A strong personality from the work Fathers and Sons. Essay “Is Bazarov a strong personality

It was created in an era of radical transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 50s, a democratic movement rose in public life, the principles of which changed strikingly in comparison with those that had prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of the new generation - this is precisely the task Turgenev set himself. He embodied his plan in the novel “Fathers and Sons.”

Using the example of Bazarov, he showed the most typical features of common democrats of the 60s. The main character of the novel is tragic in everything. Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. By denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it. Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism; he is extremely rational and materialistic. “Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but he called love in the ideal sense, or, as he put it, romantic, nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, and considered knightly feelings something like ugliness or illness...

““If you like a woman,” he said, “try to get some sense; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth is not like a wedge...” Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, create a family and find personal . Because of his critical views on people (“All people are alike, both in body and soul...”), it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone. One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness.

The main one does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully imbue him with nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who tries to outwardly appear like him, is not entirely sure of the validity of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the main character loves them, in many ways he does not approve of their lives, and even condemns them.

This is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”; they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the main character is unhappy; his love is unrequited and tragic. A feeling arises in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of his composition with Allsoch. ru 2005 existence. Bazarov tries to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless.

He, with all his ideas, does not stand the “test of love.” After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes occur in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer as firm in his views as before; he begins to waver.

A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov’s soul, which must somehow be resolved. The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel; it was his last attempt to find happiness and “understanding.” The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov’s worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The main character no longer feels like a “master in nature’s workshop,” but compares himself to a grain of sand in a huge world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to achieve his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society.

“Well, he will live in a white hut, and a burdock will grow out of me, well, what then?” Bazarov undoubtedly appeared too early in society; he was not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel. Departure from life is associated with the resolution of the conflict in the hero’s soul.

This is the death of a giant who realizes his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving this life, a kind of reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he stops hiding his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents. In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov. The author does not create a feeling of a tragic ending, since the ending itself is epically calm, the narrative goes in a philosophical direction.

Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and what, despite the death of the hero, continues.

Is Bazarov a strong personality or a weak person?

The novel “Fathers and Sons” rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of radical transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 50s, a democratic movement rose in public life, the principles of which changed strikingly in comparison with those that had prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of the new generation - this is precisely the task Turgenev set himself. He embodied his plan in the novel “Fathers and Sons.” Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of common democrats of the 60s.

The main character of the novel is tragic in everything.

Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. By denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.

Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism; he is extremely rational and materialistic.

“Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but he called love in the ideal sense, or, as he put it, romantic, nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, and considered knightly feelings to be something like ugliness or illness...” “Do you like a woman “, he said, “try to make sense; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth doesn’t fit like a wedge...”

Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, create a family and find personal happiness.

Because of his critical views on people (“All people are alike, both in body and soul...”), it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone.

One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The main character does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully embrace nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who tries to outwardly appear like him, is not entirely sure of the validity of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the main character loves them, in many ways he does not approve of their lifestyle, and even condemns them. This is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”; they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the main character is unhappy; his love is unrequited and tragic.

A feeling arises in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov tries to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the “test of love.” After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes occur in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer as firm in his views as before; he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov’s soul, which must somehow be resolved.

The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel; it was his last attempt to find happiness and “understanding.”

The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov’s worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The main character no longer feels like a “master in nature’s workshop,” but compares himself to a grain of sand in a huge world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to achieve his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society. “Well, he will live in a white hut, and a burdock will grow out of me, well, what then?”

Bazarov undoubtedly appeared too early in society; he was not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.

Departure from life is associated with the resolution of the conflict in the hero’s soul. This is the death of a giant who realizes his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving this life, a kind of reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he stops hiding his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.

In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.

The author does not create a feeling of a tragic ending, since the ending itself is epically calm, the narrative goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

The novel “Fathers and Sons” rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of radical transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 50s, a democratic movement rose in public life, the principles of which changed strikingly in comparison with those that had prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of the new generation - this is precisely the task Turgenev set himself. He embodied his plan in the novel “Fathers and Sons.” Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of common democrats of the 60s.

The main character of the novel is tragic in everything.

Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. By denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.

Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism; he is extremely rational and materialistic.

“Bazarov was a great hunter of women and female beauty, but he called love in the ideal sense, or, as he put it, romantic, nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, and considered knightly feelings to be something like ugliness or illness...” “Do you like a woman “, he said, “try to make sense; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth doesn’t fit like a wedge...”

Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, create a family and find personal happiness.

Because of his critical views on people (“All people are alike, both in body and soul...”), it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone.

One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The main character does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully embrace nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who tries to outwardly appear like him, is not entirely sure of the validity of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the main character loves them, in many ways he does not approve of their lifestyle, and even condemns them. This is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”; they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the main character is unhappy; his love is unrequited and tragic.

A feeling arises in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov tries to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the “test of love.” After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes occur in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer as firm in his views as before; he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov’s soul, which must somehow be resolved.

The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel; it was his last attempt to find happiness and “understanding.”

The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov’s worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The main character no longer feels like a “master in nature’s workshop,” but compares himself to a grain of sand in a huge world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to achieve his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society. “Well, he will live in a white hut, and a burdock will grow out of me, well, what then?”

Bazarov undoubtedly appeared too early in society; he was not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.

Departure from life is associated with the resolution of the conflict in the hero’s soul. This is the death of a giant who realizes his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving this life, a kind of reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he stops hiding his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.

In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.

The author does not create a feeling of a tragic ending, since the ending itself is epically calm, the narrative goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

The novel “Fathers and Sons” rightfully plays a leading role in the work of I. S. Turgenev. This work was created in an era of radical transformations and changes in Russian society. After the political reaction of the 50s, a democratic movement rose in public life, the principles of which changed strikingly in comparison with those that had prevailed before. In literary circles, the revival of leading authors is also noticeable - they strive to reflect in their works their vision of a “new” person who would have certain views on the further development of society. To show a representative of the new generation - this is precisely the task Turgenev set himself. He embodied his plan in the novel “Fathers and Sons.” Using the example of the image of Bazarov, the author showed the most typical features of common democrats of the 60s.

The main character of the novel is tragic in everything.

Adhering to nihilistic views, Bazarov deprives himself of many things in life. By denying art, he deprives himself of the opportunity to enjoy it.

Bazarov is skeptical about love and romanticism; he is extremely rational and materialistic.

“Bazarov was a great hunter of women and of female beauty, but he called love in the ideal or, as he put it, romantic sense, nonsense, unforgivable foolishness, considered knightly feelings something like ugliness or disease...” “You like a woman, - he said, - try to make sense; But you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth is not a wedge..."

Bazarov deprives himself of the opportunity to love and be loved, create a family and find personal happiness.

Because of his critical views on people (“All people are alike, both in body and soul...”), it is difficult for him to find an interesting interlocutor and enjoy communicating with anyone.

One of the main tragedies in Bazarov's life is loneliness. The main character does not have a true ally, since none of the people around him are able to fully embrace nihilistic ideas. Even Arkady, who tries to outwardly appear like him, is not entirely sure of the validity of the theory of negation. Bazarov's relationship with his parents is also unsuccessful. Although the main character loves them, in many ways he does not approve of their lifestyle, and even condemns them. That is why it seems that Bazarov and his parents “speak different languages”; they cannot feel and understand each other. In his love for a woman, the main character is unhappy; his love is unrequited and tragic.

The feeling arises in his soul, despite the fact that he denies even the possibility of its existence. Bazarov tries to fight the love that has arisen in his soul, but it is useless. He, with all his ideas, does not stand the “test of love.” After meeting with Odintsova, noticeable changes occur in Bazarov’s soul and worldview, his judgments are questioned. He is no longer as firm in his views as before; he begins to waver. A tragic conflict arises in Bazarov’s soul, which must somehow be resolved.

The explanation with Odintsova is the climax of the novel; it was his last attempt to find happiness and understanding.

The complete collapse that occurs in Bazarov’s worldview is manifested in his conversation with Arkady. The main character no longer feels like a “master in nature’s workshop,” but compares himself to a grain of sand in a huge world. Bazarov no longer considers it necessary to achieve his mission of “clearing space” for building a new society. “Well, he will live in a white hut, and a burdock will grow out of me, well, what then?”

Bazarov undoubtedly appeared too early in society; he was not in demand by his era. This is the reason for his tragic death at the end of the novel.

Departure from life is associated with the resolution of the conflict in the hero’s soul. This is the death of a giant who realizes his strength - this once again emphasizes the tragedy of his image. Before leaving this life, a kind of reconciliation occurs in Bazarov’s soul, he stops hiding his feelings and changes in views, he shows his true attitude towards people, tender love for his parents.

In his novel, Turgenev emphasizes that the right to tragedy belongs only to a strong nature, which, in his opinion, is Bazarov.

The author does not create a feeling of a tragic ending, since the ending itself is epically calm, the narrative goes in a philosophical direction. Turgenev wanted to show the value of life and the fact that, despite the death of the hero, life goes on.

Evgeny Bazarov is a nihilist, which means a materialist who does not recognize dogmas and tests everything only by experience. He is a physician and is interested in natural sciences. Every day is filled with work and new searches. He constantly finds something to do. "Bazarov got up...

The problem of fathers and children can be called eternal. But it is especially aggravated at turning points in the development of society, when the older and younger generations become exponents of the ideas of two different eras. This is exactly the time in the history of Russia - the 60s of the 19th century...

“Russia needs me... No, apparently I don’t.” I. S. Turgenev “In his works he usually drew attention to the question that was next in line and was already vaguely beginning to worry society,” - this is how N. A. Dobrolyubov wrote about I. S. Turgenev,...

The events that Turgenev describes in the novel take place in the mid-nineteenth century. This is the time when Russia was experiencing another era of reforms. The title of the work suggests that it will resolve the eternal question - the relationship...

The philosophical social novel “Fathers and Sons” was written in 1861. In Russia, this time was marked by a persistent socio-political struggle between noble liberalism and revolutionary democracy. Russian society turned out to be divided into two irreconcilable camps: on the one hand there were revolutionary democrats, and on the other - liberals and conservatives.

Both of them perfectly understood the need for reforms in the country, but they saw their implementation in different ways: democrats stood for radical changes in Russian society (possibly through decisive changes), while reactionaries and liberals were inclined to carry out reforms. Disputes between the two sides were waged around the main issues: attitudes towards landowner property, noble cultural heritage, issues of science and culture, art, moral principles, education of youth, duty to the fatherland, and the future of Russia.

Of course, Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons reflects this controversy. At the center of his work, the writer portrays a hero with extraordinary views and high spiritual needs. The novel puts his ideas to the test; this is especially noticeable in Bazarov’s clashes with other characters, and most importantly, with real life, nature, love, which, according to Turgenev, do not depend on any, even the most advanced philosophy. The writer poses the main problem already in the title of the work.

Touching upon the conflict of two generations, the author himself realizes that this conflict is not just an attribute of the era of the 60s, but exists at all times and underlies the development of society. This contradiction marks an indispensable condition for progress. However, the difference in views arises not only because some characters in the novel belong to the “fathers” camp, while others belong to the “children” camp.

Such an interpretation of the conflict would be incorrect, because in the work there are characters who, by age, belong to “children”, and by conviction, to “fathers”, so one should not see the cause of the conflict only in age. The problem also lies in the fact that the “fathers” and “sons” became exponents of the ideas of opposite eras (40-60s), representatives of different social strata: the old nobility, aristocracy and the young revolutionary democratic intelligentsia. Thus, a purely psychological conflict develops into a deep social contradiction. The problem of confrontation between the nobility and revolutionary democrats is stated from the first pages of the novel. Already in the very description of the heroes, the reader discovers a contrast. The author describes Bazarov as “a tall man in a long robe with tassels,” “long and thin, with a wide forehead, a flat upward, pointed nose downward, large green eyes and hanging sand-colored sideburns”; his face expressed confidence and intelligence. The author focuses on the unkempt, even somewhat sloppy appearance of the hero.

In the description of Pavel Petrovich, everything points to aristocratic over-refinement: “Dark English suite, fashionable low tie and patent leather ankle boots,” “short-cropped hair” and a clean-shaven face. Turgenev also notices that Bazarov’s hand was red and chapped, which indicates the hero’s hard work. The beautiful hand of Pavel Petrovich, “with long pink nails,” is the complete opposite of the protagonist’s hand.

So, the contrast of these images is obvious. Presenting a detailed portrait description of each of the characters, Turgenev once again reminds of the discrepancy between form and content. The contrast between the two eras is also revealed by the disputes waged by Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov. They talk about questions of the nation, about the essence of the materialist approach, about aristocracy. The principles of the new era of the 60s completely deny the principles of the old time. Whatever Kirsanov says about the benefits of the aristocracy, which “gave freedom to England,” Bazarov resolutely rejects everything: “Yes, I will spoil them, these district aristocrats.

After all, this is all pride, lionish habits, folly.” Thus, the author wanted to portray a commoner with a powerful spirit and weak nobles.

Their conflict develops throughout the novel, but never has a resolution. The writer, considering this confrontation from the outside, gives the future the right to resolve it. In addition to the theme of generation, Turgenev touches on others in his work: love, nature, art, poetry. It is these universal human values ​​that become the subject of discussion. Poetry is perceived by Bazarov as an absolutely useless thing.

“A decent chemist is twenty times more useful than any poet,” he declares. At the beginning of the novel, Nikolai Petrovich quotes lines about spring from Eugene Onegin. They correspond to the poetic mood of the hero, inspired by spring. Bazarov rudely interrupts Nikolai Petrovich.

He questions the very possibility of nature’s influence on a person’s state of mind. This is his attitude towards all phenomena of life: he evaluates everything from the point of view of benefit. Bazarov views nature in exactly the same way. “Nature is not a temple, but a workshop,” he notes. Bazarov does not perceive the organic world as something incomprehensible and unsolved. The hero speaks of nature as a workshop where man is the master and everything is subject to his will and reason.

The evidence is not just arguments, but living nature itself. The main character's views begin to be tested by life, as a result of which their inconsistency is revealed.

“Meanwhile, spring was taking its toll,” Turgenev says at the beginning of the novel and ends it with a description of the “indifferent” and eternal nature in the cemetery. Here the writer continues the Pushkin tradition (the poem “Do I wander along the noisy streets...”). Against the background of pictures of the organic world are Bazarov’s words. lose their significance, and the hero himself begins to understand his helplessness after meeting Odintsova: “And part of the time that... I will manage to live, so insignificant before eternity, where I am not and will not be...” Bazarov clearly expresses his attitude towards love already at the beginning of the novel, completely not accepting the poetic side of this phenomenon: “And what is this mysterious relationship between a man and a woman? We physiologists know what these relationships are.”

If Nikolai Petrovich looks in the eyes of Bazarov only as an “unrequited” sentimental contemplator, then Pavel Petrovich, who experienced love, “simply failed as a person.” Bazarov denies what has been deified for centuries, love, which has always been perceived as something highly spiritual, objective, tragic; all this is foreign to him. “If you like a woman, try to get some sense; but you can’t - well, don’t, turn away - the earth is not a wedge.” So, he takes care of Fenechka. Then Turgenev brings the hero together with Odintsova, and the hero notices a change in himself: “Here you go!

Baba was scared." Finally, Bazarov realizes that he has fallen in love “stupidly, madly.” The fact that he is now contradicting himself, his theory, infuriates him. Pavel Petrovich and Arkady are similarly tested by love, but the outcome of their love is different from the outcome of Bazarov’s love, who takes this feeling with him to the grave. In his love for Katya, Arkady sees a strong feeling, mutual understanding, and simple, uncomplicated happiness. Pavel Petrovich, who “gambled his whole life on a woman’s love,” turned out to be unable to withstand this test.

It is no coincidence that Turgenev shows his tender attitude towards Fenechka, which refutes the depth of feeling experienced for Princess R. In this, this character is contrasted with Bazarov. At the compositional level, this was expressed in the fact that the story of Pavel Petrovich’s love for Princess R. precedes the story of Bazarov’s love for Odintsova.

Bazarov himself, who once suggested that Arkady “study the anatomy of the eye,” is faced with Odintsova’s “mysterious smile” and her “strange calm.” She resembles a beautiful statue, cold and inaccessible. Odintsova embodies the ideal, harmony, which has been sung more than once by artists and poets. Now Bazarov is amazed by this harmony: another principle of his philosophy begins to waver - a nihilistic attitude towards art.

“Raphael is not worth a penny,” he once said. So, Bazarov, without wanting it, changes, his philosophical theory collapses, falling into the test of love. Subconsciously, he comes to terms with his defeat, and his speech changes: “Blow on the dying lamp and let it go out,” he exclaims poetically, although at the beginning of the novel he reproached Arkady for his eloquence. Bazarov himself thought that he would live a long time, but life proved completely the opposite, resorting to an absurd accident. In the final picture, Turgenev depicts nature, which speaks of “eternal reconciliation and endless life.”

Bazarov refuted the organic world as something romantic and poetic, and now nature denies the hero and all his principles with its beauty and perfection. In his work, Turgenev raises the question of the future of Russia. The problem of who holds the future of the state is one of the most important in the novel. Bazarov can only destroy the old, but he himself cannot create anything new. The writer “kills” his hero. However, he also does not leave the right to the future to the liberals. People like Pavel Petrovich are not capable of leading the country, since their beliefs do not have a strong ideological basis.