Smil research method. MMPI Questionnaire Variants

After passing online SMIL test(566 questions), at the end there will be a transcript, results and answers to questions MMPI test.

SMIL test (MMPI) online - transcript of 566 questions

By taking the MMPI test online and answering 566 questions (statements) “True” or “False”, after decoding, you will learn the following about your personality type:

Hypochondriasis (Hs). The subject's proximity to the astheno-neurotic type. Subjects with high scores are slow, passive, take everything on faith, are submissive to authority, are slow to adapt, do not tolerate change of environment well, and easily lose their balance in social conflicts.
Depression (D). Persons who are sensitive, prone to anxiety, timid, and shy have high scores. In business they are diligent, conscientious, highly moral and obligatory, but they are unable to make decisions on their own, they lack self-confidence, and at the slightest failure they fall into despair.
Hysteria (Well). Identifies individuals prone to neurological defensive reactions of the conversion type. They use symptoms of physical illness as a means of avoiding responsibility. All problems are resolved by going into illness. The main characteristics of such people are the desire to appear larger, more significant than they actually are, the desire to attract attention at all costs, and the thirst for admiration. The feelings of such people are superficial and their interests are shallow.
Psychopathy (Pd). High scores on this scale indicate social maladjustment. Such people are aggressive, conflict-ridden, and disregard social norms and values. Their mood is unstable, they are touchy, excitable and sensitive. A temporary rise on this scale due to some reason is possible.
Paranoia (Ra). The main feature of people with high scores on this scale is a tendency to form extremely valuable ideas. These people are one-sided, aggressive and vindictive. Whoever does not agree with them, who thinks differently, is either a stupid person or an enemy. They actively propagate their views, so they have frequent conflicts with others. They always overestimate their own slightest successes.
Psychasthenia (Pt). Diagnoses persons with an anxious-suspicious type of character, who
characterized by anxiety, fearfulness, indecisiveness, and constant doubts.
Schizoid (Se). Persons with high scores on this scale are characterized by a schizoid type of behavior. They are able to subtly feel and perceive abstract images, but everyday joys and sorrows do not evoke an emotional response in them. Thus, a common feature of the schizoid type is a combination of increased sensitivity with emotional coldness and aloofness in interpersonal relationships.
Hypomania (Ma). Individuals with high scores on this scale are characterized by an elevated mood, regardless of the circumstances. They are active, active, energetic and cheerful. They love work with frequent changes, willingly contact people, but their interests are superficial and unstable, they lack endurance and perseverance.
Masculinity - Femininity(Mf) - intended to measure the degree of identification of the subject with the role of a man or woman prescribed by society;
Social introversion(Si) - diagnostics of the degree of compliance with the introverted personality type. It is not a clinical scale; it was added to the questionnaire during its further development.

Take the SMIL test (MMPI)

Take the male version of the SMIL test (MMPI) online. You must answer all 566 questions and statements of the SMIL test. Don’t think for a long time, answer quickly, preferably instantly (“Yes”, “No” or “True”, “False”), whatever comes to mind first... (

STANDARDIZED MULTIFACTOR METHOD FOR RESEARCHING PERSONALITY - SMILE

(ADAPTED MMPI TEST) L.N. SOBCHIK.

Standardized multifactorial method for studying personality SMI (modified mmpi test) Introductory remarks

The SMIL technique, in terms of its significance and effectiveness, can rightfully be called the “heavy artillery” of psychodiagnostics. And not because some specialists, who are little familiar with the technique, consider it cumbersome and time-consuming: in fact, it is about an hour of work by the person being examined (in this case, the psychologist may not even be present) and 10 minutes to calculate the data. The main thing is that after this the psychologist receives a multifaceted portrait of a person, including, in addition to quantitative and qualitative characteristics of stable professionally important properties, a rich range of such structural components of the personality as motivational orientation, self-esteem, style of interpersonal behavior, gender role status, character traits, type of response to stress, defense mechanisms , cognitive style, leading needs, mood background, sexual orientation, degree of adaptation of the individual and possible type of maladaptation, presence of mental disorders, severity of leadership traits, suicidal tendencies, predisposition to alcoholism, etc. At the same time, the great advantage of this technique is the presence in its structure reliability scales, which make it possible to determine not only the reliability of the results, but also the attitude of the subject towards the examination procedure itself. This makes it possible to interpret the data obtained through the prism of tendencies toward exaggerating existing problems or smoothing them out, identified using reliability scales.

The standardized multifactorial personality research method SMIL is a modification of the MMPI test, created in 1942-49. for the purpose of professional selection of pilots during the Second World War. The authors are American psychologists I. McKinley and S. Hathaway. This is a quantified (quantitative) method of personality assessment, which, thanks to the automated method of processing survey results, eliminates the dependence of the results obtained on the subjectivity and experience of the experimenter. The high reliability of the technique, the presence of reliability scales and the multifactorial nature of interpretation have created the basis for the wide popularity of this technique in different countries of the world.

The creation of the test questionnaire was based on a quantitative comparison of the answers received in a psychological interview with representatives of the normative group with the typical answers of patients in whom one or another syndrome clearly predominated in the picture of clinical disorders: hypochondria, depression, hysteria, psychopathy, psychasthenia, paranoia, schizophrenia, hypomania. These names were given to the corresponding scales measured by the methodology. This principle of constructing psychological methods was used by many psychologists who imagined the personal characteristics of the norm as a “diluted” pathology. The famous Russian psychologist B.V. Zeigarnik justified this approach, arguing that the pathological state is a sharpened model of the norm. Everything that is balanced and smoothed out in a mentally healthy person manifests itself in the form of a grotesque in a patient - sharply and nakedly. The MMPI test, developed by American psychologists, is still mainly used in America as a differential diagnostic method. An improved version of the MMPI, the SMIL test, is primarily aimed at studying personality, since many years of experience in using the technique have shown that it reveals to a greater extent the outline of psychologically understandable experiences and personality traits than diagnoses psychopathology.

Many years of experience in studying personal characteristics in different professional groups have shown that these SMIL techniques can provide significant assistance in identifying stable professionally important personal characteristics. In addition, the technique has already become widespread among sociologists, doctors and psychologists involved in family counseling, suicidology, psychotherapy, alcoholism, psychosomatics, the study of personnel reserves, management problems, as well as in sports psychology, forensics, law, the Army, in military and civil aviation, in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, in employment centers, in schools, gymnasiums, colleges and in the field of higher education.

In the work of a practical psychologist, SMIL data allows us to understand the reasons for some turns in the fate of a particular person, directly related to his individual personal characteristics, character, style of communication with others, and his ability to self-realization.

In connection with the readaptation of the methodology and the expansion of the scope of its application, the author of the modified version gave new names to most of the basic scales of the methodology, corresponding to their psychological essence, respectively: 1st scale - the scale of “neurotic overcontrol”, 2nd - “pessimism”, 3- I - “emotional lability”, 4th - “impulsivity”, 6th - “rigidity”, 7th - “anxiety”, 8th - “individualism”, 9th - “optimism and activity”. The names of two scales have not changed: 5th - “femininity-masculinity scale” and 0th - “social introversion scale”. As for almost two hundred additional scales that are not included in the construction of a personality profile, their names did not change after restandardization. These scales, compared to the profile of the basic scales, are much easier to interpret; basically, their essence is reflected by the very name of each scale. They have been developed by different authors in connection with different applied problems and can be used in addition to the main profile scales. As for the basic scales, they form a holistic personality profile, reflecting a portrait of the individual in all its complexity and diversity. Each additional scale only adds to this portrait a certain quality, which, refracted through a personal image, can acquire one or another sound.

The SMIL profile is the broken line that connects the quantitative indicators of 10 basic scales. Adjacent to it is a small profile of reliability scales: the "?" scale. shows how many of the questionnaire statements fell into the “don’t know” response category. The "L" scale - the "Lies" scale - shows how sincere the subject was during the testing process. The "F" scale - the "credibility" scale - shows the level of reliability of the data obtained, depending on his frankness and willingness to cooperate. Scale “K” - the “correction” scale reveals the degree of distortion of the profile under the influence of the subject’s closeness. Depending on the indicators of these scales, the profile is recognized as reliable or unreliable, and its features are considered through the prism of the subject’s attitudes in relation to the examination procedure.

The technique is presented to the subject in the form of a booklet containing 566 statements (the shortened version, which allows one to obtain a personality profile, but without additional scales, contains 360 statements). Why does the questionnaire contain statements rather than questions? Because a person answers questions of interest to a psychologist more sincerely if they are in the form of a statement. In such a situation, a person feels himself analyzing his “I”, as if alone with himself, and this contributes to greater frankness than the interrogative form, which sounds like an interrogation

Statements are of a different nature, depending on what area of human problems they cover. Most of them are aimed at identifying character traits, the style of communication with others, and reflect the subjective preferences and tastes of the person being examined, his views on different life values, characteristics of emotional reactions, assessment of his own well-being and a number of physiological functions, background mood, etc. It is not important the very maxim of the statement. This is just a standard set of experimentally simulated situations to which different people react differently. What is important is the selectivity of the answers, which ultimately outlines the individual and personal properties of a particular person. The analysis of the results is not based on studying the meaning of the subject’s answers, but on a statistical procedure for calculating data, during which the quantitative dispersion of different answer options is revealed in relation, on the one hand, to the average normative average, and on the other, to the pathological sharpness of the psychological factor containing in essence, one or another individual-personal tendency. Most of the statements sound so that the subject, when answering, does not always understand how this characterizes him, which greatly complicates the desire to “improve” or “worse” the results of the examination. At first glance, the technique allows us to outline the subjective internal picture of the “I” of the person being examined. In reality, thanks to the partly projective sound of many statements, the experiment also reveals those psychological aspects that are not realized by a person or are only partially amenable to the control of consciousness. Therefore, only with statistically unreliable data is the personality profile distorted so much that it makes no sense to interpret it. Within the framework of reliable data, even in the presence of trends that influence the strengthening or smoothing of the profile pattern, the interpretation reflects the true picture of the personality. At the same time, a very differentiated gradation of the degree of expression of different personal characteristics in their complex combination is possible, when not only high indicators are taken into account, but also their relationship with low indicators. At the same time, a deviation from the average normative indicators, more than twice the mean square error, reveals an excessive degree of expression of a particular personality trait, taking it beyond a fairly wide (from 30 to 70 standard T points) corridor of normative variation. Such data do not necessarily indicate pathology. A state of stress, an objectively difficult situation, physical illness - all this can cause a state of temporary maladjustment. Therefore, the interpretation of the data obtained must be carried out in accordance with all the information available about the subject, not to mention the fact that for an adequate idea of the subject it does not hurt to look at him. “Blind” interpretation can only be used for research purposes, when the reliability of the methodology is checked, as well as in large-scale surveys, when not the personality of an individual is interpreted, but some generalized trends of large groups.

In the modified version, 26 statements were identified from the questionnaire, which turned out to be ballast: they not only misled and shocked the respondents, but also provoked inadequate answers. Basically, these are statements that “work” on the “F” reliability scale and the 8th “F” scale. schizophrenia". Thus, the statement “I often see people, animals and other objects that other people around me do not see” provoked the answer “true” from those who, by occupation (for example, athletes) travel a lot to different countries, while the statement aimed at identifying perceptual disorders.

Questionnaires in a modified form are divided into male, female and adolescent versions, the difference of which is reflected only in the form of presentation of some statements. The keys with which raw scores are calculated on each scale, the correction of raw indicators to form a personality profile in standard T indicators, as well as the interpretation scheme are absolutely identical for all forms of the questionnaire, except for some differences in the processing of data on the 5th scale in men and women profile. There are also full (566) and shortened (360) questionnaires, the only difference between which, in addition to volume, is that the shortened version does not allow obtaining indicators on additional test scales.

The profile sheets of the adult and adolescent versions differ only depending on the sex of the subject in the standards for a number of basic and most additional scales. Therefore, it is very important that the specialist is convinced of this before starting work. that the questionnaire itself, the keys, the profile sheets, and, finally, the interpretive approach belong to the same author. They differ both from the original (MMPI) and from SMIL developed at the All-Russian Research Institute of Neurology and Psychiatry. Ankylosing spondylitis Standardized clinical questionnaire SKLO and adapted by F.B. Berezin and M.P. Miroshnikov MMIL. Incomparable in all respects with the SMIL method is a questionnaire with 71 statements, a clinically oriented Mini-Multi, developed by the Swedish psychologist Kincannon and adapted in the Russian version by V.P. Zaitsev and V.N. Kozyulya.

As experience shows, the methodology is mainly designed for examining a contingent of adults (from 16 to 80 years old) with completed primary education (7-8 grades of secondary school) with intact intelligence. Due to the fact that the author of the book, together with teachers B.N. Kodess and T.V. Kodess, developed and adapted the teenage version of SMIL in 1984, the boundaries of application of the technique have expanded somewhat. If the usual adult version has been widely and effectively used for many years in the practice of career counseling when examining high school students aged 16-17 years, the teenage version has been successfully used in recent years when studying children of a slightly younger age, starting from 12 years of age (subject to good general development). It is noted that unreliable results are often directly dependent not so much on the subject’s distorted attitude towards examination, but on poor understanding of the content of statements, which may be associated, firstly, with insufficiently developed verbal intelligence, and secondly, with poor knowledge of the Russian language Therefore, in regions where people speak a different language, the methodology should be translated into their native language, but at the same time it is also necessary to restandardize the quantitative basis of the methodology, since regulatory standards may have their own regional differences

The examination procedure requires compliance with the following conditions: the subject should not be wary of the purposes of the study; he may claim certain information about the test results; An experimental psychologist or consultant is obliged, first of all, to respect the interests of the person being examined and never to interpret survey data to his detriment, since the role of a psychologist in society mainly comes down to protecting a person in every sense of the word. If this rule is violated, people will lose confidence in the psychologist and further psychological research will become impossible. The rest follows from this: the interpretation of the data obtained should be carried out from the standpoint of a psychotherapeutic, gentle approach. Each individual personal property usually carries both positive and negative information. Therefore, it is always possible to start an interview by highlighting positive characteristics, and then, against this background, highlight those characteristics and personality traits that create certain difficulties and negatively affect a person’s fate. But this should be done carefully and precisely in the style that is optimal for a given individual (see the correctional approach for each of the elevated scales in the profile).

An excellent program that includes two techniques at once - SMIL(Standardized Multivariate Personality Research Method) and eight-color M. Luscher test.

Having completed the full version of the SMPI (Standardized Multifactor Personality Test), based on the MMPI (Minnesota Multifactor Personality Inventory), you will have a complete picture of your personal characteristics, receive a detailed text description of the result and, of course, the personality profile itself in the form of a graph.

The Luscher color test is also aimed at studying a person’s personal characteristics and assessing his emotional state.

The program is very convenient, allows you to maintain a database of subjects (subjects) and can be useful not only for those interested in psychology, but also for professionals.

Standardized multifactorial method of personality research (SMIL) - adapted MMPI test

The SMIL technique is the most popular of all psychodiagnostic tests used in clinical practice.

As a result of the study, the doctor or psychologist receives multifaceted personality drawing(in the context of a state determined by the current situation) or the structure of painful changes woven into the fabric of personal characteristics. Interpretation of the data obtained during the examination allows us to assess the motivational sphere, level of self-esteem, style of interpersonal behavior, character traits, type of response to stress, defense mechanisms, cognitive style, driving needs, mood background, sexual problems, suicidal tendencies, etc.

The great advantage of this technique is the presence in its structure reliability scales(the “lie” scale L, the actual “reliability” scale F and the “correction” scale K), which make it possible to determine not only the reliability of the results, but also the attitude of the subject towards the examination procedure itself. This makes it possible to consider the test results through the prism of trends identified using reliability scales towards exaggerating existing problems or smoothing them out.

The standardized multifactorial personality research method is a modification of a popular test all over the world. MMPI, created by American psychologists I. McKinley And S. Hathaway. This is a quantified (quantitative) method of personality assessment, which, thanks to the automated method of processing survey results, makes it possible to maximally avoid the dependence of the obtained data on the subjectivity and experience of the experimenter (this refers to the calculation, and not the interpretation itself, the correctness of which is higher, the better trained and more experienced psychologist).

The goal that the creators of the original test set for themselves was to develop a system of discrete values that would allow differentiate pathological manifestations from the norm. Relying on nosological approach of Kraepelin, the authors of the original test constructed, using statistical analysis of empirically collected data, ten diagnostically significant scales, on which the average normative level, conventionally designated as 50 standard divisions (T), was compared with answers quantitatively more than twice the standard deviation from the average normative level (50T ± 20T , that is, above 70T or below 30T).

Time has revealed the conventionality of nosological boundaries, and the interpretive approach of the MMPI authors turned out to be very primitive and incomplete. The rigid framework of the Crepellin nosological scheme, on which I. McKinley and S. Hathaway based their interpretation, as experience has shown, is too narrow for a real picture of the clinical diversity of mental disorders with their numerous atypical and transitional forms. The conceptual personal approach was completely absent.

The interpretation of the modified and restandardized MMPI test, which in the new version received the name SMIL, is a much more differentiated approach based on the theory of leading tendencies and the corresponding individual-personal typology.

The basis of interpretation instead of that used by American psychologists discrete approach laid continuum approach, subtly differentiating transitional states and personal characteristics between normal and pathological conditions.

To avoid psychopathological categoricalness, the names of the scales were changed in such a way that it became possible to gradedly assess the degree of manifestation of a particular tendency: moderate indicators reflect characterological properties, increased - accentuation of personality, high peaks reveal pronounced psychopathic traits or clinical register symptoms.

The methodology questionnaire is a set of statement questions. If answers are received to 566 of them (full version), then the result reveals not only the SMIL profile, which gives a personality portrait when interpreted, but also indicators of almost 200 additional scales that play a clarifying role. The shortened version contains 398 statements. It allows you to get a personal portrait on basic scales, but does not provide information on additional ones.

The items in the SMIL questionnaire look like statements, not questions. The person being examined, answering on behalf of his “I,” as if alone with himself, analyzes his character and the characteristics of his condition.

Most of the basic scales of the methodology, instead of purely clinical names, were given new ones that correspond to their psychological essence and do not provoke the hanging of psychiatric labels in cases where we are talking about accentuation of personality or character traits.

SMIL profile- this is the broken line that connects the quantitative indicators of ten basic scales. The highest indicators appear in the form of profile peaks. Usually they serve as the main object of interpretation. However, it is impossible not to take into account both the increases accompanying the peak and the low indicators of other scales.

As a result of the work carried out, domestic standards were obtained for both basic and additional scales.

In the profile sheet, reflecting the relationships between the indicators of the basic scales, 50T is the line of a statistically verified “norm”, from which indicators are counted both upward (increase) and downward (decrease).

The spread of indicators ranging from 30 to 70T determines a fairly wide range of the so-called normal corridor.

Increases on the SMIL scales in the range of 56 - 66T reveal those leading trends that determine characterological characteristics of the individual.

Higher indicators of different basic scales (67 - 75T) highlight those accentuated features, which at times complicate a person’s socio-psychological adaptation.

Indicators above 75T indicate impaired adaptation and about the deviation of the individual’s condition from normal. These can be psychopathic character traits, a state of stress caused by an extreme situation, neurotic disorders and, finally, psychopathology, the presence of which can only be judged by a pathopsychologist or psychiatrist - based on the totality of data from psychodiagnostic, experimental psychological and clinical studies.

Additional scales are usually used to clarify the results obtained using the basic scales of the technique.

Max Lüscher's eight-color test

This test is used to identify emotional and characterological basis of personality and subtle nuances of its current state.

To carry out the testing procedure you need: a set of colored cards (8 pcs.), a pen and a sheet for recording results.

Examination procedure: Shuffle the colored cards and place them with the colored surface facing up at approximately the same distance from each other.

After this, give the subject the following instructions: “From the suggested colors, choose the one you like best. At the same time, focus on the color as such, try not to associate it with any things - the color of the car, clothes that suit you, cosmetics, etc.”.

After the desired card is selected, it is removed to the side and placed with the colored side down. Next, you ask the subject to choose the most pleasant color from the remaining seven. The selected card must be placed with the colored side down to the right of the first one, and so on. Then rewrite the card numbers in laid out order.

After 2-3 minutes, mix the cards again and repeat the examination procedure. In this case, it is necessary to explain to the subject that the study is not aimed at studying memory, and he must choose colors as if he were seeing them for the first time.

Key notes:

1. The subject must adhere only to the data of color shades tested over many years and does not have the right to imagine, for example, a lighter, more “beautiful” color.

2. Each color must be selected separately. Under no circumstances should you choose two or more colors at the same time as a beautiful color composition.

3. The subject must decide completely freely which of the proposed colors he likes or dislikes. At the same time, he should not be rushed into answering or helped with leading questions.

4. In no case should colors be chosen with the idea that they are suitable for clothing, curtains, etc.

Primary colors and their symbolic meaning:

No. 1. - Blue colour. Symbolizes calm, contentment, tenderness and affection.

No. 2. - green color. Symbolizes perseverance, self-confidence, stubbornness, self-respect.

No. 3. - Red color. Symbolizes willpower, activity, aggressiveness, offensiveness, authority, sexuality.

No. 4. – yellow color. Symbolizes activity, desire for communication, curiosity, originality, cheerfulness, ambition.

Additional colors and their symbolic meaning:

No. 5. – purple color, No. 6. – brown color, No. 7. – black color, No. 8. - grey colour.

These colors symbolize negative tendencies: anxiety, stress, fear, grief.

Data processing:

As a result of testing, we highlight the following positions: both of the most attractive colors receive a “+” sign, the second pair – pleasant colors – have an “x” sign, the third pair – indifferent colors – are indicated by an “=” sign and the fourth pair – unattractive colors – receive a “” sign. -".

It is believed that in the normal psychophysiological state of the subject, the primary colors should be in the first five places, and the additional ones in the last. If they are located differently, this indicates the presence of some kind of psychological conflict or state of physiological distress that is a source of anxiety.

Often the source of this anxiety is so repressed from consciousness that a person feels only vague anxiety, without knowing its causes. But regardless of the degree of its awareness, the presence of a constant source of stress causes compensatory type behavior. Since such activities are “replacement” in nature, they rarely lead to true satisfaction, depleting the body’s resources.

This leads to the following conclusions:

1. If at least one of the primary colors is in the last three places, then it and the subsequent colors indicate a state of anxiety. The method of alarm compensation is determined by the characteristics of the color in the first position.

2. If, in the presence of anxiety, one of the primary colors comes first, then compensation is considered more successful than in the case of an additional color, which indicates the inadequacy and failure of compensatory behavior.

3. The presence of gray, brown or black at the beginning of the color range means a negative attitude towards life. If one of these colors is in second or third place, then it itself and all the colors to the left of it are considered as compensation.

4. If grey, brown or black occupy one of the first three positions and at the same time there are no primary colors in any of the subsequent positions, then whichever color occupies the last position should be considered a source of alarm.

To assess the intensity of anxiety states and compensatory tendencies, the following notations are proposed:

! – if the main color is in 6th place (additional color is in 3rd place)

!! – if the main color is in 7th place (additional color is in 2nd place)

!!! – if the main color is in 8th place (additional in 1st place)

All existing exclamation marks (presence of compensations and alarms) are added together. The sum of conditional points (!) can range from 1 to 12. It is believed that the more “!”, the more unfavorable the prognosis.

Position meaning:

In the eight positions of the rank sequence, the following relation is distinguished:

1st place: the cutest color gets the aspiration sign. It shows the means that the subject needs and to which he resorts to achieve the goal.

2nd place: it also has the sign of "aspiration" and shows that it is a goal.

3rd, 4th place: both have the sign of “sympathy” as a symbol of their own state. This is a person’s well-being, his opinion about his health, his disposition.

5.6 place: it bears the sign of “indifference.” Indifference shows that this color and property are neither confirmed nor rejected, they are indifferent. For the subject, this color and property are temporarily lost, abolished, they seem to “float in the air.” Indifferent color is irrelevant, perceived at the moment as an indifferent, unrealizable property, which, however, can be actualized if necessary.

7.8 place: both colors have a sign of "rejection". Colors that the subject rejects as unattractive express a need that, due to expediency, is inhibited, because spontaneous satisfaction of this need has negative consequences.

To resolve organizational issues, please write to theSolution Administrator at the email address: admin@site

The value of the L, F, K scales in the SMIL test

The statements included in the L scale were selected to identify the tendency to present oneself in the best possible light by demonstrating strict adherence to social norms. If the results on the L scale are from 70 to 80 T-scores, the resulting profile seems doubtful, and if the result is over 80 T-scores, it is unreliable. Your L-scale value is 42, which means that the test results can be trusted.

A significant increase in the profile on the F scale indicates accidental or intentional distortion of the study results. If the results on the F scale are from 70 to 80 T points, inclusive, the resulting profile seems doubtful, and if the result is over 80 T points, it is unreliable. Your F-Score is 44, which means the test results can be trusted.

The K scale allows us to distinguish individuals who seek to mitigate or hide psychopathological phenomena. Individuals with high scores on the K scale usually determine their behavior depending on social approval and are concerned about their social status. They tend to deny any difficulties in interpersonal relationships or in controlling their own behavior, strive to comply with accepted norms and refrain from criticizing others to the extent that the behavior of others falls within the framework of the accepted norm.

With moderate indicators on the K scale, the above-described tendencies do not disrupt adaptation, but even facilitate it, causing a feeling of harmony with the environment and an approving assessment of the rules accepted in this environment. In this regard, a person with a moderate increase in profile on the K scale gives the impression of being reasonable, friendly, sociable, and having a wide range of interests.

You have a low K score.

This means that you are well aware of your difficulties, tend to exaggerate rather than underestimate the degree of interpersonal conflicts, the severity of the symptoms and problems noted. This is the habit of not hiding your weaknesses and difficulties. The tendency to be critical of oneself and others leads to skepticism. Dissatisfaction and a tendency to exaggerate the significance of conflicts make you easily vulnerable and create awkwardness in interpersonal relationships.

Ten clinical SMIL scales

1 Hypochondriasis Scale (HS)
2 Depression Scale (D)
3 Hysteria Scale (Hy)
4 Psychopathy Scale (Pd)
6 Paranoia Scale (Pa)
7 Psychasthenia scale (Pt)
8 Schizophrenia Scale (Sc)
9 Hypomania Scale (Ma)
0 Social Contacts Scale

These scales should be understood this way:

First scale: Somatization of anxiety
Second scale: Anxiety and depressive tendencies.
Third scale: Repression of factors that cause anxiety
Fourth scale: Realization of emotional tension in direct behavior
Fifth scale: Expressiveness of male and female character traits
Sixth scale: Rigidity of affect
Seventh scale: Fixation of anxiety and restrictive behavior
Eighth scale: Autization
Ninth scale: Denial of anxiety, hypomanic tendencies
Zero scale: Social contacts

You do not have clearly defined values on clinical scales

You did not send us the value of several dozen additional scales

You did the test in a cropped version. The letter you sent does not contain several dozen additional scales. Additional scales would help you understand your personality traits. We suggest you use it after a while full version of the SMIL test, posted on our website in the Tests section. At the moment, SMIL is in test access - it is being finalized and checked by technical specialists. A little later you will be able to use the full version of the test. The full version allows you to track the dynamics of changes in your character traits and correction of intrapersonal problems as a result of psychotherapy.

When analyzing the SMIL test, special attention should be paid to the scales of the neurotic triad

Since most people have inhibition of personal development in the form of neurosis, the dynamics of improvement can be monitored using the scales of the neurotic triad SMIL.
The scales located in the left half of the profile - the first, second and third - are often combined with the term “neurotic triad”, since an increase in the profile on these scales is usually observed in neurotic disorders. Neurotic reactions are associated with inhibition of personal development when you are treated poorly by your environment. As a result, a situation is created in which you do not have enough psychological resources for active, purposeful actions in a certain situation. Blockade of the motivated. goal-directed behavior aimed at satisfying current needs, which underlies neurotic phenomena, is usually designated by the term “frustration.”

What is intrapersonal conflict in neurosis?

With neurosis, the main problem is not the presence of real obstacles that prevent the satisfaction of an urgent need, but the impossibility of active actions to solve the problem due to the presence of multidirectional needs. In this case, maladaptive behavior associated with the difficulty of choosing one of the simultaneously existing programs is an expression of intrapersonal conflict.

Types of intrapersonal conflict can be as follows:

the need to choose between two equally desirable possibilities;
the inevitability of a choice between two equally undesirable possibilities
the need between achieving what you want at the cost of unwanted experiences and giving up what you want in order to avoid these experiences.

With a neurotic conflict, there will be an increase in values on the clinical scales of profile 1,2,3.

In this test you have no signs of increased scores on the neurotic triad scales

Please redo the test on our website in a month and send us the results for analysis, containing not only clinical scales, but also additional ones. We will be happy to help you understand the results of your character testing.

P.S.! Please. Please note that there is a fee.

Are you in a difficult life situation? Get a free and anonymous consultation with a psychologist on our website or ask your question in the comments.

Tagged

62 thoughts on “ An example of a paid consultation on decoding tests. Help me understand the meaning of the SMIL test”

Vadim
Hello!!! Check out my test at this link
http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1408-140793682628449
and notify!!! Please, can you provide an analysis as quickly as possible, this is very urgent!!!
Vadim
Vadim
Thank you very much for your answer!!!
Lyudmila
Hello.
Help me decipher, please.
Woman 23 years old

L 42 F62 K48
1-63 2-80 3-64 4-58 5-58 6-44 7 -59 8-63 9-60 0-66

Thank you.
P.S. Low 6 - is it suppressed aggression? How does it manifest itself?
Lyudmila
Thank you for not leaving it unattended. The test is completely passed, will be completed. scales over 70:

Pre-hypochondriacal state 102
Hostility Control 70
Hostility 70
Somatic complaints 70
Sheer hysteria 73
Femininity interests 103
Bias 70
Pharisaism 76
JULIA
Hello, please tell me my results from this link. thank you in advance
http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1411-141631715321532
Natalia
Hello,
Could you comment on the test results? What other tests can you recommend for deeper self-knowledge?
http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1411-141632765799798

Best regards, Natalia.
JULIA
Oleg
Please analyze my test data. Thank you. http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1501-142024323275320
Daria
http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1501-142065622133772
Hello Olesya, please help me interpret the test results. I am interested in assessing my personality, what needs to be corrected in myself, and whether there are any deviations from the norm. What prof. Are the tests still necessary to pass in your opinion? Thank you in advance.
Anastasia
Hello Olesya, could you comment on my results on the SMIL test. I would like to know what needs to be fixed
Nikita
Good day!
Please tell me. Passed the SMIL test. I can’t figure out the results... The test itself is http://www.psychol-ok.ru/statistics/mmpi/result.html?pf=1503-142524521663596
Will I be able to work in the police with this result?
Thank you very much in advance.