Are negative deposit rates possible in Russia? The Central Bank rejected the idea of ​​introducing negative rates on foreign currency deposits. That is a negative bank interest rate.

These are strange times for European borrowers. It’s as if they live in Through the Looking Glass, where all the rules of financial existence are turned inside out. How do you like a business loan at an interest rate of minus 0.1%? Yes, yes - banks now pay their borrowers extra for taking out loans. Of course, you have to pay additional fees, and they still make the loan traditionally paid. But the bank's remuneration now amounts to no more than a percent or two. The weirdness doesn't end there.

Investors provided Germany with about $4 billion of their funds. They provided it this week, knowing that not all the money would be returned - the same negative interest rates still rule the roost. And not only government bonds, but also the securities of individual corporations, the Swiss Nestlé, for example, became unprofitable for investors.

On the other side of zero

Of course, consumer and mortgage loans with negative rates are still a rare phenomenon, although some people are really lucky. While most banks are still considering their actions in the current circumstances, individual lenders have taken the actions of their central banks as a direct call. But depositors were much less fortunate - the negative rate turned out to be unprofitable for them, and now they have to pay the banks for using their deposits.

Negative interest rates in politics

Switzerland unpegged its franc from the euro, which sent markets into shock, while simultaneously cutting its key rate to negative. The Central Bank of Denmark reduced the rate as many as 4 times and in just a month. Now in this country the main rate is -0.75%. Sweden followed suit. And what’s going on in European securities markets is a topic worthy of economic research.

Back to consumers

Of course, all these incidents have not yet become widespread, and therefore depositors can still transfer their money to other banks. And bonds of emerging markets can still be an excellent alternative to European bonds.

In Russia, a fall in interest rates on loans is not yet expected. Therefore, businessmen also have to include the costs of servicing bank loans as other expenses. However, despite the rise in prices, business loans have not become more accessible - banks are still very demanding of entrepreneurs. But still

The Bank of Japan introduced a negative interest rate on new deposits that Japanese banks place with the Central Bank. This measure should stimulate economic growth

Central Bank of Japan building (Photo: AP)

On January 29, the Bank of Japan announced that it was introducing a negative interest rate on excess reserves, namely new deposits that lending institutions place with the central bank. The rate, which is now 0.1%, will drop to -0.1%. Reducing the deposit rate to negative values ​​makes it unprofitable for banks to place funds in the accounts of the Central Bank - instead of receiving income, they are forced to pay the regulator. It is assumed that in this case the funds, instead of going to the accounts of the Central Bank, will be invested in the economy.

The negative rate will only apply to those reserves that the Bank of Japan accrues to commercial banks during new rounds of repurchases of securities from the financial sector. Already existing reserves, which The Financial Times estimates amount to $2.5 trillion, will continue to carry an interest rate of 0.1%. Bloomberg writes that the new rules will take effect on February 16.

The Central Bank will also buy government bonds, securities of real estate funds, as well as exchange-traded funds in order to expand the monetary base.

Simultaneously with the introduction of a negative interest rate for part of excess reserves, the Bank of Japan maintained its securities repurchase program. It reaches ¥80 trillion ($666 billion) per year. Aggressive monetary measures are designed to stimulate inflation. The Bank of Japan intends to bring it to 2% per year - a level considered optimal for developed countries. According to the organization's forecast, this goal is achievable by the period between March and October 2017. In December 2015, the annual inflation rate was 0.2%. Rising inflation, in turn, should stimulate growth in the economy, which in Japan has stagnated in recent years and has only recently begun to show signs of recovery.

According to updated data, in the third quarter of 2015, the country's GDP grew by 1% in annual terms. But industrial production, according to statistics from the Ministry of Economic Development of Japan, decreased by 1.4% in December.

The Bank of Japan's ultra-loose monetary policy is at odds with the actions of the US Federal Reserve. In mid-December last year, the Fed raised its key rate for the first time in nine years. Prior to this, the Fed abandoned large-scale interventions in the securities market. Thus, the policy of “quantitative easing” (low key rate and repurchase of securities), which had been in effect in the United States since 2009, was completed.

Negative percentage

NEGATIVE PERCENTAGE

(negative interest) A deduction made by a bank or other depository institution for holding an amount of money for a specified period.

Finance. Dictionary. 2nd ed. - M.: "INFRA-M", Publishing House "Ves Mir". Brian Butler, Brian Johnson, Graham Sidwell and others. General editor: Ph.D. Osadchaya I.M.. 2000 .

Negative percentage

Negative interest is the interest charged by the bank for having a deposit account, applied to deposits of foreigners in national currency.
Negative interest is a fiscal measure used to restrict the inflow of foreign capital.

In English: Negative interest

Synonyms: Negative percentage

English synonyms: Interest charge

See also: Bank interest rates Deposits

Finam Financial Dictionary.

See what “Negative percentage” is in other dictionaries:

negative percentage- A deduction made by a bank or other depository institution for holding a sum of money for a specified period. Topics finance EN negative interest … Technical Translator's Guide

- (Schweizerische Nationalbank) central bank of issue of Switzerland. Founded in 1905 in Zurich. Has the form of a joint stock company; 58% of the shares belong to the cantons, cantonal banks and other public institutions and 42% to private... ... Great Soviet Encyclopedia

15 cents issued by the Young Hotel in Boston ... Wikipedia

CHF- (Swiss franc) National currency of Switzerland, history of appearance, development Information about the Swiss franc, history of appearance and development and place of the franc in the modern economy Contents monetary unit. Swiss Franc is (code for... ... Investor Encyclopedia

Funding- (Funding) Funding is the process of financing active operations of a bank. The rate and funding ratio when calculating the matrix, target funding and its sources Contents >>>>>>>>> ... Investor Encyclopedia

PNEUMONIA- PNEUMONIA. Contents: I. Croupous pneumonia Etiology.................................. and Epidemiology.................................. 615. Pat. anatomy...... ............ 622 Pathogenesis.................... 628 Clinic. .................... 6S1 II. Bronchopneumonia... ...

SYPHILIS- SYPHILIS. Contents: I. History of syphilis......515 II. Epidemiology...................519 III. Social significance of syphilis......524 IV. Spirochaeta pallida ............., 527 V. Pathological anatomy...........533 VI.… … Great Medical Encyclopedia

Swap- (Swap) Swap is an agreement between two counterparties to exchange future payments in accordance with the terms specified in the contract Swap: currency swap, swap transaction, credit swap, interest rate swap, credit default swap, swap transaction, ... ... Investor Encyclopedia

RHEUMATISM ACUTE- ACUTE RHEUMATISM. Contents: Geographical distribution and statistics. 460 Etiology and pathogenesis...... 470 Pathological anatomy............... 478 Symptoms and course......... ....... 484 Prognosis...................... 515 Diagnosis ... Great Medical Encyclopedia

The World Bank- (World Bank) The World Bank is an intergovernmental lending institution whose goal is to improve the living standards of developing countries by providing them with financial assistance Definition of the World Bank, history of the World Bank, its ... ... Investor Encyclopedia

There is increasing talk in the media about negative interest rates. How effective this approach can be, since there is great uncertainty about the consequences for commercial banks, organizations and other economic entities and their behavior.

Many developed countries around the world are entering the realm of negative interest rates. Five central banks - the European Central Bank (ECB), the Danish National Bank, the Swiss National Bank, the Bank of Sweden and the Bank of Japan - have already introduced negative rates on commercial bank funds held in deposit accounts at the central bank. In fact, commercial banks must pay to store their funds with central banks. The main goal of these decisions is to stimulate economic growth and combat low inflation and the growing threat of deflation.

Why use negative interest rates?

In simple terms, with negative rates, a depositor, such as a commercial bank, must pay the central bank to store funds at the government-owned central bank. What is the purpose of such a policy? Once banks had to pay to hold their cash, they would be incentivized to lend any additional cash to businesses and individuals, fueling the economy. Another example would be a depositor (such as a large company) who must pay to hold funds with a commercial bank if the latter uses negative rates. In this case, one goal would be to encourage companies to use the money to invest in businesses, again to increase economic growth. That is, negative rates imply that lenders pay borrowers for the privilege of making loans. However, this would be an extreme case at the commercial bank level, since the economic logic of lending is to earn interest in exchange for taking on the borrowers' credit risks. However, borrowing is limited by the use of negative interest rates, and the goal is to promote consumption, one of the main engines of economic growth. So far, the listed goals and intentions for negative interest rates are very theoretical, and there is uncertainty about their implementation in practice.

Eurozone example

In the eurozone, the central bank's goal is to stimulate economic growth and increase inflation. The ECB must ensure price stability by keeping inflation below 2%, and at the same time as close to this figure as possible, over the medium term (currently inflation in the eurozone is slightly below zero). Like most central banks, the ECB influences inflation by setting interest rates. If a central bank wants to take action against too high a rate of inflation, it basically raises interest rates, which makes borrowing more expensive and makes saving more attractive. Conversely, if he wants to increase inflation that is too low, he lowers interest rates.

The ECB has three main interest rates at which it can operate: margin lending for providing overnight loans to banks, main refinancing operations And deposits. The prime refinancing rate or base interest rate is the rate at which banks can borrow regularly from the ECB, while the deposit interest rate is the rate that banks receive on funds deposited with the central bank.

With the eurozone economy recovering very slowly and inflation close to zero and expected to remain well below 2% for a long time, the ECB decided it needed to cut interest rates. All three rates have been falling since 2008, with the most recent cut being made in March 2016. The prime rate was cut from 0.05% to 0%, and the deposit rate went further into the negative from -0.3% to - 0.4%. The ECB confirms that this is part of a set of measures aimed at ensuring price stability over the medium term, which is a necessary condition for sustainable economic growth in the euro area.

The deposit rate, which has become even more negative, means that eurozone commercial banks that deposit money with the ECB must pay more. The question may arise – is it impossible for banks to avoid negative interest rates? For example, couldn't they just decide to hold more cash? If a bank holds more money than required for minimum reserve purposes, and if it is unwilling to lend to other commercial banks, then it has only two options: keep the money in an account with the central bank or keep it in cash (of course the most expected option by central banks is that banks will increase lending to businesses and individuals). But storing cash is also not free - in particular, the bank needs a very secure storage facility. Thus, it is unlikely that any bank would choose such an option. The most likely outcome is that banks will either lend to other banks or pay a negative deposit rate. Between these two options, the second one seems more realistic, since at the moment most banks hold more money than they can lend, and it is not necessary to borrow from other banks.

The opposite effects of negative rates

As central banks aim to boost economic growth and inflation through negative interest rates, such policies are becoming increasingly unusual and raise questions worth considering. Below are some of the main pros and cons.

Firstly Given that central banks' intentions are being met and negative interest rates are stimulating the economy, this would be a positive sign for the banking sector. If markets believed that negative interest rates improved long-term growth prospects, this would increase expectations of higher inflation and interest rates in the future, which is beneficial for banks' net interest margins (commercial banks make money by taking on credit risks and charging higher interest on loans than they pay on deposits - in this case they have a positive net interest margin). Moreover, in a stronger economy, banks would be able to find more profitable lending opportunities, and borrowers would be more likely to be able to repay those loans. On the other hand, negative interest rates could harm the banking sector. If the lending rate is constantly kept lower due to falling interest rates, and commercial banks are unwilling or unable to set the deposit rate below zero, then the net interest margin becomes smaller and smaller.

Secondly, a negative interest rate policy should encourage commercial banks to lend more to avoid central bank charges on funds that exceed reserve requirements. However, for negative rates to encourage more lending, commercial banks would have to be willing to make more loans at lower potential earnings. Since negative interest rates are introduced as a counterbalance to slow economic growth and the risks of deflation, this means that businesses need to solve problems arising in this area and, as a result, banks face increased credit risks and reduced profits at the same time when lending. If profit levels suffer too much, banks may even reduce lending. Moreover, the difficulty of setting negative rates for savers could mean higher debt costs for consumers.

Third, negative interest rates also have the potential to weaken a nation's currency, making exports more competitive and increasing inflation as imports become more expensive. However, negative interest rates can trigger a so-called currency war - a situation in which many countries seek to deliberately reduce the value of their local currency in order to stimulate the economy. A lower exchange rate is clearly a key channel through which monetary easing operates. But widespread currency devaluation is a zero-sum game: the global economy cannot devalue money itself. In a worst-case scenario, competitive currency devaluation could open the door to protectionist policies that would negatively impact global economic growth.

Fourth From an investor's perspective, negative interest rates could, in theory, serve the same function as cutting rates to zero - this could be beneficial for exchanges since the relationship of interest rates to the stock market is quite indirect. Lower interest rates imply that people looking to borrow money can enjoy lower interest rates. But it also means that those who lend money or buy securities such as bonds will have less opportunity to earn interest income. If we assume that investors are thinking rationally, then falling interest rates will encourage them to take money out of the bond market and put it into the stock market.

But in practice, this particular policy of negative interest rates may not be so useful. Investors may view negative interest rate policies as a sign of attempts to sort out serious problems in the economy and remain risk averse. Also, the use of negative interest rates will not necessarily encourage commercial banks to increase lending, which will make it more difficult for financial companies to make profits in the future and harm the performance of the global financial sector. Problems in the financial sector are very sensitive for the entire stock market, and they can weaken it. And even if commercial banks wanted to increase lending, success in encouraging businesses and individuals to borrow more money and spend more is questionable.

Fifthly, negative rates could complement other easing measures (such as quantitative easing) and signal to the central bank the need to address the economic slowdown and missed inflation target. On the other hand, negative interest rates could be an indicator that central banks are reaching the limits of monetary policy.

Main conclusion

Central banks are determined to do everything possible to increase economic growth and inflation. With interest rates already at zero, an increasing number of central banks are resorting to negative interest rates to achieve their goals. However, this is a relatively new tool for them, and the main opportunities and risks of such a policy have not yet been realized. Therefore, it is worth taking a closer look at and monitoring the unintended consequences of these increasingly popular policies. Currently, the eurozone economy is gaining momentum slowly, inflation is low, commercial banks are in no hurry to increase lending volumes, but instead are looking for other ways to reduce the potential damage to profits, the desire of businesses and individuals to take out more loans at a lower interest rate is growing quite slowly, investors are not rush to take on more investment risks, bond yields remain at record lows. Negative interest rates will take longer to realize the full impact.

Gunta Simenovska,
Head of Sales Support Department, Business Development Department, SEB Bank

Sources: European Central Bank, World Bank, Bank for International Settlements, Nasdaq, Investopedia, Bloomberg, BBC, CNBC

At first glance, the policy of negative interest rates (NIRR) looks like a paradise for both the population and business.

Which of us would refuse a loan at, say, two percent per annum? If you take out a mortgage at this percentage, and even for 30 years, it turns out that buying an apartment will cost much less than renting. It would seem how great it would be to live in the West, where mortgages are often issued at such low rates!

Experience, however, has shown that low interest rates have worked in the opposite way in the United States and Europe, making housing unaffordable for a record number of citizens.

The “paradox” is explained simply: the lower the loan rate, the more citizens can spend on apartments. Since there are a limited number of apartments, their prices are rising. Well, as prices rise, buyers with average incomes find themselves left out, since not every American can afford to buy a house made of sawdust for a million dollars.

To illustrate the problem, it is enough to mention a couple from San Francisco who semi-legally rent out container cabins to those residents of the city who do not have two or three thousand dollars to rent at least some apartment. For the opportunity to live in a metal container, the unfortunate people pay $600 a month.

Low interest rates and pension funds are killing: you can now invest money in reliable dollar securities only at zero percent per annum. This, of course, is not enough for normal functioning, so pension funds in the United States now have to either cut pensions or gamble, investing, for example, in bonds of Tajikistan and Ecuador.

However, the real sector of the economy fares the worst. It would seem that cheap loans are a businessman’s dream: you can quickly expand production and easily close any cash gaps. However, in practice, it turns out the same way as with a mortgage: it turns out that cheap loans are only good if you have access to them, and your competitors do not.

A capitalist economy operates through a few simple mechanisms, the main one being competition. Bad businessmen take losses and leave the market, leaving the best on the playing field: those who make dollars and ten cents out of a dollar every year. Banks should speed up the process of selecting the best by providing loans at 6-12% per annum.

This system of natural selection worked well in the United States until the turn of the millennium, and the country’s economy developed especially well in the early 1980s, when loan rates jumped in places to as much as 20% per annum. Unfortunately, after the dot-com crisis, the US Federal Reserve decided to lower lending rates to almost zero, and market mechanisms that had worked for centuries began to jam.

Let's imagine two businessmen, John and Bill. John works normally, receiving his few percent of profits and looking confidently into the future. Bill doesn't know how to work, he only has losses. At normal lending rates, Bill would have gone bankrupt pretty quickly and cleared the market for John. However, now Bill can take out a loan from a bank at a very low interest rate and... continue to work at a loss. In two or three years, when the money runs out, take out another loan. And then another and another, thereby delaying their bankruptcy indefinitely.

A skillful businessman, John is forced, willy-nilly, to follow Bill: to reduce prices below the level of profitability, so as not to lose customers in this unhealthy market. As an example, we can point to American shale producers, most of whom, at normal lending rates, would have gone bankrupt long ago, thereby returning oil prices to a healthy level of $100 or more per barrel.

Let's add to this unsightly picture monopolies and oligopolies, which cheap loans allowed to grow uncontrollably, and the portrait of the disease will perhaps become complete.

We observed something similar in the USSR in the 1970s and 80s. The Soviet authorities did not have enough political will to close inefficient enterprises, and they gradually degraded, producing products of lower quality and less and less in demand by the economy. The hothouse conditions led to a logical result: when, after the collapse of the USSR, domestic industry was thrown into the arena with the capitalist tigers, during the first years it was practically unable to provide them with worthy resistance.

Exactly the same thing is happening now in the West. Of course, the central banks of the United States and the European Union are well aware that POPS is a dead end, but it is no longer possible to return back to healthy capitalist lines. Raising interest rates to a level of at least 5% per annum is guaranteed to kill businesses that have become hooked on cheap loans.

Unfortunately, this problem no longer has a good solution. If the USSR had at least a theoretical opportunity to follow the example of China by gently reforming the economy (instead of handing it over to the slaughter of pro-American reformers), then our Western friends and partners simply no longer have such an opportunity. Printing presses have produced so much money over the past 15 years that it is unlikely that it will be possible to get out of the crisis without massive bankruptcies and hyperinflation.

• Tags: ,