Haplogroup of Jesus Christ j1. Research by American geneticists The most ancient haplogroup

The modern Internet is a great thing. On the one hand, it contains a lot of interesting and useful information. Information available on the Internet that can be used to develop certain concepts, but if a) the author has some knowledge on the topic b) when comparing it with counterarguments c) when analyzing arguments and counterarguments from the standpoint of logic, context, verifiability, compliance with the general and related bodies of information in terms of consistency.

Unfortunately, this approach - essentially a source study, which requires, in fact, a serious humanitarian (exactly this kind of) education and, at a minimum, a flexible mind and refined logic - is not found among everyone. Unscrupulous journalists, bloggers and various types of online crazy people like to operate on data taken out of context. Sometimes the information of the latter contains references to “seemingly scientific” arguments and seems “evidence-based” to many inexperienced people. Usually their imaginary scientific nature is revealed by smart people quite quickly. As a rule, pseudoscience comes out immediately when the texts talk about “they are hiding the truth from us.” Any conspiracy theory always deals with delusional, unverifiable and unprovable things and outright fakes - such as the “Dulles Plan” invented by the commies (which never existed), the mythical phrase “Stalin took Russia with a plow and left with an atomic bomb” (which he never wrote and Churchill did not say), a classic forgery of a source - “Vlesova’s Book” (written, of course, by a self-taught White emigrant, and not by the ancient Slavs), and numerous exercises by Bushkov about “Russia that did not exist”, based on the nonsense works of Fomenko and Nosovsky - as an example, “The Great Wall of China, built by the ancient Rus, because the battlements are not on the same side” or “The Great Wall was built by Mao Zedong”, all kinds of chudinovism and leftism (everyone can buy the diplomas of these “academicians” for 300 dollars), etc.

In various kinds of pseudo-historical discussions concerning the historical origin of Russians and Slavs, it is now fashionable to interweave “haplogroups”. With the light hand of a certain “scientist” (not a biologist at all) Klesov, who lives (like “academician” Levashov) in the USA (hence the ridiculously familiar trick - an appeal to the authority of “Western science” - “American scientists have proven that Russians are 4500 years old!” ) this completely scientific method of determining paternity and dynasticity began to be used for constructions for which it was not at all intended. As a result, many posts contain monstrously distorted results of its use. The purpose of this post was to clarify the obvious points, so that the numerous references to the fact that “haplogroups have been proven”, given by the authors in place and out of place, would not be perceived uncritically when reading some texts.

Let me clarify some commonplaces in the form of popularly given answers to questions.

Question 1 Can a specific haplogroup indicate a specific nationality? In other words, is there a Russian or German (without quotes) haplogroup?

Answer: No. Why? Because any currently existing ethnic group consists of people with at least two or three Y-chromosomal haplogroups. In other words, you can be Russian with haplogroup I1, R1a1, R1b, N3, I2, J2 and even E. The same applies to other peoples. for example, among Ashkenazi Jews - about 12% are carriers of the supposedly "marker" haplogroup R1a1 for Russians - and it is emphasized that not among "half-breeds" and "goyim", but among the most real, typical representatives of their ethnic group. And so on.

Thus, the correlation of a certain haplogroup with modern nationalities and individual representatives of ethnic groups can only be of a statistical, relative nature. “Measuring skulls” by haplogroups won’t work - it’s quite likely that you’ll classify a Jew as a Russian, and a Russian as a Jew. The presence of R1a among Poles - 56.4%, and... Kyrgyz - as much as 63.5% speaks about whether peoples can be defined as “Aryans” by only one criterion - the presence of a statistical marker haplogroup. And the Volga Tatars are no different from the Russians in terms of the set of haplogroups. I hope that conclusions have been drawn? In other words, no ethnic community will emerge that unites people from the conventionally “Aryan” haplogroup R1a1. At the same time, there is no objective difference between the classical Russians living in the same region, but with the conditionally “Finnish” haplogroup N, and the same classical Russians, carriers of the “Aryan” haplogroup R1a. The entire rest of the gene pool (and in many ways more significant than the haplomarker) of the descendants of the “ancestral Finnish men” and the “ancestral Aryan men” was mixed a long time ago.

Question 2. What do haplogroups actually talk about and what can’t they talk about?

Answer: As follows from answer 1 and as correctly noted by the author of another detailed post dedicated to haplogroups: “Those sections of the Y chromosome that serve as markers for identifying haplogroups themselves do not encode anything and have no biological meaning. These are markers in their pure form "They can be compared to the orange and green LEDs in the film "Kin-dza-dza", which were used to identify Chatlans and Patsaks, and there was no other difference between these "races" except the color of the light bulb."

By haplogroup one can judge - statistically(!!! this is important - precisely statistically, i.e. with inevitable errors, but still possible) about the difference, dissimilarity in the origin of certain large ethnolinguistic massifs and the degree of proximity of their contacts (sexual ones). For example, all Turkic peoples are carriers of specific haplogroups. Even if some of the Turks do not have or have very few of their “markers” and C, O and Q, which are absent among the Slavs, then D, R1b1b1 or N1b, which are less common among the Turks, are still statistically absent among Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. We can conclude, therefore, that contacts with the Turks throughout history among the Eastern Slavs are statistically insignificant, and the statement that “we are Asians” is incorrect. Such conclusions are quite scientific. It can also be argued that the typical “Mongoloid” haplogroups C and Q are not found among Russians at all, and if so, the contacts of the population of Rus' with the Mongols during the period of the yoke were minimal. This, however, is clearly evidenced by all historical sources - 20 years after 1240, all Mongol military formations were withdrawn from the territory of Rus' and the Russian princes carried the tribute collected in Rus' to the Horde themselves. Thus, most likely the average Russian peasant of the late 13th and 14th-15th centuries never saw a single living “Mongol” (Horde) in his life. And this is not a “discovery” at all - haplogroups only confirm what we already know (another thing is that in “popular” ahistorical literature, including in textbooks, the content of which is now practically not controlled by scientists, about little is written about this).

Further, from answer 1 it is clear that if representatives of a certain ethnic group belong to several haplogroups, then this DOES NOT MEAN that this ethnic group is a kind of mechanical combination of populations with different gene pools. The rest of their gene pool, except for the Y chromosomes, will be mixed without any practical possibility of differentiation. 16% of haplogroup N among Russians in the regions north of Moscow does not mean that 16% of them are supposedly “more Finns than Slavs” - both for the reason stated above (mixing the rest of the, much more important, gene pool to the point of unrecognizability) and for reasons statistical - because Among the population of Finland, only 60% of the population have this haplogroup, and among Estonians in general there are 40%.

I will quote again - “The peculiarity of the Y chromosome is that it is passed from father to son almost unchanged and does not experience “mixing” or “dilution” by maternal heredity. This allows it to be used as a mathematically accurate tool for determining paternal origin. If the term "dynasty" has any biological meaning, then it is precisely the inheritance of the Y chromosome. a specific mutation has occurred on the Y chromosome."

Modern science is inclined to believe that these mutations could have occurred between 50 and 10 thousand years ago, and the creationist version, which seems more truthful to me, speaks of the complete uncertainty of the results of using the “biological clock” methods (they give completely different values) and says about the probable practical simultaneity of the appearance of these mutations associated with the legend of the Tower of Babel and the dispersion of peoples. Whether one or the other is right is, in principle, not very important for us living today.

What matters is that Y - chromosome does not determine the gene pool. It is not a carrier of some “ethnically specific” information in the genome. From more than 20,000 genes human genome, the Y chromosome contains only about 100 pieces. They encode mainly the structure and functioning of the male genital organs. There is no other information there. Facial features, skin color, mental and thinking characteristics are spelled out on other chromosomes which, during inheritance, go through recombination (the paternal and maternal sections of the chromosomes are randomly mixed). The carrier of the “Aryan chromosome” after hundreds of generations can be a typical black man (if, say, his black mother got pregnant in the 16th century from a Portuguese father). And vice versa.

Thus. people who talk about “Aryan”, “Semitic”, “Russian”, “Finnish”, “Celtic” haplogroups not in their conventional marker meaning tied to MODERNITY, but in a literally understood one, and even transfer these definitions to the distant past - are mistaken and confuse others. The phrase “4500 years ago in the Voronezh region they found a skeleton identified by haplogroup as Russian, Russians began to exist 4500 years ago” does not make any sense. Russians have several haplogroups, - once. The skeleton does not represent a statistically significant sample - that's two(maybe this is the same Ashkenazi Jew from the 12% of carriers of the “Aryan” haplogroup R1a1? Or Kyrgyz?). Three: Why on earth was it concluded that the mutation arose (and continued) exactly 4500 years ago? Were the skeletons of his father and grandfather, as well as the skeletons of his offspring, examined? Why didn't it arise 10 thousand years ago? And so on.

Question 3: is R1a1, a Russian haplogroup, an “unconditional enic marker”? Is it true that Russians, in terms of their purity (i.e., the frequency of occurrence of this haplogroup), are the most stable and pure among Europeans?

Answer: No. And it's not true. The stability of Russians as a people, their ethnic uniqueness is not determined by haplogroups, and neither is haplogroup R1a1. Let's look at the data: if we take an average sample from several different studies with a 100% fit. then (remember that haplogroups are named according to MODERN distribution among peoples):

47% of Russians have the “Aryan” haplogroup R1a1, which they inherited from the Proto-Slavs and other autochthons of Eastern Europe.

16% of Russians- conditionally “Finnish” haplogroup N3.

7% of Russians- conditionally “Celtic” haplogroup R1b, which dominates among many peoples of Western Europe. This is a legacy of the presence of the Proto-Slavs in Central Europe.

5% of Russians- “Northern European” haplogroup I1 (I1a according to the old classification), common in Scandinavia and Northern Europe. Apparently, these are the descendants of the notorious “Varangians”.

15% of Russians- “Balkan” haplogroup I2 (formerly I1b), characteristic of the peoples of the Balkan Peninsula. This is an indirect consequence of Slavic expansion in the Balkans in the 6th-9th centuries, when Slavic newcomers actively mixed with the local autochthonous population. Some of the Slavs subsequently left the Balkans to the north and northeast (see “The Tale of Bygone Years”).

4%- “Eastern Mediterranean” haplogroup J2, typical of the ancient Greeks and even more ancient representatives of the Minoan civilization. For the Russians, this is most likely an integral part of the “Balkan heritage”, and perhaps of the earlier Hellenic colonization of the Northern Black Sea region.

6% Russians are represented by the “Afrasian” haplogroup E, the frequency of which among Jews, Greeks, Balkan Slavs and southern Italians reaches 20% or more. This is the “Balkan trace” again. In total, the descendants of “Byzantine refugees” (settlers from the Balkans and the Black Sea region) make up more than 25% of Russians.

We see, therefore (as expected from the answer to the second question) that haplogroups DO NOT determine “Russianness”. The purely statistical “predominance” of R1a1 is 47 percent. 53 percent of Russians DO NOT HAVE this haplogroup and are still Russian. Consequently, if we do not fall into Russophobia and do not say that 53 percent of modern Russians are “unclean” (which we will not do), we will inevitably be forced to once again draw the same conclusion that was made above - the haplogroup does not have any specific characteristics ethnically defining features, and ethnicity is indefinable through haplogroups.

Question 4: is the reconstruction of ethnic migrations and processes based on the analysis of modern haplogroups justified?

Answer: No. There are several problems here.

One can perceive with great skepticism and rather negatively the reports about the “correspondence of the distribution of haplogroups to historical migrations,” and all “haplogroup” conclusions about the time of the emergence of a particular people are likely to be considered at least unverifiable and strained. Why? Because you need to not uncritically quote the “Klesovs” (“a scientist wrote!”) but THINK. First of all, with your own head, using logic and the education you have received.

Firstly, the historical migrations of certain peoples in preliterate times are not an axiom. but the subject of scientific debate and discussion - both in terms of whether the bearers of a particular archaeological culture were representatives of a certain ethno-linguistic unity (we will never be able to say this with accuracy - pots and axes do not speak), and in terms of accuracy of correspondence of archaeological culture to a specific ethnic group or ethnocultural unity. Archaeological cultures are a complex of objects of material culture, things, their remains, or rather. From the point of view of an archaeologist of the 30th century, throughout Russia and Europe. In the United States in the 21st century, there will be a single, with local variations, archaeological culture of “tires, plastic bags, bottles, cans and computers”, in which the differences between nations in their material culture will not be visible. Although there is little reason to imply such globalization in antiquity, it is worth remembering. that the older the archaeological culture, the more blurred its ethnicity. Thus, the thesis “such and such a skeleton is undoubtedly Indo-European... has such and such a haplogroup” is immediately called into question. The fact that he is “undoubtedly” Indo-European, and not a foreigner who slipped in here and adopted the way of life of this tribe, still needs to be proven. And with an extremely unrepresentative sample(agree, a dozen or a hundred burials over a huge area is not a sample, or at least a sample incomparable in terms of representativeness with a modern sample among living people) this is made almost equally probable, that is, uncertain.

Secondly, tracing such migrations by haplogroups is extremely problematic due to the fact that (in the case of the Indo-Europeans, for example) among the many archaeological cultures of the Bronze Age - “cuisines of ancestral ethnic groups”, the funeral rite of cremation of corpses in its various variations is common, the same in some territories and in the Iron Age. The DNA material of the carriers of these cultures is irretrievably lost and we can say absolutely nothing about their haplogroups. Thus, the “haplogroup” approach does not work here - vast territories and entire millennia fall out of its scope completely, depriving us of the opportunity to build any kind of succession chain of already extremely scarce and essentially unrepresentative material.

Third, mutations occur on the Y chromosome randomly and can both increase and “decrease” (or return to the original, source code). This indicates that you cannot determine the time and place of the emergence of this or that “group” due to constant migrations, which could be by land or sea, and mutations that occur throughout the life of a particular historical human community.

Fourthly, theoretically, the very accuracy of the study of the modern distribution of haplogroups can be questioned - i.e. that initial material extrapolated to the past (difficulty in determining the ethnicity of persons taking the test - who is stopping you from calling yourself Russian or Belarusian?). With relatively small samples and controversial issues like “Russian-Ukrainian” (in fact, a free question of self-designation), this is extremely important and can decide everything.

In other words, transferring the modern distribution of sets of haplogroups into the past is unjustified, and if so, then it is impossible to draw conclusions about the ethnicity of certain human remains, passing them off as someone’s ancestors only on this basis. It's forced and superficial.

To summarize everything described.

References to haplogroups as an “unconditional indicator of ethnicity” are untenable.
- Haplogroups are research tools, statistically significant markers. Real, objectively observed Y chromosomes do not carry significant ethnic information in the gene code.
- Russians (like Germans, Finns and Turks, etc.) exist and are unique not due to haplogroups.
- Any nation has not one, but two, three or more haplogroups in its set, and there is no reason to make some “less pure” and others “more pure”, for the reason described in the thesis above.
- We a priori cannot reconstruct reliable migrations based on haplogroups. and even more so - the date of origin (emergence) of this or that modern ethnic group.

Thus, you can safely throw Klesov’s works and fairy tales into the same trash bin where we have Fomenko, Levashov and Chudinov.

Checheno-Ingush haplogroups: J2, J1, F, L3

An attempt to create a DNA genealogy of Joseph, the Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ

According to the Holy Books, about 4000 years ago, the common ancestor of the future Jews and Arabs was born in Mesopotamia, and according to the Bible (Old Testament), Torah and Koran, his name was Abraham (Ibrahim). Strictly speaking, it is not known which haplogroup Abraham belonged to, but since the late 1990s Jewish population geneticists have actually postulated that he belonged to haplogroup J1.

In principle, as the author of this study previously showed, the common ancestors of Jews and Arabs of haplogroups J2 and R1a also lived between 4000 and 5000 years ago (Klyosov A.A. Slavs, Caucasians, Jews from the point of view of DNA genealogy. M., Book World , 2015, 351 pp.), but no matter which haplogroup of the three (J1, J2 or R1a) you take, this will not change the conclusions of this study. Therefore, we will assume that this was haplogroup J1, and keep the other options “in reserve.”

So, almost 4000 years ago, one of the owners of haplogroup J1, a resident of the ancient city of Ur, one of the oldest cities in Sumer, left the city with his family and went to the northwest, to Canaan, on the Mediterranean coast. His name was Abram, and he was a descendant of Eber, the great-great-grandson of Shem, the first son of Noah, as the Bible tells. With him were his father Terah, his wife Sarai, and his nephew Lot. The reasons why he left his hometown are unknown. But it is known that at that time Ur fell into economic decline, and many inhabitants who were not engaged in agricultural labor and were not tied to their land holdings migrated from Ur.

Now let us recall why Abraham is preferably classified as haplogroup J1. In fact, at first it was classified as haplogroup J, without detailing the subclade. But then it turned out that it was the J1 haplogroup that was most represented among the Kohanim, they are also Kohanim (which means “priests” in Hebrew), and was most represented in the J1a2b-P58 subclade, namely in the number of 99 people out of 215 tested Kohanim (46% of all ) (Hammer M.F., Behar D.M., Karafet T.M., Mendez F.L., Hallmark B., Erez T., Zhivotovsky L.A., Rosset S., Skorecki K. (2009) Extended Y chromosome haplotypes resolve multiple and unique lineages of the Jewish priesthood. Hum Genet. 126, 707-717). Another 63 Cohens tested haplogroup J2 with subclades, 29%), of which almost half, 31 people, are in the J2a-M410 subclade. Haplogroup R1a had 5 Kohanim, that is, 2.3%.

It is clear that the Kohanim, descendants of Aaron, in turn, a direct descendant of Abraham, if we follow biblical history, can only belong to one subclade, since each subclade of those noted is many thousands of years old. One ancient subclade and only one can be the “subclade of Abraham” and then the “subclade of the 12 tribes of Israel,” that is, the descendants of Abraham, his son Isaac and his grandson (son of Isaac) Jacob. Based on the maximum number of Kohanim, almost half, in the J1-P58 haplogroup, we will further assume that the probability of the “Abraham haplogroup”, and therefore the 12 tribes of Israel (including the tribe of Judah, his descendant King David, and his descendant Joseph Plotnik, which will be discussed below) is maximum for this haplogroup.

John the Baptist is the son of Elizabeth and Zechariah, a priest from the Aaronic family (haplogroup J1), and they gave birth to him at an old age.

Anatoly A. Klyosov,
Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor

Haplogroup J2 originated approximately 35,000 years ago in the Middle East (Sumer, Akkad, Elam, Babylon, Assyria)
The world's highest frequency of haplogroup J2 is found among Ingush (88% of the male population) and Chechen (56%) men in the Northeast Caucasus.

Not only the Old Testament, the Psalter, the Gospel tell about these generations of the progenitors of humanity

Ingush - 90%
Chechens - 60%
Jews - 40%
Mishari - 40%
Krits - 40%

Three J2s found at Merovingian burial site (Romano-Frankish transition period)

Merovingians (descendants of Jesus Christ) (French Mérovingiens, German Merowinger or Merovinger) - the first dynasty of Frankish kings in the history of France. The kings of this dynasty ruled from the end of the 5th to the middle of the 8th century in the territory of modern France and Belgium.

It is interesting that the Vainakhs are Chechens and Ingush, the only people in which this ancient haplogroup dominates

The predominant speakers of J2 are Sicilians, Ingush, Shugnans, Chechens, Yagnobis, Dvals, Cypriots, Cretans, Macedonians, Parsis, Greeks of the Northern Black Sea region (Urums, Rumels, Hellenes).
Many ancient Mediterranean and Middle Eastern civilizations flourished in areas where haplogroup J2 was predominant. These are the Chatti, Hurrians, Hittites, Etruscans, Cretans, Greeks, Phoenicians (and their Carthaginian offshoot), Israelites, and to a lesser extent, also Romans, Assyrians and Persians.
Outside the Caucasus, the highest frequency of haplogroup J2 is observed in Cyprus (37%), Crete (34%), Northern Iraq (28%), Sicily (26.5%)
The Romans most certainly contributed to the spread of haplogroup J2 within their borders, judging by the distribution of J2 in Europe (where the frequency is more than 5%), which bears an interesting resemblance to the borders of the Roman Empire. The maximum concentration of haplogroup J2a in the world is on the island of Crete (32% of the population). Subclade J2a3d (M319) is believed to be from Crete.
Haplogroup J2a also reaches high frequencies in Anatolia, the South Caucasus, Chechnya and Ingushetia.

The Rothschild clan belongs to this haplogroup Rothschild DNA Y-J2

The interest in these chains of snips is primarily due to the fact that subclade J1-P58 was previously attributed to the Kohanim (Cohanim), direct descendants of the High Priest Aaron, brother of Moses, who led the Jews out of Egypt approximately 3600 years ago. At first, in the late 1990s, the Kohanim were simply assigned to haplogroup J1 (although the Kohanim, carriers of J2, did not agree, and believed, and continue to believe, that Aaron had a J2 haplogroup). Then, in the most detailed work of the 2000s, Hammer et al (2009) found that testing 215 Cohens diverged into 21 subclades of many haplogroups, of which:

almost half, 46% (99 people) belong to haplogroup J1-P58*,
14% (31 people) – haplogroup J2a-M410,
7% (16 people) – haplogroup J2b-M12,
6% (13 people) – haplogroup J2a-M318,
5.6% (12 people) – haplogroup R1b-M269,
4.6% (10 people) – haplogroup E1b-M123,

The Lubomirskis (Polish: Lubomirscy, Ukrainian: Lyubomirski) are a Polish princely family of the coat of arms "Szrenyava", dating back to the beginning of the 16th century.
Lubomirski Family is J2b2 +L283

According to some already established stereotype, many believe that haplogroups J1 and J2 are Jewish haplogroups. This, of course, is not the case, as can already be seen from the list of some Caucasian ethnic groups above; they are not Jews at all. The common ancestors of haplogroup J2 for many groups in the Caucasus go back to 6-8 thousand years ago, and they came partly with the so-called Uruk migrations from Mesopotamia, partly from Western Asia, partly from the Mediterranean. There were no Jews as such then; Jews and Arabs as ethno-social and religious entities appeared only 4000-3600 years ago.

INGUSH GENE L3, L1C
It is assumed that the haplogroup arose about 105-85 thousand years ago.
Speakers: Pakistanis: Kalash, Pashtuns, Burushi, Ingush, Chechens
Moreover, the haplogroup is present in the gene pool of the Caucasus among Chechens with a frequency of up to 14%, among Ingush - about 3%
There is a version about the origin of the current L3 from the pharaohs, who in turn descended from heaven to create a race of people
branch L3 e

Ingush gene F
Haplogroup F
- Y-chromosomal human haplogroup. From this haplogroup comes most other haplogroups, in total covering about 90% of the modern male population of the planet.

J2 This haplogroup is really very interesting. Firstly, it is part of the J-I cluster, which is the haplogroup of the first modern people of Europe who replaced the Neanderthals. Bratskaya I is the only one that arose in Europe among all haplogroups.
Are the GGs localized territorially among the Vainakhs? Let's say J1 is elevated in a certain territory, L3 is also high, or is everything mixed up and not connected territorially in any way?

That’s the thing: most often it’s mixed up. For example, J2, J1, L3 are distributed from Ingushetia to Dagestan, if we talk about the territory of the Nakhs. But within groups there are some nuances regarding branches. For example, the Galgaev branch is mainly localized only in the Galgaev society in the area of the triangle Targim, Khamkhi and Egikal and nearby villages. The Shatoi branch is localized in the Shatoi region - Khal Keloy, Sattoy, Nuokhoy and nearby villages. I repeat, it is not the haplogroups that are localized, but the branches within the haplogroup. These are most likely teips that have one ancestor from which these branches originated. Also, naturally, in some area there is predominantly one group. For example, among Ch1anti we have so far found only J1, but this is a large society and few people are covered. For example, L3 is located more in the Galanchozhsky and Vedensky districts.

Jesus' Speech on the Cross
Eloi, Eloi! Lamma sabachthani?) One of the words of Jesus on the cross, a quotation from Psalm 21:2: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Matt 27:46; Mark 15:34). In Hebrew this phrase sounds like: "Eli, Eli, Lama Azavtani."

Ingush language Lomma: the day after tomorrow
Chechen language the day after tomorrow (lama): lama
Ingush language Elli: prince
Ingush language Vitani: left
Ingush language az: I, azakh: me
Ingush language loam: mountain
Phoenician language Lamed: l, mountain

The number of characters describing the haplogroup of human Y chromosomes (women have XX sets, men have XY chromosomes) is up to 5-10 or more, and in order to draw any conclusions, “haplotypes” are better used. The so-called "haplogroup tree" could more accurately be called a haplotype tree. Haplotypes - I, J, O, C, R1a1, R1b1, D and so on.

DNA genealogy is an important tool for historians and for researchers of the origins of humanity. Humanity is countries, peoples. Nations are made up of tribes, ethnic and cultural groups. The culture of humanity is international, but it always has national and state differences and characteristics.

Information about the origin of tribes and peoples is transmitted not only through sections of the Y chromosomes, identified as marks of the first ancestor, starting from which there have been no mutations until now; - but also through the X chromosomes, which are present in both men and women.

Historically, humanity has always, from time to time, been sick with ideas of superiority, but no people or tribes have any special advantages or disadvantages. There is also no obvious identification of peoples by haplotypes.

Haplotypes could be designated in history as follows - I - Slavs (I1 - northern, I2 - southern), J - Semites, D - Tibetans, O - Chinese, E - Arabs, (O1 - northern, O2 - southern), Q - Mayans, gypsies,
R1a1 - Scythians, R1b1 - Sumerians, C - Mongols. Haplotypes I and J originated from IJKL about 20 thousand years ago. The peoples of Eastern Europe, Russians, Ukrainians, Poles, Belarusians have about 50% of R1a1 statistics. Haplogroup R1b1 originates from the West, Africa. R1b1 - characteristic of the pharaohs, this group is of great importance among the Irish (up to 90%). Among Russians, R1b1 is about 4%; these are ethnic Bashkirs or immigrants from the West. In the West, accordingly, R1a1 are immigrants from the East (Vikings, Swedes). The Scythian haplotypes were combined with the South Siberian N3C. The Sumerian haplotypes are not only R1b1, but also D (D1, D2). Haplogroup D1 is found among both the Ayni and Japanese peoples.

The origin of the Turks comes from the Scythians, like the Eastern European peoples. The Chinese O and Mongolian C lines were of great importance in the creation of the Turkic community. The Turks conquered the Rourans, the Chinese, and in the 7th century the Turks captured Khazaria and created the Turkic Kaganate. Khazaria is a state from Crimea to Muscovy, which was formed in the 3rd century, after the conquest of Scythia by the Huns.

The Kyrgyz are also Turkic, and they have a Turkic language, but the Kyrgyz have R1a1 - up to 70%. Unlike the Kyrgyz, the Kazakhs have large statistics of Chingizids C, Naimans - O, the Kazakhs have up to 4% of statistics - Semites, up to 10% - Argyns. Kazakhs are not only Chingizids, but also Timurids - possible origin of the Timurids - R1a1.

Theories of the “Tatar-Mongol yoke” are fundamentally erroneous because neither the Russians nor the Tatars have Mongol lines - C (tenths of a %).

All attempts to create theories of the “Aryans” or “Slavic-Aryans” were unsuccessful. There are no Aryans, and among the Russians and the peoples of Eastern Europe, only a quarter of statistics - I, having origin - the Mediterranean, the Balkans. Some people believe that Semites are Jews. But Jews have about 40% J statistics, Georgians, Armenians, Azerbaijanis - up to 30% J. Greek Cypriots - up to 40% J. Some peoples of the North Caucasus - up to 90% J. In Qatar, Yemen - up to 90 % (E+J).

For example, Albert Einstein has E2. Haplotypes of Jews - Ashkenazi - R1a1; among Jews, this haplotype, according to A. Klyosov (Harvard), appeared in the 7th century. Haplogroups R1b1 appeared among Jews about 4 thousand years ago, J - about 17,500 years ago. There is no direct identification of nationality and haplotype - but for the history of the origin of the peoples that exist now, not only the statistics of ancestors are important, but also the times when these haplotypes appeared among tribes and peoples.

All models of the development of the haplogroup tree are based on the continuous development of humanity. However, all human activity comes down to the general movement of humanity directed towards the End of the World. The earth was saved from humanity by floods and fires, great glaciations. And therefore, models of the development of humanity, which is more than 4 billion years old on Earth, can also be based on models of restoration of large communities from small ones that remained on Earth after global catastrophes.

For some groups of people, the theories of evolution and eugenics, based on the superiority of the European - the “crown” of these same theories, are considered more convenient, and other peoples are supposedly less distant in their “development” (through labor, etc.) from monkeys.

The origin of Russians and Ukrainians are now very sensitive, even political, topics. But these topics can be studied using DNA genealogy methods. Scientists' research should not be biased, and should not be directed towards some pre-prepared results. And then it turns out that the Russians are part of the new Ukrainian nation, and the Ukrainians are part of the Russian people, the southern Russians.

In the study of the origin of tribes and peoples, toponymy, including geographical names and linguistic similarities, is very important evidence. There are a lot of geographical names - Argyn, Argun, Argyn Gorge, Argun River. The Argyns were part of the Huns - and the striking force of the Huns was the Bashkir army. The Argyns did not submit to the Russian tsarist government and went to the Ottoman Empire.

Bash - pick - this is the main blow. Alty ai - six months, Altai. Baikal is a great lake (Turk). Mas keve - tax to row, keve - oar, row (Hebrew), Moscow, Kyiv - toponymy of Khazaria. Tomen - low (Turkic). Sar sin - marked king (Hebrew), sary sin - yellow island (Turkic), Tsaritsyn. Oryn Bor - place of chalk (Turk), Orenburg.

Scythia, which existed from Crimea to India, including Afghanistan, was conquered by Alexander the Great (3rd century BC). He built cities - Alexandria, in Afghanistan - the city of Kandahar, in Uzbekistan - Khojent. Alexander himself, a young conqueror, married the daughter of an Afghan nobleman. Now Afghans and Iranians have up to 30% R1a1 statistics, and no J at all - so these peoples are on the “axis of evil”. In Afghanistan there were traces of ancient Slavic peoples who mixed with the Scythians and peoples with haplogroup L.

Linguistic similarities alone cannot serve as models of the origin of peoples and tribes. There are more differences between the Turks than similarities, despite the fact that the Turkic languages are similar to each other. The languages of the Turks are closer to the language of the ancestors of the Eastern European peoples - the Scythians. Among the Eastern European peoples, the roots of Slavic (Mediterranean) languages now have greater weight - the origin of the peoples of the IJKL groups - the Mediterranean coast, islands. The cultural development of Eastern Europe occurred in such a way that Polish words were added to the Ukrainian language, and words of Romance origin were added to Polish, despite the fact that Poland had been set against Russia for many centuries.

Modern prospects for the development of Western European states assume their gradual destruction, the resettlement of masses of migrants from Africa and Eastern Europe, and the re-creation of Khazaria.

Original taken from servicefree in post Oleg Timofeevich Vinogradov, an outstanding Russian surgeon and writer, served in the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union for more than 30 years, awarded 15 medals and one order. Since 1980, he began to study professionally the ancient history of the Slavs.
Monograph by Vinogradov "Ancient Vedic Rus' is the basis of existence" was published in 2008 and immediately sold out. In order to declare the book extremist, in 2011 the author was accused of standard “Russian typing” under Article 282

Drawing from a book
...in best quality:
http://lib.rus.ec/i/47/229447/doc2fb_image_02000001.jpg

Book "Ancient Vedic Rus' - the basis of existence"(download) :
http://narod.ru/disk/36694522001/vinogradov_drevn.zip.html

Russian spirit.

The scientific data below is a terrible secret. Formally, this data is not classified, since it was obtained by American scientists outside the field of defense research, and was even published in some places, but the conspiracy of silence organized around it is unprecedented. The atomic project at its initial stage cannot even be compared: then some things still leaked into the press, and in this case, nothing at all.
What is this terrible secret, the mention of which is a worldwide taboo? This is the secret of the origin and historical path of the Russian people.

Agnation.

Why information is hidden - more on that later. First, briefly about the essence of the discovery of American geneticists.

There are 46 chromosomes in human DNA, half of which he inherits from his father, half from his mother. Of the 23 chromosomes received from the father, only one - the male Y chromosome - contains a set of nucleotides that is passed on from generation to generation without any changes for thousands of years. Geneticists call this set a haplogroup. Every man living now has in his DNA exactly the same haplogroup as his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather, etc. for many generations.

The haplogroup, due to its hereditary immutability, is the same for all people of the same biological origin, that is, for men of the same nation. Each biologically distinctive people has its own haplogroup, different from similar sets of nucleotides in other peoples, which is its genetic marker, a kind of ethnic mark. In the biblical system of concepts, one can imagine the matter in such a way that the Lord God, when He divided humanity into different nations, marked each of them with a unique set of nucleotides in the Y-chromosome of DNA. (Women also have such marks, only in a different coordinate system - in the mitochondrial DNA rings.) .

Of course, there is nothing absolutely unchangeable in nature, for movement is a form of existence of matter. Haplogroups also change (in biology such changes are called mutations), but very rarely, at intervals of millennia, and geneticists have learned to very accurately determine their time and place. Thus, American scientists found that one such mutation occurred 4,500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain. A boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which they assigned a genetic classification R1a1. Paternal R1a mutated and a new one arose R1a1.

The mutation turned out to be very viable. The R1a1 genus, which was started by this same boy, survived, unlike millions of other genera that disappeared when their genealogical lines were cut off, and multiplied over a vast space. Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%. R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.
Thus, the Russian people in a genetically modern form were born in the European part of present-day Russia about 4,500 years ago. A boy with the R1a1 mutation became the direct ancestor of all men now living on earth whose DNA contains this haplogroup. All of them are his biological or, as they used to say, blood descendants and among themselves - blood relatives, together making up a single people - the Russians.

Biology is an exact science.

It does not allow for double interpretation, and genetic conclusions to establish kinship are accepted even by the court. Therefore, genetic and statistical analysis of population structure, based on the determination of haplogroups in DNA, allows us to trace the historical paths of peoples much more reliably than ethnography, archeology, linguistics and other scientific disciplines dealing with these issues.

Indeed, the haplogroup in the Y-chromosome DNA, unlike language, culture, religion and other creations of human hands, is not modified or assimilated. She's either one or the other. And if a statistically significant number of indigenous inhabitants of a territory have a certain haplogroup, we can say with one hundred percent certainty that these people descend from the original carriers of this haplogroup, who were once present in this territory.

Realizing this, American geneticists, with the enthusiasm inherent in all emigrants in questions of origin, began to wander around the world, take tests from people and look for biological “roots”, their own and others. What they accomplished is of great interest to us, since it sheds true light on the historical paths of our Russian people and destroys many established myths.

So, having emerged 4500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain (the place of maximum concentration of R1a1 - an ethnic focus), the Russian people quickly multiplied and began to expand their habitat. They looked then exactly the same as we do now; the ancient Rus did not have any Mongoloid or other non-Russian features. Scientists have recreated the appearance of a young woman from the “civilization of cities” from bone remains: the result is a typical Russian beauty, millions of the same live in our time in the Russian outback.

Haplogroup R1a1 in the ancient world.

3500 years ago, haplogroup R1a1 appeared in India. The history of the Russians’ arrival in India is known better than other vicissitudes of the territorial expansion of our ancestors thanks to the ancient Indian epic, in which its circumstances are described in sufficient detail. But there is other evidence of this epic, including archaeological and linguistic.

It is known that the ancient Rus were called Aryans at that time (as they are recorded in Indian texts). It is also known that it was not the local Hindus who gave them this name, but that it is a self-name. Convincing evidence of this has been preserved in hydronymy and toponymy - the Ariyka River, the villages of Upper Ariy and Lower Ariy in the Perm region, in the very heart of the Ural civilization of cities, etc.

It is also known that the appearance of the Russian haplogroup R1a1 on the territory of India 3500 years ago (the time of birth of the first Indo-Aryan calculated by geneticists) was accompanied by the death of a developed local civilization, which archaeologists called Harappan based on the site of the first excavations. Before their disappearance, this people, who had populous cities at that time in the Indus and Ganges valleys, began to build defensive fortifications, which they had never done before. However, the fortifications apparently did not help, and the Harappan period of Indian history gave way to the Aryan.

The first monument of the Indian epic, which talks about the appearance of the Aryans, was written down 400 years later, in the 11th century. BC e., and in the 3rd century. BC e. in its completed form, the ancient Indian literary language Sanskrit emerged, surprisingly similar to the modern Russian language.

Now men of the Russian genus R1a1 make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes there are almost half of them - 47%, which indicates the active participation of the Aryans in the formation of the Indian aristocracy (the second half of the men of the upper castes are represented by local tribes, mainly Dravidian).

Unfortunately, information on the ethnogenetics of the Iranian population is not yet available, but the scientific community is unanimous in its opinion about the Aryan (i.e. Russian) roots of ancient Iranian civilization. The ancient name of Iran is Arian, and the Persian kings loved to emphasize their Aryan origin, as eloquently evidenced, in particular, by the popular name Darius. This means that there were Russians there in ancient times.

Our ancestors migrated not only to the east and south (to India and Iran), but also to the west - to where European countries are now located. In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Russian (Aryan) haplogroup R1a1 make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12 %, and in England - the least (3%).

Unfortunately, there is no ethnogenetic information on the European patrimonial aristocracy yet, and therefore it is impossible to determine whether the share of ethnic Russians is evenly distributed across all social strata of the population or, as in India and, presumably, Iran, the Aryans made up the nobility in the lands where they came . The only reliable evidence in favor of the latter version was a by-product of a genetic examination to establish the authenticity of the remains of the family of Nicholas II. The Y chromosomes of the king and heir Alexei turned out to be identical to samples taken from their relatives from the English royal family. This means that at least one royal house of Europe, namely the house of the German Hohenzollerns, of which the English Windsors are a branch, has Aryan roots.

However, Western Europeans (haplogroup R1b) in any case are our closest relatives, oddly enough, much closer than the Northern Slavs (haplogroup N) and the Southern Slavs (haplogroup I1b). Our common ancestor with Western Europeans lived about 13,000 years ago.

The settlement of the Russian-Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north; and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group - the so-called. "Indo-European" (Correct: Slavic-Aryan). These are almost all European languages, some languages of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason: in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source - Aryan the proto-language from which all other “Indo-European” languages grew.
Note - more about European languages as remakes - “How “national” remake languages were created in the 18th-19th centuries”- http://ladstas.livejournal.com/71015.html

“It’s impossible to argue. You need to shut up.”

The above are irrefutable natural scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test in a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And there are reasons for this.

The first such reason is quite trivial and boils down to scientific false solidarity. Too many theories, concepts and scientific reputations will have to be refuted if they are revised in the light of the latest discoveries of ethnogenetics.

For example, we will have to rethink everything that is known about the Tatar-Mongol invasion of Rus'. The armed conquest of peoples and lands was always and everywhere accompanied at that time by the mass rape of local women. Traces in the form of Mongolian and Turkic haplogroups should have remained in the blood of the male part of the Russian population. But they are not there! Solid R1a1 - and nothing more, the purity of the blood is amazing. This means that the Horde that came to Rus' was not at all what is commonly thought of it: if the Mongols were present there, then in statistically insignificant numbers, and it is generally unclear who was called “Tatars”. Well, which scientist will refute scientific foundations, supported by mountains of literature and great authorities?!
see Myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke- http://ladstas.livejournal.com/16811.html
No one wants to spoil relationships with colleagues and be branded an extremist by destroying established myths. In an academic environment, this happens all the time: if the facts do not correspond to the theory, so much the worse for the facts.

The second reason, incomparably more significant, relates to the sphere of geopolitics. The history of human civilization appears in a new and completely unexpected light, and this cannot but have serious political consequences.

Throughout modern history, the pillars of European scientific and political thought proceeded from the idea of Russians as barbarians who had recently climbed down from the trees, naturally backward and incapable of creative work. And suddenly it turns out that Russians are the ones arias, which had a decisive influence on the formation of great civilizations in India, Iran and Europe itself! That Europeans owe a lot to Russians for their prosperous lives, starting with the languages they speak. It is no coincidence that in recent history, a third of the most important discoveries and inventions belong to ethnic Russians in Russia itself and abroad. It is no coincidence that the Russian people were able to repel the invasions of the united forces of continental Europe led by Napoleon and then Hitler. Etc.

Great historical tradition

It is no coincidence that behind all this there is a great historical tradition, thoroughly forgotten over many centuries, but remaining in the collective subconscious of the Russian people and manifesting itself whenever the nation faces new challenges. Manifesting itself with iron inevitability due to the fact that it grew on a material, biological basis in the form of Russian blood, which remains unchanged for four and a half millennia.

Western politicians and ideologists have a lot to think about in order to make their policy towards Russia more adequate in the light of the historical circumstances discovered by geneticists. But they don’t want to think or change anything, hence the conspiracy of silence around the Russian-Aryan topic.

The Russian situation itself

The main thing is the very statement of the existence of the Russian people as a biologically integral and genetically homogeneous entity. The main thesis of the Russophobic propaganda of the Bolsheviks and current liberals is precisely the denial of this fact. The scientific community is dominated by the idea formulated by Lev Gumilyov in his theory of ethnogenesis: “From a mixture of Alans, Ugrians, Slavs and Turks, the Great Russian people developed.” The “national leader” repeats the common saying “scratch a Russian and you will find a Tatar.” Etc.

Why do the enemies of the Russian nation need this? The answer is obvious. If the Russian people as such do not exist, but some kind of amorphous “mixture” exists, then anyone can control this “mixture”: be it Germans, be it African pygmies, or even Martians. The denial of the biological existence of the Russian people is the ideological justification for the dominance of the non-Russian “elite” in Russia (formerly Soviet, now liberal).

But then the Americans with their genetics intervene, and it turns out that there is no “mixture”, that the Russian people have existed unchanged for 4500 years, that Alans and Turks and many others also live in Russia, but these are separate, distinctive peoples, etc. etc. And the question immediately arises: why then are Russia not ruled by Russians for almost a century? Illogical and wrong, Russians should be controlled by Russians.

Czech Jan Hus

Czech Jan Hus, a professor at the University of Prague, argued in a similar way 600 years ago:
“The Czechs in the Kingdom of Bohemia, by law and by the dictates of nature, must be first in positions, just like the French in France and the Germans in their lands.”
This statement of his was considered politically incorrect, intolerant, inciting ethnic hatred, and the professor was burned at the stake.

Now morals have softened, professors are not being burned, but so that people are not tempted to succumb to Hussite logic, in Russia the non-Russian government simply “cancelled” the Russian people: “a mixture,” they say. And everything would have been fine, but the Americans jumped out from somewhere with their analyzes - and ruined the whole thing. There is nothing to cover them up with, all that remains is to hush up the scientific results, which is done to the hoarse sounds of an old and hackneyed Russophobic propaganda record.

The collapse of the myth about the Russian people

The collapse of the myth of the Russian people as an ethnic mixture automatically destroys another myth - the myth of the multinationality of Russia.
Until now, they have tried to present the ethno-demographic structure of our country as a vinaigrette from the Russian “you won’t understand what the mixture is” and many indigenous peoples and newcomer diasporas. With such a structure, all its components are approximately equal in size, so Russia is supposedly “multinational.”

But genetic studies provide a completely different picture. If you believe the Americans (and there is no reason not to believe them: they are authoritative scientists, they value their reputation, and they have no reason to lie in such a pro-Russian way), then it turns out that 70% of the entire male population of Russia are purebred Russians. According to the data of the penultimate census, 80% of respondents consider themselves Russian, i.e. 10% more are Russified representatives of other nations (it is these 10%, if you “scrub”, that you will find non-Russian roots). And 20% falls on the remaining 170-odd peoples, nationalities and tribes living on the territory of the Russian Federation. Total: Russia is a mono-ethnic country, albeit multi-ethnic, with an overwhelming demographic majority of natural Russians. This is where Jan Hus' logic comes into play.

About backwardness

Next - about backwardness. Judeo-Christian churchmen thoroughly contributed to this myth: they say that before the baptism of Rus', people lived in complete savagery. Wow, "wildness"! They mastered half the world, built great civilizations, taught the aborigines their language, and all this long before the so-called. “The Nativity of Christ”... The real story does not fit, does not fit in any way with its Judeo-Christian church version. There is something primordial, natural in the Russian people that cannot be reduced to their religious life.

Of course, biology and the social sphere cannot be equated. There are undoubtedly points of contact between them, but how one passes into the other, how the material becomes ideal, is unknown to science. In any case, it is obvious that under the same conditions different peoples have different patterns of life activity. In the north-east of Europe, in addition to the Russians, many peoples lived and now live, but none of them created anything even remotely similar to the great Russian civilization. The same applies to other places of civilizational activity of the Russian-Aryans in ancient times. Natural conditions are different everywhere, and the ethnic environment is different, therefore the civilizations built by our ancestors are not the same, but there is something common to all of them: they are great on the historical scale of values and far exceed the achievements of their neighbors.

“Everything flows, everything changes,” “...except the human soul.”

The father of dialectics, the ancient Greek Heraclitus, is known as the author of the saying “Everything flows, everything changes.” Less known is the continuation of this phrase of his: “...except for the human soul.” While a person is alive, his soul remains unchanged (what happens to it in the afterlife is not for us to judge). The same is true for a more complex form of organization of living matter than man - for the people. The people's soul is unchanged as long as the people's body is alive. The Russian folk body is marked by nature with a special sequence of nucleotides in the DNA that controls this body. This means that as long as there are people on earth with haplogroup R1a1 on the Y chromosome, their people retain their souls unchanged.

The language evolves, culture develops, religious beliefs change, but the Russian soul remains the same for all 4500 years of the existence of the people in its current genetic form. And together, the body and soul, constituting a single biosocial entity under the name “Russian people,” have a natural ability for great achievements on a civilizational scale. The Russian people have demonstrated this many times in the past; this potential remains in the present and will always exist as long as the people live.

It is very important to know this and, through the prism of knowledge, to evaluate current events, words and actions of people, to determine one’s own place in the history of the great biosocial phenomenon called the “Russian nation.” Knowledge of the history of a people obliges a person to try to be at the level of the great achievements of his ancestors, and this is the most terrible thing for the enemies of the Russian nation. That's why they try to hide this knowledge. And we are trying to make it publicly available.

Spirin Vladimir Georgievich

change from 02/17/2016 - (added)

The data below is essentially a secret. Formally, this data is not classified, since it was obtained by American scientists outside the field of defense research, and was even published in 2011, but the aura of silence organized around it is unprecedented. And the information that can be found is very confusing. So, briefly about the essence of the discovery of American geneticists:

There are 46 chromosomes in human DNA, half of which are inherited from the father and half from the mother. Of the 23 chromosomes received from the father, one single, male Y-chromosome contains a set of nucleotides (58 million), which is passed on from generation to generation without any changes for thousands of years. Geneticists call this set a haplogroup. Every man living today has in his DNA exactly the same haplogroup as his father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great-grandfather, and so on for many generations.

Of course, there is nothing absolutely unchangeable in nature, for movement is a form of existence of matter. Haplogroups also change - in biology such changes are called mutations - but very rarely, at intervals of millennia, and geneticists have learned to very accurately determine their time and place. Thus, American scientists found that one such mutation occurred four and a half thousand years ago on the Central Russian Plain. Or did they decide that? Maybe they should have turned to the epic “Mahabharata” and re-read it more carefully?

Briefly speaking. A boy was born with a slightly different haplogroup than his father, to which they assigned the genetic classification R1a1. The paternal R1a mutated and a new R1a1 emerged.

Currently, holders of haplogroup R1a1 make up 70% of the total male population of Russia, eastern Ukraine and Belarus, and in ancient Russian cities and villages - up to 80%. R1a1 is a biological marker of the Russian ethnic group. This set of nucleotides is “Russianness” from a genetic point of view.

Thus, the Russian people in a genetically modern form appeared on the European part of present-day Russia about 4,500 years ago. A boy with the R1a1 mutation became the direct ancestor of all men now living on earth whose DNA contains this haplogroup. All of them are his biological or, as they used to say, blood descendants and blood relatives among themselves, together making up a single people.

Biology is essentially an exact science. It does not allow for double interpretation, and genetic conclusions to establish kinship are accepted even by the court. Therefore, genetic and statistical analysis of population structure, based on the determination of haplogroups in DNA, allows us to trace the historical paths of peoples much more reliably than ethnography, archeology, linguistics and other scientific disciplines dealing with these issues.

From an investigative point of view, the inscription on the clay pot “Vasya was here” is, of course, evidence indicating Vasya’s presence in this place, but only indirectly - someone could have joked and signed Vasya’s name, the pot could have been brought from another area, etc. etc. But if local men have Vasya’s haplogroup in their DNA, then this is direct and irrefutable evidence that Vasya or his blood relatives in the male line actually visited here and inherited - the hereditary biological mark is not washed away. Therefore, genetic history is the main one, and everything else can only complement or clarify it, but not refute it in any way.

Realizing this, American geneticists, with the enthusiasm inherent in all emigrants in questions of origin, began to wander around the world, take tests from people and look for biological “roots”, their own and others. What they accomplished is of great interest to us, since it sheds true light on the historical paths of peoples and destroys many established myths. Maybe that’s why they were afraid to publish this data for 20 years?

So, having emerged 4500 years ago on the Central Russian Plain (the place of maximum concentration of R1a1 is an ethnic focus), the ethnos began to quickly expand its habitat. I hope you understand that now we are talking purely about the conclusions of American geneticists, about a specific period, and not about the entire history of the Russians. 4000 years ago, the ancestors of the Russians went to the Urals and created Arkaim and a “civilization of cities” there with many copper mines and international connections all the way to Crete (chemical analysis of some of the products found there shows Ural copper). They looked then exactly the same as we do now; the ancient Rus did not have any Mongoloid or other non-Russian features. Scientists have recreated the appearance of a young woman from the “civilization of cities” from bone remains - the result is a typical Russian beauty, millions of the same live in our time in the Russian outback.

Another 500 years later, three and a half thousand years ago, haplogroup R1a1 appeared in India. The history of the arrival of the Rus in India is known better than other vicissitudes of the territorial expansion of our ancestors thanks to the ancient Indian epic, in which its circumstances are described in sufficient detail. But there is other evidence of this epic, including archaeological and linguistic.

It is known that the ancient Rus were called Aryans at that time - this is how they are recorded in Indian texts. It is also known that it was not the local Hindus who gave them this name, but that it was a self-name. Convincing evidence of this has been preserved in hydronymy and toponymy - the Ariyka River, the villages of Upper Ariy and Lower Ariy in the Perm region, in the very heart of the Ural civilization of cities, etc.

It is also known that the appearance on the territory of India of the Russian haplogroup R1a1 three and a half millennia ago (the time of birth of the first Indo-Aryan calculated by geneticists) was accompanied by the previous death of a developed local civilization, which archaeologists called Harappan (settlers from the sinking continent Mu) based on the site of the first excavations. Before their disappearance, this people, who had populous cities at that time in the Indus and Ganges valleys, began to build defensive fortifications, which they had never done before. However, the fortifications apparently did not help, and the Harappan period of Indian history gave way to the Aryan. The first monument of the Indian epic, which talks about the appearance of the Aryans, was formalized in writing four hundred years later, in the 11th century BC, and in the 3rd century BC, the ancient Indian literary language Sanskrit, surprisingly similar to the modern Russian language, emerged in its completed form.

Now men of the R1a1 genus make up 16% of the total male population of India, and in the upper castes they make up almost half - 47%, which indicates the active participation of the Aryans in the formation of the Indian aristocracy (the second half of the men of the upper castes are represented by local tribes, mainly Dravidian).

Unfortunately, information on the ethnogenetics of the Iranian population is not yet available, but the scientific community is unanimous in its opinion about the Aryan roots of ancient Iranian civilization. The ancient name of Iran is Arian, and the Persian kings loved to emphasize their Aryan origin, as eloquently evidenced, in particular, by the popular name Darius.

The ancestors of the Rus migrated from their ethnic home not only to the east, to the Urals, and to the south, to India and Iran, but also to the west, to where European countries are now located. In the western direction, geneticists have complete statistics: in Poland, holders of the Aryan haplogroup R1a make up 57% of the male population, in Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia - 40%, in Germany, Norway and Sweden - 18%, in Bulgaria - 12%. In Britain and France, haplogroup R1a is expressed even less - only 8%, at most 12%, and in England the least - 3%. The remaining place in percentage terms is occupied by haplogroup R1b1a2 (R1b is a parallel subclade for haplogroup R1a) and other haplogroups that do not belong to representatives of the white race. Currently, most of Europe speaks Indo-European languages, while haplogroup R1b is more specific to western Europe and R1a to eastern Europe. It can be assumed that the tribes of hybrid Celts had the R1b1a2 haplogroup, because it is this haplogroup that is widespread among the Arabs and European Iberians. For example, here in the Caucasus and Central Asia - where the Arabs once visited.

The current concentration of haplogroup R1b is maximum in the territories of the migration routes of the Celts and Germans: in southern England about 70%, in northern and western England, Spain, France, Wales, Scotland, Ireland - up to 90% or more. And also, for example, among the Basques - 88.1%, Spaniards - 70%, Italians - 40%, Belgians - 63%, Germans - 39%, Norwegians - 25.9% and others. In Eastern Europe, haplogroup R1b is much less common. Czechs and Slovaks - 35.6%, Latvians - 10%, Hungarians - 12.1%, Estonians - 6%, Poles -16.4%, Lithuanians - 5%, Belarusians - 4.2%, Russians - from 1 .3% to 14.1%, Ukrainians - from 2% to 11.1%. In the Balkans - Greeks - up to 22.8%, Slovenes - 21%, Albanians - 17.6%, Bulgarians - 17%, Croats - 15.7%, Romanians - 13%, Serbs - 10.6%, Herzegovinians - 3.6%, Bosnians - 1.4%.

The only reliable evidence in favor of the latter version was a by-product of a genetic examination to establish the authenticity of the remains of the family of Nicholas II. The Y chromosomes of the king and heir Alexei turned out to be identical to samples taken from their relatives from the English royal family. This means that at least one royal house of Europe, namely the house of the German Hohenzollerns, of which the English Windsors are a branch, has Aryan roots.

However, Western Europeans (haplogroup R1b) are in any case our closest relatives, oddly enough, much closer than the northern Slavs (Finno-Ugrians, haplogroup N1c1, settled from Tibet) and the southern Slavs (haplogroup I1b, the Balkans are considered their homeland and Pyrenees). Our common ancestor with Western Europeans lived about 13 thousand years ago, at the end of the Ice Age, five thousand years before gathering began to develop into crop farming, and hunting into cattle breeding. That is, in the very gray Stone Age antiquity.

The fundamental point is that there are no descendants of the Mongols (haplogroup C3) left after the two-hundred-year Tatar-Mongol yoke. Or they do occur, but very rarely. How can this be? Moreover, in the genome of the Bulgar Tatars there are also a large number of carriers of the R1a1 (30%) and N1c1 (20%) gaprogroups, but they are mostly not of European origin.

The settlement of the Aryans to the east, south and west (there was simply nowhere to go further to the north, and so, according to the Indian Vedas, before coming to India they lived near the Arctic Circle) became a biological prerequisite for the formation of a special language group, Indo-European. These are almost all European languages, some languages of modern Iran and India and, of course, the Russian language and ancient Sanskrit, which are closest to each other for the obvious reason - in time (Sanskrit) and in space (Russian language) they stand next to the original source, the Aryan proto-language , from which all other Indo-European languages grew.

So, haplogroup R1a in DNA genealogy is a common haplogroup for part of the Slavs, part of the Turks and part of the Indo-Aryans (since naturally there were representatives of other haplogroups among them), part of the haplogroup R1a1 during migrations along the Russian Plain became part of Finno-Ugric peoples, for example Mordovians (Erzya and Moksha). Part of the tribes of haplogroup R1a1 during migrations brought this Indo-European language to India and Iran approximately 3500 years ago, where the Aryan languages became the basis of a group of Iranian languages, the oldest of which date back to the 2nd millennium BC. A large part of the R1a1 haplogroup joined the Turkic ethnic groups in ancient times and today largely marks the migration of the Turks

Haplogroup N1 can be traced, besides Russia, in southern China, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Japan, Taiwan and Korea. Many researchers also associate the emergence of Turkic languages with haplogroup N1, possibly N1b. Among the Huns there was also a significant proportion of Siberian subclades of haplogroup N, and perhaps the legendary leader Attila was its representative. The first leaders who took part in the formation of the Hungarian Empire about X centuries ago were also N1c1, a Ugric subclade, which was confirmed by DNA testing. In Europe, haplogroup N, in the form of the European subclade N1c1, is extremely common around the entire Baltic Sea, reaching maximum frequencies in the eastern Baltic, while the southern Baltic region and southern Scandinavia are characterized by a slightly different subclade.

The ancestor of haplogroup E1b1b1 was born approximately 15 thousand years ago in East Africa (apparently in Ethiopia). For several millennia, the carriers of this haplogroup lived in their historical homeland in Ethiopia and were engaged in hunting and gathering. By race, they were initially Negroid, but later, after migrations to the north, separate peoples appeared with their own language and culture: Egyptians, Berbers, Libyans, Cushites, Ethiopians, Himyarites, Canaanites, etc. Currently, haplogroup E1b1b1a is common among Albanians and Greeks, and is represented by various Balkan subclades.

Haplogroup C3 - Mongolian peoples, Tungus-Manchu peoples, Turkic peoples of Siberia and Central Asia, part of the Yakuts and Chinese. The same genus includes two mysterious isolated peoples - the Yukagirs and the Ainu, the origin of whose language is still controversial among scientists.

Haplogroup O3 was born in the territory of modern China, at the same time it reached the Indonesian islands of Borneo and Sumatra, and today O3 carriers are found all the way to remote Polynesia.

There are haplogroups of other peoples (denoted by Latin letters from A to T), including Caucasian, Semitic and peoples of the American continent. But everything there is so confusing that it needs to be dealt with separately.

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT

Despite the fact that Russians are anthropologically the most homogeneous ethnic group in Europe, and this has already become an axiom among researchers, genetically they represent two peoples. Two ethnic groups completely different in mental organization. By mental organization, but not by appearance. The fact is that the Valdai group of our people, the Central Russian and South Russian groups have the R1b1a2 haplogroup in their chromosomes. Exactly the same haplogroup is distributed throughout Western Europe, including Scandinavia. This proves that genetically our people are no different from Western Europeans. No matter how much they boast of their “Europeanism,” the fact remains. What’s even more interesting is that this haplogroup is named by geneticists "Atlantic".

But among the northern population of Rus', haplogroup R1a1 predominates. Representatives of both haploid groups differ in behavior. “Atlantists”, by their nature, are more drawn to the South. The North makes them afraid, they are afraid of it. Suffice it to remember who explored Siberia? Mostly people from the north - Arkhangelsk residents, industrialists from Pinega, Mezen residents, people from Vologda, Ladoga residents and others. The Cossacks did not rush from the forest-steppe zone to the east. If they went there, it was under duress. But that is not all. The Atlanticists, with the exception of the Don Cossacks, are prone to individualism; they do not shy away from trade. Consequently, deception for them, although a sin, is not fatal.

From all of the above it is clear that they are predisposed to opportunism and deep materialization of consciousness. The tsarist authorities were well aware of this weakness of the Southern Russians. Therefore, when fighting with Stepan Razin, and later with Emelyan Pugachev, they very often resorted to bribery.

The behavior of the northern group of Rus is completely different. People with the R1a1 haploid group have a keen sense of the North. They cannot imagine their life without their native places, pine forests, clean rivers and lakes. The Russians of the north are not inclined to trade. They do it only when necessary. They are drawn to creative creativity. Here they have no equal. It is enough to recall our northern shipbuilding. The northern group of Russians is characterized by conscientiousness, the concept of honor, and they have a very developed sense of justice. In a word, in terms of behavior, they are a completely different Russian people.

So where did the northern haplogroup R1a1 come from? But essentially there is no choice except from the lost ancestral home - the great Oriana. And the descendants of the white-eyed miracle, and settlers from Ladoga, Novgorod, Pskov, and residents of Ustyug, Vologda - all of them are direct heirs of northern Oriana. The country is long gone, but its children are alive.

Do you understand now why the West hates Russians so much? Moreover, they realized that people with the northern haplogroup are programmed with great difficulty. It is difficult for them to get into their heads those things that contradict their nature. That's the problem for Westerners! But at the same time, carriers of the Atlantic haplogroup R1b1a2 are easily programmed. Just like the French or Germans. Remember how Napoleon, with his articles and speeches, warmed up the French public for war with Russia? No one thought why Russia began to threaten Europe? Has she gone crazy? She should take care of her affairs. The country is vast! Hitler did the same with his people. The effect is exactly the same. Of course, not everyone among the French and the Germans fell for it, but we are now talking about the majority. The same thing is happening now in Ukraine. The script is the same everywhere, the actors are different.

We are not saying now that people with the Atlantic haplogroup are defective, these are ordinary people. Among them there are individuals with developed moral and spiritual qualities. Simply because of slightly different genetics, they have a different mental organization. I don’t think it’s worth proving that children are born with an established character. Of course, you can meet creative, noble, and incorruptible people, but there are relatively few of them! That's the problem. Just one percent, maybe two or three. Here we are dealing with a law of nature.

By the way, this is the reason for the medieval witch hunts. In essence, the descendants of the Vedic priests and keepers of ancient sacred knowledge were destroyed. But there was another hidden meaning. In the countries of Western Europe, inquisitors used hot iron and fires to kill the direct descendants of the Orians, people with haplogroup R1a1. Actually, they were the descendants of ancient guardian priests and boyar managers. Why were they burned? Because they were sometimes forced to use secret knowledge, because they deeply understood the laws of nature, because they did not recognize Christ as God, and even because of external beauty. This is the whole essence of the project, which, on behalf of those who wished to remain in the shadows, was carried out by the Catholic Church in Europe 3-4 centuries ago.

What about the Atlantic group? How did it come about? Of course, we can only assume that the northern Adityas and Danavas, the western Atlanteans (dityas), descendants of the goddess Danu (according to the Indian epic), differed from each other not only in the psychology of their behavior, but also genetically. There are versions that this is genetic mixing with archanthropes, only not directly, but through the genetic mediation of the Iberians and similar races that once lived in these territories. And note that we are still persistently convinced that interracial mixing does not cause any problems.

Now the question is: why is programming not accepted into the mental field of carriers of the R1a1 haplogroup? Yes, and owners of haplogroup R1b1 are selectively affected. Basically, people with a natural predisposition to vice. From all of the above, we can conclude that mental field worms mainly infect the mental structures of serfs or sudras, and only because the latter do not want to get rid of them by force of will. Maybe they can’t, that’s why they are sudras.

Will is a great power. If we consider the classes of the Golden Age from the position of volitional potential, we get the following picture: the most weak-willed are the slaves. An order of magnitude higher than them is the first class of workers. Managers stand even higher, and above them are priests or philosophers, but this is ideal. Here we also need to consider the quality of will. There is an evil will and a good will. The above refers to the will of the creator - good. So she is able to cleanse a person from any filth. By turning it on, even an inveterate hater of goodness gradually turns into a normal person. In fact, willpower can change human genetics. But genetic transformation also requires faith. Faith is as important as will. Nothing will work without her.

What has been said above about haplogroups are irrefutable scientific facts, moreover, obtained by independent American scientists. Disputing them is the same as disagreeing with the results of a blood test at a clinic. They are not disputed. They are simply kept silent. They are hushed up unanimously and stubbornly, they are hushed up, one might say, completely. And as we see, there are good reasons for this.

The father of dialectics, the ancient Greek Heraclitus, is known as the author of the saying “everything flows, everything changes.” Less known is the continuation of this phrase of his: “except for the human soul.” While a person is alive, his soul remains unchanged. The same is true for a more complex form of organization of living matter than a person - for a people. The people's soul is unchanged as long as the people's body is alive. The Russian folk body is marked by nature with a special sequence of nucleotides in the DNA that controls this body. This means that as long as there are people on earth with haplogroup R1a1 on the Y chromosome, their people retain their souls unchanged.

The language evolves, culture develops, religious beliefs change, but the Russian soul remains the same as all four and a half millennia of the people’s existence in current its genetic form. And together, the body and soul, constituting a single biosocial entity under the name “Russian people,” have a natural ability for great achievements on a civilizational scale. The Russian people have demonstrated this many times in the past; this potential remains in the present and will always exist as long as they are alive.

It is very important to know this and, through the prism of knowledge, to evaluate current events, words and actions of people, to determine one’s own place in the history of the great biosocial phenomenon called the “Russian nation.” Knowledge of the history of a people obliges a person to try to be at the level of the great achievements of his ancestors, and this is the worst thing for opponents of the Russian nation. That's why they try to hide this knowledge.

And further. When studying the haplogroups of other peoples, do not be attached to the conclusions drawn from the research of American geneticists. Take the grain, that is, specific haplogroups and apply them to the chronicle and historical facts that are reliable for you. I assure you that you will find a lot of interesting things. But since the actual conclusions largely depend on the level of awareness and worldview of a particular person, it makes no sense to present them here.

EPILOGUE

Once upon a time, the light priesthood taught that, in terms of species, the humanity of the Earth, in addition to races and nations, is divided into four more outwardly similar, but internally completely different species. Two species are carnivorous, and two are non-predatory. The Magi called the predators this way: the first type is a non-human cannibal, the second type is a werewolf cannibal.

The first type was considered the most formidable and bloodthirsty. This includes people whose psyche, from childhood, has been aimed at destroying their own kind. These are people who know neither pity nor compassion. They see their life purpose in violence against their fellow men and from fanaticism they receive satisfaction, joy and mental relaxation. They are afraid, like animals, only of those who are much stronger than them. They do not recognize equal relationships: they suppress those who are weaker, and if they deal with the strong, they wait in the wings for years. They are very vindictive and cruel. Torture of living beings and especially people is their greatest entertainment. These are straightforward, cynical, evil creatures, brave and arrogant to the point of madness. Bloody orgies lead them into a wild trance. It is enough to recall one of the heroes of the ancient Greeks, Athena’s favorite, Theseus, who, having struck his enemy, split his skull and began to devour the still living human brain. Even the warrior Pallas recoiled from such a beast-man.

It must be said that non-human cannibals have strong strong-willed qualities, moreover, the need for destruction and global extermination of all living things, and first of all humans, constantly stimulates their will. And, as we have already said, the will for a magical action is no less important than the energy of thought. Therefore, as occultists (due to the fact that the will of non-humans is dark) they are very dangerous.

The second predatory human species, which was called by the Russian people a werewolf cannibal, differs little in terms of aggressiveness towards humans from the first species. He is also predatory and insatiable, like the cannibalistic non-human species. But it is more flexible and cunning than the first type. A werewolf cannibal always hides his predatory essence for the time being. He knows how to perfectly disguise himself and play the role of a harmless, even virtuous person. If in human society the first predatory species plays the role of a wolf, then the second species resembles a fox in its behavior. He is artistic, very articulate, sociable and surprisingly active. A striking example of people of the second predatory type can be such famous political figures as Trotsky, Lenin, Hitler and others. All of them are united by eloquence and the ability to transform.

The Magi believed that both predatory human species appeared on Earth as a result of the mixing of the Aryans, descendants of the Lemurians, red and yellow peoples with the humanoid descendants of the ancient earthly races, degraded to the bestial level, whose ancestors came to our planet tens of millions of years ago. Over time, hybrids from such mixing, while outwardly remaining representatives of their races and peoples, turned into a special species due to changes in the brain.

The two non-predatory human species were called Magi as follows. The first type is the most common - “people of agreement”. And the last type is the people of the Aryan spirit, or “people of light.”

People of the Aryan spirit, or “people of light” are the only group of non-predatory people who are able to fight the will of predatory human species. These are people, first of all, creators and preservers, people of high honor, love and faith in the triumph of goodness and justice. These are true warriors in spirit, defenders of the weak and disadvantaged. Only from them are true heroes of nations born. Such people always go to great deeds and even to death consciously; they do not experience joy from the sight of blood and suffering even from their enemies. Murder always causes them a feeling of regret, and they resort to it as a last resort, when all other means have been exhausted.

An example of the high Aryan spirit is the defender of Troy, Hector, from the ancient heroes. And among the Russian heroes, of course, is the old Cossack Ilya Muromets. According to the epic, this bright hero confronts the Nightingale the Robber - a representative of the first predatory human species - and defeats him.

If you still doubt the scientific nature of the Magi’s statement about the presence of four types of people in the human races: two predatory and two non-predatory, let us once again return to the data of science.

In the middle of the 20th century, the prominent Russian anthropologist Boris Fedorovich Porshnev (Russian historian, sociologist, doctor of historical and philosophical sciences), studying the skulls of modern humans, in particular, their anterior frontal lobes, where the center of speech is located, and therefore the second signaling system , came to the sensational conclusion that people's nervous systems are not the same. Over time, using the scientific method, using genetics, mathematics and other sciences, Porshnev proved that Homo sapiens is represented on Earth by four species. It turned out that all four species of Homo sapiens differ from each other in the structure of the frontal lobes of the brain, and all these four species are scattered throughout all large and small earthly human races.

Porshnev was very interested in this issue, and he devoted more than 20 years to studying it. And what did he discover? But the fact that two human species have a third signaling system, but two species of Homo sapiens do not have it. In addition, the scientist realized that human species that do not have a third signaling system, i.e. those who do not have reason, but live only by reason (the second signaling system that appeared in humans thanks to speech), are not genuine people. These two species, according to Porshnev, originate from other adelphophages. More precisely, from those anthropoids who killed and ate their own fellow tribesmen. According to the scientist’s research, all four types of Homo sapiens are so different in the structure of their human brain that the offspring from mixing these species, especially from predatory with non-predatory ones, is doomed to degeneration. This explains the degeneration of many royal European and Asian dynasties. And among the people there are any number of examples of the degeneration of surnames and clans. And, as a rule, the ancestor of such surnames has always been a human individual of a predatory species. Porshnev named these four types of people scientifically.

The first species - the one that was called by the Magi "non-human cannibal" - was christened by Porshnev superanimal, i.e. talking animals. This is an evil, assertive, very cruel despot, striving to subjugate everyone and everything to his will, he does not know compassion, pity, does not suspect that there is honor, conscience and nobility in the world. In a word - a super animal.

The second species - "werewolf cannibal" - he called suggestor(from Latin suggestio - suggestion). Suggestors are somewhat different predators; they prefer not forceful pressure, but psychological pressure. Their main weapons are all forms of lies and persuasion. In appearance they are cheeky and talkative, but at the same time they are very assertive, unscrupulous and arrogant.

The third type - those whom the priests called “compromisers” - the scientist called diffusers(from Latin diffusio - distribution, dispersion). In his opinion, such people can be broken, their consciousness can be lowered to the animal structure of the psyche, that is, the psyche of slaves.

And the last type of “people of light” Porshnev called non-anthropes, a man of the future. He considered them a new emerging species. Moreover, Porshnev classified all three highest ancient forgotten classes as non-anthropes: workers, managers and strategists. According to the scientist, the neanthrope is so strong and resilient that it is able to withstand the pressure of both superanimals and suggestors.

Porshnev’s mistake is only in one thing: the scientist proceeded in his research from Darwin’s theory, he was a fan of it, which is why he called the last species of man a nonanthrope. Although in fact the Porshnev neanthrope is the most ancient of all four human species. It is he who has survived to our time without change, in his psyche, as a cosmic species of Homo sapiens, a descendant of the great Oriana-Hyperborea. In fact, this is exactly what American geneticists showed.

Some parallels in human relationships can be traced from the point of view of Ayurveda.