Action in the estate of simpletons - free school essays. Minor morals of the family of simpletons

To be honest, one litter.

D. Fonvizin. Minor

D. I. Fonvizin is not only a great playwright, but also a leading man of his century. He was the first in the history of drama to speak out against the brutal oppression of the masses and sharply denounced the autocracy and the reactionary policies of Empress Catherine II. “The brave ruler of satire,” Pushkin called Fonvizin, and today we consider the author of the immortal comedy “The Minor” to be one of the most progressive writers of the “satirical direction” of Russian literature of the 18th century.

In the images of the Skotinin-Prostakov family, Fonvizin very expressively depicted the rudeness, cruelty, ignorance of the serf-owners, and the unlimited arbitrariness of the landowners' power.

Taras Skotinin is proud to belong to a “great and ancient family.” Why is he so great? Stupidity, stinginess, stubbornness. It’s scary that out of the “eighteen people” children of the Skotinin parents, only two remained, while the rest “by the power of God died.” And this was at a time when the father of the family saved money all his life, but was so stingy that he died of starvation without touching his wealth. The main distinguishing feature of the family, according to Prostakova (nee Skotinina): “We were not taught anything... and it wouldn’t be Skotinin who would want to learn something.” Brother and sister Taras Skotinin and Mrs. Prostakova faithfully fulfill this covenant.

Skotinin “hasn’t read anything in my life.” He is afraid of science and is glad that “God saved me from this boredom.” Cruel, cowardly, narcissistic and self-confident, Skotinin does not notice his vices. It is easy for him to live in the world, since there is a science that he himself can teach anyone: he is a master of oppression, of collecting rent from peasants who are already robbed to the bone. Skotinin has a “death hunt” in his life - he loves pigs. The landowner's pigs have a free life, because he treats them “much better than people.” Skotinin even intends to get married at first not out of love for the girl and not because of the “orphan’s” dubious wealth, but because there are large pigs in her village. The landowner’s limitations are limitless, and he himself admits the reason for his strange attachment: “People in front of me are smart, but among the pigs I myself am smarter than everyone else.”

Is Mrs. Prostakova very different from her brother? One of the heroes calls her “a despicable fury,” “an inhuman mistress.” She is despotic and power-hungry, life is hard for the serfs in her house. She complains to her brother that “we took away everything that the peasants had, and we can no longer collect anything.” However, Prostakova does not treat her family much better than her serfs. Everyone gets it: the husband, the brother, and the teachers of Mitrofanushka’s beloved son. Prostakova is ignorant and uneducated, she doesn’t even know how to read letters: “Thank God, I’m not brought up like that. I can receive letters, but I always tell someone else to read them.” But, unlike her rather simple-minded brother, Prostakova perfectly knows how to be a hypocrite; she will never miss her benefit: she disposes of the estate of her sister-in-law Sophia, who was left an orphan, as her own, and is looking for a richer bride for her stupid son. Seeing that her plans are crumbling, she is even ready to use brute force against a weak girl and force her to marry her son. However, having met Sophia’s defenders stronger than her, Prostakova readily throws herself on her knees and begs for forgiveness. Flattery, hypocrisy, rudeness and impudence in the landowner are not only funny, but also scary at times. “Both the crime and the repentance of contempt for her are sufficient.”

Prostakov is the ideal husband for such a despotic wife as his wife. This man is timid and insecure, has no opinion on anything, “a wife’s husband,” as he says about himself. His life was not in vain, because he learned to obey Prostakov unquestioningly and even say what she thinks. “My mother,” he calls his wife. “Freak” and “weeper,” Prostakov calls her husband. Such is the family idyll. Material from the site

And here is Prostakov-Skotinin, the youngest: Mitrofa-nushka, a runt. What a worthy son of his parents! An infinitely lazy liar, a coward, a hypocrite, a rude person, an ignorant person - these are the distinctive qualities of a sixteen-year-old blockhead. “Mother’s son,” he went even further than his parents in his ability to not give a damn about others. Mitro-fanushka is a spiritually devastated person. All his interests in life are to eat well and sleep. He does not know how to think for himself, despite the fact that he is the only “scientific” person in the family. However, the “brilliance” of the knowledge he acquired is so dim that it becomes funny.

Fonvizin touches on a lot of problems in his comedy, asks many questions that have not lost their relevance even now. How do we treat other people? How do we behave in the family? What is more important for a person: pedigree, good education or a kind heart? How to behave when meeting with simpletons, mitrofanushki, and cattle? There are a lot of questions, and it is very important that a person learns to answer them on his own, so as not to be like the ignorant heroes of D. I. Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor.”

Didn't find what you were looking for? Use the search

On this page there is material on the following topics:

  • essay on the topic of undergrowth Prostakova
  • Are Prostakova and Skotinin literate with examples?
  • ideals of the family of simpletons and brute
  • portrait of heroes by Nedrosl
  • message relationship in the simpleton family

Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor” is relevant to this day. One of the dominant themes of the work is getting an education. By decree of Peter I, all nobles were required to master the basics of science. And Mitrofan was no exception. But his family does not believe that knowledge will be useful in life. Therefore, Mitrofan studies only in order to receive ranks in the future. Without attaching value to knowledge, the Prostakov family sees the meaning of life in money.

He thinks that with their help you can not only live securely, but also achieve respect.

The main character, Mitrofan, is characterized by such traits as laziness, disinterest in his future and immaturity. These qualities are often found among young people in our time. However, now it is even more difficult to cope without education, without knowledge, than in the eighteenth century. The young man is also stubborn - he constantly contradicts his mother. The minor is stupid in mathematics and other subjects. Since Mitrofan does not want to think for himself, he is unable to solve the assigned problems and constantly turns to his mother for help.

Mrs. Prostakova herself is one of the central figures of aristocratic society.

She appears to readers mainly from the negative side. Prostakova is illiterate “Read... yourself... I, thank God, was not brought up like that”), incredulous (“... you’re a craftswoman, but I really don’t really believe you”). Also, the heroine does not want to notice in life what she does not like (“Uncle... did not resurrect”). However, there is one positive feature in the image of Prostakova - this is caring for her son (“... it’s a sin to say that we don’t try to raise Mitrofanushka”). For the sake of her child, the mother of the family is even ready to become related to people whom she has never perceived on a positive side: the news of Sophia’s large inheritance “pushes” the woman to think about the wedding of young people. After all, such an event could in the future provide a luxurious life for both the beloved son and his parents.

However, in the process of talking about the letter that Sophia received from Starodum, it turns out that not only Minor, but almost all the heroes are illiterate. It turns out that the aristocracy of Russia during the time of Peter the Great ignored learning and acquiring knowledge for the most part, and this contradicted and is contrary to the moral ideas of a civilized society about human values.

Thus, in the person of the Prostakov family, D.I. Fonvizin incriminates and ridicules the “literates” of high society. The author shows the wrongness of those who are unable to realize the real cost of education and those who ardently defend their ignorance. Although the level of knowledge in society has increased significantly since the writing of the work, the issue of studying “for the sake of a diploma”, for the sake of a career, and not for the sake of one’s own development, is still relevant in Russia. Therefore, the comedy “The Minor” will sound “on the topic of the day” for a long time.

Updated: 2017-03-04

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

What can be said about the methods of education in the Prostakov family?

A person is not born bad or good; moral qualities, character, interests and inclinations are formed in the family. Much depends on the parents, on the atmosphere that reigns in the house. Truly, education is “a great thing: it decides the fate of a person...”.

The comedy by D.I. is dedicated to the problem of education in the family of a Russian landowner. Fonvizin "Undergrowth". From the very first remark, the author introduces us to the atmosphere of a Russian landowner's estate. We meet Mrs. Prostakova, her husband, son Mitrofanushka. “Matriarchy” reigns in this family. Mrs. Prostakova, not being particularly intelligent or educated, keeps her entire family subordinate. Both the servants and Mitrofan’s nurse, old Eremeevna, get it from the wayward landowner. Prostakova's speech is dominated by abusive expressions; she treats her servants rudely, thereby setting a negative example for her own son. So, Eremeevna for her is a “beast”, the tailor Trishka is a “cattle”. The only person to whom her love is directed is her son Mitrofanushka.

This is a runt, a lazy, clumsy fellow who is not yet sixteen years old. His favorite pastime is chasing pigeons. Mitrofan is not particularly fond of science; he is not very successful in it. His speech contains colloquial expressions: “such rubbish”, “maybe”. Mrs. Prostakova, loving her son with all her heart, does not bother him with his studies and pampers him in every possible way. She is unable to instill in Mitrofan any positive qualities or concepts of morality, since she herself is deprived of them. The results of such an upbringing are deplorable: Mitrofanushka is not only ignorant, but also malicious and cunning. In this scene we see that he knows how to flatter his mother, skillfully playing on her feelings.

The hero appears in this scene as the favorite of his entire family. For his father, he is a “funny man” and an “entertainer”; his uncle characterizes Mitrofanushka as “mother’s son.” In fact, he is a slacker and a lazy person, a spoiled brat, accustomed to idleness, who quickly learned the customs of the family.

The hero-reasoner in the comedy is Sophia's uncle, Starodum, a character who is not present in this scene. However, we consider it necessary to mention it, revealing the author’s position in the comedy. “These are the fruits worthy of evil!” - he exclaims in the finale. This character expresses the author’s views in the play, arguing that a decent upbringing should be the key to the well-being of the state. Education should be at a high level, but education has no value in itself. The main goal of all human knowledge is “good behavior”, “enlightenment elevates one virtuous soul.”

The tyrant landowner, Mrs. Prostakova, her brother Skotinin, who loves pigs, the lazy Mitrofanushka - everything is in this comedy, as N.V. notes. Gogol, “seems like a monstrous caricature of the Russian. And yet there is nothing caricatured in it: everything was taken alive from nature and verified by the knowledge of the soul.”

Morals of the Prostakov family. What do we learn from Prostakova and Skotinin about their relatives? What are the relationships between family members? What are the relations of the nobles to the serfs, the interests of the landowners?

Slide 13 from the presentation "Undergrowth and classicism". The size of the archive with the presentation is 3529 KB.

Literature 8th grade

summary of other presentations

“A.S. Pushkin at the Lyceum” - The successes of the lyceum student A. Pushkin were very modest. Tsarskoye Selo Park played a big role in the poet’s life: Among the 30 boys admitted to the Lyceum was 12-year-old Sasha Pushkin. The king was angry. Gogel-mogel. One of the tutors drew attention to the excessive gaiety of the pupils. Lyceum friendship. And sometimes such tasks were given in class. From the first days of lyceum life, students had nicknames. At the Lyceum they were fond of writing.

“Fonvizin’s minor” - How many governors did the mayor manage to deceive during his service? Fenelon "On the education of girls." Ask what to write!” How much did Prostakova pay the math teacher for a year of work? Literature - 15. Mathematics - 30. Potilitsa - back of the head. “Didn’t I tell you, you thieving mug, that you should make your caftan wider?” What is the lexical meaning of the word "potylitsa"? Literature - 40. Milon. Name the conflict of the era, reflected in the comedy “The Minor.” 3 teachers.

“Kuprin Gambrinus” - How does the antithesis of living and nonliving develop in “Gambrinus”? The first idea of ​​a neo-romantic hero. He was brought up in the cadet corps, then in the cadet school. What life circumstances and impressions are reflected in Kuprin’s work? Serves as an officer in the Podolsk province. One piece of your choice. The plot as a means of characterizing the hero. Write down the titles of the parts of the story. Acquaintance with the biography and work of the writer. Contrast between the external and internal state of the hero. Realism and romanticism.

"G.R. Derzhavin" - Archaic words. S.F. Golitsin. High vocabulary. Analysis of the ode “Autumn during the siege of Ochakov” (cluster). “Derzhavin’s idol 1/4 gold, 3/4 lead has not yet been appreciated.” Metaphors. Kozlovsky was a nobleman who lived in Tambov and later became a writer. G.R. Derzhavin (1743 – 1816). Personifications. Elvira Chernyshova, graduate of 2008. Mythological images. Yuri Dombrovsky. Works by G.R. Derzhavin. Khodasevich V.F.

“Green Voice and Eye” - Introduction. About the form and content in Alexander Green’s story “Voice and Eye”. Literature lesson in 8th grade. Why are the words “form” and “content” used in the title of the topic? J. Labruyère. N. Zabolotsky. Problematic question. V. Lessing. Voice of the eyes. Epigraph. Why did A. Green call the story “Voice and Eye” and not “Eye and Voice”?

“Yesenin 8th grade” - On his first trip, Sergei was accompanied by his mother. Entering a church school. When I turned 10 I was allowed to gallop. My grandfather had three adult unmarried sons. Municipal educational institution “Secondary school No. 10” in Slavgorod. Content. I especially loved listening to my class reading. Sergei's first trip. Creative project on literature. "Yesenin's life and death." The program of general education subjects was also designed for all three years of study.

The problem of raising children, the legacy destined for the country, played an important role in society in the old days and remains relevant to this day. Members of the Prostakov family are strangers to each other. They don't look like a strong, loving family at all. Mrs. Prostakova is rude, power-hungry, and hypocritical. She is a hereditary noblewoman. Following the example of her ancestors, the lady uses her uncontrolled power over the serfs, treats them unjustifiably cruelly, setting a bad example for her son, she humiliates herself before those in power and noble people, which expresses her slavish essence.

Mr. Prostakov, completely subject to the influence of his wife and subordinate to her word, is narrow-minded, apathetic, and soft-hearted. In the relationship between Mitrofan's parents, disrespect reigns, generated by total matriarchy, disregard for the law on the subordination of the wife, the keeper of the hearth, to the husband, the head of the family. Mitrofan is a lazy, careless young man of 16 years old, not striving for anything and not thinking about his own future. He appears as a pampered mama's boy.

Knowing who is boss in the house, he takes advantage of his mother’s boundless, blind love to satisfy his whims. Prostakova, however, does not limit her son in anything, seeing his happiness in wealth and idleness. Knowing about the difficulties of public service, she “allows” Mitrofan to enjoy the last carefree years of his life. Time passes, children grow up, and parents, preparing them for a difficult adult life in accordance with their ideals, often raise them in their own image and likeness. Children inherit habits, ways of thinking and living from their parents.

Mitrofan’s “evil character” is a direct consequence of the bad qualities of his parents. The entire environment of the protagonist is anti-virtuous, so where does his honor and compassion come from?

This might interest you:

  1. 1. Project theme: “Our friendly family” 2. Relevance of the project The problem of spiritual and moral education of a person has always been and remains relevant - in any historical era and in any state....

  2. Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment" is one of the most complex works of Russian literature, in which the author told about the story of the death of the protagonist's soul...

  3. Extracurricular event “DAD, MOTHER, ME – AN OLYMPIC FAMILY” Purpose: To form a healthy lifestyle in children and their parents in a school setting. Objectives: Popularization of family...

  4. Prostakova is a noblewoman, the mother of Mitrofanushka and the sister of Taras Skotinin. Her surname indicates the heroine's lack of education and ignorance, as well as the fact that at the end of the play...

  5. Having read Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor” and getting acquainted with its characters, you are once again convinced of the enormous influence society and family have on a person’s upbringing, on his formation...


  • Rating entries

    • - 15,565 views
    • - 11,062 views
    • - 10,650 views
    • - 9,827 views
    • - 8,733 views
  • News

      • Popular Essays

          Peculiarities of teaching and raising children in a type V school The purpose of a special educational institution for children with disabilities (CHD),

          “The Master and Margarita” by Mikhail Bulgakov is a work that pushed the boundaries of the novel genre, where the author, perhaps for the first time, managed to achieve an organic combination of the historical-epic,

          Open lesson “Area of ​​a curvilinear trapezoid” 11th grade Prepared by mathematics teacher Lidiya Sergeevna Kozlyakovskaya. MBOU secondary school No. 2 of the village of Medvedovskaya, Timashevsky district

          Chernyshevsky’s famous novel “What to do?” was consciously oriented towards the tradition of world utopian literature. The author consistently presents his point of view on

          REPORT ON THE WEEK OF MATHEMATICS. 2015-2014 academic year year Objectives of the subject week: - increasing the level of mathematical development of students, expanding their horizons;

      • Exam essays

          Organization of extracurricular activities in a foreign language Marina Viktorovna Tyutina, French teacher The article belongs to the section: Teaching foreign languages ​​System

          I want swans to live, and from white flocks the world has become kinder... A. DementyevSongs and epics, fairy tales and stories, stories and novels of Russians

          “Taras Bulba” is not an ordinary historical story. It does not reflect any accurate historical facts or historical figures. It is not even known

          In the story “Sukhodol” Bunin paints a picture of the impoverishment and degeneration of the Khrushchev noble family. Once rich, noble and powerful, they are going through a period

          Russian language lesson in 4th "A" class