt, G. Russian nobility. Legalizations and clarifications / G. Blosfeldt. SPb.: Public benefit. 1910. - 60 p.

79. Borisova, V. D. Essays on the history of entrepreneurship in Russia. / V. D. Borisova, N. V. Baranova. Penza: PGPU, 1997. - 78 p.

80. Borovoy, S. Ya. Credit and banks of Russia / S. Ya. Borovoy. M.: Gosfinizdat, 1958.-288 p.

81. Borodin, A.P. United nobility and agrarian reform / A.P. Borodin // Questions of history. 1993. - No. 9.

82. Borodin, A. P. The relationship between the capitalist and mining systems in the landowners’ estates of the Black Earth Center in the 60-80s of the 19th century (Based on materials from zemstvo statistics) / A. P. Borodin // History of the USSR. -1990.-No. 2.

83. Bokhanov, A. N. The big bourgeoisie of Russia (late XIX 1914) / A. N. Bokhanov. - M.: 1992. - 260 p.

84. Buganov, V.I. Russian nobility / V.I. Buganov // Questions of history.-1994. -No. 1.S. 29-41.

85. Burmistrova, N. Agriculture of the Penza province / N. Burmistrova // Education. 1926. - No. 8/9.

86. Busygin, E. P. Russian rural population of the Middle Volga region. Historical-ethnographic study of material and spiritual culture (mid-19th - early 20th century) / E. P. Busygin. - Kazan: ed. Kazan, Univ., 1966.-246 p.

87. Bystrenin, V.P. Letters from a Penza village / V.P. Bystrenin // Zemstvo. 1994.-№4.

88. Varb, E. The question of hired workers in agriculture / E. Varb // Russian Thought, 1897. Book. X.

89. Vasilchikov, A. I. Land ownership and agriculture in Russia and other European states. T. 2. / A. I. Vasilchikov. - St. Petersburg: Type. M. M. Stasyulevich, 1876.- 163 p.

90. Bulletin of finance of industry and trade. 1886. No. 2, No. 15, No. 31.

91. The influence of harvests and grain prices on some aspects of the Russian national economy. St. Petersburg: B. publishing house, 1897. - 94 p.

92. Vodarsky, Ya. E. Population of Russia over 400 years (XVI early XX centuries) / Ya. E. Vodarsky. - M.: Education, 1973. - 159 p.

93. Vorontsov, V.V. The fate of capitalism in Russia / V.V. Vorontsov. St. Petersburg: B. publishing house, 1882.-312 p.

94. Gaister, A. Agriculture of capitalist Russia. From the reform of 1861 to the reform of 1905 / A. Gaister. M.: 1928. - 175 p.

95. Gindin, I. F. Requirements of the nobility and financial and economic policy of the tsarist government in 1880-1890. / I. F. Gindin, M. Ya. Gefter // Historical archive. - 1957. - No. 4. P. 122 - 155.

96. Golovanova, A. Issues of state economy / A. Golovachova. -SPb.: 1873.- 177 p.

97. Golubem, A. K. Information on loans issued by land credit institutions / A. K. Goluben. St. Petersburg: B. publishing house, 1880. - 24 p.

98. Gopchprsnko, L. N. Labor market in the Volga region in the second half of the 19th century: formation and functioning / L. N. Goncharenko // Volga region in the system of the all-Russian market: history and modernity: Materials of a scientific conference. Cheboksary: ​​2000.

99. Goryushkip, M. L. Development of capitalism in breadth and the nature of agrarian-economic evolution in Russia during the period of imperialism / M. L. Goryushkin // History of the USSR. 1974. - No. 2. P. 49 - 70.

100. Goshulyak, V.V. History of the Penza region: In 5 books. / V.V. Goshulyak-Kn. 1. Penza: Penza Pravda, 1995. - 145 e.; Book 2. - Penza: typ. regional information and rental center, 1996. - 133 p.

101. Gurevich, N. Economic situation of the Russian village / N. Gurevich. -M.: Type. N. I. Skorokhodova, 1896. 290 p.

102. Danilov, G. G. From the history of agriculture in Mordovia / G. G. Danilov. Saransk: Mordovian book publishing house, 1964. - 112 p.

103. Noble and merchant rural estate in Russia in the 16th and 20th centuries: Historical essays. - M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. - 784 p.

104. Janshisv, G. A. The era of great reforms. / G. A. Dzhanshiev. St. Petersburg: Rassvet, 1892.-855 p.

105. Demina, G.V. The world of a noble estate as a mirror of the life of society / G.V. Demina // Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 8. History. M.: 1996.- No. 6.

106. Druzhinin, I. M. The influence of peasant reforms on the economy of the Russian village / N. M. Druzhinin // History of the USSR. 1975. -No. 5. P. 22 - 41.

107. Druzhinin, N. M. Liquidation of the feudal system in the Russian landowner village (1862-1882) / N. M. Druzhinin // Questions of history. -1968,-No. 2.

108. Druzhinin, N. M. Landowner farming after the reform of 1861 / N. M. Druzhinin // Historical notes. T. 89. M.: Nauka, 1972. -408 p.

109. Druzhinin, N. M. Russian village at a turning point. 1861 1880 / N. M. Druzhinin. - M.: Nauka, 1978. - 287 p.

110. Druzhinin, N. M. Socio-economic history of Russia: Selected works / N. M. Druzhinin. M.: Nauka, 1987. - 424 p.

111. Dubovntsky, D.I. Reasons for the decline of our agriculture and means for raising it. / D. I. Dubovitsky // Penza Provincial Gazette. 1893.-№5/6, 9.

112. Dubrovsky, S. M. Agriculture and peasantry of Russia during the period of imperialism / S. M. Dubrovsky. M.: Nauka, 1975. - 398 p.

113. Dyakin, V. S. Money for agriculture in 1892 1914. Agricultural credit in the economic policy of tsarism / V. S. Dyakin. - St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 1997. - 365 p.

114. Eroshkin, N. P. History of state institutions of pre-revolutionary Russia / N. P. Eroshkin. M.: Higher. school, 1983. - 352 p.

115. Efimov, I. A. Agrarian system of the Volga region on the eve of 1917. / I. A. Efimov. Saransk: Moscow State University, 1989. - 61 p.

116. Zayonchkovsky, P. A. Russian autocracy at the end of the 19th century / P. A. Zayonchkovsky. M.: Mysl, 1970. - 444 p.

117. Zverev, V.V. Capitalism and post-reform development of the Russian village (1870s, early 1890s of the 19th century) / V.V. Zverev. - M.: Prometheus, 1999. -613 p.

118. Zverev, V.V. Capitalism and post-reform development of the Russian village / V.V. Zverev // Domestic history. 1998. - No. 1.

119. Ivanova, N. A. Class structure of Russia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. / N. A. Ivanova, V. P. Zheltova. - M.: Nauka, 2004. - 574 p.

120. Ivanyukov, I. I. The fall of serfdom in Russia. / I. I. Ivanyukov. SPb.: Type. N. F. Panteleeva, 1903. - 216 p.

121. Historiography of the agrarian history of pre-revolutionary Russia. / answer Ed. G. P. Zhidkov. Kaliningrad: KSU, 1982. - 149 p.

122. Historiography and sources on the agrarian history of the Middle Volga region. -Saransk: Mordovian book publishing house, 1981.-368 p.

123. History of the Mordovian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic: in 2 volumes. Saransk: Mordovizdat, 1979. T. 1 -319 p.

124. History of Mordovia: from the era of great reforms to the great Russian revolution. Under. Ed. N. M. Arsentieva, V. A. Yurchenkova. Saransk: Mordov Publishing House. University, 2005. - 412 p.

125. History of the Penza region. Saratov: Privolzhsk. Book publishing house, 1977. -103 p.

126. History of the Penza region from the second half of the 19th century to the present day. / Ed. A. S. Kasimova. Penza: 2000.

127. Kabytov, P. S. Agrarian relations in the Volga region during the period of imperialism (1900-1917) / P. S. Kabytov. - Saratov: ed. Saratov University, 1982.- 199 p.

128. Kabytova, E. P. The crisis of the Russian nobility. / E. P. Kabytova. Samara: ed. Myself. State University, 1997. - 143 p.

129. Karnaukhova, E. S. Distribution of Russian agriculture during the period of capitalism (1860-1914). / E. S. Karnaukhova. M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1951.-216 p.

130. Kashkarov, I. D. Noble affairs. / I. D. Kashkarov. M.: type. Petersburg gas., 1888.- 191 p.

131. Kashkarov, I. D. Modern purpose of the Russian nobleman. / I. D. Kashkarov. M.: Type. M. N. Lavrova, 1885. - 15 p.

132. Klein, N. L. Small industry of the Middle Volga region in the late XIX - early XX centuries. / N. L. Klein // Questions of the history of capitalist Russia. - Sverdlovsk: 1972. pp. 346 - 363.

133. Klein, N. L. Economic development of the Volga region at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. On the question of the prerequisites for the bourgeois-democratic revolution in Russia / N. L. Klein. - Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House, 1981. - 199 p.

134. Kovalchenko, I. D. Agrarian typology of the provinces of European Russia at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. / I. D. Kovalchenko, L. M. Borodkin // History of the USSR.-1973.-No. 2.

135. Kovalchenko, I. D. Agricultural market and the nature of the agrarian system of capitalist Russia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. / I. D. Kovalchenko // History of the USSR. - 1973. - No. 2. - P. 42 - 74.

136. Kovalchenko, I. D. Agrarian system of Russia in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. / I. D. Kovalchenko. M.: 2004. - 503 p.

137. Kovalchenko, I. D. All-Russian agricultural market of the 18th and early 20th centuries. Experience in quantitative analysis. / I. D. Kovalchenko, L. V. Milov - M.: Nauka, 1974.-415 p.

138. Kovalchenko, I.D. Lenin on the nature of the agrarian system of capitalist Russia / I.D. Kovalchenko // Questions of the history of the USSR. -1973. No. 3.

139. Kovalchenko, I. D. The relationship between peasant and landowner farming in agricultural production in capitalist Russia / I. D. Kovalchenko // Problems of the socio-economic history of the USSR. M.: Nauka, 1971.-S. 171 - 194.

140. Kovalchenko, I. D. Socio-economic structure of the landowner economy of European Russia in the era of capitalism. Sources and methods of study. / I. D. Kovalchenko, N. B. Selunskaya, B. M. Litvakov M.: Nauka, 1982.-264 p.

141. Horse breeding in the Penza province. // Penza Provincial Gazette. -1873.-No. 24.

142. Konovalov, M. M. Agricultural areas of the Penza Province / M. M. Konovalov // Nature and economy of the Penza region. No. 2/3.

143. Korelin, A.P. Nobility in post-reform Russia (1861-1904) / A.P. Korelin // Historical notes. T. 87. - M.: Nauka, 1971. - 408 p.

144. Korelin, A.P. Nobility in post-reform Russia 1861-1904. Composition, number, corporate organizations. / A. P. Korelin. - M.: Nauka, 1979.-304 p.

145. Korelin, A. P. Nobility and commercial and industrial entrepreneurship in post-reform Russia / A. P. Korelin // Historical notes. T. 102.- M.: Nauka, 1978.-367 p.

146. Korelin, A.P. Institute of Leaders of the Nobility. On the social and political position of the nobles / A. P. Korelin // History of the USSR. 1978. No. 3.

147. Korelin, A.P. Russian nobility and its class organization (1861 1904) / A.P. Korelin // History of the USSR. 1971. -No. 5.

148. Korelin, A.P. Agricultural credit in Russia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. / A. P. Korelin. M.: Nauka, 1988. - 259 p.

149. Kotkov, K. A. Development of capitalism in Mordovia after the abolition of serfdom / K. A. Kotkov, I. M. Korsakov // Notes of the MNIYALIE. 1955. -No. 17.

150. Laverychev, V. Ya. The big bourgeoisie in post-reform Russia. 1861 - 1900 / V. Ya. Laverychev. M.: Mysl, 1974. - 252 p.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). Therefore, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

The industrial foundation of Penza was laid by small artisans. At the end of the 17th century, leather production became widespread in Penza, when the first leather craftsmen appeared in the city to make bags, bridles, saddles, and belts. These products were necessary for mounted and foot Cossacks, riders, and gunners who served the sovereign on the southeastern borders of the Russian state.

An 18th-century document, noting the sectoral limitations of industrial and handicraft production in Penza, emphasizes: “The main trades and crafts consist of maintaining soap and tanneries... Soap and leather made in these establishments... are sent when the rivers open with spring water. ...These factories receive lard from the city of Orenburg through the purchase of Kyrgyz sheep, and everything else - ash and everything needed - is bought in the local and Saratov provinces from ordinary people; They take it to St. Petersburg, Moscow, Tula and other cities.”

A prominent Penza manufacturer was the merchant of the 1st guild M.P. Ochkin, who built a linen factory with 25 machines at the end of the 18th century. It employed over 80 civilian workers, including 7 shearers, 26 spinners, and 2 slingers. The factory produced up to 800 pieces of linen per year, which were sold in St. Petersburg.

In 1785, merchant D.V. Kazitsyn created a soap factory, which was equipped with 3 boilers for making soap, 1 boiler for burning lard, and 8 vats. The plant employed 15 people, producing up to 4 thousand pounds of soap annually.

Kupets I.A. Rodionov, awarded the honorary title of “eminent citizen,” in 1797 built a tile factory in Penza for the production of wall tiles with and without irrigation.

Tanneries also belonged to merchants. In 1795 A.F. Ochkin founded a tannery that produced products worth 922 rubles. Plant D.V. Kazitsyna was opened in 1798 and equipped with 12 vats for processing leather, of which up to 2 thousand units were produced per year.

The largest tannery in the 18th century belonged to E.F. Shulgin - his annual production exceeded 5 thousand leathers. 10 vats of the Shulginovsky plant were served by 15 workers.

In the 17th century, due to the intensive construction of brick buildings and structures, brick establishments were created in Penza, although the residents of Pedestrian Street Berezovka were engaged in manual molding of bricks. In the first quarter of the 19th century, the main suppliers of bricks were the merchant factories of I.I. Kalashnikov in the Prolomny ravine area and P.A. Pokholkova behind the Bogolyubskaya Church.

In the first half of the 19th century, the industry of Penza received further development in the creation of new industries and in increasing production volumes. On Starodragunskaya Street, merchant I.I. In 1824, Kalashnikov opened a tannery, which produced up to 5 thousand leathers.

Second tannery of merchant D.S. Kuznetsov was opened near the Red (now Bakuninsky) Bridge.

Plant M.Ya. and I.Ya. Neudachnykh was located in stone buildings.

At the tannery P.P. Kadomtsev had 6 vats and 2 boilers; in 1827, 1 thousand 525 leathers were produced.

In the upper part of the city there was a tannery of the tradesman P.I. Kasatkina.

At the beginning of the 19th century, soap production was maintained and developed in Penza. In 1800, merchant A.I. Sergeev built a factory with an annual productivity of up to 1 thousand poods of soap and a net profit of up to 14 thousand rubles.

At the soap factory I.E. Chembarov in 1838 had only one boiler for making soap; later he installed a second boiler and mastered the production of tallow candles.

Kupets I.I. The Reich, on the banks of the Penza River, on pasture land, had a soap factory, which in 1827 produced 970 pounds of the best soap, in 1831 - 2 thousand pounds. Later this plant became the property of the Kulakhmetovs.

At the N.D. plant Kazitsyn there were 6 vats in operation, in 1829 2 thousand 490 pounds of soap were produced; plant E.F. Chernyshov produced 2.1 thousand pounds.

At the salotopne I.T. Babynin employed two workers, who in 1829 produced 500 pounds of lard. Salotope establishment L.P. Potekhin produced 1 thousand pounds in 1829, and E.A. Kleshchova - 400 poods. Salotope plant M.A. Tyurina annually produced up to 1.5 thousand pounds of raw materials for soap factories. Thanks to the presence of salotopic enterprises in Penza, candle factories were also created. Plant V.P. Kazitsyn in 1813 issued 1 thousand pounds of candles to consumers, M.A. factories. Kshindin and N.A. Kalashnikov - 550 each, P.A. Pokholkova - 500 poods.

There was brewing and vodka production in Penza. Brewery A.I. Sergeev was located in two wooden buildings near the Erik River.

At the brewery of the merchant of the 1st guild V.I. Serebrennikov installed 10 vats, 4 kvass, 4 boilers; in 1815, 8.4 thousand buckets of beer were brewed on it, in 1817 - 8 thousand 350.

At the factory of merchant V.A. Kadomtsev in 1826 received 1 thousand 512 buckets.

Vodka factory V.I. Serebrennikov in 1827 passed to the chamber cadet L.O. Poniatovsky, merchant of the 1st guild M.A. Kramarev and commercial advisor I.Yu. Hazelnuts. In 1815, this plant produced 4 thousand 150 buckets of alcohol, in 1827 - 226 buckets.

In Penza there was a tobacco factory K.O. Shill, on which 8 workers serviced two machines.

In the first half of the 19th century, P.V. entered the business arena. Sergeev. He started his business with a flour mill, which by the 1860s employed 120 people, operated 50 units (34 grain mills and 16 grinders), and up to 400 thousand pounds of grain were ground per year.

Pilnya P.V. Sergeeva sawed up to 1 thousand logs per year into 2 frames and 12 workplaces. In 1850 P.V. Sergeev organized a stationery factory, which in the second half of the 19th century took a leading position in the industrial production of Penza. By 1870, it employed 1 thousand people. Production at the factory increased from 113 thousand pounds in 1887 to 280 thousand pounds in 1913. Sergeevskaya paper was awarded gold medals at the All-Russian exhibitions in 1882 and 1886; it received the same honorary awards at the international exhibitions of 1885 in Antwerp and in Paris in 1900 and 1908.

In the first half of the 19th century, there were metalworking enterprises in Penza. The first iron smelting plant of bourgeois A.N. Otrakova was already operating in 1830; later it became the property of A.P. Lamberga. The plant produced threshing machines and other equipment.

In the pre-reform period in Penza, the merchant F.A. Privalov created a bell factory, housed in two wooden buildings. Copper, tin, and iron were used to make bells. Annual production was 2 thousand poods. Owned by F.A. Privalov there was also an iron smelting plant that produced self-propelled guns and threshing machines.

In the second half of the 19th century, larger enterprises appeared in Penza, especially for wool processing and cloth production. In 1856, merchant of the 1st guild P.G. Beloyartsev created a cloth factory with 60 mills, which annually processed from 4 to 5 thousand pounds of raw materials.

The factory produced army and yellow cloth, in 1865 its production amounted to 18.3 thousand rubles, in 1866 - 5.1 thousand rubles, in 1867 - 72 thousand rubles.

In 1857, hereditary honorary citizen I.V. Bryushkov founded a cloth factory for the production of Slön cloth, drapes, and cloth from Russian wool for the army. The factories of Beloyartsev and Bryushkov produced up to 160 thousand arshins of coarse cloth and drape.

Cloth factory of the merchant of the 1st guild F.I. Finogeeva had 4 Belgian units that served 260 workers. In 1868, the Finogeevsk factory produced 55 thousand arshins of army cloth and 25 thousand of camel cloth.

The merchant of the 2nd guild I.F. owned a cloth factory with 19 machines. Kakushkin, in 1869 it produced 2.6 thousand arshins of army cloth and 12 thousand of camel cloth.

In the second half of the 19th century, quantitative changes occurred in the leather industry. At merchant factories I.P. Makarova, I.N. Meshcheryakova, D.I. Meshcheryakova, I.I. Pentyukova, N.F. Kartashov employed from 7 to 12 workers. Annual production at the D.I. Meshcheryakov amounted to 1.5 thousand products, I.I. Pentyukova - 2 thousand products, I.N. Meshcheryakov - 1 thousand 150 products.

Soap production was in the hands of I.E. Chembarova, V.M. Pavlova, I.E. Kleshchova.

In the 1880s, Tatar entrepreneurs A.Kh. and M.H. The Kulakhmetovs created a chemical laboratory (perfume factory), which produced perfume, cologne, eau de toilette and toilet soap, and lipstick. Raw materials for their production were brought from France, Moscow, and St. Petersburg.

Wax production was concentrated in the hands of merchants of the 2nd guild I.T. and K.T. Yuganovs, whose annual production at their factories exceeded 1 thousand pounds.

To replace the tobacco factory K.O. Shill has received a new production from A.P. Ochkin, the Z.K. phosphor match plant appeared. Bogdanov, producing more than 2 thousand boxes.

During these same years, there was a further rise in brewing and vodka production. Breweries P.V. Kazitsyna. I.A. Kononova, N.K. Kleshchov produced beer and honey.

In the second half of the 19th century in Penza there were 7 vodka factories I.P. Ocheva, O.A. Rakovskaya, I.F. Ulanova, A.T. Rusanova, S.P. Popova, V.I. Serebrennikova, A.S. Marshevoy, E.F. Meyergold, I.A. Kononova.

In 1863, the factory of the merchant of the 2nd guild E.F. was founded. Meyergold, which in 1864 produced 10 thousand buckets of liqueurs, liqueurs, and rum. At the factory I.P. Ochev in 1868 produced 5 thousand buckets of liqueurs, sweet vodka, balms, rowan, cherry, robin; at the I.A. plant Kononov - 2 thousand 495 buckets of vodka, balms, liqueurs, rums.

In Penza there was a large flour milling business. The mills of V.V. were engaged in grinding grain. Kadomtseva - up to 3 thousand poods, M.I. Toluzakova - up to 44 thousand poods, N.N. Kornepolova - 180 thousand poods, P.S. Sidelnikov - 14 thousand poods.

In the post-reform period, a sugar industry developed in Penza.

In 1865, engineers F.I. and E.I. Gerke founded a sugar refinery, which was housed in a four-story brick building. In 1872, 50 thousand pounds of sugar were produced worth 400 thousand rubles. At the end of the 1870s, the plant became the property of the commercial and industrial partnership P.V. Sergeev and Count I.A. Apraksina. In 1879, there was a fire at the plant, which brought huge losses to entrepreneurs and increased sugar prices. Within 6 months the plant was restored and on December 11, 1879 it was put back into operation. Two new high-performance machines were installed at the plant; annual sugar production reached 340 thousand rubles.

During these years, the metalworking industry developed. In 1858, merchant N.R. Sokolov built an iron smelting plant, which was transferred to A.N.’s daughter in 1866. Sokolova, and then to the merchant of the 1st guild I.M. Lobanov. The plant produced seeders, horse-drawn threshers with permanent and portable drives, gratings, balconies, and stairs. At the international exhibition in Rome in 1903, the products of this plant were awarded a bronze medal, at the All-Russian Exhibition in 1908 - gold and bronze.

At the iron smelting plant of merchant D.I. Davydov, housed in a two-story wooden building, cast production parts and mechanisms for distilleries, cloth factories, and stationery factories: wheels, gears, water pipes.

German subject V.I. In 1868, Kruger founded an iron foundry, the equipment of which included 1 steam engine with a capacity of 15 horsepower, 2 cupola furnaces, 6 forges, and 23 various machines. The plant's products were used in the distillery industry and sawmills.

In the same year, engineer V.A. Krakk put into operation a mechanical plant equipped with a 30 horsepower steam engine. In 1913, the plant employed 156 workers, and annual production was estimated at 88 thousand rubles.

In 1898, Serdob tradesman D.V. Vorontsov founded a new mechanical plant, equipped with an oil engine with a capacity of 17 horsepower. In 1913, over 100 workers worked here. During the First World War, the Krakka and Vorontsov factories produced machine tools for the Penza Pipe Plant and hand grenades 9; in 1916, 56 thousand of them were produced.

On Popovka in 1895, mechanical engineer N.N. Meshcheryakov opened a blacksmith's workshop, which served as a training ground for students of the railway school.

Large-scale construction in Penza created a need for bricks. Therefore, in the early 1870s, merchant N.I. Trunov creates a large brick factory on Ovrazhnaya Street.

By 1912, N.N. had significant brick factories. Meshcheryakov (founded in 1883 on Popovka), D.E. Ivanovsky (founded in 1894 on Popovka).

In 1914, engineer K.K. Tsege founded a steam plant for the production of sand-lime bricks at Sands. In 1914, merchant I.A. Groshev, who had a wholesale warehouse of building materials and brick sheds, together with I.G. Zhuravlev established the commercial and industrial joint-stock company “Brick production and trade in building materials” with an annual production of up to 4 million bricks, which in 1915-1916 were supplied for the construction of a pipe factory in Penza.

In the western part of Penza there was a municipal brick factory, transferred in 1916 to the Black Sea Construction Society.

In 1901, Penza entrepreneurs N.L. Rabinovich, I.M. Mikhailov and hereditary honorary citizen I.A. Baryshev founded the factory of bent Viennese furniture "Ramiba", named after the first syllables of the surnames of its owners. Later, this factory mastered the production of stylish furniture from expensive wood species. In 1916, the factory was sold to aviator V.A. Lebedev, as a result of which she received an aviation orientation. Aviation production here remained until 1923 and resumed in 1935.

By the beginning of the 20th century, 16 large factories and factories operated in Penza, employing 1,792 people. Penza's industrial enterprises included 4 iron foundries (370 workers), 1 paper mill (952 workers), 1 match factory (70 workers), 2 flour mills (57 workers). The Ramiba factory employed 485 people, the Krakka mechanical plant - 156 people, the Vorontsov mechanical plant - 102 people, the Faidsh match factory - 150 people, and the Groshev brick factory - 197 people.

There were also small enterprises whose products had a high level of competitiveness, for example, the products of D.A. Volosov at the international exhibition in Paris in 1909 were awarded the Grand Prix gold medal.

The industry of the provincial Penza over many decades of its development has gone from small semi-handicraft establishments to large enterprises that served as the basis for the further industrial development of our city.

The publication was prepared based on information from open sources and materials from the publication “Penza Encyclopedia”: / Ch. ed. K.D. Vishnevsky. - Penza: Ministry of Culture of the Penza Region, M.: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 2001.

Various aspects of the history of the Sursky region are of interest to young researchers whose “roots” are connected with the Penza region. In the newsletter of the Penza State Museum of Local Lore - "Museum Bulletin" No. 1 (66) of this year, an article was published "Women's entrepreneurship in the Penza province in the 18th - 19th centuries" by a 3rd year student of the Faculty of History of St. Petersburg State University Elena Vladimirovna Voskresenskaya, with whom we We invite our subscribers to meet you.

Women's entrepreneurship in the Penza province inXVIII - XIXcenturies

Penza, built in the 17th century as a defensive fortress, by the following centuries turned into a developed economic center in central Russia and was actively involved in the trade relations of the country's cities. Industry and trade developed in the region, involving ever wider social strata of society in this sphere. Thus, an important subject of entrepreneurship in the Penza region was the phenomenon of women’s entrepreneurship, widespread in Russia since the 17th century.

In the era under review, Russian women, unlike the fairer sex of most European countries, had equal rights with men to own property and engage in commercial activities. This right is legally secured by the statute on direct taxes of the Russian Code of Laws. Women were allowed to freely receive merchant and trade certificates. A woman's inheritance rights also contributed to her participation in entrepreneurial activity, since it was often the death of a spouse or father that encouraged women to do so.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, women made up half of the population of the Penza province. They took part in social life city: in organized balls, gubernatorial receptions, performances, exhibitions and other events in the cultural life of the city, following the latest fashion trends in the capital. Prince I.M. Dolgorukov in his memoirs described the women's society of Penza as follows: “The society of the ladies was quite pleasant, some were sharp, kind and very dexterous. The girls all knew how to dance, dress up, and showed off with taste.”

Entrepreneurial activities in the region were carried out by women of different classes - from noble noblewomen to bourgeois women.

Penza noblewomen sometimes owned and managed not one, but several large enterprises, most often in light industry. Under women's leadership, the cloth industry developed widely: most of the large cloth factories, which annually produced large quantities of cloth, were owned by noble women of Penza in the 18th and 19th centuries. Particularly noteworthy is the activity of the secret adviser Alexandra Yakovlevna Lubyanskaya, whose factory in Golitsyn, Narovchatsky district, according to the report of the Penza Provincial Gazette in 1836, produced 145,000 arshins of processed material.

Glass and beet production confidently developed under female leadership. In 1795, the wife of Penza prosecutor A.M. Beketova built a glass factory in the village of Bogolyubovka, Gorodishchensky district, which produced up to 14,000 units of tableware (damasks, half-damasks, bottles).

In the 19th century, an example of noble entrepreneurship was the diversified, highly profitable Zemetchinsky estate, whose owner O.P. Dolgorukova, using new technologies, managed to achieve the largest indicators in the production of sugar beets. The estate also operated a bone grinding and glue plant, two large mills, a mechanical workshop, a meteorological station, its own railway line, a hospital and a school for the children of workers.

The Nikolsky glass factory, famous throughout Russia, was owned by the widow A.N. until 1884. Bakhmetyev, Countess Anna Petrovna, née Tolstoy (1804-1884).

However, in addition to noblewomen, the bulk of the Penza entrepreneurial class were merchant women and bourgeois women. Women of the merchant class were engaged in entrepreneurship on an equal basis with men. This is told to us by statistical data on the number of merchants in the Penza province and the size of merchant capital, published in the newspaper “Penza Provincial Gazette” for 1838 and 1854. Most of the women merchants in our region belonged to the 2nd and 3rd guilds.

The most common industries among the female half of the Penza merchants and philistines were: light industry, food industry, flour-grinding and foundry. Women of these social classes owned breweries, tanneries, iron smelters, and sawmills.

In the 19th century, most of these not very large enterprises operated for a short time. Among them are: the brewery of the bourgeois Maria Nikolaevna Tatarinova (mentioned from 1813 to 1826), the vodka factory of the merchant Lyubov Sergeevna Marsheva (1870-1875), the tannery of the bourgeois Daria Sukhanova (mentioned from 1816), the tannery of the 3rd merchant's wife guild of Fedosya Denisyevna Kadomtseva (mentioned since 1845), since 1856 we find mention of the tannery of merchant Alexandra Grigorievna Kalashnikova and Saratov merchant of the 1st guild Pelageya Gutkova.

In the Penza province there were also iron smelting factories owned by women. In 1835, an iron smelting plant was founded by bourgeois Alexandra Nikolaevna Otrakovskaya, but in 1848 it was leased by a foreigner. The plant produced threshing machines, equipment for factories, factories, and utensils.

Women of Penza were engaged not only in industrial production. They also engaged in trade, mainly in the second half of the 19th century. So, during this period, merchant Anfisa Ilyinichna Lycheva opened a crockery store, haberdashery goods were sold in N.N.’s stores. Maslova, A.S. Bartemeva.

Women also owned hotels and inns. For example, in the late 1870s, bourgeois Olga Mikheeva Bobyleva opened a hotel in her house, Vera Vasilievna Lisova set up furnished rooms and an inn, not far from which A.I.’s “Commercial Rooms” were also located. Belyaeva.

Some women also took part in the development of banking in Penza. Maria Egorovna Bazderova, the sister of the merchant of the 1st guild and owner of the banking office Fyodor Egorovich Shvetsov, after the death of her brother, continued stock exchange transactions with securities. Bazderova herself was a merchant who traded in colonial goods.

Thus, in the XVIII-XIX centuries. women of the Penza region contributed to the development and establishment of entrepreneurship and the economy of the province.

List of sources and literature used

Sources:

1. Address - calendar and memorial book of the Penza province. Penza, 1884.

2. Dolgorukov I.A. The story of my birth, origin and whole life. St. Petersburg, 2004, T.1

3. Memorial book of the Penza province. Penza region of the 17th century. - 1917: Documents and materials. Saratov, 1980.

4. Penza Provincial Gazette (No. 1 of January 7, 1838. No. of February 25, 1838, No. 4 of February 1, 1854.

In the 19th century, the country's business world changed significantly. The reforms became the reason for the success of representatives of classes that were previously limited in the right to conduct business. This is the time of the rise of the Vtorov, Morozov, Vogau, Ryabushinsky dynasties, the formation of the business of talented engineers N.I. Putilov and N.S. Avdakov, the heyday of other famous families. When implementing their projects, they did not ignore the interests of the state or the needs of the people.

 

The 19th century occupies a special place in the history of Russian entrepreneurship. The state carries out legislative activities, trying to create favorable conditions for economic development. By the end of the century, the system of guilds established in the time of Peter the Great to systematize and regulate business activities, protect the rights of merchants and create class privileges had exhausted itself.

The trade taxation reform in 1898 established the enterprise as the object of taxation, and not the individual entrepreneur, as was previously the case. Increased competition in trade has caused business people to turn to industrial production. Transformations in the field of joint stock business established a limitation of liability and provided the opportunity for representatives of different classes to participate in commercial enterprises.

The changes led to the fact that the business community was replenished with people from peasants, townspeople, nobles, foreigners and employees. Due to large-scale entrepreneurship, by the beginning of the 20th century, about 1.5 million people lived in the country.

The names of famous Russian entrepreneurs of the 19th century are still heard today: representatives of the families are famous for the introduction of progressive technologies, charity, and participation in political life.

Morozovs

Savva Vasilyevich Morozov (1770 - 1860) - the founder of the dynasty - comes from serf peasants in the village of Zuevo, Bogorodsky district, Moscow province. He achieved his success thanks to his personal qualities: hard work and business acumen. Having started working as a weaver in a factory, after getting married, he organized a small production with the help of his dowry, where he himself worked with his wife and sons. Savva sold silk fabrics and openwork ribbons created in the workshop in Moscow. The income allowed the entrepreneur and his family to buy out the landowner in 1820. Savva’s family had five sons: Elisha, Zakhar, Abram, Ivan and Timofey. An entrepreneurial spirit is characteristic of many of Savva’s descendants: the family is considered to consist of several branches, whose representatives became famous in textiles and other fields. In 1842, the Morozovs received hereditary honorary citizenship, which eliminated the restrictions imposed on peasants and urban inhabitants.

Over time, the Morozovs bought land, built new factories for the production of silk, wool and cotton fabrics, introducing modern technologies and mechanisms into production.

The first of Savva Vasilyevich's enterprises grew into the Partnership of the Nikolskaya Manufactory "Savva Morozov's Son and Co.", which was run by the Timofeevich branch - the descendants of his youngest son, and included factories providing paper spinning, weaving, dyeing and printing, finishing, bleaching, pleat cutting production.

The name of the manufactory is associated with the “Morozov strike” of 1885 in the village. Nikolsky. Workers protested against low wages and high fines for violations. The protest was suppressed and some of the participants were arrested by the authorities, but the event had positive consequences for the workers. Under the leadership of Savva Timofeevich, new English equipment was installed, working conditions and living conditions of workers were improved.

The Bogorodsko-Glukhovskaya manufactory company was founded in 1830 and transferred by Savva Vasilyevich to his son Zakhar, who gave birth to the Zakharovich branch. The enterprise became the first enterprise in the form of a partnership in the central region of the country. It included spinning, weaving, dyeing, bleaching, thread production and peat mining.

The eldest son of Savva Morozov, Elisha, stood out and organized his own manufactory, which later acquired the name “Partnership of Morozov Vikula Manufactories with Sons.” Vikula Eliseevich played an important role in the formation of the enterprise and took over the reins from his retired father. This branch of the Morozov family - “Vikulovichi” - is named after him.

Under the management of the “Tver” Morozovs - descendants of Abram - there was an enterprise created by Timofey at the request of his father. The Tver manufactory produced about thirty types of cotton fabrics, which were in constant demand at Russian fairs and were also exported. The production was led by Abram and David Abramovich.

Social infrastructure grew around Morozov's enterprises: shops, baths, hospitals, schools, almshouses, stadiums. The legacy of the dynasty of factory owners can still be seen today on the streets of Orekhov-Zuev, Noginsk, Zheleznodorozhny and others settlements near the capital.

Researchers have noted various reasons for the success of dynasty enterprises, including:

  • active entrepreneurial position;
  • desire for mechanization of labor, emphasis on a high technical level of production;
  • continuous modernization of production facilities;
  • refusal of foreign specialists and support of domestic education and attraction of graduates of Russian educational institutions to work;
  • creation of laboratories to connect theoretical and experimental science with production;
  • a two-stage management model that eliminated the exclusive authoritarian influence of owners through the attraction of qualified hired management personnel;
  • gradual awareness of social responsibility to enterprise personnel.

In addition to textile production, the family participated in the activities of other institutions. Timofey Morozov was one of the founders of the Volga-Kama Bank, created in 1870 and occupying a leading position in the country until the end of the century. In the period 1868-76, he also served as chairman of the Moscow Exchange Committee, which collaborated with the state in matters of legislative activity in the field of trade and industry, regulated exchange trading, and issued certificates and opinions on trade matters. David Ivanovich built a railway line away from the main line Moscow - Vladimir, ending at the Zakharovo station, named after his grandfather and still existing.

Representatives of the family did a lot of charity work and supported the culture of the country. With the financing of the Morozovs, the Alekseevskaya Psychiatric Hospital, Morozovskaya Children's Hospital, Cancer Institute and other medical institutions were built. With the participation of the Moscow Merchant Society of Mutual Credit, whose founders included T.S. Morozov, the newspapers “Moskvich” and “Shareholder”, and the magazine “Bulletin of Industry” were financed. Varvara Alekseevna, the wife of Abram Abramovich, donated funds for the establishment of a free “Turgenev Library-Reading Room” in 1895, supported the newspaper “Russian Vedomosti”, took part in the creation of the technical base of many educational institutions, for example, the Imperial Technical School. Sergei Timofeevich provided assistance to the artist Levitan, Savva Timofeevich did not leave the Moscow Art Theater without support. In short, in pre-revolutionary Moscow it was difficult to find a charitable event or social institution that remained outside the attention and support of the Morozovs.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the fortune of the Morozov family, according to Forbes magazine, amounted in modern equivalent to over 500 million dollars, which puts them in fourth place in the list of the richest Russian entrepreneurs of their time.

On the eve of the October Revolution, according to historians, about 60 families of Savva Vasilyevich’s descendants lived in Moscow. After October 1917, the life of the Morozovs developed differently: some immigrated (Nikolai Davidovich, Sergei Timofeevich, Pyotr Arsenievich and others), but the majority remained in their homeland, where a time of trials and losses awaited them.

Ryabushinsky

The founder of the dynasty is the peasant Mikhail Yakovlev, who in 1802 arrived in Moscow from the Kaluga province, purchased a shop and became one of the merchants of the third guild. Subsequently, the family surname was changed to the name of the native settlement of the founder. The entrepreneur's interests lay in the textile industry: in 1846 he acquired the first weaving factory. The Ryabushinsky family business was brought onto the broad road by the middle son, Pavel Mikhailovich, who sold his father’s old manufactories and purchased a factory, equipping it with the latest technology.

In 1887, the family business was transformed into the P. M. Ryabushinsky Manufactory Partnership, the fixed capital of which was 2 million rubles. The company owned paper spinning, weaving, dyeing, finishing, and finishing factories in the Tver province. By the beginning of the 20th century, the enterprise’s capital had grown to 5 million rubles; in general, the family’s fortune was estimated at over 20 million rubles.

After the death of Pavel and his wife, the business was headed by their eldest son, Pavel Pavlovich, whose name is more often associated with social and political activities, however, it was under his leadership that the Ryabushinsky business continued to flourish at the turn of the century. Pavel, like his brothers, was educated at the Moscow Practical Academy of Commercial Sciences, a secondary education institution for training businessmen, administered by the Ministry of Finance. Four of the eight brothers worked together with Pavel: Sergei, Vladimir, Stepan and Mikhail. Entrepreneurs established themselves in the flax industry, invested in sawmills, and were engaged in paper production.

The family owned the Ryabushinsky Brothers Banking House, which was later transformed into the Moscow Bank with the support of entrepreneurs involved in the textile industry. The Ryabushinskys recruited graduates of the academy where Pavel studied; Village children who, in addition to school, were trained at the expense of entrepreneurs in trade evening classes, were trained for junior staff positions.

The well-known plans of the Ryabushinskys characterize the brothers as far-sighted entrepreneurs who relied on investments in promising technologies.

Thus, during the First World War, Sergei and Stepan founded the Moscow Automobile Plant Partnership - an enterprise that was transformed into ZIL in Soviet times. A year after its foundation, the plant was supposed to produce the first batch of trucks under license from the Italian company FIAT. The equipment was created, albeit behind schedule, but the plant was not fully completed due to the events of 1917. Projects for oil exploration in the Ukhta fields and for the creation of machine-building enterprises in the Urals remained unrealized.

In the financial sphere, the brothers’ plan to create a bank of “world scale” is known through the merger of the Moscow Bank with other large institutions: the Volzhsko-Kama and Russian Commercial and Industrial Banks.

In addition to managing family affairs, Pavel Pavlovich was passionate about socio-political processes, took an active part in the life of the country, consistently defending his position:

  • collaborated with the “Union of October 17th”, with which he subsequently broke off due to disagreement with the policies of P. Stolypin;
  • published the newspapers “Morning”, “Narodnaya Gazeta”, “Morning of Russia”, where he outlined his vision of the prospects for the development of the state.

The entrepreneur saw the path of development of the country in combining the Old Believer traditions of pre-Petrine Rus' with the institutions of Western capitalism, and warned the intelligentsia against being carried away by socialist ideas. Ryabushinsky fully supported the events of February 1917, because he believed that they opened up the opportunity for businessmen and industrialists to influence political life countries.

After the revolution, the brothers emigrated; the descendants of Pavel Mikhailovich’s daughters live in Russia.

Vtorovs

Alexander Fedorovich Vtorov came from the Kostroma townspeople, lived in Irkutsk and, being a merchant, conducted a wholesale trade in manufactured goods, furs, gold, and financial transactions. Success in business allowed him to move to the 1st guild in 1876, and in 1897 to move with his family to Moscow and receive hereditary honorary citizenship. Alexander Alexandrovich remained to conduct business in Irkutsk, without stopping interaction with his father and brother. The elder Vtorov’s brother, Pyotr Mazhukov, worked in Chita. Alexander Fedorovich successfully married off his daughters, becoming related to wealthy Moscow families.

Together with his son Nikolai, Alexander Fedorovich founded an enterprise that later became known as the A.F. Partnership. Vtorov and Sons”, which:

  • traded in textiles and tea;
  • supplied the treasury with raw materials for the production of smokeless gunpowder;
  • owned commercial real estate in the cities of Siberia and the Urals;
  • carried out manufacturing production;
  • conducted foreign trade operations in Mongolia.

Nikolai Alexandrovich was distinguished by his extraordinary thinking and chose promising industries and enterprises for investments, the effectiveness of which allowed him to increase his father’s fortune.

At the end of the century, Nikolai Alexandrovich focused his interests on gold mining, but did not ignore other areas of activity: he expanded the list of textile enterprises, his factories produced military uniforms and ammunition, created the Moscow Industrial Bank, was engaged in the production of dyes, and worked in other industrial industries. The Electrostal Share Partnership founded by Vtorov became the first such plant in Russia and gave birth to the city of the same name.

Nikolai Alexandrovich was helped in the management of some enterprises by his son, Boris. The result of his fruitful work was the largest fortune in the country, which surpassed the wealth of other famous families and was estimated at over 700 million modern dollars.

Nikolai Alexandrovich was killed in 1918, his family moved to France. Alexander Vtorov left Irkutsk in 1917.

Wogau

The founder of the business, Philipp-Max von Vogau, arrived in 1827 from Germany. Despite his noble origins, he was poor and was initially forced to serve “on errands.” Having no prospects in his homeland, he takes Russian citizenship and seeks a better life in Russia. The reputation earned here in 1839 gave Maxim Maksimovich the opportunity to marry the daughter of the textile manufacturer F. Rabenek. The Vogau dynasty of Russian entrepreneurs dates back to this time.

With the participation of the brothers Friedrich and Karl, Maxim Maksimovich opens an office that first sells tea, household and household chemicals, and then moves on to import sugar, yarn and cotton. The company grew into the trading house "Wogau and Co", which was under the control of the family until the October coup. In addition to the brothers, their sons-in-law Erwin Schumacher and Konrad Banza, nephew Moritz Mark, and Max’s sons Otto and Hugo took part in the family business. The enterprise reached its peak of development during the period of management of Hugo Maksimovich, the son of the founder of the dynasty.

In addition to conducting large-scale foreign trade operations, the family invested in the financial sector and industry:

  • with the participation of Vogau, the Moscow Accounting Bank, the Russian Foreign Trade Bank, the Riga Commercial Bank and the Anchor Insurance Company were created;
  • the family controlled enterprises in various industries; its interests included ore mining, metal smelting, cement production, chemical and textile production;
  • together with Knop, searches were conducted for deposits of platinum and oil in the Urals and copper in the Caucasus.

The family's way of life was common for the German bourgeoisie: they professed Lutheranism, lived in the neighborhood, and preserved the traditions of their people. In 1900, five of the eight members of the company's board of directors remained German citizens, so when the war began, the Wogau found themselves in difficult situation. Some enterprises suffered from pogroms, and government supervision was established over the company's activities. The family was forced to sell leading enterprises.

Hugo took part in financing the founded P.P. Ryabushinsky of the newspaper “Morning of Russia”, which criticized government policy in the economic sphere and was closed by the authorities “due to its harmful direction”.

The fortune of the Wogau family, acquired over 90 years in Russia, was comparable to the wealth of the Morozovs and, according to Forbes, amounted to about 500 million dollars in modern terms.

After 1917, most of the Wogau emigrated from Russia. Today, the descendants of Hugo’s son, Maxim, who remained here, who has been a member of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) since 1919, live in the country.

Engineer-entrepreneur N.S. Avdakov

Nikolai Stepanovich was born in 1847 into the family of a military doctor assigned to the Kura Regiment stationed in the Caucasus. The Avdakovs' ancestors lived in the Vladimir province and, for the most part, were clergy. Nikolai was educated at the St. Petersburg Mining Institute, from which he graduated in 1873. The Main Mining Directorate sent Avdakov to work as a mine engineer at the Rutchenko Coal Company, located in the Yekaterinoslav province and created with Belgian capital.

    Cultural life of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century. Gladkov Theater

    First half of the 19th century made few changes to the lifestyle of townspeople and settlements. The nobles were still the wealthiest class. Balls, theater, cards and other idleness filled all their leisure time.
    At this time, there was an extremely active development of theatrical and musical life, which proclaimed Penza one of the largest cultural centers in the country.
    Thus, the first theater in the city, which existed in 1792 - 1797, was directed by famous poet and amateur actor, memoirist, Penza vice-governor Prince I.M. Dolgorukov. In the 1st quarter of the 19th century, three theaters operated simultaneously in Penza: the troupe of the rich man Gorikhvostov, which staged Italian operas; troupe G.V. Gladkova, who staged tragedies, dramas and comedies; Governor's troupe V.I. Kozhina.
    At the beginning of the 19th century in Penza there was a street called “Teatralnaya”, it was located in the area of ​​​​the fortress rampart. It was called that because at the end of the 18th century there was the Dolgoruky Theater here, and then the theater of the landowner G.V. Gladkova. Penza theater expert, E.M. Marin believes that “in terms of the number of theaters in Russia, the Penza province was in third place, after Moscow and St. Petersburg.”
    The founder of the first professional theater in Penza was Grigory Vasilyevich Gladkov. His theater was considered a commercial enterprise that brought income to the owners. Judging by archival data and the memoirs of contemporaries, the theater building was not of architectural interest. It represented a wooden extension to Gladkov’s brick house. The owner was more concerned with spaciousness than with architectural decoration. There were 10 actors and 6 actresses working in the theater, not counting the theatrical
    servants. After his death, the theater passed into the hands of his son Vasily, who continued the traditions of his father. An enterprising man, he managed to manage carpet and linen establishments, a distillery and a brick factory. Under the leadership of V.G. The Gladkov Theater was located until 1829. Many contemporaries left testimonies about the unbearable life of Gladkov’s actors and actresses.

    Answer Delete
  1. Industry of Penza in the first half of the 19th century.
    Industry, compared to the second half of the 18th century, did not take even half a step forward. If in 1790 there were 5 soap factories in Penza, then in 1850 there were 3, tanneries were 5 and 4, respectively, and 3 iron smelting factories were added, producing 2.7 thousand rubles worth of products per year. While, for example, a cloth factory in the village. Golitsyno, Nizhnelomovsky district - by 105.7 thousand rubles. All enterprises in the city of Penza produced products worth 70.2 thousand rubles in 1850, all 90 factories and factories in the Penza province (excluding 43 distilleries) - worth 972.2 thousand rubles. (Our calculation was made according to the table published in the book “Penza Region”. 1989, pp. 53–55). Thus, the share of industrial production in Penza was only 7.2% of the total provincial volume. If we take into account the distillery, which was located in the districts and brought the greatest income, then the share of the city of Penza in the economy of the province will generally be negligible. Most of the workers in the city worked at brick factories - 353, followed by shoemakers and shoemakers - 199, butchers - 127, carpenters - 124, tailors - 121, cab drivers - 116, Kalashniks - 101. And only 7 mechanics, 10 gunsmiths, 11 watchmakers , 22 silversmiths, 19 gilders, 30 coppersmiths and 88 blacksmiths. For 28 thousand inhabitants, there were not even two hundred people who knew how to work with metal products. Therefore, when several decades ago they talked about the centuries-long backwardness of Tsarist Russia from the industrialized countries of the West, this was not an exaggeration.

    Answer Delete

  2. Part of the literary Penza of the first quarter of the 19th century was the famous Russian novelist Mikhail Nikolaevich Zagoskin. The writer, who during his lifetime earned the fame of the “Russian Walter Scott,” is a Penza landowner.
    Mikhail Nikolaevich was born on July 14, 1789 in the village of Ramzai, Penza Uyezd (now Mokshansky district, Penza region).
    His family came from the oldest indigenous noble family of the Penza Province. Mikhail was educated at home. The future writer loved to read; living in the village, he rarely shared the fun of his peers and devoted almost all his time to reading books. Close people were even afraid that the boy would lose his eyesight, which was weak, so they took away his literature, but Mikhail found various ways to read another book.
    With the rank of second lieutenant in the St. Petersburg militia, he took part in the Patriotic War of 1812, and at the end of hostilities in 1814 he returned to his family estate Ramsay, from where he traveled to Penza. He was one of the few Penza inhabitants of that time who saw the meaning of his life in literary work. On Penza soil he created the first dramatic work comedy plan “The Prankster”, which thus added another page to the chronicle of the literary life of Penza. The novel “The Tempter” was created by Zagoskin 23 years after leaving Penza for St. Petersburg, but this is a purely Penza work, as it is a mirror reflection of the life of local society.
    Zagoskin became the founder of Russian historical novel. Fame came to the writer after the publication of his novel “Yuri Miloslavsky, or the Russians in 1612.” In 1834, the magazine “Library for Reading” published a series of fantastic stories “Evening on Khoper”.
    Zagoskin M.N. died in Moscow on June 23, 1852 as a result of improper treatment of hereditary gout.
    A street in Penza was named in his honor, and a memorial plaque and monument were erected to him in the village of Ramzai.

    Answer Delete
  3. M.Yu. Lermontov.
    A considerable number of famous people have visited Penza. One of them was Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov. He was born on October 3, 1814 in Moscow, but since 1815 he lived on the family estate of Tarkhany, Penza province, where he spent half his life. Lermontov lost his mother early, so his grandmother E.A. raised him. Arsenyev. Received a good home education. From childhood, he looked at the life of Tarkhan peasants and rural nature. Joined folk art: listened to songs and legends. My childhood companions were ordinary peasant children. He was interested in military history; his grandmother A.A.’s siblings had a great influence on him. and D.A. Stolypins, who took part in the Patriotic War of 1812. In 1828, Mikhail Yuryevich entered the Moscow University Noble Boarding School, and in 1830 - Moscow University. A year later, he resigned and entered the school of guards ensigns and cavalry cadets in St. Petersburg. In 1834, his poem “Hadji Abrek” was published. On December 31, he comes on vacation to Tarkhany, where he works on several works: the drama “Two Brothers”, the poem “Demon”, “Song about the Merchant Kalashnikov”, the poem “Tambov Treasurer”, the poem “The Dying Gladiator” and others. This visit to Penza was the last. He was sent into exile in the Caucasus for the poem “The Death of a Poet,” written in 1837. He spends 1838-40 in St. Petersburg, where he publishes a number of poems and the novel “A Hero of Our Time.” For a duel with E. de Barant he was sent to the Caucasus for the second time.
    Having settled in Pyatigorsk for treatment, he met with fellow countryman N.S. Martynov. As a result of a quarrel with him, a duel took place in which Lermontov was killed. He was buried in the Pyatigorsk cemetery, then on April 23, 1842 he was reburied in the chapel of the Tarkhan estate.

    Answer Delete
  4. Famous people of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.

    Istomin Vladimir Ivanovich Born in December 1809 in the village of Lomovka, Mokshansky district, Penza province (now Luninsky district, Penza region). He came from a noble family in the Pskov province and spent his childhood in the Estland province.

    In 1823 he entered the Naval Cadet Corps, and in 1827 he was released with the rank of midshipman.
    After graduating from the Naval Corps, he was assigned to the battleship Azov, on which, as part of the squadron of Vice Admiral Heyden, he made a trip from Kronstadt to Portsmouth, and then to the shores of Greece, where he participated in the Battle of Navarino on October 8, 1827, and was awarded for distinction Insignia of the Military Order of St. George and promoted to midshipman.
    In 1827-1832, V.I. Istomin served on the same ship, sailing in the Mediterranean Sea, improving his naval education in a serious military situation created by long cruising in the Archipelago and participation in the blockade of the Dardanelles and landing on the Bosphorus. In 1830 he was presented to the Order of St. Anne, 3rd degree.
    In 1832, Istomin was transferred to the Baltic Fleet on the frigate "Maria".
    Since 1835, he served in the Black Sea on various ships: the lugger "Glubokiy", the yacht "Rezvaya", the battleships "Pamyat Evstafiya" and "Warsaw".
    In 1837, he was promoted to lieutenant and appointed commander of the steamship Severnaya Zvezda, on which Emperor Nicholas I and the Empress sailed through the Black Sea ports that same year. Awarded the Order of St. Vladimir, 4th degree, and a diamond ring.
    In 1843, V.I. Istomin was presented with the Order of St. Stanislav, 2nd degree.
    From 1845 to 1850 he was at the disposal of the governor in the Caucasus, Prince Vorontsov, taking an active part in joint operations of the army and navy aimed at the conquest of the Caucasus. In 1846 he was awarded the Order of St. Anne, 2nd degree, and in 1847, for actions against the highlanders, he was promoted to captain of the 2nd rank.
    In 1849, V.I. Istomin was promoted to captain 1st rank, and in 1850 he was appointed commander of the battleship Paris. In 1852 he was presented with the Order of St. Vladimir, 3rd degree.

    Answer Delete
  5. Cultural life of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.

    For many decades, the only public entertainment for Penzyaks were fair booths, but by the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries, buffoon performances gave way to a new type of spectacle - performances by amateur, serf and state theaters.
    One of the most famous in Russia at that time was the home theater of Alexei Emelyanovich Stolypin, the richest landowner, owner of houses in Moscow and estates in the Volga region, Penza provincial leader of the nobility. As “a brave warrior on the battlefield, a wise and honest administrator in the field of civil service” Alexander Mikhailovich Turgenev recalled, “every week a home-grown and organized troupe of serf actors performed tragedy, opera, comedy, and, to tell the truth, for the sake of Alexei Emelyanovich and the entire venerable assembly , without caresses, they played the comedy perfectly.” In 1806, A.E. Stolypin sold it for 32 thousand rubles. all its actors (70 people) to the Petrovsky Theater, where they actually formed the basis of the troupe. According to the fair assertion of theater expert V.A. Dyakonov, Stolypin’s actors were destined to become the pioneers of the domestic state theater».

    <...> <...>I had a huge ball. Up to two hundred people were admitted into the theater with tickets, and some of them came to me; Horn music in the garden, and instrumental music in the hall delighted my guests. The governor also visited me that day...” These enthusiastic lines belong to Vice-Governor Ivan Mikhailovich Dolgorukov. Note that nobles and officials played on stage, and there were people of the same class in the hall. But already in 1796 the theater troupe included professional actors. This is how a significant event happened in Penza - the birth of the theater. And already at the beginning of the 19th century the theater became very popular among the residents of our city.
    Talented inspirers and organizers I.M. Dolgorukov and D.E. Polchaninov, the first Penza comedians laid the foundation for public theatrical performances that demonstrated high professional skills and contributed to establishing the glory of the first theater in Penza close to a professional format. By the beginning of the 19th century, theatrical entertainment had ceased to be just a lordly home entertainment; both the local nobility and ordinary people were drawn to it.

    Answer Delete
  6. Famous people of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.

    On August 30, 1816, Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky was appointed governor of Penza; he arrived in Penza on October 20. The nobility of Penza greeted him, as a former reformer, with restraint and some hostility. The governor did not wait for people to come to him; he himself decided to visit the houses of influential people in Penza. This turned out to be the right step and gave a positive result for him. Speransky as a person and as an official was attentive and kind to his subordinates. The period of his governorship in Penza was the most fruitful in terms of awards for those who worked with him. Before and after him, officials did not receive as many awards as under him. He was available to any visitor who came to see him. On Sundays and holidays, he often visited institutions of public charity and even prisoners in prison. Speransky could lodge protests against the decisions of the Penza court if he saw them as an unfair verdict.
    In Penza he continued to study science. Studied German and Jewish languages. Thanks to the intervention of Speransky, on April 4, 1818, the emperor issued a decree on the transformation of the Penza Theological Seminary. On March 31, 1819, a decree dated March 22 was received in Penza on the appointment of M.M. Speransky Governor-General of Siberia. He left Penza on May 7, 1819 and worked in Tobolsk until February 8, 1821. On the way back to St. Petersburg, Speransky again visited Penza, where on February 25 he was solemnly welcomed. He stayed in Penza for 9 days. All the days of his stay in the city were spent at dinner parties and balls.
    He arrived in St. Petersburg on March 23, and 4 months later, on July 17, 1821, there was a decree appointing him a member of the State Council.
    05.08.1821 he was granted 3486 acres of land in the Penza province. On January 1, 1839, Speransky was elevated to the rank of count. On February 11, 1839, Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky died as a result of a cold.

    Answer Delete

    Literary celebrity of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.

    The history of the literary life of Penza is also woven from the works of P.A. Vyazemsky and D.V. Davydova. One of V.G.’s friends Belinsky wrote to him in July 1829 from Penza to Chembar: “Two remarkable persons made our Penza happy with their arrival, this is Denis Vasilyevich Davydov - major general, partisan hero, poet, and poet - Prince Pyotr Andreevich Vyazemsky.”

    P.A. Vyazemsky was married to Vera Fedorovna Gagarina, whose mother P.Yu. Kologrivova lived not far from Penza - in the village of Meshcherskoye. At the end of the 1820s, the poet was a frequent visitor to Meshchersky and Penza. On Penza soil he did not stop his work, creating a noticeable literary background in the provincial Sursky region. Here Pyotr Andreevich translated the novel “Adolphe” by the French writer Benjamin Constant and created the poetic cycle “Winter Caricatures”. A.S. Pushkin appreciated the Penza works of P.A. Vyazemsky with the following words: “Your poems are lovely.” V.G. Belinsky used Pyotr Andreevich's poem "For the New Year 1828" to complete his article on Russian literature of 1843. The poem “Russian God”, written on Penza soil, was first published by A.I. Herzen abroad.

    In the late 1820s - mid-1830s, a notable figure in Penza was Denis Vasilyevich Davydov (1784 - 1839), who called Penza “my inspiration”. In the city on Sura, the poet fell in love with the local beauty E.D. Zolotarev. To whom he dedicated the poems “I love you, I love you madly”, “River”, “Waltz”. Love motives are felt in the poems “And My Little Star”, “After Separation”, “Romance” and others, written in Penza. Unnamed D.V. Davydov, it is impossible to imagine the literary life of Penza in the first half of the 19th century, significantly enriched by his work.

    Answer Delete
  7. ECONOMIC GROWTH OF PENZA

    Penza was traditionally located at the intersection of important trade routes, and by the end of the 19th century. received railway access in all directions: on October 11, 1874, traffic began on the Morshansk-Syzran section. This circumstance created good preconditions for economic and cultural development.

    Penza had a well-deserved reputation as one of the largest nests of the Russian nobility, personifying the power and glory of the state. Here it was represented by the names of the Sheremetevs, Shuvalovs, Golitsyns, Kurakins, Tatishchevs, Trubetskoys, Dolgorukys, Suvorovs, Vorontsovs, Razumovskys and others.

    At the same time, the epithet of a “merchant” city was firmly assigned to Penza. The leading position in the commercial world was occupied by the Karpovs, Finogeevs, Sergeevs, Barsukovs, Kuzmins, Kuznetsovs, Tyurins, Evstifeevs, Ochkins, Pankovs and others, who entered the all-Russian and even world market.

    In the 19th – early 20th centuries, the leading role in the economy of Penza continued to belong to the trade in bread and alcohol and the food industry, especially flour-grinding and vodka.

    Since the middle of the 19th century, new industries have appeared in the city. The largest of them in pre-revolutionary Penza was a paper mill, established in 1850 by one of the richest merchants in the province, grain merchant P.V. Sergeev (now the Mayak factory).

    Firstborn defense industry The city is a plant created during the First World War for the production of remote tubes for explosive devices (now the ZIF production association).

    Answer Delete

    Literary celebrities of Penza of the early 19th century.
    A notable figure in the literary life of Penza in the second half of the 19th century was Nikolai Vasilyevich Prozin (1836 - 1898), who received a medical education at Kazan University, from which he graduated in 1859. In 1865-1867, he edited the unofficial part of the Penza Provincial Gazette, and since 1889 he was a permanent contributor to this newspaper. Nikolai Vasilyevich had a talent for literary journalism; his travel essays always increased the rating of Vedomosti. In particular, his essays on travel to Tarkhany and Chembar are of great educational value.
    The Georgian poet Solomon Gavievich Ramadze (1798 - 1862), who was exiled here for administrative residence, also took part in the literary life of Penza. In Penza, he wrote the poems “Elbrus”, “Loneliness”, “For the Fatherland”, “Why are you bored” and others. Proximity S.G. Ramadze's connection to the literary atmosphere of Penza is also due to his service in the provincial public library.
    In 1818-1821, the writer Nikolai Aleksandrovich Radishchev (1779 - 1829), the second son of A.N., lived in Penza. Radishcheva. Already in the first works of N.A. Radishchev showed interest in the ancient Russian epic. Since 1803, Nikolai Alexandrovich was a member of the Free Society of Literature Lovers and wrote many poems and reviews. In Penza he communicated with P.A. Vyazemsky and gave him the manuscript of the biography of his father A.N. Radishcheva.

    Answer Delete

    Cultural life of the city of Penza in the 19th century.

    The cultural life of Penza has always had certain features that positively distinguished it from Russian provincial cities. In particular, during the years of the last reign, in terms of the number of educational institutions, Penza, inferior to the few university cities at that time, was ahead of most other provincial centers. This feature is a characteristic feature of the city both in the Soviet era and today. Thanks to the large number of cultural and educational institutions, Penza at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. had the proud title of “New Athens”.
    The first theater in the city, which existed in 1792 - 1797, was led by the once famous poet and amateur actor, memoirist, Penza vice-governor Prince I.M. Dolgorukov. In the 1st quarter of the 19th century, three theaters operated simultaneously in Penza: the troupe of the rich man Gorikhvostov, which staged Italian operas; troupe G.V. Gladkova, who staged tragedies, dramas and comedies; Governor's troupe V.I. Kozhina.





    In 1891, the first local history museum in the province was opened (under the statistical committee), in 1901 - a scientific archival commission, in 1905 - the Penza Society of Natural History Lovers, and in 1911 - its natural history museum (now the regional local history museum). The most important role in the study of natural conditions, economics and labor resources of the province belonged to the Penza zemstvo (1865 - 1918).
    The first public library in the city of Penza was opened in 1837, the library named after. M.Yu. Lermontov - in 1892, a people's library-reading room, which later became the Central City Library named after. V.G. Belinsky - in 1895.

    Answer Delete

    Famous people of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.
    Klyuchevsky Vasily Osipovich (1841 – 1911)
    Outstanding Russian historian, honorary academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences (1908). From the family of a rural priest in the Penza province. In 1850, Vasily Klyuchevsky lost his father. Left without funds, the family moved to Penza, where Klyuchevsky studied at the parish and district theological schools, and from 1856 to 1860 - at the Penza Theological Seminary.
    In 1861, Klyuchevsky, having changed his mind about becoming a priest, left the seminary and entered the Faculty of History and Philology of Moscow University, from which he graduated in 1865 with a candidate's degree and was left at the department to prepare for a professorship. For six years he worked on his dissertation “The Lives of Saints as a Historical Source.” In 1871, Klyuchevsky’s work was published, and in 1872 it was successfully defended.
    Vasily Osipovich Klyuchevsky gave 36 years (1871-1906) to Moscow University, first as a private lecturer, and from 1882 as a professor. At the same time, he lectured on Russian civil history at the Moscow Theological Academy (in Sergiev Posad), as well as at the Moscow Women's Courses (Klyuchevsky's lectures on the courses lasted 15 years).
    In 1872 he began work on his doctoral dissertation "The Boyar Duma Ancient Rus'", which took him ten years. This was Klyuchevsky’s major research work, which he defended in 1882. In 1887-1889, Vasily Osipovich was elected dean and vice-rector of the university. In 1893, he was invited to teach a course in Russian history to the son of Alexander III - George. In 1899 he published a "Brief Guide to Russian History", which actually became a textbook for gymnasiums. Klyuchevsky is widely known for his lecture "Course of Russian History", published by him for the first time in 1902 (subsequently reprinted several times and translated into many European languages ).
    Klyuchevsky Vasily Osipovich is rightfully considered an unsurpassed lecturer. The auditorium of Moscow University, where he taught his course, was always crowded. In 1905, Klyuchevsky V.O. received an official instruction to participate in the work of the Commission for the revision of laws on the press and in meetings (in Peterhof, chaired by Nicholas II) on the project for the establishment of the State Duma and its powers.
    After retiring, Vasily Osipovich Klyuchevsky continued to lecture at Moscow University, but his main attention was focused on preparing for the republication of the “Course of Russian History”: in addition to the previously published four volumes, he was preparing the final one, the fifth (finished in 1910). On October 29, 1910, Klyuchevsky gave his last lecture at the School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. Klyuchevsky died on May 12, 1911, and was buried in the Donskoy Monastery cemetery.

    Answer Delete
  8. Famous doctors of Penza of the first half of the 19th century.
    Neil Fedorovich Filatov is a Russian doctor, founder of the Russian pediatric school. Uncle of the famous ophthalmologist V.P. Filatov.
    Born on June 2, 1847 in the village of Mikhailovka, Saransk district, Penza province, into a family of nobles. In 1859, Nil Filatov entered the second class of the Penza Noble Institute, where three more of his brothers were studying at the same time. Filatov received his special medical education from 1864 at the Faculty of Medicine of Moscow University. After graduating from the university in 1869, N. F. Filatov first worked as a zemstvo doctor in his native Saransk district, and then, in 1872-1874, he specially studied childhood diseases in clinics and hospitals in Vienna, Prague, and Heidelberg. He received his Doctor of Medicine degree in 1876 for his dissertation “On the relationship of bronchitis to acute catarrhal pneumonia,” and a year later he received the title of Privatdozent of Childhood Diseases.
    Working at a children's hospital in Moscow, he attracted many listeners, students and doctors. During this period, he identified scarlet fever and infectious mononucleosis as separate nosological forms, and described one of the early signs of measles - Filatov-Koplik spots. The result of the systematization of Filatov’s observations and conclusions were several textbooks that went through many editions in a short period of time; His most brilliant works are “Semiotics and diagnosis of childhood diseases”, “Lectures on open infectious diseases in children”, “Clinical lectures”. These manuals are all translated into German, and some of them into French, Italian, Czech and Hungarian. Together with G.N. Gabrichevsky, he introduced serum treatment for diphtheria.
    The Penza Regional Children's Clinical Hospital (Penza, Bekeskaya St., 43) is named after N.F. Filatov. In 1989, a monument to the scientist was erected in the courtyard of this hospital (sculptor - V. G. Kurdov).
    Grigory Antonovich Zakharyin is an outstanding Russian general practitioner, founder of the Moscow clinical school, honorary member of the Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences.
    G. A. Zakharyin was born on February 8, 1829 in Penza into the family of a poor landowner. From 1839 to 1847 he studied at the Saratov Men's Gymnasium.
    At the age of 23 he graduated from the medical faculty of Moscow University. Defended his dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medicine: “The doctrine of postpartum diseases. In 1856-1859 he studied abroad in the clinics of R. Virchow and other prominent European scientists. Most of Zakharyin’s scientific works date back to his youth: “Is sugar prepared in the liver” (“Moscow Medical Journal”, 1855), “On some questions about blood” (“Medical Bulletin”, 1861), “On recurrent fever "(Moscow Medical Newspaper, 1865), etc. Zakharyin was one of the most outstanding clinical practitioners of his time and made a huge contribution to the creation of an anamnestic method for studying patients. He outlined his diagnostic techniques and views on treatment in “Clinical Lectures”, which became widely known. These lectures have gone through many editions, including in English, French, and German. The research methodology according to Zakharyin consisted of a multi-stage questioning by the doctor of the patient, which made it possible to get an idea of ​​the course of the disease and risk factors. In contrast to S.P. Botkin, Zakharyin paid little attention to objective research and did not recognize laboratory data.
    Zakharyin was known for his difficult character and lack of restraint in dealing even with the sick. Zakharyin's conflict with his listeners prompted him to resign in 1896. A year after that, he died of a stroke.
    On February 26, 1982, by a resolution of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR, the name of G. A. Zakharyin was assigned to the Penza Central City Hospital No. 6 (now the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “City Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care named after G. A. Zakharyin”).
    In 1988, a bust of G. A. Zakharyin was unveiled in the hospital courtyard.

    Answer Delete
  9. Famous scientists of Penza of the 19th century.
    Ulyanov Ilya Nikolaevich (14.7.1831, Astrakhan - 12.1.1886, Simbirsk), teacher, educator, actual state councilor. Father V.I. Lenin. In 1855-63, senior teacher of physics and mathematics at the Penza Noble Institute. Conducted according to the instructions of N.I. Lobachevsky meteorological observation, headed the fundamental library, taught lessons at Sunday school. Wrote the following works: “On thunderstorms and lightning rods”, “On the benefits of meteorological observations and some conclusions from them for Penza”. In November 1861 he met M.A. Blanc, who became his wife. After Penza he served in Nizhny Novgorod, Simbirsk, was an inspector, director of public schools, participated in the organization of schools not only in Russian, but also in Mordovian and Chuvash villages. “For excellent and diligent service” he was awarded the Order of St. Stanislav 1st degree, St. Anna 2nd degree, St. Vladimir 3rd degree, and received hereditary nobility. In Penza, in front of the building of the former noble institute, a monument to I.N. was erected in 1970. and M.A. Ulyanov (sculptor A.A. Fomin).
    Yablochkov Pavel Nikolaevich (14.9.1847, village of Zhadovka, Serdobsky district, Saratov province, now the village of Yablochkovo, Serdobsky district, Penza region - 19.3.1894, Saratov), ​​scientific electrical engineer, inventor and entrepreneur. During his childhood years spent on his parents' Serdob estate, he showed a penchant for invention. In 1858-1866 he studied at the Saratov gymnasium, then continued his education at the Main Engineering School in St. Petersburg, from where he was graduated as an engineer-second lieutenant in 1866. In the 1870s he left military service and, having opened a workshop of physical instruments in Moscow, conducted experiments on the use of electric current for lighting. Financial failures forced him to leave for Paris, where in 1875 he realized his invention - an arc lamp without a regulator. “Electric candle”, “Yablochkov candle”, patented on March 23, 1876, made fundamental changes in electrical engineering. The triumphant demonstration of the “Yablochkov candle” at the Paris World Exhibition of 1878 and the creation of a syndicate for the exploitation of Yablochkov’s patents led to the widespread use of electric lighting throughout the world. In 1878-80, having returned to Russia, he did a lot to disseminate his invention and promote electrical engineering, but did not achieve financial success. Living in France in 1880-93, he focused on working on electric current generators. Upon returning home in 1893, he settled on a Serdob estate, where he intended to continue experiments on a light engine for an aircraft. Streets in Penza, Saratov and Serdobsk, where a monument to the inventor is erected, are named after Yablochkov.
    Stankevich Apollinariy Osipovich (1834-15.9.1892, Gorodishche), forester of the Gorodishche district of the Penza province. From brief newspaper reports we know about his work since the summer of 1881 on the creation of an aircraft. In 1883 his model was completed and an attempt was made to test it in action. However, technical problems in the design delayed the launch time, and sharply deteriorating weather damaged the apparatus itself. On March 2, 1885, there was a publication about the results of his labors in the Petersburg Newspaper, which said: “Stankevich, serving in the Penza province, invented a method of free floating in the air,” demonstrated his apparatus - “A bird of enormous size with paper wings. The project was reviewed by the military department and received positive feedback.” Subsequently, the project drowned in bureaucratic archives, and the name of the author himself remained in oblivion.

    Answer Delete
  10. DECEMBRISTS of the Penza region

    DECEMBRISTS - Russian. noble revolutionaries who raised in December. 1825 uprising against autocracy and serfdom. Among them were people associated with Penz. edge. Some were born here, lived, were in service, others had estates. All of them were in the military. service, some of them were participants in the Fatherland. the war of 1812 and the Russian campaign abroad. army one of them was Novikov Mikhail Nikolaevich. Retired court adviser, former ruler of the office of the Little Russian Governor-General, Prince. N.G. Repnina. Member of the pre-Decembrist secret organization “Order of Russian Knights”, member of the Union of Salvation (1816), freemason, member of the “Elect Michael” lodge, founder and managing master of the “Love of Truth” lodge in Poltava (1818-1819), which he tried to turn into one of management of the Union of Welfare.
    Father - Nikolai Vasilyevich Novikov (d. 1786), cousin of the famous educator N.I. Novikova; mother - Daria Mikhailovna Martynova (in 1797 she entered the Penza Trinity Convent), enrolled in service in the Life Guards. Izmailovsky Regiment - 02/16/1782, entered service as a second lieutenant in the Kiev Grenadier Regiment - 01/14/1793, transferred as a lieutenant to the Narva Infantry Regiment, adjutant to the regiment chief O.V. Rotgof (chief adjutant) - 10.10.1798, retired as a staff captain - 1802, renamed titular advisers and appointed Penza mayor - November 1803, Penza police chief and collegiate adviser - 1804, dismissed from service - 20.6.1807, Moksha district leader nobility 1807-1810, hundredth (squadron) chief of the Penza cavalry regiment (militia) - 1.9.1812, for participation in the suppression of unrest of the Penza militia, presented to the Order of Anna 2 tbsp. - 06/03/1813, assigned to the headquarters of the head of the 3rd district of the militia P.A. Tolstoy - 01/15/1813, participant in foreign campaigns (Dresden, Hamburg), sent to Alexander I with a report on the capture of Dresden, entered service in the department of the Ministry of Justice - 07/13/1815, transferred to the number of officials under the General Provision Master - 06/26/1816, transferred as head of the department to the office of the Little Russian Governor-General, Prince. N.G. Repnina - 08/22/1816, arrived in Poltava - 12/8/1816, court councilor - 12/31/1816, ruler of the chancellery - March 1817, retired - 05/15/1820. After retiring, he acquired it from S.M. Kochubey has several villages with 346 peasant souls. Corresponding member of the Free Society of Lovers of Russian Literature - 9/30/1818.

    Answer Delete

    Famous people of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.

    Konstantin Apollonovich Savitsky (May 25, 1844, Taganrog, Taganrog City Government, Land of the Don Army, Russian Empire - January 31, 1905, Penza, Russian Empire) - Russian genre painter, academician, full member of the Imperial Academy of Arts, member of the Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions, teacher, first director of the Penza Art School name day. D. Siliverstova.
    Father of the Soviet painter, academician of the USSR Academy of Arts G. K. Savitsky.
    Born in Taganrog into the family of a military doctor (the village of Krasny Kholm, later Baronovka). Having lost his parents early, he was sent by relatives to be raised in a private boarding school at the Livonia Noble Gymnasium in the town of Birkenruhe, Wenden County, Livonia Province, after which in 1862, K. A. Savitsky entered the Imperial Academy of Arts in the class of historical painting. He studied with professors F.A. Bruni, A.T. Markov and P.P. Chistyakov.
    During his studies at the Academy he was awarded seven medals: in 1868, three small silver medals for the painting “Organ Grinder”, in 1869 a large silver medal for the sketch “Crucifixion of Christ”, in 1870 a large silver medal and a large encouragement medal for the paintings “Visiting a Sick Son” and “Sentry” at the powder magazine." In 1871, for the program “Cain and Abel” he was awarded a small gold medal, after which he was sent abroad by the Academy, where until 1874 he received a scholarship from Emperor Alexander II. After visiting the art academies of Dresden and Dusseldorf, he lived and worked in Paris, and became interested in metal engraving.
    Since 1872 an exhibitor, since 1878 a member of the Association of Traveling Art Exhibitions. In 1878 he exhibited at the World Exhibition in Paris, in 1882 at the All-Russian Art and Industrial Exhibition in Moscow.
    After tragic death wife in February 1875, returned to Russia, settling in Dinaburg, where the artist created several of his most significant works: “Meeting the Icon” (1878), “To War” (1880).
    From 1883 to 1889, K. A. Savitsky lived in St. Petersburg and taught at the Central School of Technical Drawing of Baron A. L. Stieglitz. In 1891 he moved to Moscow as a teacher at the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. Since 1894 he led the full-scale class at the School. Since 1895, he has been a full member of the Imperial Academy of Arts; in 1897, “for fame in the artistic field,” K. A. Savitsky was awarded the title of academician of painting.
    According to the will of Lieutenant General N.D. Seliverstov, who was shot dead in Paris in 1890 by the Polish socialist Sigismund Padlevsky, 300 thousand rubles and a collection of books and paintings collected by the general were transferred to the ownership of the city treasury of the city of Penza with the condition of organizing an art school in Penza, which should was named after the testator.
    The first director of the newly built Penza Art Gallery and the Penza Art School named after N. D. Seliverstov, which came under the jurisdiction of the Imperial Academy of Arts and the Ministry of the Imperial Court in 1898, was appointed academician of painting K. A. Savitsky. The artist developed his own training program, made changes to the layout of the building, and the best graduates of the School were admitted to the Imperial Academy of Arts without exams. Thanks to Savitsky, XXVI traveling art exhibitions were sent to Penza in 1898 and XXIX in 1901.
    K. A. Savitsky headed the School until his death on January 31 (February 13), 1905. He was buried at the Mitrofanievsky cemetery in Penza.

    Answer Delete
  11. This is from Olya Gavrilova!!! At noon on December 14, 1825, officers brought regiments to Senate Square in St. Petersburg to overthrow the Tsar through regicide and the establishment of constitutional government. Officers associated with the Penza region took part in the uprising against the autocracy.
    Ivan Aleksandrovich Annenkov (1802-1878), son of a wealthy Penza landowner. The handsome young man, lieutenant of the Cavalry Regiment, was a member of the Southern and Northern societies. Sentenced to 20 years of hard labor. Shortly before the uprising, he met a Frenchwoman, Polina Gebl, who followed him to Siberia, where they got married. P. Annenkov's faithful friend and wife greatly eased the difficult years of hard labor and exile for I. Annenkov, whom all relatives abandoned. After his release, he lived for some time in Penza and the village. Horse racing in Mokshansky district, mother’s estate.
    Pyotr Fedorovich Gromnitsky (1801-1851), son of a small-scale Kerensky landowner. His childhood years passed in Kerensk. After graduating from the cadet corps, he joined the Southern Society, a supporter of regicide. Sentenced to 20 years of hard labor, died of consumption. I sent several letters to my homeland in Kerensk through third parties.
    Ivan Nikolaevich Gorstkin (1798-1876), son of a landowner from the village. Golodyaevki, Chembar district. He served in the office of the Moscow Governor-General, a member of the Northern Society. Deported to Vyatka, then to Chembarsky district. Under police surveillance, he lived in Penza, where he was buried.
    Alexey Alekseevich Tuchkov (I800-1879), nephew of the heroes of the Patriotic War of 1812. Member of the Northern Society, released due to lack of evidence. He lived under police surveillance on his estate in the village. Dolgorukovo. His daughter Natalya became the wife of N.P. Ogarev.

    Answer Delete
  12. This is from Nikita Chernov!!! The first theater in the city, which existed in 1792 - 1797, was led by the once famous poet and amateur actor, memoirist, Penza vice-governor Prince I.M. Dolgorukov. In the 1st quarter of the 19th century, three theaters operated simultaneously in Penza: the troupe of the rich man Gorikhvostov, which staged Italian operas; troupe G.V. Gladkova, who staged tragedies, dramas and comedies; Governor's troupe V.I. Kozhina.

    The current largest theater in the city is the Penza Drama Theater. A.V. Lunacharsky - traces its history back to the Penza Drama Club named after. V.G. Belinsky.

    The best symphony orchestra in provincial Russia in the 2nd third of the 19th century was the orchestra of the Penza governor A.A. Panchulidzeva. Of outstanding importance for the culture of the region is the Penza School of Music, one of the oldest in the country, which arose in 1882 as classes of the Penza branch of the Imperial Russian Musical Society, opened a year earlier.

    Penza is the birthplace of the Russian circus: in 1873, the city hosted the first performance of a circus owned by Russian entrepreneurs, the Nikitin brothers.

    The first art educational institution of Penza and the province - the Makarov school (third quarter of the 19th century); I.K. taught there. Makarov, later academician of painting, author of portraits N.N. Pushkina-Lanskaya and the children of the great poet.

    Penza Governor N.D. played a major role in the development of the city’s educational and museum affairs. Seliverstov. He bequeathed 500 thousand rubles to the city. and a collection of books and paintings for the establishment of a school and museum. The art gallery, which opened in 1892, after the creation in 1898 of the Penza Art School named after. N.D. Seliverstova received the status of an art and industrial museum at the school (now it is the regional art gallery named after K.A. Savitsky).

    Thanks to the personal assistance of N.D. Seliverstov in 1869 the opening of the Penza girls' gymnasium took place.

    Answer Delete
  13. Penza militia at the beginning of the 19th century.
    The population of the province collected and sent 4,800 pounds of crackers, 4,250 pounds of cereal, and 10 thousand pounds of oats for the needs of the army. The total amount of voluntary donations amounted to 2 million 476 thousand rubles.
    Penza province formed 5 militia regiments: 4 infantry and 1 cavalry Cossack. In total, about 14 thousand people were recruited. In some regiments there were riots before being sent to the front.
    On January 3, 1813, the militia marched to the site of hostilities, covering more than 3 thousand km. They took part in battles with the French near Leipzig, Dresden, Magdeburg and Hamburg. Many received awards. About 2 thousand militias died in battle.
    Nikolai Fedorovich Kishensky (1775-1831), major general, commander of the Penza militia.

    Answer Delete
  14. What did Penza look like at the beginning of the 19th century? Historical street of the city.
    Volodarsky Street is a street in Penza, which is located in the historical, administrative and commercial center of the city. It runs from Karl Marx Street to Oktyabrskaya Street.
    The street, which now bears the name of Volodarsky, is one of oldest streets Penza, it appeared almost simultaneously with the emergence of the city in the second half of the 17th century. The street started from the northwestern tower of the city fortress and passed through the upper part of the settlement, where the townspeople lived who were engaged in trade and craft, which is why it was initially called Verkhne-Posadskaya. In 1795 there was already Verkhne-Posadskaya Street, which in 1815 was known as Lekarskaya.
    Penza memoirist F.F. Vigel explained the origin of the name Lekarskaya in this way. During the reign of Catherine II, the Swede G.P. Peterson arrived in Penza and was appointed staff physician. On this street he built houses for each of his three daughters. By marrying them off to doctors, Peterson gave them housework as a dowry. That's why local residents began to call the street Lekarskaya. The exact origin of the street name has not been established.
    On February 18, 1919, Lekarskaya Street was renamed Volodarsky Street. At the corner of Volodarsky and K. Marx streets there is a building (Volodarsky Street, house No. 2), built at the beginning of the 19th century, which belonged to G. D. Stolypin, a relative of E. A. Arsenyeva. Little Misha Lermontov stayed in Stolypin’s house with his grandmother in 1817-1818, as the text says memorial plaque, opened in 1966. Later, a hotel was located in this house. During the Civil War, the political department of the Ural Military District and the editorial office of the newspaper “To the Krasny Ural” were located here. Later there was a dormitory for the party school, and now there is a vocational school.

    Answer Delete
  15. Famous people of Penza. V.G. Belinsky
    Born in the Sveaborg fortress in the family of a naval doctor Grigory Nikiforovich Belinsky (1784-1835).
    In 1816, the family moved to Chembar, a district town in the Penza province. In 1822-1824, V. G. Belinsky studied at the Chembarsky district school, in 1825-1828 - at the Penza gymnasium, from which he did not graduate.
    In 1829, V. G. Belinsky entered the literature department of Moscow University. Participated in the student literary “Society of Number 11”. In 1832, he was expelled from the university with the wording “due to poor health” and “limited abilities.”
    In 1831, in the magazine “Listok,” V. G. Belinsky published the poem “Russian True Story” and a review of “Boris Godunov” by A. S. Pushkin. In 1833, his translations from French magazines appeared in the Telescope magazine. In the fall of 1833, V. G. Belinsky began to attend N. V. Stankevich’s circle and studied the philosophical systems of I. Kant, I. G. Fichte, and F. V. Schelling. In 1834, the first large article by V. G. Belinsky was published in the newspaper “Molva” Literary dreams" Belinsky became the main critic of Telescope and Rumor.
    In the article “On the Russian story and the stories of Mr. Gogol,” V. G. Belinsky characterized the realism of N. V. Gogol. In the fall of 1836, A. S. Pushkin intended to attract V. G. Belinsky to collaborate in Sovremennik, but did not have time to do this.
    In 1837, V. G. Belinsky was treated for tuberculosis in Pyatigorsk. According to some evidence, it was then that his first meeting with M. Yu. Lermontov took place.
    In 1838-1839, V. G. Belinsky edited the Moscow Observer magazine, which he reorganized. The magazine was not successful.
    In the fall of 1839, V. G. Belinsky moved to St. Petersburg and was invited by the publisher A. A. Kraevsky to the journal “Domestic Notes”. He published annual reviews of Russian literature (from 1840 to 1845), a cycle of eleven articles “The Works of Alexander Pushkin”, articles about the works of M. Yu. Lermontov, theater reviews.
    Disagreements with A. A. Kraevsky led to V. G. Belinsky’s departure from Otechestvennye zapiski in 1846.
    In January 1847 - May 1848, V. G. Belinsky headed the critical department of the Sovremennik magazine.
    From May to October 1847, V. G. Belinsky was treated abroad. He was accompanied by I. S. Turgenev and P. V. Annenkov. In July 1847, V. G. Belinsky wrote a “Letter to Gogol” regarding “Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends” (1846), which, in fact, became his literary and political testament.
    V. G. Belinsky died in St. Petersburg on May 26, 1848.

    Answer Delete
  16. The history of the creation of the first public library in the city of Penza.
    December 20, 1837 provincial town Penza opened the first public library on the territory of the Penza province. I would like to note that back in the early 30s of the 19th century, central government authorities repeatedly made attempts to create an institution of this kind. But, unfortunately, all of them were received with indifference by the local nobility. The decision to create the library, in particular, was made by the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Russian Empire, Arseniy Andreevich Zakrevsky, and the President of the Imperial Free Economic Society, Admiral Mordvinov. It was intended to reduce the cultural distance between the capital and the provinces, to bring closer the spiritual world of the Penza and St. Petersburg intelligentsia, to revive the public spirit, and most importantly “to provide everyone with easy means of reading and enriching themselves with very useful information and discoveries in science, art, agriculture, manufacturing.” and commercial industry."
    The library was financed through donations from the local nobility. He had no particular desire to provide voluntary financial assistance for the maintenance of the library. Despite the governor’s repeated appeal to the district nobles with a request for voluntary donations, the leaders of only three districts (Gorodishchensky, Narovchatsky, Saransky) contributed a total of only 150 rubles. In order to find funds for the maintenance of the library, under the chairmanship of the governor, a committee was organized from the provincial leader of the nobility, the honorary trustee of the gymnasium and the trustee of the library. The library trustee was elected at a meeting of the nobility. For many years he was State Councilor Alexander Grigorievich Kiselev, “known for his distinctive qualities and behavior. The position of librarian was also elective. He was the senior teacher of the gymnasium, Nikolai Dmitrievsky. “The librarian was obliged to maintain the books in good order, have a register, and be responsible for the integrity of the books and their safety.” The library was open to the public every day for four hours except Sundays and working days. Anyone was allowed to enter the library, excluding persons in indecent appearance and attire, without difficulty and without the prior issuance of tickets. The main contingent of readers were nobles, officers of military units located in Penza, and officials (up to 120 people). Those who wished were allowed to take books home, but with “ensuring their integrity with a pledge.” No later than February 15 of each year, detailed information about the state of the library was to be provided to the Emperor himself.
    The peak of activity occurred in 1837 - 1840. and was noted for high readership activity. The composition of the fund was quite diverse (fiction, agriculture, law, philosophy, etc.) and, according to the 1857 report, included 747 titles of books and periodicals (2288 volumes). The decline of the public library began in the 1840s and was caused by a number of objective reasons: 1) There were no state and public mechanisms that could provide the library with uninterrupted funding. 2) The reading world of the province was just beginning to take shape. 3) During the period of government reaction, the public library actually left the control of the authorities and was left to the mercy of fate as a project that did not bring the expected results. The public library in Penza did not “take root”, since it was created and supported artificially from the center, without taking into account local conditions.

    Answer Delete

    From Nikita Baranov.
    City authorities and governors at the beginning of the 19th century.
    As it turned out, the Penza province was formed 2 times. The first time was in 1796, but it existed in this form for only a few months.

    Later, five years later, in 1801, the province was restored by Alexander I. The province included 10 districts. The province remained in this composition until 1928.
    On September 9, 1801, by decree of the Senate, Penza was declared a provincial city, being at the same time the center of the Penza district. The governor's residence was located in Penza. The most famous in the field of the Penza governor were: F.L. Wigel (1801 – 1809), G.S. Golitsyn (1811 – 1815), M.M. Speransky (1816 – 1819), A.A. Panchulidzev (1831 – 1859).

    Answer Delete
  17. Many military leaders came from Penza. But I would like to talk about Alexander Ivanovich Yushkov. Alexander Ivanovich Born in 1780 in the family of the chairman of the Kazan Upper Zemstvo Court, Ivan Iosifovich Yushkov and Natalya Ipatievna Polyanskaya. He entered service as a lieutenant officer on January 23, 1792 in the Preobrazhensky Life Guards Regiment and, having served in the regiment as a lower rank, on December 22, 1798 he was promoted to ensign and in 1800 to lieutenant. He took part in a foreign campaign in Prussia in 1807, where in May he fought near Heilsberg, after which he returned through Tilsit to Russia.

    Promoted to colonel on February 12, 1810 and appointed battalion commander of the Pereobrazhensky Regiment on October 7 of the same year, Yushkov took part in the Patriotic War in 1812 and fought with the French at Borodino in August. In 1813, having crossed the border of Russia, he fought in April and May at Lützen and Bautzen, then, after troops advanced through Bohemia to Saxony, he was in the battles of Pirna and in the bloody battle of Kulm, where the twice-strong enemy was completely defeated by the Russians, Moreover, the French lost 80 guns, two convoys and 10 thousand prisoners, among whom was Vandam. On September 15, 1813 he was promoted to major general for distinction at Kulm, on September 28 he was appointed chief of the Yakut regiment and then was brigade commander of the 9th Infantry Division. In October, Yushkov fought under the walls of Leipzig, and in December he took part in the blockade of the Mainz fortress from the Rhine. In mid-January 1814, Yushkov crossed the Rhine and entered French possessions, where he took part in the battles of Brienne, La Rotière, Etoges and Champaubert. Retreating to Chalons in February, he pursued the enemy through Sedan beyond the Seine, after which he fought at Nelly, Soissons and Laon. In March, Yushkov was in the battles near the village of Vertio, in the Montmartre suburb of Paris, during the occupation of it by the Russians and the conquest of the city and fortress of Sendelia. In 1815, after the capture of Paris by Russian troops, he was appointed commandant of Paris.

    During the Turkish campaign of 1828-1829, Yushkov, commanding the 7th Infantry Division, was in August at the blockade of Silistria, after which, leaving an observation corps at the fortress, he retreated through Kaurga and Yenibazar to a position to the Shumle fortress, where, under the main command of General Dibich defeated the Turks on May 30, 1829 in the battle near the village of Kulevchi.
    From here the Russians decided to cross the Balkans. With this in mind, they left the camp at Shumla and, heading through Devno, approached the Kamchik River in early July, where they fought a battle, during which Yushkov was shell-shocked in the left side. Having crossed the river and defeated a fortified camp near the village of Dzhevany, Yushkov, following in the vanguard through the Balkan Mountains, arrived on July 10 at the fortress of Mesemvria, where the two-bunchu Pasha Osman was defending. After the surrender of the fortress, Yushkov set out with a division through Aidos and took part in the case near the village of Slivia, after which, following through Yambol, he approached Adrianople on August 4, which was taken by the Russians on August 8. After the fall of the city, Yushkov left Adrianople and headed to Burgas, where he remained until the end of hostilities with Turkey.

    On October 23, 1835, Yushkov was dismissed and awarded a uniform and a full salary pension.

    He settled in Penza, where he died. He was buried in the cemetery of the Spaso-Preobrazhensky Monastery in Penza.

    Answer Delete
  18. Entrepreneurship in Penza.
    Entrepreneurship originated in the 9th century, but it was the 19th century that is considered the most active and fruitful. However, in agriculture entrepreneurial activity was limited to the community. S.Yu. Witte wrote: “Woe to that country that... imposed various kinds of collective ownership.” The sphere of entrepreneurship included officials, military personnel, and engineers.
    In the period 1860-1890, a foundry and mechanical plant and a mechanical plant B.I. were opened in Penza. Kruger, mechanical plant D.V. Vorontsova, stationery factory P.V. Sergeeva and that’s not all.
    In 1865, in the south-eastern Zasurye of Penza, process engineers P.Eduard Ivanovich and Friedrich Ivanovich Gerkev founded a refined sugar factory, which employed 90 workers and 2 foremen. Already in 1872, 50,000 pounds of “head” sugar were produced. The enterprise occupied a four-story stone building. In 1875, the plant was bought by hereditary honorary citizen Alexey Petrovich Sergeev. Four years later, there was a fire at the company. As a result, hundreds of workers lost their jobs and sugar prices in Penza increased significantly. It took 6 months to repair the plant, and already in November 1879 the plant continued to operate at full capacity. The annual output of the revived plant exceeded 340,000 rubles. http://penzahroniki.ru.62-152-34-98.ppa.listkom.ru/images/003-tyustin-19-2kap-predpri/74-gerke-sahar-rafinad-zavod-w.jpg
    Glass entrepreneurship. The founder of glass entrepreneurship in the Penza region was Second Major Alexey Ivanovich Bakhmetev. Permission to build a crystal and glass factory was received back in 1763. However, it was at the beginning of the 19th century that the enterprises achieved enormous success. In 1806, lieutenant, son of the founder of the glass business, Nikolai Alekseevich Bakhmetev, received an imperial order for the production of glass items for 70 couverts, which were sent to St. Petersburg. In 1810, the highest decree was issued on awarding N. A. Bakhmetev with the Order of St. Vladimir 4th Art. “For the improvement of such a generally useful institution.”
    Bakhmetev Alexey Ivanovich http://kraeved.dyub.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/bahmetiev_an.jpg
    Bakhmetev Nikolai Alekseevich http://file.podgourski.net/opopova/bahmetev-nikolai-alekseevich-w.jpg?size=300
    Penza entrepreneurs and artisans tried themselves in various fields of activity, such as carriage production, jewelry, bakery, etc.

    Answer Delete
  19. Anton M. The religious life of Penza received its greatest development in the 19th century. October 16, 1799 Penza received the status of a diocesan center, and the first bishop of the Orthodox Church was appointed. Although, of course, there were churches of the Orthodox Church before. In 1663, the Cathedral Church of the All-Merciful Savior was consecrated, and a little earlier, even before the construction of the city fortress in Circassia, the first temple of our city, the Church of the Resurrection, was opened. And yet, church affairs began to reach full speed in the 19th century. Apparently this gave impetus to non-Orthodox believers to pay attention to social activities. Moreover, Protestants showed the most active position. If the Alexander Church was consecrated in 1838, then the Catholic Church only in 1906, the synagogue in 1897.

    In the 20s of the 19th century, there were up to 150 people in the Protestant community of Penza. It was decided to acquire its own religious building. In 1822, the community council received permission to purchase a building on Dvoryanskaya Street (now Krasnaya Street). But the reconstruction of the building was delayed and in 1827 the community council petitioned for money to complete the interior decoration, but Nicholas I did not give the money.

    The reconstruction lasted another 10 years, and in 1837 a pastor was appointed to the Penza Lutheran Church, who received the title of Penza Evangelical Division Preacher, since the bulk of the community members were soldiers of the Penza garrison. In March 1838, the Alexander Church was consecrated.

    Answer Delete
  20. Famous people of Penza at the beginning of the 19th century.
    Mikhail Evgrafovich Saltykov-Shchedrin (real name Saltykov, pseudonym Nikolai Shchedrin - Russian writer, Ryazan and Tver vice-governor. From January 14, 1865 to December 2, 1866, he lived in Penza, where he was appointed chairman of the Penza Treasury Chamber by order of the Minister of Finance.
    On duty, Mikhail Evgrafovich controlled the state of trade and trade, tried to organize the smooth work of the provincial and district treasuries, dealt harshly with landowners who did not pay arrears, defended the interests of the ruined “temporarily obliged”, spoke out against embezzlement and extortion. Saltykov-Shchedrin often visited Chembar, Mokshan, Nizhny-Lomov, Kerensk, Narovchat, Insar, Gorodishche and other districts of the province, which he mentioned quite often in his works. During his stay in Penza, Mikhail Evgrafovich created a library for employees at the state chamber, as well as a mutual aid fund - “an unheard of thing for that time.” It was in Penza that Saltykov-Shchedrin’s “Essays on the City of Bryukhov”, “Letters from the Province”, “Signs of the Times” began to take shape; here he is working on completing the story “A Quiet Refuge”. Frequent travel around the province helped the writer to better understand the life of the post-reform Penza village. The morals of the Penzyaks more than once became the object of his satire, for example, in “Poshekhonsky Stories”. And we can safely say that Penza impressions were reflected in many of the writer’s works.
    But about the Penza ladies:
    Penza ladies are lovely! They are a little full, but so full that this fullness never turns into vagueness. They are flirtatious, but in such a way that they never completely deprive a person of hope. They love to lie, but so much so that they never lose their self-esteem. One could not wish for softer, more pleasant morals.
    By the way, the wife of Mikhail Evgrafovich E.A. Boltina was from the Penza province. The writer's son, K.M. Saltykov (1871–1932) in 1907–1929. lived in Penza, wrote in provincial newspapers, and in 1923 published his memoirs “Intimate Shchedrin.” In Penza, a street and city library No. 2 are named after the writer. A memorial plaque was installed at house No. 8 on Belinsky Street, where the state chamber was located.

    Answer Delete
  21. GORSTKIN IVAN NIKOLAEVICH

    Ivan Nikolaevich was noble origin, his father was Nikolai Petrovich Gorstkin, a Tula landowner who had 650 serf souls in the Tula and Penza provinces. Mother - Elizaveta Ivanovna Ozerova, sister - Sofya Nikolaevna Gorstkina.

    Ivan Gorstkin was brought up in a Moscow university boarding school. In June 1814, a sixteen-year-old young man entered the Life Guards Jaeger Regiment as a cadet, in January 1818 he became an ensign, in October 1819 he received the rank of second lieutenant, and in January 1821 he retired from military service with the rank of lieutenant. In July 1824, Ivan Gorstkin was enrolled in the civil chancellery of the Moscow Military Governor-General, and in May 1825 he became a titular adviser to the Moscow provincial government.
    Member of the Welfare Union (1818), the Moscow council of the Northern Society (1825) and the secret Decembrist organization “Practical Union” (1825). After the Decembrist uprising in January 1826, he was arrested in Moscow, taken to St. Petersburg and imprisoned in the Peter and Paul Fortress, from where exiled under watchful control to Vyatka. In July 1827, he was allowed to live permanently under secret police surveillance on a family estate in the village of Golodiaevka, Chembar district, Penza province. He was married to Evgenia Grigorievna Lomonosova.

    Living in the provincial city, Ivan Nikolaevich did a lot for the development of performing arts in Penza. In 1846, he bought the old building of the Gladkov Theater and organized amateur charity performances, the proceeds from which went to the needs of orphanages, a women's parish school, and the organization of a school at the prison castle. The capital's press noted the success of Gorstkin's staging of scenes from A. Griboedov's "Woe from Wit", which were prohibited by censorship from being staged in the provinces. In the 1840s, the theater premises were also rented out to entrepreneurs, whom Gorstkin helped in organizing performances.
    In March 1848, Gorstkin received the right to enter the service in Moscow and free entry into St. Petersburg, but remained to live in the Penza province. Taking an active part in public life.

    He died in Penza in 1876. Unfortunately, his grave has not survived to this day.

    Answer Delete

    Penza in the first half of the 19th century.

    The first half of the 19th century, compared to the second half of the 18th century, made few changes in the lifestyle of townspeople and settlements. As before, the wealthiest class were the nobles, who lived in winter with their families in city estates. Balls, theater, cards and other idleness filled all their leisure time. We do not know a single fact when at least one of the adult representatives of the “noble” class who lived in Penza in the first half of the 19th century was engaged in useful work. The facts speak for themselves: in 1838, the city library issued only 400 books to “officials and other persons.” The nobles had little interest in books and science. Writer P.I. Sumarokov wrote about the life of the Penza nobility in 1838 that his “new generation spends money on St. Petersburg carriages, on furniture... and spends time in solitude, without pleasure for themselves or others. The reason for this is insane luxury; it is impossible to give a dinner without truffles, champagne not on silver or porcelain. To send a few feasts and balls, you need to mortgage the village; to get married, you have to go half broke.”

    Makeev N.V.

    Answer Delete
  22. Continuation...

    Industry in Penza. First half of the 19th century.

    Industry, compared to the second half of the 18th century, did not take even half a step forward. If in 1790 there were 5 soap factories in Penza, then in 1850 there were 3, tanneries were 5 and 4, respectively, and 3 iron smelting factories were added, producing 2.7 thousand rubles worth of products per year. While, for example, a cloth factory in the village. Golitsyno, Nizhnelomovsky district - by 105.7 thousand rubles. All enterprises in the city of Penza produced products worth 70.2 thousand rubles in 1850, all 90 factories and factories in the Penza province (excluding 43 distilleries) - worth 972.2 thousand rubles. Thus, the share of industrial production in Penza was only 7.2% of the total provincial volume. If we take into account the distillery, which was located in the districts and brought the greatest income, then the share of the city of Penza in the economy of the province will generally be negligible. Most of the workers in the city worked at brick factories - 353, followed by shoemakers and shoemakers - 199, butchers - 127, carpenters - 124, tailors - 121, cab drivers - 116, Kalashniks - 101. And only 7 mechanics, 10 gunsmiths, 11 watchmakers , 22 silversmiths, 19 gilders, 30 coppersmiths and 88 blacksmiths. For 28 thousand inhabitants, there were not even two hundred people who knew how to work with metal products. Therefore, when several decades ago they talked about the centuries-long backwardness of Tsarist Russia from the industrialized countries of the West, this was not an exaggeration.

    Answer Delete
  23. The lack of locally produced products was compensated for by fair trade and other types of trade. Contemporaries noted the rich selection of goods in Penza shops. Trade in horses developed. For some reason, the brilliant description of the Penza horse fair in the story by N.S. escaped the attention of local historians. Leskov "The Enchanted Wanderer". According to all the signs, names and names of villages mentioned (Selixa, Mordovian Ishim), the fair took place in Akhuny. The main character of the story, Ivan Severyanovich Flyagin, having drunk tea in a Penza tavern, went out “beyond the Sura River to the steppe, where there are schools of horses, and with them there are Tatars in wagons.” Among the important people of the fair, Leskov’s hero saw “Khan Dzhangar,” who “in the steppe is like a king.” The mention of this name in the story allows us to date the events described by Leskov. In 1823, Dzhanger (and not Dzhangar) was appointed by the tsarist government as khan of the Bukeev “Kyrgyz” horde, which roamed the Astrakhan province (died in 1845). Since 1826, the main occupation of the horde was the sale of bred horses, including purebreds. Khan went to fairs personally for fun. The sale, which began as an auction, ended in fierce competition for the right to buy the handsome horse. Apparently, it is no coincidence that Akhuny became known as the “Tatar” part of Penza, and by the end of the 19th century. became a Muslim cultural center: apparently, it was here, on the Kazan road, that Tatar horse fairs were held in the old days.

    Answer Delete
  24. Famous people of Penza in the first half of the 19th century.

    Alexey Nikolaevich Bakhmetev.

    Bakhmetev Alexey Nikolaevich, hero of the war of 1812, was born in 1774 in the village of Rozhdestvenskoye, Insarsky district, Penza province, Kazan province. He came from the nobility of the Penza province. Graduated from the noble boarding school at Moscow University. According to the custom of that time. was enlisted at the age of four, on September 10, 1777, as a sergeant in the Life Guards Preobrazhensky Regiment. He entered active service on January 1, 1790: as an ensign in the Izmailovsky Life Guards Regiment, he took part in the war with Sweden. In 1800
    Bakhmetev was promoted to major general and appointed chief of the Siberian Grenadier Regiment, with which in 1807 he distinguished himself in battles with the Turks at Zhurzha and Obilesti. In 1809, Bakhmetev was entrusted with a detachment and given the task of disturbing the Turks in the vicinity of Brailov. In the battle of Rassevat, B. commanded the Arkhangelsk and Vologda regiments and was awarded the Highest Rescript for his courageous actions. Oct 10 in the battle of Tataritsa, he commanded a square in the center of the combat position, with which he attacked the central Turkish battery, drove the Turkish Janissaries from it with bayonets, took possession of it and, placing his artillery on it, assisted with its fire and the bayonets of his infantry in repelling Turkish counter-attacks. Wounded at the end of the battle, Bakhmetev. was awarded the order. saint George 3rd class. In 1810, B. fought under the walls of Silistria and Shumla, defeated the Turks near the village. Chigrikioy and was seriously wounded during the assault on Rushchuk. Appointed commander of the 23rd Infantry Division, Bakhmetev in 1812 joined it in the 1st Army and staunchly defended the city of Ostrovna for a whole day, and then took an active part in the Battle of Borodino, where the core, tearing off his leg, put an end to his combat activities. Awarded for Borodino the rank of lieutenant general.
    Appointed March 27, 1814 as military governor of Kamenets-Podolsk. Since May 1816, he was also the plenipotentiary governor of the Bessarabia region. On December 12, 1823, he was promoted to infantry general, and five years later he was appointed governor-general of Nizhny Novgorod, Kazan, Simbirsk and Penza. In 1828 he became a member of the State Council with release from the post of Governor General. Died 1841

    Answer Delete
  25. Pyotr Fedorovich Gromnitsky is an active participant in the Decembrist movement, lieutenant of the Penza Infantry Regiment. Born into the family of a small-scale Kerensky landowner in the Penza province. His childhood years passed in Kerensk. He was educated in the 2nd Cadet Corps, where he entered in 1814. In February 1819, he was released as an ensign and assigned to the Penza Infantry Regiment, second lieutenant - from April 1820, lieutenant - from May 1823. In 1824 he was a member of the Society of United Slavs. After the suppression of the Decembrists' speech, he was arrested, taken from Zhitomir to St. Petersburg, put in the main guardhouse, and on the same day transferred to the Peter and Paul Fortress in bastion No. 8 (Trubetskoy Bastion Prison). Was under investigation. The commission charged Gromnitsky, among other things, with participation in the intent to commit regicide, in the intent of rebellion, and knowledge of the preparations for the conspirators in December 1825.
    He was recognized as a state criminal, and by the verdict of the Supreme Criminal Court he was sentenced in the second category to political death, deprivation of ranks and nobility and to 20 years of hard labor. While imprisoned, he changed a number of fortresses, and in 1828 he was sent to Siberia. Initially placed in the Chita prison, then transferred to the Petrovsky plant, in December 1835 he was released from hard labor and sent to settle in the village. Belsk, Irkutsk province. Since 1836 he lived in this small Siberian village. Since childhood, having a talent for drawing, at the Petrovsky plant, communicating with N. A. Bestuzhev, he improved his abilities. He painted icons for the local church, thus earning his living. In 1842 he was placed under special supervision of the local police for reading and rewriting the works of the Decembrist M. S. Lunin. He died of consumption in the hospital of the Irkutsk salt plant in the village. Usolye, where he was buried (the grave has not survived).

    Answer Delete
  26. Famous people of Penza in the first half of the 19th century.

    Ivan Vasilievich Saburov

    Ivan Vasilyevich Saburov (1788-1873) - agronomist and public figure. Born in Penza. In 1806 he entered military service and served in Kyiv. In 1809, he retired, married M. M. Kheraskov’s niece, Vera Petrovna Kheraskova, and settled with his father in the village of Derteve, Penza province, and began farming.
    In 1812, with the rank of major, he was elected commander of a battalion of the Penza militia; participated in the campaign of 1813; was appointed Dresden parade major; then he was commandant in Dresden and carried out a diplomatic mission in Vienna. He had the Order of St. Vladimir, IV degree, with a bow. Returning to his homeland, he seriously studied agriculture, political economy and statistics, and after the death of his father he began farming independently. In 1822 he was elected a member of the Imperial Moscow Society of Farmers eastern Russia.
    He owns: “A short guide to breeding and keeping fine-wool sheep in Central Russia”, M., 1826; “Notes of a Penza landowner. On the theory and practice of agriculture” (“Domestic Notes”, 1842 and 1843, parts XX-XXVI); "Notes on the economy of the southern part of the Penza province in 1854." (“Proceedings of I.V.E.O.”, 1854, No. 9); “Economic and statistical program for describing the composition, productivity, strength and various accessories of Russian noble estates” (Appendix to rural improvement, M., 1858); "The progress of agriculture in England. Preliminary considerations and comparisons"; “Opinions on measures to improve peasant agriculture,” M., 1876; “Map of Russia with division into stripes in relation to agricultural productivity”; “Tables for collecting statistical information”, etc. In the last years of his life he was chairman of the Penza statistical committee. He died in Penza in 1873.

    Answer Delete
  27. VARENTSOV, merchants.
    Egor Ivanovich (1781-1843), in 1825 he was assigned to the Penza merchant society from the economic peasants of the Yaroslavl province. He had a stone house on Moskovskaya Street in Penza and sold wines and vegetables. In August 1836, he supplied food to Emperor Nicholas I, who was in Chembar (now Belinsky).
    Grigory Egorovich, his son, was born in 1819, was a member of the 1st merchant guild, sold colonial and vegetable goods in his own store (now the corner of K. Marx and Moskovskaya streets), and was awarded the title of hereditary honorary citizen and a gold medal. He was repeatedly elected as a 1st class member of the Penza City Duma.

    OCCHINS, Penza merchants, public figures.
    Mikhail Petrovich (1743-1821), merchant of the 1st guild, had a stone house in Penza, 4 shops at the Nizhny Market, grain barns, ran a drinking establishment, and sold small goods and drinks. In 1797 he built the Peter and Paul Church in Penza. In 1795 he was elected burgomaster, in 1799–1801. city ​​mayor.
    Nikolai Fedorovich (1772-?) carried out the grain trade. Since 1792, the vowel of Penza. City Duma. He donated to the organization of the Penza militia in the Patriotic War of 1812.
    Alexey Fedorovich (1782–1819), merchant of the 1st guild, owner of a grain barn at Nizhny Torg. Brother of Nikolai Fedorovich. In 1811–1817 city ​​mayor. In 1817, at his own expense, he built the All Saints Church in Penza, on the territory of which the family necropolis was located.

    BABYNINS, Penza merchants
    Pyotr Andreevich Babynin (1778 - after 1827), firmly followed his father’s path, maintaining the vegetable trade. He invested the accumulated money in real estate, building two stone houses on Moskovskaya Street and one wooden house on Troitskaya. Evidence of his high public recognition was his election as market leader, ratman and burgomaster.
    In 1827, Pyotr Andreevich’s merchant career was cut short - he moved into the philistine class. Lost in the sea of ​​tax-paying inhabitants of Penza. However, one of his daughters-in-law, Nadezhda Andreevna Babynina (1831 - 1896), died while remaining a merchant. Penza lived in the 19th century peaceful life provincial town. The noble families of the Arsenyevs, Sheremetevs, Shuvalovs, Golitsyns, Kurakins, Tatishchevs, Dolgorukys, Suvorovs, Vorontsovs, Razumovskys, Beketovs, Zagoskins are associated with the Penza province. The Penza governor in 1816-1819 was Mikhail Mikhailovich Speransky - his governorship was perceived by everyone as an “honorable exile” after the failed reform. Alexander Nikolaevich Radishchev and Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov visited Penza several times; the hero of the war of 1812, Denis Vasilyevich Davydov, and the poet Vasily Andreevich Zhukovsky visited Penza. The critic Vissarion Grigorievich Belinsky graduated from the Penza gymnasium, and the future historian Vasily Osipovich Klyuchevsky graduated from theological school and studied at the seminary. Lenin's father Ilya Nikolaevich Ulyanov and surgeon Nikolai Nilovich Burdenko, writers Mikhail Evgrafovich Saltykov-Shchedrin (head of the Treasury Chamber) and Nikolai Semenovich Leskov, artist Konstantin Apollonovich Savitsky worked in Penza. Penza was considered an enlightened city, since the oldest theater in our country (1793), the first national stationary circus of the Nikitin brothers in Russia (since January 1874), cultural societies and libraries named after Belinsky and Lermontov, and a large number of secular and religious educational institutions operated in the city.

    Answer Delete
  28. Officialdom of the Penza province in the first half of the 19th century.
    In the first half of the 19th century. bureaucracy of the Penza province social background and financial situation were divided into two categories. The first category included representatives of the highest authorities of the province, mostly from the nobility. The second category of provincial officials consisted of the so-called “officials of clerical origin.” In 1826, 36.6% of officials belonged to hereditary nobles by origin. By 1855 the ratio had changed. The number of officials of noble origin increased. For many nobles in the 19th century. The career of an official began after retirement from military service. The positions of mayor and judge with a salary of 300 rubles per year were considered the top rung of the county bureaucratic ladder.
    In an effort to provide institutions with literate and qualified workers, the government prohibited the children of clerks from entering any service other than the civil service. One of the leading factors in career advancement was education. At the beginning of the 19th century. The level of education of officials in the Penza province was extremely low. The main type of education was home. According to the memoirs of State Councilor G.I. Meshkov, who served in Penza, in the early 1820s. a seminarian was hired to train him for 5 rubles. banknotes per month, since his father, a titular councilor, did not have the opportunity to give his son another education. The decree of August 6, 1809, developed by M. M. Speransky, should have become a serious incentive for obtaining education. According to the decree, in order to obtain the rank of collegiate assessor, which gave the rights of hereditary nobility, and state councilor, it was necessary to present a certificate of graduation from the university or pass the appropriate exams. These measures had certain results. In 1834, in the Penza province, 3.2% of officials had higher education, 11.3% had secondary education; persons who graduated from lower educational institutions or were educated at home accounted for 85.5%.
    In the upper part of the city there was a tannery of the tradesman P.I. Kasatkina.

    At the beginning of the 19th century, soap production was maintained and developed in Penza. In 1800, merchant A.I. Sergeev built a factory with an annual productivity of up to 1 thousand poods of soap and a net profit of up to 14 thousand rubles.

    At the soap factory I.E. Chembarov in 1838 had only one boiler for making soap; later he installed a second boiler and mastered the production of tallow candles.

    Kupets I.I. The Reich, on the banks of the Penza River, on pasture land, had a soap factory, which in 1827 produced 970 pounds of the best soap, in 1831 - 2 thousand pounds. Later this plant became the property of the Kulakhmetovs.

    At the N.D. plant Kazitsyn there were 6 vats in operation, in 1829 2 thousand 490 pounds of soap were produced; plant E.F. Chernyshov produced 2.1 thousand pounds.

    At the salotopne I.T. Babynin employed two workers, who in 1829 produced 500 pounds of lard. Salotope establishment L.P. Potekhin produced 1 thousand pounds in 1829, and E.A. Kleshchova - 400 poods. Salotope plant M.A. Tyurina annually produced up to 1.5 thousand pounds of raw materials for soap factories. Thanks to the presence of salotopic enterprises in Penza, candle factories were also created. Plant V.P. Kazitsyn in 1813 issued 1 thousand pounds of candles to consumers, M.A. factories. Kshindin and N.A. Kalashnikov - 550 each, P.A. Pokholkova - 500 poods.

    There was brewing and vodka production in Penza. Brewery A.I. Sergeev was located in two wooden buildings near the Erik River.

    At the brewery of the merchant of the 1st guild V.I. Serebrennikov installed 10 vats, 4 kvass, 4 boilers; in 1815, 8.4 thousand buckets of beer were brewed on it, in 1817 - 8 thousand 350.

    At the factory of merchant V.A. Kadomtsev in 1826 received 1 thousand 512 buckets.

    Vodka factory V.I. Serebrennikov in 1827 passed to the chamber cadet L.O. Poniatovsky, merchant of the 1st guild M.A. Kramarev and commercial advisor I.Yu. Hazelnuts. In 1815, this plant produced 4 thousand 150 buckets of alcohol, in 1827 - 226 buckets.

    In Penza there was a tobacco factory K.O. Shill, on which 8 workers serviced two machines.

    In the first half of the 19th century, P.V. entered the business arena. Sergeev. He started his business with a flour mill, which by the 1860s employed 120 people, operated 50 units (34 grain mills and 16 grinders), and up to 400 thousand pounds of grain were ground per year.

    Pilnya P.V. Sergeeva sawed up to 1 thousand logs per year into 2 frames and 12 workplaces. In 1850 P.V. Sergeev organized a stationery factory, which in the second half of the 19th century took a leading position in the industrial production of Penza. By 1870, it employed 1 thousand people. Production at the factory increased from 113 thousand pounds in 1887 to 280 thousand pounds in 1913. Sergeevskaya paper was awarded gold medals at the All-Russian exhibitions in 1882 and 1886; it received the same honorary awards at the international exhibitions of 1885 in Antwerp and in Paris in 1900 and 1908.

    Answer Delete
  29. continuation...
    In the first half of the 19th century, there were metalworking enterprises in Penza. The first iron smelting plant of bourgeois A.N. Otrakova was already operating in 1830; later it became the property of A.P. Lamberga. The plant produced threshing machines and other equipment.

    In the pre-reform period in Penza, the merchant F.A. Privalov created a bell factory, housed in two wooden buildings. Copper, tin, and iron were used to make bells. Annual production was 2 thousand poods. Owned by F.A. Privalov there was also an iron smelting plant that produced self-propelled guns and threshing machines.

    Answer Delete
  30. Theaters at the beginning of the 19th century in Penza.
    The theatrical atmosphere of Penza and the province was created by the serf theaters of princes A.B. Kurakin and S.F. Golitsyn, landowners N.E. Struisky, G.V. Gladkov, P.A. Gorikhvostov, V.I. Kozhina, E.P. Chemesov, O.V. Matsneva, A.M. Beketov, L.V. Akimov, N.F. Kishensky, A.N. Arapov, Bakhmetevs, Panchulidzevs.
    And so, by the end of 1793, on Troitskaya Street in Penza, on the estate of the court councilor Dmitry Egorovich Polchaninov, a theater building was erected, which was not similar to the usual “home” architecture of traditional houses. “On November 24, on the name day of Great Catherine, we decided to update it with a public performance, intending to publish about it in the newspapers; We chose a comedy composed by the Empress herself, called “The Deceiver.”<...>So, we played on the greatest holiday. After the comedy that all the noble hunters enjoyed,<...>I had a huge ball. Up to two hundred people were admitted into the theater with tickets, and some of them came to me; Horn music in the garden, and instrumental music in the hall delighted my guests. The governor also visited me that day...” These enthusiastic lines belong to Vice-Governor Ivan Mikhailovich Dolgorukov. Note that nobles and officials played on stage, and there were people of the same class in the hall. But already in 1796, professional actors joined the theater troupe. This is how a significant event happened in Penza - the birth of the theater.
    Talented inspirers and organizers I.M. Dolgorukov and D.E. Polchaninov, the first Penza comedians laid the foundation for public theatrical performances that demonstrated high professional skills and contributed to establishing the glory of the first theater in Penza close to a professional format. Theatrical entertainment ceased to be just home lordly entertainment; both the local nobility and ordinary people were drawn to it.
    The birth of a professional theater and the active work of amateur theaters in Penza also had an all-Russian significance: the city on Sura was approaching its honorary title of the theater capital of the Russian province. In the first half of the 19th century, the province ranked third in the number of theaters after Moscow and St. Petersburg.
    In the middle of the 19th century, the baton of amateur and semi-professional theaters was picked up by various entrepreneurs who spread theatrical and commercial entrepreneurship in the Russian provinces. The first such entrepreneur was I.F. Boleslavsky. Official Mikhail Pavlovich Zhdanov called this period the decline of Penza’s theatrical glory, when “a gang of traveling buffoons under the command of a certain Boleslavsky” ruled the roost. Penza owes its overcoming of theatrical stagnation to the former Decembrist Ivan Nikolaevich Gorstkin, who bought the empty building of the Gladkov Theater in 1846. Soon amateur performances and professional troupes performed here again.

    Answer Delete
  31. Philip Philipovich Vigel (November 12, 1786, Simbukhovo estate (now the village of Kalinino, Penza district, Penza region) - March 20, 1856, Moscow) - one of the most famous Russian memoirists, an acquaintance of Pushkin, a member of the Arzamas circle, an author widely known and popular in the 19th century " Notes" (complete edition in seven parts, 1892), which provide rich material for the history of Russian life and customs of the first half of the 19th century, characteristics of various figures of that time.

    His father was a Swedish Estonian, and his mother’s was from the noble family of the Lebedevs. Grandfather Lavrenty Wigel (1689-1764) in his youth served as a Drabant captain in the army of Charles XII. Father, Philip Lavrentievich Vigel (1740-1812), a privy councilor, was the first civilian governor of the Penza province from 1801, and before that he was in charge of the delimitation of land for new settlers of the Penza and Saratov regions. The mother came from the family of the first Penza governor, Ivan Lebedev. The sister was the wife of General I. I. Alekseev, an exaggerated description of whose exploits Wigel left to posterity. On his father's side his closest relative was General F. I. Sanders.

    He was brought up in Moscow and in Zubrilovka (the Tambov estate of Prince S. Golitsyn and his wife Varvara, née Engelhardt), where he was in contact with Krylov, the tutor of the prince’s sons. He served in the Moscow archive of the Collegium of Foreign Affairs, where he met his future patron D.N. Bludov. In 1805 he participated in Golovkin's embassy to China. During his stay in Paris in the 1810s, Wigel got into a dark story when a hairdresser's apprentice, who spent the night with him, stole his gold watch; The famous detective Vidocq helped him find the loss. At meetings of the Arzamas circle he bore the nickname “Ivikov the Crane.” At the age of 39, under the patronage of M. S. Vorontsov, he was appointed vice-governor of Bessarabia. Later he was the mayor of Kerch and director of the department of foreign religions. He was fond of collecting engravings and lithographs. After retiring, he began writing memoirs.

    Wigel owes his fame to his memoirs about the first third of the 19th century (up to 1830), which, despite the bile and bias of assessments, as well as numerous inaccuracies, serve as a primary source for researchers of that time. The author himself read passages both at home and in crowded living rooms. Memoirs, for a long time circulated in the lists, were published with significant censorship omissions in the Russian Messenger after the death of the author (1864) and enjoyed wide popularity. Many rushed to justify themselves from Wigel's harsh sentences and to acquit their relatives or friends.
    In its first edition, F. F. Vigel’s memoirs were called “Memoirs of Philip Philipovich Vigel,” and when republished in 1928, which restored censorship passes, they began to be called simply “Notes.” The most complete publication was carried out in 1891-93. Throughout the 20th century, the Notes were not published in their entirety and became a bibliographic rarity.

    Answer Delete
  32. What did Penza look like at the beginning of the 19th century?
    Lermontov Street (until 1964 - Sadovaya) is a street in Penza, located in the historical center of the city. It runs from Kirov Street to Leningradskaya Street on Western Polyana. On the north side the street is adjacent to the Central Park of Culture and Leisure named after. V. G. Belinsky and the square named after M. Yu. Lermontov.
    The street, which now bears the name of Lermontov, is one of the oldest streets in Penza; it appeared in the first half of the 19th century.
    Since the 20s of 1820, the street was called Sadovaya, since it was planned as a road to the gardening school located five miles west of Penza (now the Penza Agrarian College), opened on August 15, 1820. The Penza School at that time was the first school of this profile in Russia. An alley was cut through the forest to the school, which was marked out as building sites within the city limits. In 1838, the house of the Decembrist I.N. was built. Gorstkin on Sadovaya Street, which later housed the Penza branch of the State Bank. And in 1846, a hospital was opened at the very top of Sadovaya Street, which became the Provincial Zemstvo Hospital in 1865.
    In connection with the 150th anniversary of the birth of the great poet in the fall of 1964, the street was named after M. Yu. Lermontov (1814-1841). In 1817-1818, as a child, M. Yu. Lermontov visited Penza with his grandmother E. A. Arsenyeva.
    On this street there is a square (1839), where in 1892 a monument to M. Yu. Lermontov was erected by the sculptor I. Ya. Ginzburg (1859-1939), and the square was given the name of the poet.

    Answer Delete
  33. 19th century architecture.
    The beginning of the 19th century quite clearly divided the period of predominance of baroque and the period of complete dominance of classicism in the territory of the province. As is known, the period of formation and then the flourishing of classicism in Moscow and the Moscow region occurred in the 1760-1780s. Consequently, the overall delay in style in the Penza province was 30-40 years. But in the classic period, which lasted in the province until the 1860s, it is difficult to talk about a delay; rather, we are talking about local selection, since at this time local architectural practice constantly interacts with the architecture of the capital regions.

    As in other regions of Russia, with the advent of classicism, significant changes occurred in the architecture of the Penza province. The analysis showed that centric types of temples became widespread, and primacy in the end was given to a single type: a wide rotunda under a hemisphere.

    Despite the presence in the Penza province of all centric types (compact-, cross-, linear-centric), known both in the architecture of the capital and other regions of Russia, the predominant type is still uniaxial buildings, in which the tendency towards centricity is only emerging, then there is still a tendency towards the traditional axial structure. In second place in terms of prevalence were temples of the linear-centric type. Probably because they were the most acceptable compromise between traditional axial and centric designs. Planning types, the centricity of which was more clearly expressed than the “barrier of understanding” of the new style defined by local traditions, appeared here very rarely.