A short essay “what is the tragedy of Pechorin, a hero of our time.” Essay on the topic “What is the tragedy of Pechorin
In the life story of Pechorin - the main character of the novel M.Yu. Lermontov - reflected the fate of a generation of young people in the 30s of the 19th century. According to Lermontov himself, Pechorin is the image of his contemporary, the way the author “understands and... often met him.” This is “a portrait made up of the vices ... of a generation in their full development.”
Creating the image of Pechorin, Lermontov wanted to find answers to the questions why gifted people who stand out from the general mass cannot find a place for themselves in life, why they waste their energy on trifles, why they are lonely.
In order to more fully reveal the essence and causes of the tragedy of people like Pechorin, the author shows us his hero in different life circumstances. In addition, Lermontov specifically places his hero in different strata of society (highlanders, smugglers, “water society”).
And everywhere Pechorin brings people nothing but suffering. Why is this happening? After all, this person is endowed with great intelligence and talent, “immense powers” lurk in his soul. In order to find the answer, you need to get to know the main character of the novel better. Coming from noble family, he received a typical upbringing and education for his circle. From Pechorin's confession we learn that, having left the care of his relatives, he set out in pursuit of pleasure. Once in big light, Pechorin starts affairs with secular beauties. But he very quickly becomes disillusioned with all this, and boredom takes over. Then Pechorin tries to do science and read books. But nothing brings him satisfaction, and in the hope that “boredom does not live under Chechen bullets,” he goes to the Caucasus.
However, wherever Pechorin appears, he becomes “an ax in the hands of fate.” In the story “Taman,” the hero’s search for dangerous adventures leads to unpleasant changes in the established life of “peaceful smugglers.” In the story “Bela,” Pechorin ruins the life of not only Bela herself, but also her father and Kazbich. The same thing happens with the heroes of the story “Princess Mary”. In “Fatalist,” Pechorin’s gloomy prediction (the death of Vulich) comes true, and in the story “Maksim Maksimych” he undermines the old man’s faith in the younger generation.
In my opinion, the main reason for Pechorin’s tragedy lies in the value system of this person. In his diary, he admits that he looks at the suffering and joy of people as food that supports his strength. In this Pechorin reveals himself as an egoist. One gets the impression that, while communicating with people, he is conducting a series of failed experiments. For example, he openly admits to Maxim Maksimych that “the love of a savage better than love noble lady; the ignorance and simple-heartedness of one are just as annoying as the coquetry of the other.” In a conversation with Werner, he says that “from the storm of life... he brought out only a few ideas - and not a single feeling.” “For a long time now I have been living not with my heart, but with my head. I weigh and analyze my own passions and actions with strict curiosity, but without participation,” the hero admits. If Pechorin refers to his own life “without participation,” then what can we say about his attitude towards other people?
It seems to me that the hero of the novel cannot find his place in life precisely because of his indifference to people. His disappointment and boredom are caused by the fact that he is truly no longer able to feel. Pechorin himself justifies his actions this way: “...this has been my fate since childhood! Everyone read on my face signs of bad qualities that were not there; but they were assumed - and they were born... I became secretive... I became vindictive... I became envious... I learned to hate... I began to deceive... I became a moral cripple...”
I think that M. Yu. Lermontov gives his answer to the question of what Pechorin’s tragedy is in the very title of the novel: “Hero of Our Time.” On the one hand, the name speaks of the typicality of this character for the 30s of the 19th century, and on the other, it indicates that Pechorin is a product of his time. Lermontov makes us understand that Pechorin’s tragedy lies in the lack of demand by time for his mind, talents and thirst for activity.
Tasks and tests on the topic “What is Pechorin’s tragedy? (based on the novel “A Hero of Our Time”)”
- Orthoepy - Important Topics to repeat the Unified State Exam in Russian
Lessons: 1 Tasks: 7
- Changing past tense verbs by gender and number - Verb as part of speech grade 4
Lessons: 1 Assignments: 9 Tests: 1
The essay is an analysis of the relationship between the character and fate of the main character of the novel M.Yu. Lermontov “Hero of Our Time” by Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin. So, what is this man's tragedy?
He is cheerful, gallant, smart, merciless and pitiful,
And unpredictable: now ice, now blazing fire,
What drives the dazzlingly young Vestal Virgins crazy?
Zoya Yashchenko
Pechorin has a noble origin, upbringing and education respectively. He's like Pushkin's Onegin, is pretty tired of the bustle of society and its conventions and is trying to find his own path in life, different from the generally accepted canons.
“I entered this life having already experienced it mentally, and I became bored and disgusted, like someone who reads a bad imitation of a long-known book.”
This person is constantly burdened by boredom, burdening him equally with pleasures and sorrows. Choosing a military career, he hopes for a variety of sensations, but he will be disappointed:
“I hoped that boredom did not live under Chechen bullets - in vain: after a month I got so used to their buzzing and the proximity of death that, really, I paid more attention to mosquitoes - and I became more bored than before, because I had lost almost the last hope."
Grigory Alexandrovich undoubtedly has an inquisitive mind and deep insight. But, unfortunately, these character traits do him a disservice. The mind borders on irrepressible corrosiveness, insight, turned inward, leads to boundless disappointments and increasing spiritual emptiness.
Pechorin has long ceased to live with his heart, listening only to the voice of reason and, in his own expression, laughs at everything and most of all at feelings. What we're talking about First of all, about his own feelings (“I sometimes despise myself... Isn’t that why I despise others?”) - absolutely no one knows, and from the outside the hero makes an almost unambiguously negative impression. Self-mockery is visible to the reader from the diary, and other characters in the novel are not aware of the subtle mental work, constantly happening in Pechorin’s mind.
He understands perfectly well how much misfortune his actions bring to the people around him; He also sees that he himself suffers from his own mentality, but rightly notes that this does not make it any easier for anyone. Actually, that’s why his emotional impulses, sometimes suffering, cannot serve as an excuse for his actions, because they are committed in full understanding of all possible consequences. He does not feel sorry for anyone else, primarily because he is incapable of feeling sorry for himself.
Pechorin notes, not without bitterness, that in life he is driven by ideas, but not by emotions; he evaluates his actions harshly and harshly, but “without participation,” as if from the outside. The duality of his nature is manifested in the fact that one part of it seems to live the life of the hero himself, and the second caustically comments on it and condemns it. They are inseparable, and the balance between them is very fragile.
It is difficult to consider him a negative character for the reason that we, the readers, see very well what mental torment his entire existence costs him. He is not able to experience true happiness, since this category is more emotional than material, and Pechorin’s feelings are perverted and suppressed. Whether we are talking about a certain psychological trauma received in society (in a dialogue with Princess Ligovskaya, he notices that those around him were always inclined to turn the properties of his personality upside down), or simply such an innate sad feature of his worldview - God knows. At the same time, I can’t even call the hero a positive character after everything that we learn from the events of the novel.
There is such a category of people, who probably even have their own terminological definition, unknown to me, these are people who, in principle, are not capable of being happy. And their misfortune is organically woven into their fate, seemingly becoming a kind of analogue of happiness. Pechorin's tragedy also lies in the discrepancy between the external and the internal. Emotions healthy person they are refracted in it, transforming into a pathological passion for living a dual life, including objective events and their subjective assessment, most often clearly negative. He denies himself the opportunity to live in harmony with his caustic inner skeptic, content with looking at what is happening from the outside and from above.
“I feel this insatiable greed within me, devouring everything that comes my way; I look at the sufferings and joys of others only in relation to myself, as food that supports my spiritual strength.”
In general, in my opinion, the hero is most accurately characterized by his following statement:
“The sad things are funny to us, the funny things are sad, but in general, to be honest, we are quite indifferent to everything except ourselves.”
There is both a contradictory nature and painful self-abasement.
So, alas, he did not leave M.Yu. Lermontov to his favorite character has prospects for happy life. What could have awaited him if he had not died at a young age? Marriage? Hardly. In any case, this could not have lasted for any long time: the next enthusiastic young lady or hot-tempered officer would certainly have met, and everything would have started all over again... Brilliant military career? Considering that Pechorin is not cowardly by nature, and also values little own life- quite possibly.
But again - not for long: promotion in rank would probably again require a certain game according to someone else’s rules, and this is not about him. So, again there is a scandal, a duel... We can only dream of peace, in other words. Peace for Lermontov is generally a special topic, integral to his lyrical hero, this permeates the entire work of the poet.
Pechorin really was classic example extra person in society: neither did he need it in his in real form, neither he to him. Such people have always been, are and will be, regardless of the time in which, in the language of the character, they had the misfortune of being born. However, probably the hero M.Yu. Lermontov was the first among them, whose psychological picture we had the opportunity to see on the pages officially recognizing the right of such a person to exist.
In the novel “Hero of Our Time,” Lermontov introduces the reader to the image of a man who absorbed the most characteristic qualities of the generation of the 30s XIX century. The novel examines the problem of the “extra person” using the example of the main actor, Pechorina.
Pechorin is a very difficult and contradictory person. His life bears the imprint of tragedy. This is both a tragedy of a person rejected by society and a tragedy of a crippled soul. What is this tragedy and what are its origins and causes?
Pechorin is placed in conditions in which his extraordinary personality cannot fully open up and express himself, and therefore is forced to waste his energy on unnecessary petty intrigues that only bring misfortune to people. Pechorin is forced to play the role of an egoist, that is, to be a “reluctant egoist,” and he himself suffers because of this.
This is the tragedy of the hero.
Pechorin stands out from the crowd of people around him. He is smart, straightforward and insightful. Lies and pretense, hypocrisy and cowardice are alien to him. He is not satisfied with an empty and monotonous existence in pursuit of petty, insignificant interests. Pechorin does not want to go with the flow with everyone else. With his intelligence and strength of character, he is capable of the most decisive and courageous actions. If he had directed his activities towards good, lofty goals, he could have achieved a lot. But fate and life decreed differently. As a result, Pechorin appears before us as an egoist who lives in the world to dispel his boredom at the expense of the misfortunes of others. He lives not with his heart, but with his mind. His soul is half dead. “I have become a moral cripple,” Pechorin admits to Princess Mary. Pechorin is full of contempt and hatred for people. He loves to study the psychology of people in various situations, without empathy or sympathy, but completely indifferently. Pechorin brings nothing but misfortune to those around him. Through his fault, the smugglers suffer, Bela dies, the lives of Vera and Princess Mary are destroyed, and Grushnitsky dies. “I played the role of an ax in the hands of fate,” Pechorin writes in his diary. What prompted the hero to cruel, selfish actions? Most likely the desire to relieve boredom. Pechorin did not think that behind each of his unbridled actions there was a living person with a soul and heart, with his own feelings and desires. Pechorin did everything for himself and nothing for others. “I look at the suffering and joy of others only in relation to myself,” Pechorin admits. This is how he explains his actions in relation to Princess Mary: “... There is immense pleasure in possessing a young, barely blossoming soul... I feel this insatiable greed in myself.” No wonder Princess Mary considers Pechorin worse than a murderer.
What made the hero this way? Possessing extraordinary qualities, Pechorin stood out from the crowd of peers, friends and other people from childhood. He put himself above others, and society put him below. Society does not tolerate those who are not like everyone else; it cannot come to terms with the existence of an extraordinary person who stands out in some way. And yet people failed to bring Pechorin under their average level, but managed to cripple his soul. Pechorin became secretive, envious, and vindictive. “And then despair was born in my chest - not the despair that is treated with the barrel of a pistol, but cold, powerless despair, covered with courtesy and a good-natured smile.”
Using the example of Pechorin, Lermontov shows inevitable conflict between thinking person and society, confrontation strong personality and the gray, faceless crowd, the problem of the “extra person”.
But can the hero be definitely called a cruel egoist?
“... If I am the cause of the misfortune of others, then I myself am no less unhappy!.. I... am very worthy of regret,” says Pechorin. Indeed, by torturing others, Pechorin himself suffers no less. If he is an egoist, then he is a suffering egoist. Genuine human feelings did not completely die in it. An example is the attitude towards Faith. Indeed, his feelings for this woman are genuine. Pechorin at his core is a deeply unhappy person. He is lonely and incomprehensible.
People avoid him, feeling some kind of evil force in him. Pechorin lives without a goal, without aspirations, wasting himself on empty intrigues and unnecessary passions. But despite this, his heart is still capable of love, his soul is still capable of feeling, and his eyes are still capable of crying. At the end of the chapter “Princess Mary” we see Pechorin crying like a child. We see an unhappy, lonely person who has never found his place in life, who repents of his actions, a person who evokes pity and compassion.
The image of Pechorin is a tragic image of a thinker, strong man. Pechorin is a child of his time, in him Lermontov concentrated the main typical vices of his generation, namely: boredom, individualism, contempt. Lermontov portrayed a man in a struggle with society and with himself and the tragedy of this man.
Lermontov in “Hero of Our Time” reflected the fate of a whole generation of the most interesting, educated and the most talented people, great geniuses with whom the 30s of the 19th century were oversaturated. It’s a pity, but they often ended their lives stupidly, as they aimlessly drove themselves into a complete moral and emotional dead end. What is Pechorin's tragedy? Perhaps, let's start with the fact that the author put into the portrait of our hero whole line various human vices, which he often noticed among his contemporaries. These vices, like soul eaters, had a destructive effect on the individual, leading to complete despair, leading to shameful and reckless actions, leading to madness and even suicide.
We are writing an essay on the topic “What is the tragedy of Pechorin”
In this amazing hero, Lermontov showed a very subtle and vulnerable soul, which was tormented by constant disturbing thoughts about something global and incomprehensible to an ordinary person.
What is Pechorin's tragedy? In his young years, he tried to understand the meaning of life and figure out for himself why it was given, why it was so boring and meaningless, and why the feeling of happiness is just a moment. Why is a person gifted with extraordinary qualities unable to find a place for himself in a busy life, differing from the general crowd of people, is he doomed to misunderstanding and loneliness?
Portrait of a hero
Now let’s take a closer look at exactly what Pechorin’s tragedy is. To fully reveal the complexity of nature, this is far from the most positive hero it is worth paying attention to such minor features of his appearance as a dark mustache and eyebrows with different blonde hair, which indicate his extraordinary, contradictory nature and natural aristocracy. And here is another characteristic detail of the portrait: his eyes never laughed and shone with a steely cold shine. Oh, that says a lot! Lermontov shows his hero in a variety of different and unexpected circumstances.
Let's consider the reasons for what Pechorin's tragedy is, when he by nature, it would seem, is the darling of fate: smart, handsome, not poor, ladies adore him, but he has no peace anywhere, so his meaningless life ends at the peak of maturity.
Grigory Alexandrovich is not at all a noble warrior or a fatal man, who, wherever he appeared, brought nothing but trouble, so Mikhail Yuryevich literally specially places him in the most different strata of society: among the mountaineers, smugglers, and the “water society.” At the same time, Pechorin himself suffered no less than the people around him. But he was not tormented by remorse, but most of all suffered from the dissatisfaction of his ambitions and the complete absurdity of all the enterprises he started for fun, which were conceived for entertainment, in order to experience the acuity of feelings.
Seducer
So why did everything connected with him end so tragically? And everything seemed to happen not on purpose, but as if inadvertently, even completely by accident, sometimes under the guise of nobility, so to speak, out of pure motives. Many of his close circle wanted to see him as a reliable patron and friend, but they were simply poisoned by communication with him. The story “A Hero of Our Time” is partly based on this. Pechorin’s tragedy also lies in the fact that he understood this, but did not want to do anything, he did not feel sorry for anyone, he never truly loved anyone and did not become seriously attached to anyone.
Let's plunge into his biography, which testifies in detail to his noble origin and that the education and upbringing he received was absolutely typical for his circle. As soon as he felt freedom from the care of his family, he immediately set off in pursuit of pleasure secular society, where there were some adventures. Having immediately taken the path of a seducer of women's hearts, he began to have affairs left and right. But when he achieved his goal, he instantly became bored with everything, he quickly became disappointed in the fact that yesterday he was so attracted, haunted and excited his imagination, but today he no longer needed anything, he suddenly became cold and indifferent, calculating and cruel selfish.
Science to the rescue
While discussing the tragedy of Pechorin, it must be briefly said that, tired of love pleasures and flirtations, he decides to devote himself to science and reading, perhaps in this, as it seemed to him then, he would find at least some satisfaction, but no, he is still sad and lonely. Then he decides to desperate step and goes to the Caucasus, mistakenly thinking that boredom does not live under Chechen bullets.
The essay on the topic “What is Pechorin’s tragedy” can be continued by saying that Pechorin became “an ax in the hands of fate.” In the story “Taman” he was carried away by very dangerous adventures, in which he himself almost died and which ultimately led to the disruption of an established life and doomed “peaceful smugglers” to a miserable death. In the story “Bela” one death brought with it several more; in “Fatalist” Pechorin acts as a soothsayer, predicting the death of Vulich, which immediately happened.
Experiments
Pechorin becomes more and more insensitive and selfish with each new incident. In his diary, the only friend to whom he trusted his innermost thoughts, he suddenly writes that human suffering and joy became the real spiritual food that supported his vitality. There may even be such an unremarkable opinion that he seems to be conducting experiments, but they are very unsuccessful. Pechorin admits to Maxim Maksimych that he is not capable of serious feelings, be it Bela or another society lady, they will bore him equally, one - out of ignorance and simple-heartedness, the other - from habitual and constant coquetry.
From all the storms of life, he brings out his ideas and himself admits that for a long time he has been living not with his heart, but with his head. Analyzing his own actions and the passions that prompt them, he analyzes them, but somehow completely indifferently, as if this concerned him little, he always behaved this way in relationships with other people.
Worthlessness and lack of demand
What could be driving this man? And nothing but absolute indifference and inhumanity. He justified his actions by the fact that since childhood, adults, raising a highly noble nature in him, focused their attention on his supposedly bad properties, which did not exist, but after some time they manifested themselves in him. at will. He became vindictive, envious, ready to deceive, and eventually turned into a “moral cripple.” His supposedly good intentions and desires often turned people away from him.
Pechorin, with all his talents and thirst for activity, remained unclaimed. Personality calls him different points view, on the one hand - hostility, on the other - sympathy, but the tragedy of his image cannot be denied, torn by contradictions, he is close in image to Onegin and Chatsky, because they also placed themselves separately from society and did not see any meaning in their existence. And all because they didn’t find it for themselves high goal. Yes, exactly high, since people of this kind are absolutely not interested in base everyday goals. In this life, they only acquired the ability to see through people, they wanted to change the whole world and the whole society. They see the path to perfection through “communion with suffering.” So everyone who meets them is subjected to their uncompromising test. In general, this is where you can finish your essay on the topic “What is Pechorin’s tragedy.”
And his generations (based on the novel by M. Yu. Lermontov “Hero of Our Time”)
The novel “A Hero of Our Time” can hardly be classified as instructive and edifying literature. It rather arouses interest because the author asks philosophical questions, but does not answer them himself, giving the reader the opportunity to decide for himself what is true and what is not. Main character the novel, on the one hand, is the focus of “the vices of the entire generation in their full development,” and on the other, a personality who in many respects stands a step higher than most representatives of the youth generation of that time. That is why Pechorin is lonely. He is looking for a person who could oppose him in some way, understand him.
Pechorin was an aristocrat by birth and received a secular upbringing. Having left the care of his relatives, he “entered the big world” and “began to wildly enjoy all the pleasures.” He soon became disgusted with the frivolous life of an aristocrat, and reading books, like Onegin, became boring. After the “noisy story in St. Petersburg,” Pechorin was exiled to the Caucasus.
Drawing the appearance of his hero, the author emphasizes his aristocratic origin with several strokes: “pale, noble forehead”, “small aristocratic hand”, “dazzlingly clean linen”. Pechorin is a physically strong and resilient person: “his broad shoulders proved a strong build, capable of enduring all the difficulties of nomadic life... undefeated by either the debauchery of metropolitan life or spiritual storms.” The portrait of the hero reflects and personal traits: contradiction and secrecy. Is it any wonder that, “despite light color hair, his mustache and eyebrows are black"? His eyes did not laugh when he laughed.
“Born for a high purpose,” he is forced to live in languid inaction or waste his strength on actions unworthy of a real person. Even thrilling adventures cannot satisfy him. Love brings only disappointment and grief. He causes grief to those around him, and this deepens his suffering. Remember what the fate of Bela, Grushnitsky, Princess Mary and Vera, Maxim Maksimych was.
Pechorin tries to put the people around him on the same level as himself. But they do not stand up to such comparisons: the generation is simply not ready, incapable of any changes, and all the dark human sides are revealed. Testing people, the hero sees their baseness, inability to noble deeds, and this oppresses him and destroys his soul. Pechorin, who deep down believes in man, studies him and, not finding support for his faith, suffers. This is a person who has not found a high goal for himself. Precisely high, because so strong, strong-willed natures ordinary everyday goals do not attract. The only thing he mastered was the ability to see right through people. And he wants to change this world. Pechorin sees the path to perfection in “communion with suffering.” Everyone who meets him is subjected to a severe, uncompromising test.
Pechorin not only makes people rise higher in spiritual development, but also trying to understand himself. He is looking for the ideal of purity, nobility, spiritual beauty. Perhaps this ideal is inherent in Bel? Alas. Disappointment again. The girl could not rise above her servile love for Pechorin. Pechorin appears as an egoist, thinking only about his feelings - he quickly got bored with Bela, his love dried up. Nevertheless, the death of the girl deeply wounded the hero and changed his life. He probably no longer wrote in his diary and was unlikely to fall in love with anyone else.
Gradually we begin to understand Pechorin’s actions, we see how different he is from the other heroes, how deep his feelings are. The image of Pechorin appears most widely through the perception of other people: Maxim Maksimych, Princess Mary, etc. Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych do not have mutual understanding. There is not and cannot be a true feeling of affection between them. Friendship between them is impossible due to the limitations of one and the doom of loneliness of the other. If for Maxim Maksimych everything that happened was sweet, then for Pechorin it was painful. Pechorin leaves, realizing that the conversation will not bring them closer, but, on the contrary, will intensify the bitterness that has not yet subsided.
But not all representatives of the Pechorin, and therefore Lermontov, generation lost the ability to feel, not all became gray and immoral. Pechorin awakened the soul of Princess Mary, which could have faded away due to Grushnitsky’s facelessness. The girl fell in love with Pechorin, but he does not accept her feelings, not wanting to deceive. He cannot and does not want to live quietly, calmly, content with peaceful joys. Here Pechorin’s selfishness once again manifested itself, leaving Mary alone with a soulless society. But this girl will never fall in love with the ostentatious smug dandy.
In a socially close circle, Pechorin is not liked, and some simply hate him. They feel his superiority and their inability to resist him. Society hides its depravity and deceit. But all the tricks to disguise themselves are in vain: Pechorin sees the falsity of the same Grushnitsky, an empty and dishonest man. Pechorin tests him too, hoping that there, in the depths of his soul, there remains at least a drop of honesty and nobility. But Grushnitsky could not overcome his petty pride. That is why Pechorin is so cruel in a duel. Society's rejection hurts Pechorin painfully. He does not strive for enmity, he tries to enter the circle of people close to him. social status. But they cannot understand Lermontov’s hero, just like others who do not belong to this circle. But everyone who ended up being closer to Pechorin leaves his life. Of these, Werner is too naive, although Pechorin’s egocentrism, who does not recognize friendship, played an important role in their relationship. They didn't become friends. By the will of fate, he remains without Vera. Pechorin's only “worthy interlocutor” turns out to be his diary. With him, he can be completely frank, not hide his vices and virtues. At the end of the book, the hero enters into a struggle not with people, but with fate itself. And he comes out victorious, thanks to courage, will and thirst for the unknown.
However, along with wealth mental strength and with the hero’s talent, Lermontov reveals in Pechorin such qualities that sharply reduce his image. Pechorin is a cold egoist, he is indifferent to the suffering of others. But the author’s most serious accusation against Pechorin is that his hero lacks life goal. Having thought about the question of the purpose of his life, he wrote in the “journal”: “Oh, it’s true, it existed and, it’s true, I had a high purpose, because I feel immense strength in my soul.”
At all times, the attitude towards Pechorin was not unambiguous. Some saw, others did not see, a “hero of the time” in him. But there is a secret hidden in this image. Pechorin cannot be predicted or comprehended. His distinctive feature is that, understanding the insignificance of the world around him, he does not resign himself, but fights and searches. Loneliness makes him a colorless person, like the rest. There's a lot in it negative traits: he is cruel, selfish, unmerciful to people. But at the same time (which is important!) he does not judge anyone, but gives everyone the opportunity to open his soul, to express good qualities. But if this does not happen, then he is merciless.
Pechorins are rare. Not everyone can look at the world soberly, evaluate it and... not accept it as it is. Do not accept all the evil, cruelty, heartlessness and other vices of humanity. Not many can rise up, fight and seek. Not everyone can do this.
Pechorin's tragedy is that he was unable to realize his spiritual and physical strength, his life was wasted.
Analyzing the image of Pechorin, V. G. Belinsky said: “This is the Onegin of our time, the hero of our time. Their dissimilarity is much less than the distance between Onega and Pechora.” Onegin is a reflection of the era of the 20s, the era of the Decembrists; Pecho-rin is the hero of the third decade of the “cruel century”. Both of them are thoughtful intellectuals of their time. But Pechorin lived in a difficult era of social oppression and inaction, and Onegin lived in a period of social revival and could have been a Decembrist. Pechorin did not have this opportunity. That’s why Belinsky says: “Onegin is bored, but Pechorin is suffering.”
