Conclusion of the comparative characteristics of Pechorin and Grushnitsky. Comparative analysis of Pechorin and Grushnitsky

Pechorin Grushnitsky
Origin An aristocrat by birth, Pechorin remains an aristocrat throughout the novel. Grushnitsky is from a simple family. An ordinary cadet, he is very ambitious, and by hook or by crook he strives to become one of the people.
Appearance More than once Lermontov focuses attention on the external manifestations of Pechorin’s aristocracy, such as pallor, small brush, “dazzlingly clean linen.” At the same time, Pechorin is not fixated on his own appearance; it is enough for him to look neat. Being a narcissistic dandy, Grushnitsky wants to make an impression everywhere and everywhere. Appearance is of extreme importance to him; he constantly straightens his hair, curls his mustache, and tries his best to look impressive. This quality is especially pronounced in the presence of ladies.
Character A self-confident, intelligent, subtle psychologist, Pechorin is well versed in people and relationships. Talented, has an analytical mind. He doesn't mind manipulating people just for fun, he's quite cynical. Pechorin is disappointed in the ideals of the previous generation, but he has nothing to oppose them. Because of this, the hero is doomed to boredom and fatigue. Grushnitsky is not stupid, but clearly cannot compete with Pechorin, and naively does not notice his manipulations. Tends to romanticize people, exaggerate and dramatize feelings. His disappointment in people is more parodic than sincere; he enjoys feeling like a person who has suffered “sublime passions and exceptional suffering.”
Attitude towards women Despite his youth, Pechorin perfectly studied the weaker sex. For him, love is fun; he does not take relationships with the opposite sex to heart. Knowing that women like audacity, mystery and inaccessibility, he makes Princess Mary fall in love with him, only to annoy Grushnitsky. Grushnitsky believes in love, in it he can reveal himself as a romantic and a ladies' man. His feelings for Princess Mary are sincere, although somewhat exaggerated.
Hero and Society Pechorin is a prominent representative of the “cream of society.” However, he opposes himself to society, ridiculing the capital's aristocrats. Pechorin has a great understanding of people and sees all the vices of his contemporaries. The image of Grushnitsky captures a real, contemporary type of Lermontov. In the 30s of the 19th century, disappointment in life and a certain romanticism, which were so characteristic of Grushnitsky, were in fashion. Among young people, Grushnitsky feels like he belongs among his own.
    • Grigory Pechorin Maxim Maksimych Age Young, at the time of his arrival in the Caucasus he was about 25 years old Almost retired Military rank Officer of the Russian Imperial Army. Staff Captain Character Traits Anything new quickly gets boring. Suffering from boredom. In general, a young man, tired of life, jaded, is looking for a distraction in the war, but in just a month he gets used to the whistle of bullets and the roar of explosions, and begins to get bored again. I am sure that he brings nothing but misfortune to those around him, which strengthens his […]
    • Arise, prophet, and see, and heed, Be fulfilled by my will, And, going around the seas and lands, Burn the hearts of people with your verb. A. S. Pushkin “The Prophet” Since 1836, the theme of poetry has received a new sound in Lermontov’s work. He creates a whole cycle of poems in which he expresses his poetic credo, his detailed ideological and artistic program. These are “The Dagger” (1838), “The Poet” (1838), “Don’t Trust Yourself” (1839), “Journalist, Reader and Writer” (1840) and, finally, “The Prophet” - one of the latest and [...]
    • One of Lermontov's last poems, the lyrical result of numerous searches, themes and motives. Belinsky considered this poem to be one of his chosen works, in which “everything is Lermontov.” Not being symbolic, with instant immediacy capturing the mood and feeling in their “lyrical present,” it nevertheless consists entirely of emblematic words that are highly significant in Lermontov’s world, each of which has a long and changeable poetic history. The chorus contains the theme of lonely fate. “Flinty […]
    • Decorated prophet I boldly consign to shame - I am inexorable and cruel. M. Yu. Lermontov Grushnitsky is a representative of a whole category of people - as Belinsky puts it - a common noun. He is one of those who, according to Lermontov, wear a fashionable mask of disillusioned people. Pechorin gives an apt description of Grushnitsky. He is, in his words, a poser posing as a romantic hero. “His goal is to become the hero of a novel,” he says, “in pompous phrases, importantly draping in extraordinary […]
    • I look sadly at our generation! Its future is either empty or dark, Meanwhile, under the burden of knowledge or doubt, It will grow old in inaction. M.Yu. Lermontov V.G. Belinsky wrote: “It is obvious that Lermontov is a poet of a completely different era and that his poetry is a completely new link in the chain of historical development of our society.” It seems to me that the main theme in Lermontov’s work was the theme of loneliness. It went through all of his work and sounds in almost all of his works. Novel […]
    • Lermontov's novel is entirely woven from opposites that merge into a single harmonious whole. It is classically simple, accessible to everyone, even the most inexperienced reader, but at the same time it is unusually complex and multi-valued and at the same time deep and incomprehensibly mysterious. At the same time, the novel has the properties of high poetry: its accuracy, capacity, brilliance of descriptions, comparisons, metaphors; phrases brought to the brevity and sharpness of aphorisms - what was previously called the “syllable” of the writer and constitutes the unique features […]
    • “Taman” is a kind of culmination in the collision of two elements of the novel: realism and romanticism. Here you don’t know what to be more surprised at: the extraordinary charm and charm of the subtle, all-pervading color that lies in the images and paintings of the short story, or the extremely convincing realism and impeccable life-like verisimilitude. A. A. Titov sees, for example, the whole meaning of “Taman” with its poetry in the deliberate reduction and debunking of the image of Pechorin. Convinced that this was precisely the author’s intention, he writes […]
    • My life, where are you going from and where are you going? Why is my path so unclear and secret to me? Why do I not know the purpose of labor? Why am I not the master of my desires? Pesso The theme of fate, predestination and freedom of human will is one of the most important aspects of the central problem of personality in “A Hero of Our Time.” It is most directly presented in “The Fatalist,” which, not by chance, ends the novel and serves as a kind of result of the moral and philosophical quest of the hero, and with him the author. Unlike the romantics [...]
    • Lermontov's novel “A Hero of Our Time” became the first socio-psychological and realistic novel in Russian literature of the first half of the 19th century. The author defined the purpose of his work as “the study of the human soul.” The structure of the novel is unique. This is a cycle of stories combined into a novel, with a common main character and sometimes a narrator. Lermontov wrote and published the stories separately. Each of them can exist as an independent work, has a complete plot, a system of images. At first […]
    • Curiosity, fearlessness, an unjustified thirst for adventure are the characteristics of the main character of the novel. Throughout the book, the author shows him to us from many different sides. First, this is the view of Maxim Maksimych, and then the notes of Pechorin himself. I cannot call the hero’s “fate” tragic, since neither the death of Bela, nor Grushnitsky, nor the sadness of Maxim Maksimych makes his life more tragic. Perhaps even your own death is not much worse than all of the above. The hero has a very detached attitude towards people, plays [...]
    • Actually, I'm not a big fan of Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov's novel "A Hero of Our Time", the only part that I like is "Bela". The action takes place in the Caucasus. Staff Captain Maxim Maksimych, a veteran of the Caucasian War, tells a fellow traveler an incident that happened to him in these places several years ago. Already from the first lines, the reader is immersed in the romantic atmosphere of the mountain region, gets acquainted with the mountain peoples, their way of life and customs. This is how Lermontov describes mountain nature: “Glorious [...]
    • The novel by M. Yu. Lermontov was created in the era of government reaction, which brought to life a whole gallery of “superfluous people.” Grigory Aleksandrovich Pechorin, whom Russian society became acquainted with in 1839–1840, belonged precisely to this type. This is a man who did not even know why he lived and for what purpose he was born. “The Fatalist” is one of the most plot-intensive and at the same time ideologically rich chapters of the novel. It consists of three episodes, original experiments that either confirm or deny […]
    • “And what do I care about human joys and misfortunes?” M.Yu. Lermontov In Lermontov's novel "A Hero of Our Time" a pressing problem is solved: why do people, smart and energetic, not find use for their remarkable abilities and wither without a fight at the very beginning of life? Lermontov answers this question with the life story of Pechorin, a young man belonging to the generation of the 30s. The task of a comprehensive and deep disclosure of the hero’s personality and the environment that raised him is […]
    • In any high-quality work, the fate of the heroes is associated with the image of their generation. How else? After all, people reflect the character of their time, they are its “product”. We clearly see this in the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "Hero of Our Time". Using the example of the life of a typical person of this era, the writer shows the image of an entire generation. Of course, Pechorin is a representative of his time; his fate reflected the tragedy of this generation. M.Yu. Lermontov was the first to create in Russian literature the image of the “lost” […]
    • And it’s boring and sad, and there’s no one to give a hand to In a moment of spiritual adversity... Desires! What good is it to wish in vain and forever?.. And the years pass - all the best years! M.Yu. Lermontov In the novel “Hero of Our Time,” Lermontov poses to the reader a question that worries everyone: why do the most worthy, intelligent and energetic people of his time not find use for their remarkable abilities and wither at the very beginning of life’s impulse without a fight? The writer answers this question with the life story of the main character Pechorin. Lermontov […]
    • So, “A Hero of Our Time” is a psychological novel, that is, a new word in Russian literature of the nineteenth century. This is truly a special work for its time - it has a truly interesting structure: a Caucasian short story, travel notes, a diary... But still, the main goal of the work is to reveal the image of an unusual, at first glance, strange person - Grigory Pechorin. This is truly an extraordinary, special person. And the reader sees this throughout the novel. Who is […]
    • Pechorin's life story is told to the reader by Maxim Maksimych. The psychological portrait sketched by the traveler adds several characteristic touches to the story of Pechorin’s life. The memory of Maxim Maksimych captured individual confessions of the hero, thanks to which the biography of the “hero of the time” acquired extraordinary credibility. Pechorin belonged to the highest society in St. Petersburg. His youth was spent in pleasures that could be obtained for money, and he soon became disgusted with them. Social life with its seductions is also [...]
    • Lermontov’s youth and the time of formation of his personality occurred during the years of government reaction after the defeat of the Decembrist uprising. A difficult atmosphere of denunciations, total surveillance, and exile to Siberia on charges of unreliability reigned in Russia. Progressive people of that time could not freely express their thoughts on political issues. Lermontov was acutely worried about the lack of freedom, the state of stopped time. He reflected the main tragedy of the era in his novel, which he meaningfully called “The Hero of Our […]
    • “How often surrounded by a motley crowd...” is one of Lermontov’s most significant poems, close in its accusatory pathos to “The Death of a Poet.” The creative history of the poem has until now been the subject of ongoing debate among researchers. The poem has the epigraph “January 1st,” indicating its connection with the New Year’s ball. According to the traditional version of P. Viskovaty, it was a masquerade in the Assembly of the Nobility, where Lermontov, violating etiquette, insulted two sisters. Pay attention to Lermontov’s behavior during this […]
    • And tell me, what is the mystery of the alternation of periods of history? In the same people, in just ten years, all social energy subsides, the impulses of valor, having changed their sign, become impulses of cowardice. A. Solzhenitsyn This is a poem by the mature Lermontov, revealing the social and spiritual crisis after the December generation. It closes the poet’s previous moral, social and philosophical quests, sums up past spiritual experience, reflecting the aimlessness of personal and social efforts […]
  • Comparative characteristics of Pechorin and Grushnitsky? Preferably a table. Thanks) and got the best answer

    Answer from Puma[guru]
    Pechorin was an aristocrat by birth and received a secular upbringing. Having left the care of his relatives, he “entered the big world” and “began to wildly enjoy all the pleasures.” He soon became disgusted with the frivolous life of an aristocrat and became bored with reading books. After the “notorious story in St. Petersburg,” Pechorin was exiled to the Caucasus. Drawing the appearance of his hero, the author with a few strokes indicates not his aristocratic origin: “pale”, “noble forehead”, “small aristocratic hand”, “dazzlingly clean linen”. Pechorin is a physically strong and resilient person. He is endowed with an extraordinary mind, critically assessing the world around him. He reflects on the problems of good and evil, love and friendship, and the meaning of human life. In the assessment of his contemporaries, he is self-critical: “We are no longer capable of great sacrifices, either for the good of humanity, or even for our own happiness.” He has a great understanding of people, is not satisfied with the sleepy life of the “water society” and gives destructive characteristics to the capital’s aristocrats. Pechorin’s inner world is revealed most fully and deeply in the story “Princess Mary,” where his meeting with Grushnitsky takes place.
    Grushnitsky is a cadet, he is the most ordinary young man, dreaming of love, “stars” on his uniform. Making an impact is his passion. In a new officer's uniform, dressed up, smelling of perfume, he goes to Mary. He is mediocrity, he has one weakness that is quite forgivable at his age - “to be draped in extraordinary feelings,” “a passion to recite.” He seems to be striving to play the role of a disappointed hero, fashionable at that time, “a creature doomed to some kind of secret suffering.” Grushnitsky is a completely successful parody of Pechorin. That is why the young cadet is so unpleasant to him.
    With his pitiful behavior, Grushnitsky, on the one hand, emphasizes the nobility of Pechorin, and on the other, as if erasing any differences between them. After all, Pechorin himself spied on him and Princess Mary, which, of course, was not a noble act. And he never loved the princess, but simply used her gullibility and love to fight Grushnitsky.
    Grushnitsky, as a narrow-minded person, at first does not understand Pechorin’s attitude towards him. Grushnitsky seems to himself to be a self-confident person, very insightful and significant: “I feel sorry for you, Pechorin,” he says condescendingly. But events are developing imperceptibly according to Pechorin’s plans. And now the cadet, overwhelmed by passion, jealousy and indignation, appears before us in a different light. He turns out to be not so harmless, capable of revenge, dishonesty and meanness. Someone who just recently played at being noble is today capable of shooting at an unarmed person. The duel scene reveals the essence of Grushnitsky, shoot, I despise myself, and I hate you. If you don’t kill me, I’ll stab you at night from around the corner. There is no place for the two of us on earth... Grushnitsky rejects reconciliation Pechorin shoots him in cold blood. The situation becomes irreversible. Grushnitsky dies after drinking the cup of shame, repentance and hatred to the end.
    On the eve of the duel, remembering his life, Pechorin thinks about the question: why did he live? for what purpose was he born? And then he himself answers: “Oh, it’s true, she existed, and, it’s true, I had a high purpose, because I feel immense strength in my soul.” And then Pechorin realizes that he has long been playing “the role of an ax in the hands of fate”
    So, the image of Grushnitsky helps to reveal the main thing in the central character of the novel. Grushnitsky - a distorting mirror of Pechorin - highlights the truth and significance of the experiences of this “suffering egoist”.


    Portrait of Pechorin: medium height, slender, strong build. His fingers were pale; there was something childish in his smile; he had blond hair, but his mustache and eyebrows were black; had brown eyes, an upturned nose, teeth of dazzling whiteness; his eyes did not laugh when he laughed. Age: about twenty-five years old. Portrait of Grushnitsky: he was wounded in the leg by a bullet, walked with a crutch.

    Our experts can check your essay according to the Unified State Exam criteria

    Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
    Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.


    He looked twenty-five years old, when in fact he was only twenty-one years old. He was well built, he had dark skin and black hair and a mustache. He threw his head back when he spoke. Pechorin's character: this character is not capable of sincere friendship. In his character, one of the main features is selfishness (can be seen in many of his actions). (he was secretive, as evidenced by his gait). His character contains determination and curiosity (can be seen in the actions described in the chapter “Taman”). Grushnitsky's character: he does not listen to his interlocutor (a kind of manifestation of selfishness). His goal is to become the hero of a novel. There is romanticism in the character (the consequence of this is a trip to the Caucasus). Pechorin's actions: Pechorin, meeting Vera, being in a relationship with her, brings her not happiness, but only suffering. He treats Princess Mary like Onegin treats Olga (he entices the girl in order to annoy the other), does not think about the consequences. Also, in one of his actions there is a share of determination (he tries to the last not to reveal Grushnitsky’s scam, risking his life). Grushnitsky's actions: he basely plans to cheat in a duel: he does not load Pechorin's pistol. Pechorin's attitude towards Princess Mary: he did not feel sincere and strong love for Mary. He spent time with her only out of envy of Grushnitsky, in order to annoy him, and also because Pechorin’s true love (Vera) could only meet Pechorin in the house of the Ligovskys (Princess and Princess Mary). Grushnitsky's attitude towards Princess Mary: he fell in love with Mary. His feelings are sincere (he admires her singing, while she sings terribly and wears a ring with the name "Mary"). Pechorin's behavior during the duel: he showed nobility. He gave Grushnitsky the opportunity to save his life (but confirm that what was said was slander), while Grushnitsky staged an unfair duel. Pechorin was also nervous (his pulse was feverish, but it was not noticeable in his face). Grushnitsky's behavior during the duel: Grushnitsky, having refused to shoot at Pechorin, shows some positive character trait (he thought that Pechorin did not know about the conspiracy). Grushnitsky was also very nervous during the duel (especially while thinking about whether to shoot him at Pechorin or not). The general conclusion (what these characters are like): both characters have negative traits in their character: Pechorin has egoism, which accompanies many of his actions, Grushnitsky has meanness, since he decided to arrange a dishonest duel. As for appearance, these heroes are opposite: Pechorin is blond, Grushnitsky is dark-haired.

    Updated: 2018-01-01

    Attention!
    If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
    By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

    Thank you for your attention.

    Two bright characters in Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time” are the cadet Grushnitsky and the officer Grigory Pechorin.

    Our heroes are young men. Grigory Pechorin in the novel is about twenty-five, and Grushnitsky looked older than his years. He was given twenty-five years old, but in fact he was only twenty-first.

    Both heroes are young and handsome men. Grushnitsky is dark and black-haired, and he is well built. And Pechorina is told that he is very handsome.

    Grushnitsky has a very expressive face, while Pechorin’s face expresses absolutely nothing. Even when he lay in a fever, it could not be determined by the expression on his face.

    Grushnitsky is a cadet who later becomes an officer. Pechorin is an officer (ensign) who used to be a cadet. Moreover, Pechorin himself believes that the best part of his life was precisely the period when he held the rank of cadet.

    Both characters are nobles. But Pechorin is rich, he is called the St. Petersburg winner, and Grushnitsky is not very rich and comes from the provinces, his father has his own village.

    Pechorin has an extraordinary mind, while Grushnitsky cannot be called smart. Pechorin is restrained in the manifestation of his feelings and passions, and Grushnitsky, on the contrary, is uncontrollable in the manifestation of his emotions.

    If Pechorin is a very brave man and knows how to take responsibility for his actions and actions, then Grushnitsky in the work manifests himself as a cowardly little man.

    Pechorin does not like to talk much; in conversation he is mostly silent. In his opinion, being silent is not as tiring as talking. In addition, this deprives you of the opportunity to spill the beans and inadvertently give away your or someone else’s secret. And this character really doesn’t like to reveal his secrets. And for him, silence in a conversation is a great opportunity to find out someone’s secret. Grushnitsky, on the contrary, loves to cook. He speaks at length and tastefully, using pre-prepared long and ornate phrases in his speech. Moreover, he shares his secrets with almost everyone.

    Pechorin is very arrogant and often speaks impudently to people. And Grushnitsky is a modest guy, he feels awkward if he has to ask for it, even if this is customary among people living in the area.

    Pechorin is very insightful, he sees people through and through and knows them. Grushnitsky does not know people, does not know how to find an approach to them and touch the secret strings of their souls.

    The heroes have a lot of different things, but they also have a lot in common. They are both nobles, both well-bred and received a decent education. They are both military and both serve in the Caucasus. As for their character, both heroes are proud, proud and vengeful.

    Grushnitsky absorbed all the negative qualities of Pechorin, without taking any of his positive character traits from the main character of the novel. Therefore, Grushnitsky sets off Pechorin very favorably, because in comparison with Grushnitsky, Pechorin seems much better than he really is.

    Option 2

    Pechorin and Grushnitsky are two characters from the novel "A Hero of Our Time". Outwardly they are very similar. The author of the work, Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov, wrote the novel in such a way that the reader learns with interest about these heroes and observes the diversity of their characters. Each of the characters behaves differently in the same situation. They see life with their own eyes.

    Let's look at the image of Pechorin.

    Pechorin Grigory Alexandrovich of noble roots. His ancestors were aristocrats. He is a rich and educated Petersburger. His parents took care of his excellent upbringing, otherwise it was impossible - such is the level of the circle of friends around them.

    But the boy grew up and now he is a 25-year-old young, handsome, fit man with curly hair. The blonde's pale face was adorned with black eyebrows and a mustache, and his forehead was high. There was a coldness in the brown eyes. Pechorin's hands are small, but his fingers are thin and long. His casual gait did not spoil his stately physique. Grigory did not think about his appearance; for him it was not important. And yet he always looked neat, richly dressed.

    Pechorin with positive and negative sides of character. For example, he is able to think logically, understands a lot about communicating with people, reasons sensibly, is confident in his actions, and knows how to use his advantages correctly. At the same time, he is cynical, knows how to manipulate a person for his own purpose, restrains emotions, and is secretive.

    Pechorin's life is like a duel between each other, a duel with the outside world. He is disappointed and doesn't know what to do with himself. The meaning of life has been destroyed. He is alone in this world, tired of the empty search for the purpose of existence on earth.

    Now let's look at the image of Grushnitsky.

    Grushnitsky is also a nobleman. Parents are from the common people. Village life was not to his liking, so he dreamed of leaving his native home, where he imagined that he would achieve success. He was not going to be bored in the wilderness of the village. Educated, romantic.

    Now the hero of the novel is twenty years old. Grushnitsky has black hair and dark skin. Expressive facial features are complemented by a mustache. He likes to make a good impression of himself. He takes care of his appearance.

    Like all people, he is characterized by positive and negative characteristics. Smart and romantic. That seems to be all the good things about him. His bad sides: he is selfish, has evil and envy, is ready to betray, pleases everyone who has to. He dramatizes a suffering image, he is given the ability to express emotions well.

    Grushnitsky likes his modern society, life flows beautifully and smoothly. He is a lover of social evenings, where he will always find something to show off.

    These are the almost identical, but at the same time different heroes of the novel. Grushnitsky wants to be like Pechorin, but finds himself in absurd and funny situations.

    The conclusion suggests itself: we build our own destiny. So Lermontov’s characters each live in their own worldview. The characters act as they imagine the whole life around them.

    Comparative characteristics of Grushnitsky and Pechorin

    In Lermontov’s work “A Hero of Our Time,” or rather, in one of its parts, there are two heroes, one of whom is the most important, and exists throughout the entire novel. This person is Pechorin.

    Grigory Pechorin is a person who is not subject to anyone. No one was able to figure out this man, or understand him completely. After all, Pechorin is very original and mysterious, since he never really had friends and did not share his innermost thoughts with anyone.

    Pechorin never fell in love and did not truly love. He destroyed all those who did not risk loving him. He used people very successfully, and often despised them, since by his nature he was arrogant and even arrogant. But at the same time, he was handsome, and there was a sense of breed in him, something that distinguished him from other people.

    Pechorin is a man who does not need the shackles of marriage, as he called it. He always wanted to remain free in his actions. He also did not tolerate boasting in people, as he considered it the highest stupidity and worthlessness. That is why he did not tolerate Grushnitsky, who had these qualities in abundance. Pechorin is the one who remained in the hearts of many as someone clearly unusual, cold, even a little arrogant, and at the same time so mysterious and so brave. Not everyone liked this character, but still this personality is worthy of admiration to some extent.

    Grushnitsky is precisely the type of person who despises everyone who is below him, and respects or simply flatters everyone who is even slightly higher in position and rank than him, while he scolds and envyes them behind his back. He did not see Pechorin as superior to himself, although somewhere on a subconscious level he was wary of him, because he understood that Pechorin could not possibly be inferior to him in everything, although he did not want to believe that he was superior. That is why he hated Pechorin, although outwardly they had a very friendly relationship.

    Grushnitsky is a person who loves to brag and show himself to everyone - how good, smart and handsome he is. This is exactly what let him down - excessive pride never leads to a good end. He did not see himself from the outside, and did not know how to think things through too far ahead. And he never paid attention to others, especially to their feelings. Although he was very handsome, and even an officer, he could only in the first impression interest him with his appearance and shoulder straps, as well as his dapperness, but nothing more. When, like Pechorin, he interested everyone from the moment they met and beyond.

    In the work “A Hero of Our Time” the main character is clearly defined. But there are other heroes next to him. With the help of comparative analysis, you can get to know the characters more deeply and compare their similar or different traits. A comparative description of Pechorin and Grushnitsky is an excellent way to identify the features of the image of the main character and his friend.

    Relations between Pechorin and Grushnitsky

    Pechorin and Grushnitsky were bright representatives of their time. Despite the fact that they meet as old friends, there is no real friendship between them. The confrontation between the heroes is shown in the chapter “Princess Mary”. Grushnitsky and Pechorin saw the lady almost at the same time. Since then, their relationship has ceased to be friendly, and a wave of hostility has arisen between them.

    Using the example of the relationship with Mary, the comparison between Pechorin and Grushnitsky is very clearly visible. They treat this girl differently, as they treat the entire female sex. Pechorin plays with Mary, he ties her to himself, knowing in advance that he does not need her and they cannot have any future together. Grushnitsky is seriously interested in Mary. He wants to win her heart, shares this with Pechorin, but instead of support and friendly advice he receives a strong competitor. This becomes a critical point regarding the buddies. Grushnitsky decides to teach Pechorin a lesson, but paid for his joke with his life.

    Character similarities

    The characters spend quite a lot of time together. Grushnitsky trusts Pechorin, he does not immediately see how he treats him. The characters' similarities allow them to be on the same page. For example, a very small age difference plays an important role in the characters’ communication.

    Both of them turned out to be men of honor, because none of them ultimately refused the duel. Each of them values ​​himself and has a high, and sometimes even excessive, degree of self-esteem.

    Character differences

    Pechorin and Grushnitsky are too different to find true friendship. Pechorin is cynical and cold. He reveals the vices of others and is too self-confident, although he is demanding of himself. He does not reveal his emotions and feelings to others, keeps his thoughts to himself, and in conversations prefers to remain silent, listening to what others have to say. Grushnitsky is a windbag. He loves beautiful speeches, is quite sentimental and quick-tempered. The character is overly enthusiastic about the whole world, talks too much and does too little.

    However, the differences do not prevent the characters from spending a lot of time together. Grushnitsky reveals Pechorin's soul. But instead of support he receives ridicule. It is unlikely that such a relationship can be called true friendship.

    If Pechorin is cynical and has a tough character, then Grushnitsky is too soft. He lacks the charisma that attracts women to Pechorin. The comparison of characters emphasizes the dependence of the life line on character. Heroes find their destiny through their qualities.

    Mapping table

    Using the comparison table as an example, you can clearly see the similarities and differences between the characters and draw conclusions about each of them.

    Thus, we see how different the characters are who could become friends. This is confirmed by some quotes: “I understood him, and he doesn’t love me for it, although we are outwardly on the most friendly terms,” “I understood him, and he doesn’t love me for it, although outwardly we are on the most friendly terms.”

    It turns out that from the very beginning, behind the imaginary friendly relations of the characters, enmity, irritation and a readiness to defend themselves were hidden. Each of them feels a certain hostility, which is not expressed in direct relationships.

    By comparing the character traits, age, and position of the characters, we can conclude that everyone builds their own destiny. The kind of person you are directly affects how life turns out. Similarity of characters does not always mean that friendship will be mandatory. But when friendship turns into competition, mutual hostility and ultimately the death of one of the heroes, it turns out that friendly relationships can be disastrous.

    This article will help you write an essay “Comparative characteristics of Pechorin and Grushnitsky”, compare their similar and different features.

    useful links

    Check out what else we have:

    Work test