He wrote a work called genius and madness. Genius and madness

Cesare LOMBROSO

Genius and madness

When, many years ago, being, as it were, under the influence of ecstasy (raptus), during which the relationship between genius and insanity was clearly presented to me as if in a mirror, I wrote the first chapters of this book in 12 days. I confess that even I myself was not clear to what serious practical conclusions the theory I created could lead to. I did not expect that it would provide the key to understanding the mysterious essence of genius and to explain those strange religious manias that were sometimes the core of great historical events, that it would help establish a new point of view for assessing the artistic creativity of geniuses by comparing their works in the field of art and literature with the same works of madmen and, finally, that it will provide enormous services to forensic medicine.

Little by little, I was convinced of such an important practical significance of the new theory by both the documentary works of Adriani, Paoli, Frigerio, Maxime Ducamp, Rive and Verga regarding the development of artistic talents among the insane, as well as the high-profile trials of recent times - Mangione, Passanante, Lazaretti, Guiteau, which proved everyone that the mania for writing is not just a kind of psychiatric curiosity, but directly a special form of mental illness and that the subjects obsessed with it, apparently completely normal, are all the more dangerous members of society because it is difficult to immediately notice a mental disorder in them, and between Thus, they are capable of extreme fanaticism and, like religious maniacs, can even cause historical upheavals in the lives of peoples. That is why it seemed to me extremely useful to re-examine the previous topic on the basis of the latest data and on a broader scale. I will not hide that I even consider him brave, in view of the bitterness with which the rhetoricians of science and politics, with the ease of newspaper writers and in the interests of one or another party, try to ridicule people who prove, contrary to the nonsense of metaphysicians, but with scientific data in their hands complete the insanity, due to mental illness, of some of the so-called "criminals" and the mental disorder of many persons hitherto considered, according to generally accepted opinion, to be completely sane.

To the caustic ridicule and petty quibbles of our opponents, we, following the example of the original who moved in their presence to convince people who denied the movement, will only respond by collecting new facts and new evidence in favor of our theory. What could be more convincing than facts and who would deny them? Perhaps only the ignorant, but their triumph will soon come to an end.

Introduction to Historical Review

The recognition of the close connection and multiple correlations between genius and insanity is now deeply rooted among scientists. This happened thanks, firstly, to the scientific works of Verga, Moreau, Schilling and Maudsley, and secondly, to the studies of the skulls of great people carried out by Broca, Canestrini, Turner, Vogt, Kupfner, Quatrefage and Mantegazza. To some extent, this may have been facilitated by my book, which is now in its third edition, but a particularly large role in this case was played by the proliferation of many diary magazines, which several years ago began to be published in Italy by almost all the best hospitals for the insane.

Almost every issue of these curious entries contained new factual data in support of the correctness of the thesis, which for so long was considered an absurd paradox, namely, that the mentally ill only rarely display that complete disorder of mental faculties that the crowd attributes to them, and that, on the contrary, the illness itself often causes them to have extraordinary mental alertness. However, although this theory is no longer considered absurd or false, many still call it sterile, cruel and practically inapplicable. I don’t argue that it should seem sad, but there is a lot of sadness in natural phenomena, from our point of view - for example, the fact that nettles and roses, violets and wormwood grow simultaneously.

However, is a botanist indignant at such a phenomenon and denies it? No, he takes it into account, studies it, describes it, and, of course, no one will blame him for this.

The benefits and important practical significance of the latest research in the field of psychiatry can only be contested by those who do not know their results, who do not know that it was thanks to such research that it was possible not only to determine, at least in part, the essence and origin of genius, but also to dispel forever that fatal delusion , on the basis of which only subjects who had completely lost their minds were considered insane, and therefore insane, as a result of which thousands of innocent victims of mental disorder were handed over as criminals into the hands of executioners.

PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION

When many years ago, as if under the influence of an influx from above (raptus), the relationship between genius and insanity appeared to me as clearly as in a mirror, and I wrote the first chapters of this book in 12 days, I confess that even I myself was not clear about what serious practical conclusions can the theory I created lead to? I did not expect that it would provide the key to understanding the mysterious essence of genius and explaining those strange religious manias that were sometimes the core of great historical events, that it will help to establish a new point of view for evaluating the artistic creativity of geniuses by comparing their works in the field of art and literature with similar works of madmen and, finally, that it will provide enormous services to forensic medicine.

Over time, I was convinced of such an important practical significance of the new theory by both the documentary works of Adriani, Paoli, Frigerio, Maxime Ducamp, Rive and Verga regarding the development of creative talents in the insane, as well as the high-profile trials of recent times - Mangione, Passanante, Lazaretti, Guiteau, which proved to everyone that the mania for writing is not only a kind of psychiatric curiosity, but in the literal sense a special form of mental illness, and that the subjects obsessed with it, outwardly completely normal, are all the more dangerous members of society because it is difficult to immediately notice a mental disorder in them, and yet they They are capable of extreme fanaticism and, like religious maniacs, can even cause historical upheavals in the lives of peoples. That is why it seemed to me extremely useful to re-examine the previous topic on the basis of the latest data and on a broader scale. I will not hide that I even consider him brave, in view of the bitterness with which the rhetoricians of science and politics, with the ease of newspaper writers and in the interests of one party or another, try to ridicule people who, contrary to the ravings of metaphysicians, but with scientific data in their hands, are completely insane due to the mental illness of some of the so-called criminals and the mental disorder of many persons hitherto considered, by popular opinion, to be completely sane. To the caustic ridicule and petty quibbles of our opponents, we, following the example of the original who moved in their presence to convince people who denied the movement, will only respond by collecting new facts and new evidence in favor of our theory. What could be more convincing than facts and who would deny them? Perhaps only the ignorant, but their triumph will soon come to an end.

PREFACE TO THE RUSSIAN EDITION

Lombroso's work “Genius and Madness” is already partly known to the Russian public from magazine reviews and reports. The reviews that appeared about this book so distinguished it from a number of others similar to it that the attempt to translate the psychiatric study of the Italian scientist into Russian requires neither justification nor explanation.

We only consider it necessary to make a reservation that, due to inevitable circumstances, some minor cuts have been made in places in the book and those details that are interesting only to specialists and which usually frighten laymen very much have been released. There are, however, not many such details in Lombroso’s work, which is purely journalistic in nature and intended as much for scientists as for the general public. The reductions affected mainly small forensic details and quotes from literary works of madmen, almost untranslatable into a foreign language, as well as partly that factual material that is significant only for the author’s compatriots and often even obscures the meaning of the points he is proving. In addition, the article on the “Geographical distribution of artists in Italy and scientific researchers in France” included in the appendix was excluded as it was too cluttered with the names of secondary and tertiary “celebrities”, dry in presentation and of exclusively local interest.

It would be desirable to fill out these abbreviations with data from Russian life, but they are not in the hands of private individuals, and those psychiatrists whom the publisher asked to provide the translation with appropriate notes could not do this successfully: some due to lack of free time, others – due to ignorance of the Italian language or disagreement with the main provisions of the author.

Lombroso revealed the purpose and practical significance of his research with sufficient completeness in two prefaces to various editions of the book and in the text itself. No matter how extensive the task he set for himself, it has recently been further expanded by the German psychiatrist Radstock, who considered it possible to apply a similar theory to a branch of knowledge that has been little studied by psychiatrists, but is especially important for society - pedagogy.

Lombroso Cesare

Genius and madness

Cesare Lombroso

Genius and madness

Parallel between great men and madmen

I. Introduction to Historical Review.

II. The similarity between genius people and crazy people in physiological terms.

III. The influence of atmospheric phenomena on people of genius and on the insane.

IV. The influence of meteorological phenomena on the birth of brilliant people.

V. The influence of race and heredity on genius and insanity.

VI. Brilliant people who suffered from insanity: Garrington, Bolian, Codazzi, Ampere, Kent, Schumann, Tasso, Cardano, Swift, Newton, Rousseau, Lenau, Szcheni, Schopenhauer.

VII. Examples of geniuses, poets, comedians and other crazy people.

VIII. Crazy artists and artists.

IX. Mattoid graphomaniacs, or psychopaths.

X. "Prophets" and revolutionaries. Savonarola. Lazaretti.

XI. Special characteristics of brilliant people who at the same time suffered from insanity.

XII. Exceptional characteristics of brilliant people.

Conclusion

When, many years ago, being, as it were, under the influence of ecstasy (raptus), during which the relationship between genius and insanity was clearly presented to me as if in a mirror, I wrote the first chapters of this book in 12 days*. I confess that even I myself was not clear to what serious practical conclusions the theory I created could lead to. I did not expect that it would provide the key to understanding the mysterious essence of genius and to explain those strange religious manias that were sometimes the core of great historical events, that it would help establish a new point of view for assessing the artistic creativity of geniuses by comparing their works in the field of art and literature with the same works of madmen and, finally, that it will provide enormous services to forensic medicine.

[Genius and madness. Introduction to a psychiatric clinic course given at the University of Pavia. Milan, 1863.]

Little by little, I was convinced of such an important practical significance of the new theory by both the documentary works of Adriani, Paoli, Frigerio, Maxime Ducamp, Rive and Verga regarding the development of artistic talents among the insane, as well as the high-profile trials of recent times - Mangione, Passanante, Lazaretti, Guiteau, who proved to everyone that the mania for writing is not just a kind of psychiatric curiosity, but directly a special form of mental illness and that the subjects obsessed with it, apparently completely normal, are all the more dangerous members of society because it is difficult to immediately notice a mental disorder in them, and Meanwhile, they are capable of extreme fanaticism and, like religious maniacs, can even cause historical upheavals in the lives of peoples. That is why it seemed to me extremely useful to re-examine the previous topic on the basis of the latest data and on a broader scale. I will not hide that I even consider him brave, in view of the bitterness with which the rhetoricians of science and politics, with the ease of newspaper writers and in the interests of one or another party, try to ridicule people who prove, contrary to the nonsense of metaphysicians, but with scientific data in their hands complete insanity, due to mental illness, of some of the so-called “criminals” and mental disorder of many persons hitherto considered, according to generally accepted opinion, to be completely sane.

I. INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL REVIEW

Our duty is extremely sad - with the help of inexorable analysis, to destroy and destroy, one after another, those bright, rosy illusions with which man deceives and exalts himself in his arrogant insignificance; it is all the more sad that in return for these pleasant delusions, these idols, which have served as objects of adoration for so long, we can offer him nothing but a cold smile of compassion. But the servant of truth must inevitably submit to its laws. Thus, due to fatal necessity, he comes to the conviction that love is, in essence, nothing more than the mutual attraction of stamens and pistils... and thoughts are the simple movement of molecules. Even genius - this is the only sovereign power that belongs to a person, before which one can bend the knee without blushing - even many psychiatrists have put it on the same level with the tendency to crime, even in it they see only one of the teratological (ugly) forms of the human mind, one of the varieties of madness. And note that such profanation, such blasphemy is not only allowed by doctors, and not exclusively in our skeptical times.

Even Aristotle, this great ancestor and teacher of all philosophers, noted that under the influence of a rush of blood to the head, “many individuals become poets, prophets or soothsayers and that Mark of Syracuse wrote quite good poetry while he was a maniac, but, having recovered, completely lost this ability ".

He says in another place: “It has been noticed that famous poets, politicians and artists were partly melancholic and insane, partly misanthropes, like Bellerophon. Even today we see the same thing in Socrates, Empedocles, Plato and others, and most powerfully in poets. People with cold, abundant blood (lit. bile) are timid and limited, and people with hot blood are active, witty and talkative."

Plato argues that “delirium is not a disease at all, but, on the contrary, the greatest of the blessings given to us by the gods; under the influence of delirium, the Delphic and Dodonian soothsayers provided thousands of services to the citizens of Greece, whereas in their ordinary state they brought little benefit or were completely useless It happened many times that when the gods sent epidemics to the people, one of the mortals fell into a sacred delirium and, under its influence, became a prophet, indicated a cure for these diseases. A special kind of delirium, excited by the muses, evokes in the simple and immaculate soul of a person the ability to express in beautiful poetic form the exploits of heroes, which contributes to the education of future generations."

Democritus even directly said that he does not consider a person of sound mind to be a true poet. Excludit sanos, Helicone poetas.

Cesare Lombroso

Genius and madness. Parallel between great men and madmen

When, many years ago, being as if under the influence of ecstasy (raptus), during which the relationship between genius and insanity seemed to me as if in a mirror, I wrote the first chapters of this book in 12 days 1). I confess that even I myself was not clear to what serious practical conclusions the theory I created could lead to. I did not expect that it would provide the key to understanding the mysterious essence of genius and to explain those strange religious manias that were sometimes the core of great historical events, that it would help establish a new point of view for assessing the artistic creativity of geniuses by comparing their works in the field of art and literature with the same works of madmen and, finally, that it will provide enormous services to forensic medicine.

Little by little, I was convinced of such an important practical significance of the new theory by both the documentary works of Adriani, Paoli, Frigerio, Maxime Ducamp, Rive and Verga regarding the development of artistic talents among the insane, as well as the high-profile trials of recent times - Mangione, Passanante, Lazaretti, Guiteau, which proved everyone that the mania for writing is not just a kind of psychiatric curiosity, but directly a special form of mental illness and that the subjects obsessed with it, apparently completely normal, are all the more dangerous members of society because it is difficult to immediately notice a mental disorder in them, and between Thus, they are capable of extreme fanaticism and, like religious maniacs, can even cause historical upheavals in the lives of peoples. That is why it seemed to me extremely useful to re-examine the previous topic on the basis of the latest data and on a broader scale. I will not hide that I even consider him brave, in view of the bitterness with which the rhetoricians of science and politics, with the ease of newspaper writers and in the interests of one or another party, try to ridicule people who prove, contrary to the nonsense of metaphysicians, but with scientific data in their hands complete insanity, due to mental illness, of some of the so-called “criminals” and mental disorder of many persons hitherto considered, according to generally accepted opinion, to be completely sane.

1) Genius and insanity. Introduction to a psychiatric clinic course given at the University of Pavia. Milan, 1863.

I. SIMILARITY OF GENIUS PEOPLE AND PHYSIOLOGICALLY INSANE PEOPLE

No matter how cruel and sad this kind of paradox may be, if we consider it from a scientific point of view, we will find that in some respects it is quite reasonable, although at first glance it seems absurd.

Many of the great thinkers are subject, like madmen, to convulsive muscle contractions and are distinguished by sharp, so-called “trochaic” body movements. Thus, it is said about Lenau and Montesquieu that on the floor near the tables where they studied, one could notice indentations from the constant twitching of their legs. Buffon, immersed in his thoughts, once climbed the bell tower and descended from there by rope completely unconsciously, as if in a fit of somnambulism. Santeil, Crebillon, Lombardini had strange facial expressions, similar to grimaces. Napoleon suffered from constant twitching of his right shoulder and lips, and during fits of anger, also in his calves. “I was probably very angry,” he himself once admitted after a heated argument with Lowe, “because I felt my calves trembling, which had not happened to me for a long time.” Peter the Great was subject to twitching of the facial muscles, which horribly distorted his face.

“Carducci’s face,” says Mantegazza, “at times resembles a hurricane: lightning rains from his eyes, and the trembling of his muscles resembles an earthquake.”

Ampere could not speak otherwise than by walking and moving all his limbs. It is known that the normal composition of urine, and especially the urea content in it, changes markedly after manic attacks. The same thing is noticed after intense mental exercise. Already many years ago, Golding Bird made the observation that one English preacher, who spent the entire week in idleness and only preached sermons with great fervor on Sundays, precisely on that day the content of phosphate salts in the urine increased significantly, while on other days it was extremely insignificant. Subsequently, Smith confirmed with many observations the fact that with any mental stress the amount of urea in the urine increases, and in this respect the analogy between genius and madness seems undeniable.

From this abnormal abundance of urea, or rather from this new confirmation of the law of balance between force and matter, which governs the entire world of living beings, other, more amazing analogies can be deduced: for example, gray hair and baldness, thinness of the body, and also poor muscular and sexual activity, characteristic of all madmen, is very often found in great thinkers. Caesar was afraid of the pale and thin Cassiev. D'Alembert, Fenelon, Napoleon were as thin as skeletons in their youth. About Voltaire, Segur writes: “Thinness proves how hard he works; his emaciated and bent body serves only as a light, almost transparent shell, through which you seem to see the soul and genius of this person."

Paleness has always been considered an accessory and even an adornment of great people. In addition, thinkers, along with crazy people, are characterized by: constant overflow of the brain with blood (hyperemia), intense heat in the head and cooling of the extremities, a tendency to acute diseases of the brain and poor sensitivity to hunger and cold.

It can be said about brilliant people, just like about crazy people, that they remain lonely, cold, and indifferent to the responsibilities of a family man and a member of society all their lives. Michelangelo constantly insisted that his art replaced his wife. Goethe, Heine, Byron, Cellini, Napoleon, Newton, although they did not say this, by their actions they proved something even worse.

There are frequent cases when, due to the same reasons that so often cause madness, i.e. Due to illnesses and head injuries, the most ordinary people turn into geniuses. As a child, Vico fell from a tall staircase and crushed his right parietal bone. Gratri, at first a bad singer, became a famous artist after severely bruising his head with a log. Mabille-on, completely weak-minded from a young age, achieved fame for his talents, which developed in him as a result of a wound to his head. Gall, who reported this fact, knew a half-idiot Dane whose mental abilities became brilliant after he, at the age of 13, fell headfirst down the stairs 3). Several years ago, a cretin from Savoy, bitten by a mad dog, became a completely reasonable man in the last days of his life. Dr. Galle knew limited people whose mental abilities were unusually developed as a result of brain diseases (mi-dollo).

“It may very well be that my illness (spinal cord disease) gave my latest works some kind of abnormal shade,” Heine says with amazing insight in one of his letters. It must be added, however, that the illness affected in this way not only his last works, and he himself was aware of this. A few months before the intensification of his illness, Heine wrote about himself (Correspondace inedite. Paris, 1877): “My mental excitement is more likely the result of illness than genius - in order to at least a little assuage my suffering, I composed poetry. On these terrible nights, mad with pain, my poor head rushes from side to side and makes the bells of my worn out stupid cap ring with cruel gaiety.”

Bisha and von der Kolk noticed that people with crooked necks have a more alert mind than ordinary people. Conolly had one patient whose mental faculties were stimulated during operations on him, and several such patients who showed special talent in the first periods of consumption and gout. Everyone knows how witty and cunning humpbacks are; Rokitansky even tried to explain this by saying that their aorta, giving rise to the vessels going to the head, makes a bend,

Lombroso Cesare

Genius and madness

Cesare Lombroso

Genius and madness

Parallel between great men and madmen

I. Introduction to Historical Review.

II. The similarity between genius people and crazy people in physiological terms.

III. The influence of atmospheric phenomena on people of genius and on the insane.

IV. The influence of meteorological phenomena on the birth of brilliant people.

V. The influence of race and heredity on genius and insanity.

VI. Brilliant people who suffered from insanity: Garrington, Bolian, Codazzi, Ampere, Kent, Schumann, Tasso, Cardano, Swift, Newton, Rousseau, Lenau, Szcheni, Schopenhauer.

VII. Examples of geniuses, poets, comedians and other crazy people.

VIII. Crazy artists and artists.

IX. Mattoid graphomaniacs, or psychopaths.

X. "Prophets" and revolutionaries. Savonarola. Lazaretti.

XI. Special characteristics of brilliant people who at the same time suffered from insanity.

XII. Exceptional characteristics of brilliant people.

Conclusion

When, many years ago, being, as it were, under the influence of ecstasy (raptus), during which the relationship between genius and insanity was clearly presented to me as if in a mirror, I wrote the first chapters of this book in 12 days*. I confess that even I myself was not clear to what serious practical conclusions the theory I created could lead to. I did not expect that it would provide the key to understanding the mysterious essence of genius and to explain those strange religious manias that were sometimes the core of great historical events, that it would help establish a new point of view for assessing the artistic creativity of geniuses by comparing their works in the field of art and literature with the same works of madmen and, finally, that it will provide enormous services to forensic medicine.

[Genius and madness. Introduction to a psychiatric clinic course given at the University of Pavia. Milan, 1863.]

Little by little, I was convinced of such an important practical significance of the new theory by both the documentary works of Adriani, Paoli, Frigerio, Maxime Ducamp, Rive and Verga regarding the development of artistic talents among the insane, as well as the high-profile trials of recent times - Mangione, Passanante, Lazaretti, Guiteau, who proved to everyone that the mania for writing is not just a kind of psychiatric curiosity, but directly a special form of mental illness and that the subjects obsessed with it, apparently completely normal, are all the more dangerous members of society because it is difficult to immediately notice a mental disorder in them, and Meanwhile, they are capable of extreme fanaticism and, like religious maniacs, can even cause historical upheavals in the lives of peoples. That is why it seemed to me extremely useful to re-examine the previous topic on the basis of the latest data and on a broader scale. I will not hide that I even consider him brave, in view of the bitterness with which the rhetoricians of science and politics, with the ease of newspaper writers and in the interests of one or another party, try to ridicule people who prove, contrary to the nonsense of metaphysicians, but with scientific data in their hands complete insanity, due to mental illness, of some of the so-called “criminals” and mental disorder of many persons hitherto considered, according to generally accepted opinion, to be completely sane.

I. INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL REVIEW

Democritus even directly said that he does not consider a person of sound mind to be a true poet. Excludit sanos, Helicone poetas.

As a result of such views on madness, the ancient peoples treated the insane with great respect, considering them to be inspired from above, which is confirmed, in addition to historical facts, by the fact that the words mania are in Greek, navi and mesugan are in Hebrew, and nigrata is - in Sanskrit they mean both madness and prophecy.

Felix Plater claims that he knew many people who, while distinguished by remarkable talent in various arts, were at the same time crazy. Their insanity was expressed by an absurd passion for praise, as well as strange and indecent actions. By the way, Plater met at court an architect, sculptor and musician who enjoyed great fame and were undoubtedly crazy. Even more outstanding facts were collected by F. Gazoni in Italy, in the “Hospital for the Incurable Mentally Ill.” His work was translated (into Italian) by Longoal in 1620. Of the writers closer to us, Pascal constantly said that the greatest genius borders on complete madness, and subsequently proved this by his own example. The same was confirmed by Hecart regarding his comrades, scientists and at the same time madmen, like himself. He published his observations in 1823 under the title: “Stultitsiana, or a short bibliography of the madmen in Valenciennes, compiled by a madman.” The same subject was dealt with by Delnier, a passionate bibliographer, in his interesting "Histoire littraire des fous", 1860, by Forgues in an excellent essay published in the Revue de Paris, 1826, and by an unknown author in "Sketches of Bedlam" (Sketches). in Bedlam. London, 1873).

Recently, Lelu - in Dmon de Socrate, 1856, and BAmulet de Pascal, 1846, Verga - in Lipemania del Tasso, 1850, and Lombroso in Pazzia di Cardano, 1856, have proven that many men of genius, for example, Swift, Luther, Cardano, Brougham and others suffered from insanity, hallucinations or were monomaniacs for a long time. Moreau, who dwells with particular love on the least plausible facts, in his last work Psychologia morbide, and Schilling in his Psychiatrische Briefe, 1863, tried to prove with the help of careful, although not always strictly scientific research, that genius is, in any case, something like a nervous abnormality, often turning into real madness. Similar conclusions, approximately, were made by Hagen in his article “On the affinity between genius and madness” (Veber die Verwandschaft Gnies und Irresein, Berlin. 1877) and partly also by Jurgen Meyer in his excellent monograph “Genius and Talent”. Both of these scientists, who tried to more accurately establish the physiology of the genius, came, through the most careful analysis of the facts, to the same conclusions that were expressed more than a hundred years ago, more on the basis of experience than strict observations, by one Italian Jesuit, Bettinelli, in his now already completely forgotten, the book Dell "entusiasmo nelle belle arti. Milan, 1769.