Chatsky and Onegin comparative characteristics table. Comparative characteristics of Chatsky, Onegin and Pechorin essay

Both heroes represent a new type in the literature of that time - the “extra person”. Onegin and Chatsky are intellectually superior to many people around them, but they are lonely, not truly understood by anyone. And therefore the heroes cannot find their place in society, do not find happiness in love.

Alexander Chatsky is a moral person who lives by strict moral principles. His motto perfectly reveals his essence: “I would be glad to serve, but it’s sickening to be served.” Chatsky is ready to serve the interests of the country and society, but is not used to humiliating himself before senior officials. The hero behaves honestly and simply, both with equal people and with people of higher rank. Like Skalozub, he does not know how to pretend for the sake of career growth. Power and money do not matter much to the hero. He is looking for a worthy role model for himself - a Great and truly worthy man.

Griboedov's hero is smart and inquisitive. He is constantly in search of a high noble goal.

Chatsky is sincere in love. Having fallen in love with Sophia, he strives to protect her from the whole world.

The hero is not afraid to tell the truth in person, to reveal deception. He hates the falsehood and flattery that people of high society constantly use. Spiritual slaves and vile gossips evoke contempt from Chatsky.

Alexander Chatsky is characterized by maximalism. He is an idealist who fights against the hypocrisy and evil of his time.

A hero is a patriot of his country. The young man vehemently opposes such “ulcers” of society as serfdom and inequality of rights among the country’s citizens. The philosophy of rationalism is close to him. He is ready to defend the ideas of the Enlightenment. Chatsky believes in the victory of reason. He tries to reach people through emotional speeches, but he fails. Society begins to reject him, making him a “superfluous person.”

Chatsky, like Onegin, is lonely and misunderstood. Their impulses to find an ideal are not translated into actions. Which means they are simply useless.

Evgeny Onegin feels like a stranger in his surroundings. At first he enjoyed shining at balls, but very quickly he got tired of it. After all, no one could truly appreciate his brilliant mind and ideas. Onegin also soon cooled down in his love relationships. He got women's hearts too easily, which led to his indifference and cynicism. The hero still, deep down in his soul, longed to find an ideal, but his mind refused to believe in such a thing. Perhaps this is why Onegin denies Tatyana (or maybe more to himself?) true love.

Onegin falls ill with the “Russian blues.” Nothing from his usual way of life pleases him anymore, and he cannot find interest in anything new. Why is that? Onegin is cut off from nature, unfamiliar with his native culture. He is a man without real roots. The environment in which he was brought up is completely false and therefore does not satisfy his spiritual needs.

The reason for Onegin's loneliness is in his upbringing. Since childhood, he was allowed a lot, he was not overburdened with science, but he did not feel the real love of his family. So the hero grew up to be an egoist.

Onegin by Alexandra Pushkin and Chatsky by Alexandra Griboedova are different types of people, but they are united by conflict with society and loneliness, which makes them “superfluous people.”

To the question of Comparison of the heroes of "Woe from Wit" and "Eugene Onegin" asked by the author Flush the best answer is “Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboyedov and “Eugene Onegin.” The main characters of these works, Chatsky and Onegin, are representatives of the advanced noble intelligentsia. The authors consider their characters and destinies in inextricable connection with time, with the social movement. The destinies of Chatsky and Onegin are in many ways similar. Onegin is the son of a “squandered” nobleman. Chatsky was brought up in the house of a rich uncle. It’s easy to imagine what kind of education they received. Chatsky recalls with a grin the index finger of the teacher, who inspired his students that there is no happiness for Russians without Germans. Evil irony is heard in his question: Why today, just like in ancient times, Are regiments busy recruiting teachers, in larger numbers, at a cheaper price? Pushkin, saying about Onegin’s upbringing, he rightly notes: We all learned a little of Something and somehow. Chatsky and Onegin are brought even closer together by their attitude to society, to the “light”. Onegin, tired of balls and social dinners, flees from the capital to the village. But here, too, “an eternal conversation about rain, about flax, about the barnyard” awaits him. His habits, behavior, “soul-sick laziness” cause bewilderment and dissatisfaction among his neighbors. Chatsky, passionately loving Sophia, could not stay in her father’s house. Everything there seemed lifeless to him. In Moscow, “yesterday there was a ball, and tomorrow there will be two.” A young, inquisitive mind needs food, it needs new impressions. Chatsky leaves the capital for a long time. “I wanted to travel around the whole world,” he says about himself. Onegin, living in the village, also felt his worthlessness, his uselessness, his inability to be a friend (relationship with Lensky), to love (relationship with Tatyana). “He was overcome by anxiety, a desire to change places.” “Changing places,” observations, thoughts caused by this, do not pass without a trace for the heroes. Pushkin calls his Onegin, returning from a trip, “very chilled and saturated with what he saw.” Thus, the worldviews of Chatsky and Onegin are finally formed. These are no longer youths, but adults, with rich life experience behind them. And now the fundamental differences between these literary types begin to show themselves. Onegin sees the emptiness of the life around him, the idle lordship, lies and falsehood reigning around, but he does not even think about actively fighting them. He is too well-mannered, too cold-blooded to make accusatory speeches in the living rooms of St. Petersburg in front of a crowd of laughing fools. His protest is expressed in another way. With his entire appearance he reveals a silent reproach. Pushkin describes Onegin this way: But who is it in the chosen crowd, standing silent and foggy? . Faces flash in front of him, Like a series of annoying ghosts. Chatsky behaves completely differently. He is easily irritated, personal drama makes him especially vulnerable. Appearing at Famusov’s ball, he creates, in the words of I. A. Goncharov, such a “commotion” that he is mistaken for a madman. In his actions there is no cold calculation, egoism, which are characteristic of Onegin. Chatsky’s weapon is a punishing word. He demands "service to the cause." He languishes among the empty, idle crowd of “tormentors, sinister old women, quarrelsome old men.” Chatsky demands space and freedom for his age. He announces that the “past century” is being replaced by a new one, bearing the ideal of “free life.” Goncharov in his article “A Million Torments” speaks of the typicality of Chatsky and Onegin. These types will invariably arise at a turning point. Onegins are “superfluous” people in their midst; their appearance always indicates trouble, the impending collapse of the social order. These people are head and shoulders above their contemporaries, they are noted for their insight and “sharp, cooled mind.” The Chatskys continue, develop what they started with “superfluous” people, they not only silently condemn and despise. The Chatskys openly hate, denounce, ridicule. “Chatsky is a sincere and ardent figure,” says I. A. Goncharov.

Similarities and differences between Chatsky and Onegin
The comedy “Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboyedov was written in 1824, and A. S. Pushkin created his novel in verse over the course of eight years, from 1823 to 1831. Griboedov was older than Pushkin, the authors knew each other, and highly valued each other’s work. The works reflect the same era - on the eve of the Decembrist uprising. Both sincerely sympathized with the Decembrist movement and maintained friendly relations with many of the members of secret societies. The heroes of the works are advanced representatives of the Russian nobility who critically perceive reality.
But most of “Eugene Onegin” was written after the tragic defeat on Senate Square, which could not but affect the emotional background of the work. The events depicted in both works refer to the period of the collapse of the democratic illusions of the Russian people after an unprecedented rise during the Patriotic War. Having won a heroic victory over the Napoleonic army, the people longed for liberation from serfdom; advanced representatives of the nobility expected socio-economic reforms from the tsarist regime. However, reforms did not follow, and stratification began among the progressive nobility: the most active, active part created secret societies with the goal of violently overthrowing the regime; the other, socially passive, expressed its protest by demonstrative refusal to cooperate with the regime at all levels.
Chatsky and Onegin are peers and come from the same social circle. True, Onegin was brought up in a metropolitan aristocratic family, and Chatsky was brought up in the house of the Moscow master Famusov. Onegin spent eight years in high society in St. Petersburg. Walks along Nevsky Prospekt, exquisite toilets, balls, theaters, “the science of tender passion” - all these attributes of idleness, characteristic of the “golden youth”, are also inherent in Evgeniy. He was valued in society, which, however, set a rather low bar: in addition to noble origin, all that was required was to speak flawless French, dance decently and “bow at ease.” Eugene mastered this simple set of virtues to perfection, and “the world decided that he was smart and very nice.” Onegin enjoyed life carefree, not burdening himself with thoughts:
But, tired of the noise of the ball.
And the morning turns to midnight,
Sleeps peacefully in the blessed shade
Fun and luxury child.
Wake up at noon, and again
Until the morning his life is ready,
Monotonous and colorful.
And only having become bored, Onegin did not even realize, but rather felt the incompleteness of his existence - and “the Russian blues took possession of him little by little.” An educated man, a critical thinker, he managed to overcome the stultifying influence of his environment, to look abstractly at the quagmire of fruitless vanity. Experiencing mental discomfort, aware of the harmful psychological impact of a monotonous existence, trying to find an application for his strengths, Onegin tried to put his thoughts on paper, “but he was sick of persistent work.” Hoping to find the meaning of life in someone else's wisdom, Onegin began to read, but his inability to systematically learn (“the poor Frenchman, so that the child would not be tormented, taught him everything jokingly”) did not allow him to collect the seeds of book revelations, and a “sharp, chilled mind” found in they are only flaws. Disappointed and embittered, Onegin painfully perceives the imperfection of the social structure, but does not understand how to change it. Egocentrism and isolation can only criticize, but this path, as a rule, is futile. Onegin can only communicate with those like himself, since only they can calmly relate “to his caustic argument, and to a joke with bile in half, and the anger of gloomy epigrams.” Neither a trip to the estate nor foreign voyages are able to dispel Evgeniy’s pessimism and spiritual loneliness, or encourage him to fruitful work. The pinnacle of his social activity is silent protest and demonstrative detachment from the institutions of power.
Chatsky is a person of a completely different emotional make-up. He is inquisitive, active, vital. His keen mind is concerned with the common good, and he determines the significance of the human personality not by achieved ranks and honors, not by success in secular salons, but by social activity and a progressive way of thinking. Unlike Onegin, Chatsky does not succumb to the temptations of a carefree social life, does not limit himself to sincere and, apparently, at first mutual

Chatsky and Onegin.

“Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboedov and “Eugene Onegin” by A. S. Pushkin are works dedicated to one period of the life of Russia. This era was significant for the country. After the War of 1812, the opinion of the intelligentsia about the people who rose to the pinnacle of glory and power, freeing Europe from the tyranny of Napoleon, but remained powerless and dark, changed profoundly. The main characters of these works, Chatsky and Onegin, are representatives of the advanced noble intelligentsia. The authors consider their characters and destinies in inextricable connection with time, with the social movement.

The fates of Chatsky and Onegin are in many ways similar. Onegin is the son of a “squandered” nobleman. Chatsky was brought up in the house of a rich uncle. It’s easy to imagine what kind of education they received. Chatsky recalls with a grin the index finger of the teacher, who inspired his students that for Russians there is no happiness without Germans.

Evil irony is heard in his question:

That now, just as in ancient times,

The regiments are busy recruiting teachers,

Tutoring

Need help studying a topic?

Our specialists will advise or provide tutoring services on topics that interest you.
Submit your application indicating the topic right now to find out about the possibility of obtaining a consultation.

The socio-psychological type of the superfluous person is one of the most popular in Russian literature. Many writers turned to him in their works, and the most striking characters of this type can be called Eugene Onegin from the novel of the same name by A.S. Pushkin and Alexander Chatsky from A.S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”. Let's look at the similarities and differences between these two heroes.

Chatsky and Onegin are people of the same age, representing the capital's aristocracy. Both characters received a decent education, possessing extraordinary mental abilities and critical thinking. Their similarity is also manifested in smaller details: Both Chatsky and Pechorin traveled a lot, their lovers were both fond of French novels. However, the main common feature is their ability to see the emptiness of their rotten society.

Thus, Chatsky angrily denounces him in his famous monologue:

Where, show us, are the fathers of the fatherland,

Which ones should we take as models?

Aren't these the ones who are rich in robbery?

Onegin shares these thoughts, noticing all the lack of spirituality and idle bustle of people around. That is why the hero leaves for his estate, “having cast off the burden of the conditions of light.”

There are much more differences between these characters. As the reader can see, Alexander Chatsky is a true patriot of his country, ready to work for the good of the fatherland. Unlike Onegin, he does not lose interest in life; on the contrary, his soul is filled with the desire to change society, for this he exposes the vices of “Famus” Moscow.

Evgeny does not see the meaning in life, and therefore he has no interest in it. When communicating with people, Chatsky does not hesitate to express his point of view, often using various barbs. Chatsky has a hot temper, and it is difficult for him not to enter into discussions and arguments, while Evgeny Onegin appears as a cold and calculating person who knows how to restrain himself and hide his thoughts from the people around him. In addition, heroes in love also differ. Alexander Chatsky is sincerely in love with Sophia: “...And yet I love you without memory...”. After he finds out who the girl was really in love with and how hypocritical she was towards himself, the character is disappointed in the sincerity of his feelings, because his pride was really wounded. Eugene Onegin, in turn, is not capable of such feelings - his soul is devastated by numerous petty novels, and he himself does not believe in love, being too selfish. That’s why he renounces Tatyana Larina’s love, even though this love could give him spiritual harmony.

Thus, both heroes of famous works are individuals who are not understood and accepted by society; both heroes belong to the type of “superfluous person,” however, in their images the reader can see two paths of social life of a nobleman of that time. Personalities like Chatsky showed active protest and tried to change the existing system, while “Eugene Onegin” is simply passive

but they did not accept the orders of society and doomed themselves to a painful search for truth, which led them to nowhere.