Essay on the topic “Chatsky and Sophia, the history of their relationship.” Is Sophia worthy of Chatsky's love? (based on Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”)

The main character of the comedy is Chatsky. From the moment he appears in the play, he participates in almost all scenes and is everywhere contrasted with other characters.
Chatsky’s love for Sophia is a sincere, ardent feeling. He declares his love for her at his first appearance. There is no secrecy, no falsehood in Chatsky. The strength and nature of his feelings can be judged by his words about Molchalin addressed to Sophia:
But does he have that passion? that feeling? that ardor?
So that, besides you, he has the whole world
Did it seem like dust and vanity?
Chatsky is having a hard time with his disappointment in his girlfriend. He reproaches her for being hot-tempered, even for things for which she is not at all to blame for him:
Why did they lure me with hope?
Why didn't they tell me directly?
That you turned everything that happened into laughter?
“Every word here is not true,” says Goncharov. “She didn’t entice him with any hope.” All she did was leave him, barely spoke to him, confessed to him indifference... Here not only his mind betrays him, but also his common sense, even simple decency. He did such trifles!” But the fact is that Chatsky is distinguished by “sincerity and simplicity... He is not a dandy, not a lion...”. In his feelings for Sophia, he is spontaneous, sincere, and honest. At the same time, blinded by grief, he can be hot-tempered and unfair. But this makes the image of Chatsky closer and more truthful to us. This is a living person, and he can make mistakes. Who is Sophia, whom Chatsky loves so passionately?
Goncharov said very well about her: “This is a mixture of good instincts with the lies of a living mind, with the absence of any hint of ideas and beliefs - confusion of concepts, mental and moral blindness - all this does not have the character of personal vices in it, but appears as general features her circle."
Sophia is young and inexperienced, and her upbringing and environment have already left their mark on her views and actions. And Chatsky has to admit that he was bitterly deceived in her. However, people love all sorts of people, including the vile and the unfaithful. This cannot make you stop loving. Here, human advantages and disadvantages are poorly taken into account, and if they are taken into account, it is very biased. Love, as they say, is evil...
So, Chatsky’s personal drama complicates the public one and hardens him against noble Moscow.

(No ratings yet)

Other writings:

1. The main motive of A. S. Griboedov’s work “Woe from Wit” is a reflection of the tragedy of Chatsky, a typical representative of the young generation of the 1810-1820s, who in one way or another participated in social activities. This tragedy includes many moments, but one of the most important Read More......
2. The comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” is a sad story of a man whose grief is that he is not like the others. Intelligence, honor, nobility, reluctance to curry favor - these are the qualities because of which the doors to the society of the Famusovs, the Silents, Read More ...... are closed in front of Chatsky.
3. The comedy “Woe from Wit” by Griboyedov is undoubtedly a work of great social significance. It reflected the rebellious time when freedom-loving ideas spread throughout Russia. At the center of the play is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, who embodied the best features of the progressive noble youth of the beginning of the century. Read More......
4. Chatsky is close to people of the Decembrist mindset, Famusov is his main opponent, a defender of the autocratic serfdom. Already from the first act of the comedy it becomes clear how different these people are. In subsequent episodes, Famusov expresses his opinion about books and service. From Sophia's conversation with Lisa Read More......
5. Sofya Pavlovna Famusova is Famusov’s 17-year-old daughter. After the death of her mother, she was raised by “Madame,” an old Frenchwoman, Rosier. S.'s childhood friend was Chatsky, who became her first love. But during the 3 years of Chatsky’s absence, S. has changed a lot, as has her love. Read More......
6. “Woe from Wit” is a “social” comedy with a social conflict between the “present century” and the “past century.” The work is structured in such a way that only Chatsky speaks on stage about the ideas of socio-political transformations, about new morality and the desire for spirituality. The image of Chatsky is least of all a portrait Read More ......
7. Sofya Characteristics of a literary hero Sofya Pavlovna Famusova is Famusov’s 17-year-old daughter. After the death of her mother, she was raised by “Madame,” an old Frenchwoman, Rosier. S.'s childhood friend was Chatsky, who became her first love. But during the 3 years of Chatsky’s absence, S. has changed a lot, like Read More ......
8. The comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” is a truly realistic work, because the author reproduced typical life circumstances. The main character of the comedy is Chatsky. This is a truly witty, honest and positive hero of the work. But Griboyedov contrasts Chatsky with another hero - Molchalin. This man Read More......

The main motive of A. S. Griboedov’s work “Woe from Wit” is a reflection of the tragedy of Chatsky - a typical representative of the young generation of the 1810-1820s, who in one way or another participated in social activities. This tragedy includes many moments, but one of the most important among them is his unrequited love for Sophia.

We learn about the life and character of the hero even before he appears on stage. So, Sophia’s maid Lisa, hinting at his passion for the mistress, exclaims:

Who is so sensitive, and cheerful, and sharp

Like Alexander Andreich Chatsky,

and Sophia herself gives him the most vivid description:

Sharp, smart, eloquent,

I'm especially happy with friends,

He thought highly of himself...

The desire to wander attacked him...

Chatsky, a native of a noble family, was raised in Famusov's house. He is smart and impeccably honest, sincere and witty. He loves his homeland, and this love gives rise to hatred of slavery and oppression of the people. Chatsky was engaged in literary work, was in military service, had connections with ministers, but left this because, he says: “I would be glad to serve, but being served is sickening.” He is a restless thinker, a hero of that time, one of those people whose heart “cannot tolerate dumbness,” and therefore reveals everything deeply thought out even to nonentities, “fools.” Chatsky laughs at Famusov and his entourage, sharply jokes about their morals, because he himself is taller than the Famusovs, Zagoretskys, silent ones, skalozubs and other representatives of Moscow society at the beginning of the 19th century. Over the course of three years of travel, the character of the hero undergoes many changes and is finally formed. However, his sincere love for Sophia remains unchanged. That is why he, remembering his youthful affection, is in such a hurry to see his beloved, for whose sake “forty-five hours, without squinting an eye, flew more than seven hundred miles...”, and such sincere joy from the meeting sounds in his words: “It’s barely light - already on your feet! And I am at your feet."

The best personal qualities are revealed in his attitude towards love and marriage. Chatsky loves Sophia and sees her as his future wife. However, Sophia cannot fall in love with him, because, although she is not devoid of positive qualities, she still completely belongs to Famus’s world. During the years of Chatsky's absence, Sophia's character has changed greatly; now she perceives their relationship as youthful love, which does not oblige her to anything. In addition, she now loves another person - Molchalin, but with Chatsky she is cold, and answers his questions with general phrases or jokes:

Whom do you love?

Oh! My God! The whole world.

Who is more dear to you?

There are many, relatives...

However, Chatsky still does not understand the true reason for Sophia’s coldness; he is happy, lively, talkative, asks about old acquaintances, makes fun of them. And here he makes the main mistake, mentioning Molchalin with caustic mockery. By this, he, without knowing it, causes a storm of indignation in Sophia’s soul. It is for these ridicule of the object of her love that she then deals with him so cruelly, spreading rumors about his madness.

Of course, Sophia does not love Molchalin himself, but the ideal created by her sensitive imagination. Chatsky is right when he tells her: “You gave him darkness by admiring him.”

Blinded by his grief, disappointed in his feelings, Chatsky is often unfair, reproaching Sophia even for what is not her fault:

The comedy “Woe from Wit,” written by A. S. Griboedov at the beginning of the 19th century, is still relevant for today’s Russia. In this work, the author reveals in all depth the vices that afflicted Russian society at the beginning of the last century. However, reading this work...

The comedy “Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboyedov shows Chatsky’s opposition to the Russian nobility. All characters can be considered insane. Each side thinks the other side is crazy. In all actions, the heroes of A.S. Griboedov gossip and defame each other...

As I continue to look at the site, I often wonder who are the positive characters here and who are the negative ones? And I can’t clearly answer this question. It would seem that the most negative heroes subsequently do very good deeds, and the heroes...

Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov is the author of the wonderful realistic comedy “Woe from Wit”. Inheriting the satirical traditions of Fonvizin and Krylov, he managed to create a Russian political comedy based on everyday material, with a broad depiction of modern...

From the moment he appears in the play, he participates in almost all scenes and is everywhere contrasted with other characters.

Chatsky's love for Sophia is a sincere, ardent feeling. He declares his love for her at his first appearance. There is no secrecy, no falsehood in Chatsky. The strength and nature of his feelings can be judged by his words about Molchalin addressed to Sophia:

But does he have that passion? that feeling? that ardor? So that, except for you, the whole world seems like dust and vanity to him?

Chatsky is having a hard time with his disappointment in his girlfriend. He reproaches her for being hot-tempered, even for things for which she is not at all to blame for him:

Why did they lure me with hope? Why didn’t they tell me directly that you turned everything that happened into laughter?

“Every word here is not true,” he says. “She didn’t entice him with any hope. All she did was leave him, barely spoke to him, confessed to him indifference... Here not only his mind betrays him, but and common sense, even simple decency. He did such trifles! " But the fact is that Chatsky is distinguished by “sincerity and simplicity... He is not a dandy, not a lion...”. In his feelings for Sophia, he is spontaneous, sincere, and honest. At the same time, blinded by grief, he can be hot-tempered and unfair. But this makes the image of Chatsky closer and more truthful to us. This is a living person, and he can make mistakes.

Who is Sophia, whom Chatsky loves so passionately?

Goncharov said very well about her: “This is a mixture of good instincts with the lies of a living mind, with the absence of any hint of ideas and beliefs - confusion of concepts, mental and moral blindness - all this does not have the character of personal vices in it, but appears as general features her circle."

Sophia is young and inexperienced, and her upbringing and environment have already left their mark on her views and actions. And Chatsky has to admit that he was bitterly deceived in her. However, people love all sorts of people, including the vile and the unfaithful. This cannot make you stop loving. Here, human advantages and disadvantages are poorly taken into account, and if they are taken into account, it is very biased. Love, as they say, is evil...

So, Chatsky’s personal drama complicates the public one and hardens him against noble Moscow.

How to download a free essay? . And a link to this essay; Chatsky and Sophia (based on the comedy “Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboedov) already in your bookmarks.

The comedy "Woe from Wit" stands apart in Russian literature. Without the figure of Chatsky, there would be no comedy. Chatsky is smart and warm-hearted, the rest are not. The essence of Chatsky’s character is expressed in his words: “I would be glad to serve, but it’s sickening to be served.” Unhappy love for Sophia is the reason and motive for Chatsky’s “millions of torments.” The main idea of ​​this passage is that in order to create a work with internal tension, it was necessary to introduce a person who sharply contrasts with the routine of the society of that time. Such a character
Griboyedov entered Russian literature as the author of the famous comedy “Woe from Wit.” It touches on very important issues: about upbringing, education, admiration for everything foreign, about serfdom. In the comedy, the author ridicules and condemns a number of characters: Famusov, Skalozub, Molchalin, Repetilov. But all these heroes are opposed by the main character of the comedy - Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. He received a good education and had a brilliant mind. This is an honest, open person. He understands people well
Chatsky's clash with Famus society was inevitable. It takes on an increasingly fierce character and is complicated by Chatsky’s personal drama - the collapse of hopes for personal happiness. His attacks become more and more harsh. He enters into the struggle, and in his speeches the opposition of his views to the views of Famusov’s Moscow clearly appears: If Famusov is a defender of the old century, the heyday of serfdom, then Chatsky speaks with indignation about serf owners and serfdom. If Famusov, Molchalin,
About Chatsky: Chatsky is most of all an exposer of lies and everything that has become outdated, that drowns out new life, “free life.” He is very positive in his demands and states them in a ready-made program developed by the beginning of the century. He is outraged by the ugly manifestations of serfdom, insane luxury and disgusting morals. Out of fear for himself, Famusov slanderes Chatsky, but he lies because he has nothing to say. Chatsky’s role is inevitable with every change from one century to another, because every
The clash between Chatsky and Famusov’s Moscow is inevitable. As soon as Chatsky arrived at Famusov’s house, disagreements immediately appeared. Famusov and Chatsky are completely different people, so contradictions always arise between them. Everything that Famusov praises in Moscow, Chatsky condemns. There is a clash between the “present century,” that is, the advanced nobility, and the “past century,” the mass of serf-owners. Chatsky believes that the “past century” has already passed, and the “present century” has already made its gains. Famusov is satisfied with life in noble Moscow.
"Woe from Wit" and "Eugene Onegin" are works dedicated to one period in the life of Russia. (The era after the War of 1812. The feeling (in society) of the need for change. The emergence of people who do not want to live in the old way.) Chatsky and Onegin are heroes of a turning point. The similarities of the heroes. (Origin: Onegin is the son of a “squandered” nobleman; Chatsky was brought up in the house of the rich Famusov. Attitude to society, the world: Onegin is tired of balls, social dinners, goes to the village, but even there - “eternal talk about
"Woe from Wit" and "Eugene Onegin" are works dedicated to one period in the life of Russia. (The era after the War of 1812. The feeling (in society) of the need for change. The emergence of people who do not want to live in the old way.) Chatsky and Onegin are heroes of a turning point. The similarities of the heroes. (Origin: Onegin is the son of a “squandered” nobleman; Chatsky was brought up in the house of the rich Famusov. Attitude to society, the world: Onegin is tired of balls, social dinners, goes to the village, but even there - “eternal talk about

In his timeless comedy “Woe from Wit,” Griboedov managed to create a whole gallery of truthful and typical characters that are still recognizable today. The images of Chatsky and Sophia are the most interesting to me, because their relationship is far from being as simple as it might seem at first glance.

Both Sophia and Chatsky carry within themselves those qualities that most representatives of Famus society do not possess. They are distinguished by willpower, the ability to experience “living passions,” dedication, and the ability to draw their own conclusions.

Sophia and Chatsky grew up and were brought up together in Famusov’s house:

The habit of being together every day inseparably

She bound us together with childhood friendship...

During the time spent together, Chatsky managed to recognize in Sophia an intelligent, extraordinary, determined girl and fell in love with her for these qualities. When he, matured, gained intelligence, and has seen a lot, returns to his homeland, we understand that his feelings “were not cooled by the distance, nor by entertainment, nor by a change of place.” He is happy to see Sophia, who has become surprisingly prettier during the separation, and is sincerely happy to meet.

Chatsky cannot understand that in the three years while he was gone, Famus society left its ugly mark on the girl. Having read French sentimental novels, Sophia longs for love and wants to be loved, but Chatsky is far away, so she chooses to express her feelings a person who is certainly not worthy of her love. A flatterer and a hypocrite, a “most pitiful creature,” Molchalin only uses his relationship with Sophia for selfish purposes, hoping for further advancement up the career ladder. But Sophia, overwhelmed by feelings, is unable to see the true face under the mask, and therefore directs sincere, tender, sacrifice-ready love to the coward and sycophant.

Chatsky soon realizes that Sophia does not share his feelings, and wants to know who her chosen one is - his rival. Much says that this lucky man is Molchalin, but Chatsky does not want and cannot believe this, seeing in the palm of his hand the true essence of the low sycophant.

But does he have that passion, that feeling, that ardor,

So that he has the whole world besides you

Did it seem like dust and vanity?

So that every beat of the heart

Has love accelerated towards you?

Accepting Sophia's coldness, Chatsky does not demand reciprocal feelings from her, because it is impossible to make a heart fall in love! However, he strives to know the logic of her actions, her choice, he wants to know those merits of Molchalin that made the girl choose him, but he just can’t find them. To believe that Sophia and Molchalin are close, for Chatsky, means the destruction of his faith and ideas, the recognition that Sophia not only did not grow spiritually during the separation, did not learn to critically comprehend what was happening, but also turned into an ordinary representative of Famus society.

Sophia really went through a good school in her father’s house, she learned to pretend, lie, dodge, but she does this not out of selfish interests, but trying to protect her love. She feels a deep dislike for people who speak impartially about her chosen one, so Chatsky, with his ardor, witticisms and attacks, turns into an enemy for the girl. Defending her love, Sophia is even ready to take treacherous revenge on an old close friend who madly loves her: she starts a rumor about Chatsky’s madness. We see that Sophia rejects Chatsky only out of female pride, but also for the same reasons for which Famusov’s Moscow does not accept him: his independent and mocking mind scares Sophia, he is “not his own,” from a different circle:

Will such a mind make a family happy?

Meanwhile, Chatsky is still looking for a definition of Sophia’s feelings and is deceived, because everything that is despised by him is elevated to the rank of virtue in noble Moscow. Chatsky still hopes for the clarity of Sophia’s mind and feelings, and therefore once again writes Molchalin off:

With such feelings, with such a soul

We love you!.. The liar laughed at me!

But here is the tragic moment of the solution! This moment is truly cruel and tragic, because everyone suffered from it. What did our heroes learn from this lesson?

Chatsky is so shocked by the simplicity of the solution that he breaks not only the threads connecting him with Famusov’s society, he breaks off his relationship with Sophia, offended and humiliated by her choice to the depths of his soul:

Here I am donated to!

I don’t know how I curbed my rage!

I looked and saw and didn’t believe it!

He cannot contain his emotions, his disappointment, indignation, resentment, and blames Sophia for everything. Losing his composure, he reproaches the girl for deception, although it was in her relationship with Chatsky that Sophia was at least cruel, but honest. Now the girl is really in an unenviable position, but she has enough willpower and self-esteem to break off relations with Molchalin and admit to herself her illusions and mistakes:

From then on, it was as if I didn’t know you.

Reproaches, complaints, my tears

Don't you dare expect, you're not worth it,

May I never hear from you again.

Sophia blames “herself” for everything that happened. Her situation seems hopeless, since, having rejected Molchalin, having lost her devoted friend Chatsky and being left with an angry father, she is alone again. There will be no one to help her survive grief and humiliation, to support her. But I want to believe that she will cope with everything, and that Chatsky, saying: “You will make peace with him after mature reflection,” is wrong.

Griboyedov's comedy once again reminded me that at the origins of people's actions lie ambiguous, often contradictory motives, and in order to correctly unravel them, you need to have not only a clear mind, but also intuition, a wide heart, and an open soul.

Essay text:

In his timeless comedy “Woe from Wit,” Griboedov managed to create a whole gallery of truthful and typical characters that are still recognizable today. The images of Chatsky and Sophia are the most interesting for me, because their relationship is far from being as simple as it might seem at first glance.
Both Sophia and Chatsky carry within themselves those qualities that most representatives of Famus society do not possess. They are distinguished by willpower, the ability to experience “living passions,” dedication, and the ability to draw their own conclusions.
Sophia and Chatsky grew up and were raised together in Famusov’s house:
The habit of being together every day inseparably tied us together with childhood friendship...
During the time spent together, Chatsky managed to recognize in Sophia an intelligent, extraordinary, determined girl and fell in love with her for these qualities. When he, matured, gained intelligence, and has seen a lot, returns to his homeland, we understand that his feelings “were not cooled by the distance, nor by entertainment, nor by a change of place.” He is happy to see Sophia, who has become surprisingly prettier during the separation, and is sincerely happy to meet.
Chatsky cannot understand that in the three years while he was gone, Famus society left its ugly mark on the girl. Having read French sentimental novels, Sophia longs for love and wants to be loved, but Chatsky is far away; she chooses lyric poetry to express her feelings of a man who is certainly not worthy of her love. A flatterer and hypocrite, “the most pitiful creature,” Mol-chalin only uses his relationship with Sophia for selfish purposes, hoping for further advancement up the career ladder. But Sophia, overwhelmed by feelings, is unable to see the true face under the mask and lyrically directs sincere, tender love, ready for sacrifice, to the coward and sycophant.
Chatsky soon realizes that Sophia does not share his feelings and wants to know who her chosen one is and his rival. Much is said about the fact that this lucky man is Molchalin, but Chatsky does not want and cannot believe it, seeing in the palm of his hand the true essence of the low sycophant.
But does he have that passion, that feeling,
ardor, that.
So that apart from you, the whole world seems like dust and vanity to him? So that every beat of the heart accelerates towards you with Love?
Accepting Sophia's coldness, Chatsky does not demand reciprocal feelings from her, because it is impossible to make a heart fall in love! However, he strives to know the logic of her actions, her choice, he wants to know those merits of Molchalin that made the girl choose him, but he just can’t find them. To believe that Sophia and Molchalin are close, for Chatsky, means the destruction of his faith and ideas, the recognition that Sophia not only did not grow spiritually during the separation, did not learn to critically comprehend what was happening, but also turned into an ordinary representative of Famus society.
Sophia really went through a good school in her father’s house, she learned to pretend, lie, dodge, but she does this not out of selfish interests, but trying to protect her love. She experiences a deep dislike for people who speak impartially about her chosen one, the lyricist Chatsky, with his ardor, witticisms and attacks, turns into an enemy for the girl. Defending her love, Sophia is even ready to take treacherous revenge on an old close friend who loves her madly: she starts a rumor about Chatsky’s madness. We see that Sophia rejects Chatsky not only out of female pride, but also for the same reasons for which Famusov’s Moscow does not accept him: his independent and mocking mind scares Sophia, he is “not his own,” from a different circle:
Is this the kind of mind that will make a family happy?
Meanwhile, Chatsky is still looking for a definition of Sophia’s feelings and is deceived, because everything that is despised by him is elevated to the rank of virtue in noble Moscow. Chatsky still hopes for the clarity of Sophia’s mind and feelings, and the lyricist once again writes off Molchalin:
With such feelings, with such a soul We love!.. The deceiver laughed at me!
But here is the tragic moment of the solution! This moment is truly cruel and tragic, because everyone suffered from it. What did our heroes learn from this lesson?
Chatsky is so shocked by the simplicity of the solution that he breaks not only the ties connecting him with Famusov’s society, he breaks off his relationship with Sophia, offended and humiliated by her choice to the depths of his soul:
Here I am sacrificed to someone!
I don’t know how I curbed my rage!
I looked and saw and didn’t believe it!
He cannot contain his emotions, his disappointment, indignation, resentment, and he blames Sophia for everything. Losing his composure, he reproaches the girl for deception, although it was in her relationship with Chatsky that Sophia was at least cruel, but honest. Now the girl is really in an unenviable position, but she has enough willpower and self-esteem to break off relations with Molchalin and admit to herself her illusions and mistakes:
It’s like I haven’t known you since then.
Reproaches, complaints, my tears
Don't you dare expect, you're not worth it,
But so that the dawn does not find you in the house here,
May I never hear from you again.
For everything that happened, Sophia blames “herself around her.” Her situation seems hopeless, since, having rejected Molchalin, having lost her devoted friend Chatsky and being left with an angry father, she is alone again. There will be no one to help her survive grief and humiliation, to support her. But I want to believe that she will cope with everything, and that Chatsky, saying: “You will make peace with him after mature reflection,” is wrong.
Griboyedov's comedy once again reminded me that the origins of people's actions lie ambiguous, often contradictory motives, and in order to correctly unravel them, you need to have not only a clear mind, but also intuition, a wide heart, and an open soul.

The rights to the essay “Images of Chatsky and Sophia in A. S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”” belong to its author. When quoting material, it is necessary to indicate a hyperlink to