Essay “Why are the Molchalins dangerous. Griboedov a

Why are the Silent Ones dangerous?
“Woe from Wit” is one of the most topical works of Russian drama. The problems posed in the comedy continued to worry Russian literature many years after the play appeared. The comedy shows the clash of the “present century” with the “past century”, represented by Chatsky and the Famous society. The play depicts the struggle of progressive forces against the feudal reaction.
The world of the Famusovs consists not only of serf-owning aces like Famusov and Skalozub, but also of the sycophantic silent officials who serve them. Who is Molchalin? This is a young man who, from childhood, learned his father’s behest:
First, please all people without exception -
The owner, where he will live,
The boss with whom I will serve,
To his servant who cleans dresses,
To a doorman, a nobleman, to avoid evil,
To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.
Fulfilling his father's behest - to wait for everything - helped Molchalin to “take awards and live happily.” If, for example, Maxim Petrovich earned honor at the court of Catherine II by “bravely sacrificing the back of his head,” then Molchalin acts more cunningly and subtly. Molchalin, in his words, has two talents: “moderation and accuracy.” Secondly, he understood the spirit of the Moscow nobility and its demands (“after all, nowadays they love the dumb”). This contributes to the fact that he becomes the right person, the right hand of his master Famusov. Sophia even idealizes her hero: “The enemy of insolence, always shy, timid...”; “yielding, modest, quiet, not a shadow of anxiety on his face”; “The old guys won’t step on the threshold.” In fact (and Chatsky understands this very well) Molchalin is a cunning, hypocritical, flattering, two-faced person. His idea of ​​happiness is associated only with a successful career, a prominent position in society, and wealth. He likes the maid Lisa, and he takes care of Sophia, since she is the daughter of a rich boss.
For the time being, Sophia cannot see Molchalin in his true light. And he is a great master of showing himself off favorably in the eyes of others. Only two characters have the opportunity to look into the true face of Molchalin. This is Chatsky and Lisa. He reveals his “soul,” his credo, to Lisa. Frankness with Lisa is safe for him, since she won’t give it away. But Chatsky is dangerous, but Molchalin believes that his rules are decent: “At my age I should not dare to have my own judgment”; “... you have to depend on others,” etc.
Molchalin is not petty, pathetic. An inconspicuous figure. This is an insidious, cunning, vile liar who will sell anyone in his name. It is not for nothing that Griboyedov, through the mouth of Chatsky, points out to the reader: “Molchalin are blissful in the world!” Imperceptibly, quietly, people like Molchalin reach “famous degrees,” make their way to power and become the arbiters of the destinies of decent people.
At the end of the comedy, Griboedov makes the exposed Molchalin run cowardly and thereby deal with him contemptuously. The playwright wrote: “Every age has its silent ones... Look closely: you are surrounded by silent ones.” Molchalin became a common noun for meanness and servility. His last name speaks to this. Molchalin became a symbol of slavish silence, which first Arakcheev, and then Nikolai I, tried to teach Russia. Saltykov-Shchedrin defined the danger of the silent ones: “O happy, oh hundred-fold blessed silent ones! They silently and leisurely crawl from one period of history to another.”
Modern Silencers are dangerous because they are difficult to discern, “Having served, modest, quiet,” he imperceptibly acts insolently, carefully and quietly informs, sells and betrays. And “having reached known degrees,” the silent ones “are blissful in the world.”

"Woe from Wit" is one of the most topical works of Russian drama. The problems posed in the comedy continued to excite Russian literature many years after the play appeared. The comedy shows the clash of the “present century” with the “past century”, represented by Chatsky and Famus society. The play depicts the struggle of progressive forces against the feudal reaction.

The world of the Famusovs consists not only of feudal aces like Famusov and Skalozub, but also of the sycophantic, sycophantic officials who serve them. Who is Molchalin? This is a young man who, from childhood, learned his father’s behest:

First, please all people without exception -

The owner, where he will live,

The boss with whom I will serve,

To his servant who cleans dresses,

To a doorman, a nobleman, to avoid evil,

To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.

Fulfilling his father's behest - to please everyone - helped Molchalin to "win awards and live happily." If, for example, Maxim Petrovich earned honor at the court of Catherine II by “bravely sacrificing the back of his head,” then Molchalin acts more cunningly and subtly. Molchalin, in his words, has two talents: “moderation and accuracy.” Secondly, he understood the spirit of the Moscow nobility and its demands (“after all, nowadays they love the dumb”). This contributes to the fact that he becomes the right person, the right hand of his master Famusov. Sophia even idealizes her hero: “The enemy of insolence, always shy, timid...”; “yielding, modest, quiet, not a shadow of anxiety in his face”; "The old people won't set foot on the threshold." In fact (and Chatsky understands this very well) Molchalin is a cunning, hypocritical, flattering, two-faced person. His idea of ​​happiness is associated only with a successful career, a prominent position in society, and wealth. He likes the maid Lisa, and oh

N takes care of Sophia, since she is the daughter of a rich boss.

For the time being, Sophia cannot see Molchalin in his true light. And he is a great master of presenting himself favorably in the eyes of others. Only two characters have the opportunity to look into Molchalin's true face. This is Chatsky and Lisa. To Lisa, he himself reveals his “soul,” his credo. Frankness with Lisa is safe for him, since she will not betray him. But Chatsky is dangerous, but Molchalin believes that his rules are decent: “At my age I should not dare to have my own judgment”; “... after all, you have to depend on others,” etc.

Molchalin is not petty, pathetic. An invisible figure. This is an insidious, cunning, vile liar who will sell anyone in his name. It is not for nothing that Griboyedov, through the mouth of Chatsky, points out to the reader: “The Molchalins are blissful in the world!” Imperceptibly, quietly, people like Molchalin reach “famous degrees,” make their way to power and become the arbiters of the destinies of decent people.

At the end of the comedy, Griboyedov forces the exposed Molchalin to run cowardly and thereby deal with him contemptuously. The playwright wrote: “Every age has its silent ones... Take a closer look: you are surrounded by silent ones.” Molchalin became a common noun for meanness and lackeyness. His last name speaks about this. Molchalin became a symbol of slavish silence, to which first Arakcheev, and then Nikolai I, sought to accustom Russia. Saltykov-Shchedrin defined the danger of the silent people as follows: “Oh happy, oh a hundred times blessed silent people! They silently, slowly crawl from one period of history to another.” .

Modern Molchalins are dangerous because they are difficult to discern, “Having served, modest, quiet,” he discreetly incriminates, carefully and quietly informs, sells and betrays. And “having reached known degrees,” the Silencers “are blissful in the world.”

“Woe from Wit” is one of the most topical works of Russian drama. The problems posed in the comedy continued to excite Russian literature many years after the play appeared. The comedy shows the clash of the “present century” with the “past century”, represented by Chatsky and Famusov society. The play depicts the struggle of progressive forces against the feudal reaction.
The world of the Famusovs consists not only of feudal aces like Famusov and Skalozub, but also of the sycophantic, sycophantic officials who serve them.

Who is Molchalin? This is a young man who, from childhood, learned his father’s behest:
First, please all people without exception -
The owner, where he will live,
The boss with whom I will serve,
To his servant who cleans dresses,
To a doorman, a nobleman, to avoid evil,
To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.
Fulfilling his father’s behest - to please everyone - helped Molchalin to “win awards and live happily.” If, for example, Maxim Petrovich earned honor at the court of Catherine II by “bravely sacrificing the back of his head,” then Molchalin acts more cunningly and subtly. Molchalin, in his words, has two talents: “moderation and accuracy.” Secondly, he understood the spirit of the Moscow nobility and its demands (“after all, nowadays they love the dumb”). This contributes to the fact that he becomes the right person, the right hand of his master Famusov. Sophia even idealizes her hero: “The enemy of insolence, always shyly, timidly...”; “yielding, modest, quiet, not a shadow of anxiety in his face”; “The old people won’t set foot on the threshold.” In fact (and Chatsky understands this very well) Molchalin is a cunning, hypocritical, flattering, two-faced person. His idea of ​​happiness is associated only with a successful career, a prominent position in society, and wealth. He likes the maid Lisa, and he cares for Sophia, since she is the daughter of a rich boss.
For the time being, Sophia cannot see Molchalin in his true light. And he is a great master of presenting himself favorably in the eyes of others. Only two characters have the opportunity to look into Molchalin's true face. This is Chatsky and Lisa. To Lisa, he himself reveals his “soul”, his credo. Frankness with Lisa is safe for him, since she will not betray him. But Chatsky is dangerous, but Molchalin believes that his rules are decent: “At my age I should not dare to have my own judgment”; “... after all, you have to depend on others,” etc.
Molchalin is not petty, pathetic. An invisible figure. This is an insidious, cunning, vile liar who will sell anyone in his name. It is not for nothing that Griboedov, through the mouth of Chatsky, points out to the reader: “The Molchalins are blissful in the world!” Imperceptibly, quietly, people like Molchalin reach “famous degrees,” make their way to power and become the arbiters of the destinies of decent people.
At the end of the comedy, Griboyedov forces the exposed Molchalin to run cowardly and thereby deal with him contemptuously. The playwright wrote: “Every age has its silent ones... Take a closer look: you are surrounded by silent ones.” Molchalin became a common noun for meanness and lackeyness. His last name speaks about this. Molchalin became a symbol of slavish silence, to which first Arakcheev, and then Nicholas I, sought to accustom Russia. Saltykov-Shchedrin defined the danger of the silent people as follows: “Oh happy, oh hundredfold blessed silent people! They silently, slowly crawl from one period of history to another.”
Modern Molchalins are dangerous because they are difficult to discern, “Having served, modest, quiet,” he imperceptibly incriminates, carefully and quietly informs, sells and betrays. And “having reached known degrees,” the Molchalins “are blissful in the world.”

"Woe from Wit" is one of the most topical works of Russian drama. The problems posed in the comedy continued to excite Russian literature many years after the play appeared. The comedy shows the clash of the “present century” with the “past century”, represented by Chatsky and Famus society. The play depicts the struggle of progressive forces against the feudal reaction.
The world of the Famusovs consists not only of feudal aces like Famusov and Skalozub, but also of the sycophantic, sycophantic officials who serve them. Who is Molchalin? This is a young man who, from childhood, learned his father’s behest:
First, please all people without exception -
The owner, where he will live,
The boss with whom I will serve,
To his servant who cleans dresses,
To a doorman, a nobleman, to avoid evil,
To the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate.
Fulfilling his father's behest - to please everyone - helped Molchalin to "win awards and live happily." If, for example, Maxim Petrovich earned honor at the court of Catherine II by “bravely sacrificing the back of his head,” then Molchalin acts more cunningly and subtly. Molchalin, in his words, has two talents: “moderation and accuracy.” Secondly, he understood the spirit of the Moscow nobility and its demands (“after all, nowadays they love the dumb”). This contributes to the fact that he becomes the right person, the right hand of his master Famusov. Sophia even idealizes her hero: “The enemy of insolence, always shy, timid...”; “yielding, modest, quiet, not a shadow of anxiety in his face”; "The old people won't set foot on the threshold." In fact (and Chatsky understands this very well) Molchalin is a cunning, hypocritical, flattering, two-faced person. His idea of ​​happiness is associated only with a successful career, a prominent position in society, and wealth. He likes the maid Lisa, and he cares for Sophia, since she is the daughter of a rich boss.
For the time being, Sophia cannot see Molchalin in his true light. And he is a great master of presenting himself favorably in the eyes of others. Only two characters have the opportunity to look into Molchalin's true face. This is Chatsky and Lisa. To Lisa, he himself reveals his “soul,” his credo. Frankness with Lisa is safe for him, since she will not betray him. But Chatsky is dangerous, but Molchalin believes that his rules are decent: “At my age I should not dare to have my own judgment”; “... after all, you have to depend on others,” etc.
Molchalin is not petty, pathetic. An invisible figure. This is an insidious, cunning, vile liar who will sell anyone in his name. It is not for nothing that Griboyedov, through the mouth of Chatsky, points out to the reader: “The Molchalins are blissful in the world!” Imperceptibly, quietly, people like Molchalin reach “famous degrees,” make their way to power and become the arbiters of the destinies of decent people.
At the end of the comedy, Griboyedov forces the exposed Molchalin to run cowardly and thereby deal with him contemptuously. The playwright wrote: “Every age has its silent ones... Take a closer look: you are surrounded by silent ones.” Molchalin became a common noun for meanness and lackeyness. His last name speaks about this. Molchalin became a symbol of slavish silence, to which first Arakcheev, and then Nikolai I, sought to accustom Russia. Saltykov-Shchedrin defined the danger of the silent people as follows: “Oh happy, oh a hundred times blessed silent people! They silently, slowly crawl from one period of history to another.” .
Modern Molchalins are dangerous because they are difficult to discern, “Having served, modest, quiet,” he discreetly incriminates, carefully and quietly informs, sells and betrays. And “having reached known degrees,” the Silencers “are blissful in the world.”

At the beginning of the 19th century, Griboedov wrote a comedy that opened a new stage in the history of Russian literature. All the characters in “Woe from Wit” have historical, literary and universal significance. A special discovery of the Russian playwright was the creation of the image of Molchalin. This hero combines all the negative qualities of the socio-psychological type, which is still very common in Russia today. Is Molchalin funny or scary?

Slave servility

This type of character has become quite common in Russian literature. But for the first time, readers and theater audiences became acquainted with him thanks to Griboyedov’s comedy. The writer was able to generalize everything that he observed in society. With his light hand, such concepts as “Famusism” and “silence” entered literary criticism. They are not close in meaning, but in the comedy “Woe from Wit” they are connected with each other.

Molchalin is a small man. But unlike the Pushkin type, he does not resign himself to his social position and is ready to do anything to rise in society. His father instilled in him slavish servility as a means by which he could achieve his goal. Is Molchalin funny or scary? The answer to this question, at first glance, seems obvious. Famusov's secretary can only evoke contempt and irony. This is exactly how the reader perceives him. He appeared funny and pitiful in the eyes of the main character of the comedy. But there is no clear answer to the question: “Is Molchalin funny or scary?” An essay dedicated to Griboyedov’s characters requires a deeper reading of the work. Because only after reflection and some analysis does it come to mind that this hero is not so harmless.

Careerism

Is Molchalin funny or scary? Griboedov's work is not just a comedy in which the author skillfully ridiculed the vices of Moscow society. In it, the writer also raised the question of what feelings are evoked by a person striving for a career takeoff. Chatsky’s mistake was a misconception regarding Secretary Famusov. Molchalin is a “dumb” person, but is capable of achieving “known degrees.” There is nothing reprehensible in his desire to make a career, if not for his complete indifference to everything that happens around him.

One of the critics noted that Molchalin, having once decided to make a career, took a path from which he would never turn. Even if his mother dies, his beloved woman calls for help, and the whole world begins to spit in his face, he will not back down. The question of whether Molchalin is funny or scary, based on this point of view, presupposes an unambiguous answer. Cynical careerists are to be feared. Their servile manners are no reason for irony. After all, if such a Molchalin manages to deceive those around him, sooner or later he will show his true face. And his face will be terrible.

meanness

Famus's world is opposed to Chatsky. It cannot be said that Molchalin is part of his mentor’s society. He is just striving to become one. But the confrontation between the main character and secretary Famusov is especially striking because these people belong to the same age category. But each of them chose their own path in this world. One became a rebel and a truth-seeker. The other one preferred to pray and wait for the right moment when he would finally get what he had been dreaming about for so long. Is Molchalin funny or scary? Can a snake that is lurking and ready to bite at any moment cause laughter? The answer to these questions is obvious. An essay on the topic “Is Molchalin Funny or Scary” will help reveal them.

lackeyness

Molchalin does not understand how it is possible, being a minor official, to have his own point of view. His lackeyness and desire to please sometimes take comic forms. But he is ready to praise the smooth fur of a noble lady’s dog, play the role of a lover in front of Sophia, condemn and criticize Chatsky. An essay on the topic “Is Molchalin funny or scary” is an analysis of the character, comparing him with other heroes, as well as thinking about what such a person could have become if his deception had not been discovered in time.

Most pathetic creature

As already mentioned, Chatsky was extremely mistaken at his first meeting with Molchalin. In his eyes, this man was a nonentity and a pitiful creature. This attitude towards the silent people was typical of Griboyedov’s time. The type of young progressive nobleman who, with high ideals and a brilliant education, could someday change Russian society, became popular. The old aristocratic world served as a contrast to this type. The silent ones were in the shadows. And this was the danger that the author of the comedy “Woe from Wit” points out. Is Molchalin funny or scary? The answer to this question is clear, you just have to dream a little. What would have happened if the secretary had managed to win Sophia’s hand and get into Famusov’s circle? Surely the society that was so unpleasant to Chatsky would ultimately turn out to be not as dangerous as this silent, exceptionally flattering young man.

Invulnerability

The image of a humble man created by him touches Sophia. Having read French novels, she is ready to believe in his pure thoughts and high feelings between people belonging to different social worlds. But the mask instantly flies off Molchalin, as soon as a person of lower status appears in front of him. The true face of this character can be seen in the actions where he communicates with Lisa. What Famusov’s secretary is like becomes clear from his conversations with Chatsky. In the eyes of Molchalin, the main character is a loser, which means he is worthy only of contempt.

One should not assume that the exposure of Molchalin will lead to his disappearance from the public scene. Only the “crazy” Chatsky can leave her. “Is Molchalin funny or scary?” - an essay-reasoning that requires an understanding of the historical role of Griboyedov’s heroes. At first glance, he is an unlucky careerist. In fact, he is an extremely invulnerable scoundrel. Sooner or later he will achieve his goal. And perhaps Molchalin is not so terrible as the time in which flatterers and careerists feel comfortable, and in which the truth is mistaken for madness.