Degradation of the nobility Is it possible to be free among slaves? The role of the nobility in the fate of Russia Which work examines the degradation of the Russian nobility.

The memorable date of the Great October Revolution of 1917 is approaching. Therefore, it became necessary to highlight the true role of the nobility in the fate of Russia, which, by the way, again showed us its moldy mug from the storehouses of history. Let us ask ourselves: was the origin of the hereditary nobles really so noble, was their breed so high? I affirm that no. I won’t even touch on the fundamental cosmic Law of Reincarnation in order to debunk the supposedly noble origin of the so-called nobles.

Pampered ladies, who grew up in a hothouse environment and were satiated with material goods beyond all reasonable measures, had no opportunity to cultivate chastity (i.e., integral wisdom) in themselves - a positive quality of spirit, the rudiments of which not many people on this planet possess. It is clear that young married ladies were deprived of the attention of their elderly spouses, who often suffered from various chronic diseases due to the fact that they had led an unhealthy lifestyle throughout their adult lives, indulging in all sorts of carnal excesses.

Therefore, it often happened that ladies, under the influence of their sensual nature and the irresistible call of Nature to procreate, went to great lengths... and gave birth to “noble” heirs, conceived by their lackeys, coachmen, courtyard men... and various visiting fellows . Since the moral and physical qualities of the parents left much to be desired, the offspring of the “noble” nobles only degenerated from one generation to the next.
According to the same traditions, marriages of nobles were often concluded with close blood relatives, which led to the accelerated degeneration of representatives of this class of society.

But sexual relations between cousins, that is, between cousins, is “classic” incest - a criminal incestuous relationship that is carried out exclusively by the spiritual degenerates of humanity. In confirmation, I will say that for many millennia, in all cultural countries, sexual perverts who practiced incest were subjected to shameful and painful execution. Why? Because such a harsh action of a healthy society serves as a powerful preventive measure that deters potential sexual deviants from committing criminal acts.

But all the monarchical dynasties existing in this sublunary world are subject to the most obvious and undeniable degeneration. Hemophilia is a “noble” disease that many heirs to the royal thrones have suffered and continue to suffer from; it is irrefutable proof of the degeneration of monarchical dynasties even on the physical level. Thus, it can be said without any stretch that the so-called nobles for the most part were victims of criminal incestuous relationships and descendants of far from the best layer of Russian society - lackeys, sycophants... and others who lived in the family nest of the nobility.
The nobility made a significant contribution to the poisoning of the blood of the Russian nation, not to mention the spiritual poisoning of the consciousness of the people.

Let me explain this idea. The nobles, especially the landowners of those times, practiced the most disgusting custom in their family estates. This means that the first sexual intercourse of a female courtyard servant should have taken place with a “noble” master. And only after a sexual pervert abused a girl, who, as a rule, had not even reached the age of majority, was she married off to a commoner. I want to say that almost all the “noble” bar of pre-revolutionary Russia were especially dangerous rapists who suffered from pedophilia and who raped children with absolute impunity. And since the physical and moral condition of the gentlemen, as a rule, was undermined by drunkenness, chronic diseases, often venereal diseases, the offspring conceived from “noble” fathers adopted their entire vicious bouquet of moral and physical qualities.

By the way, even after the reform of 1861, when serfdom was officially abolished in Rus', the abuse of women and children did not stop - they acquired a different character. After all, no one will deny that in pre-revolutionary Nikolaev Rus', the emerging capitalists mercilessly exploited women's and children's labor. In the so-called workhouses, or simply put, in the barracks built by “compassionate” Russian capitalists for the working people, widespread rape of underage female workers took place. There was no one to protect the workers, because the police officers took an active part in their rape. It is not surprising, because in the Russian Empire the laws were written in such a way that commoners who complained to the authorities about noblemen who had committed sexual violence against them could easily be convicted by the courts for calling for rebellion against the existing government system. Well, in pre-revolutionary times, rapists of factory workers could be any male, regardless of their material and social status in society. But, for example, at the same time, commoners were sentenced to lifelong hard labor for insulting so-called Orthodox shrines (the current Article 148 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - insulting the feelings of believers - a relapse from those times).

Commoners suffered greatly from the savage customs of their masters. They had no choice but to take the sin on their souls and make attempts to get rid of the bastards (a bastard is a child born from a criminal sexual relationship, i.e. in violation of the laws of Nature). But the common people very rarely managed to carry out their plans, for for several centuries the obscurantist priests instilled in the lordly serfs a shameful sense of fear of God (the feeling of fear, fear, animal horror experienced by Orthodox “Christians” from faith in God?!). It is for this reason that in pre-revolutionary times countless herds of holy fools and other insane fruits of lordly lust roamed the vast expanses of Rus'. And those noble degenerates who remained in peasant families, as a rule, were physically weak, they could not do hard physical work, so they often died in their young years. But it was even worse if the degenerates lived to marriageable age and began to produce even worse offspring in spiritual and physical terms.

Moreover, since in feudal Rus' the average life expectancy of peasants was calculated at only three decades, by the way, it remained almost that way even in pre-revolutionary times, and infant mortality was simply terrifying - more than half of the children did not live to the age of five, then the “noble” For several centuries, nobles forced their female serfs to enter into marital relations from the age of 11-13. Of course, the practiced sexual fanaticism in relation to minor girls, by the way, whom in those days the state authorities de jure did not consider full-fledged people, that is, female people were equal in rights to livestock, brought no small economic benefits to the nobility, because in the family In the estates of the nobles, there was an accelerated reproduction of a free and completely powerless labor force. After all, the newly born serfs are a replenishment of the property of the noble masters, with whom it was possible to make any civil “legal” transactions, such as purchase and sale, exchange, pledge, donation, will... Therefore, it can be argued that even in the unrighteous Roman Empire, slaves as a whole, they experienced less oppression from the slave owners than the Russian serfs, who were cruelly tortured by the noble class for almost five centuries.

A great crime has been committed against the Russian nation by the “cream” of society, the so-called nobles. I touched only on the physical side of the pernicious influence of the nobility on the Russian nation. How many times stronger was the pernicious influence of the nobility on the decay of the collective consciousness of the Russian nation? – Only Those Who control the evolution of humanity on Earth know about this.

And where did the so-called Russian Orthodox Church, this self-proclaimed “bride of Christ”, look? – The priestly brethren were an integral part of the rotten pre-revolutionary “elite” of Russian society, therefore the “servants of Christ” without a twinge of conscience blessed the outrages committed by the nobility against ordinary Russian people, and often themselves took part in them. In those days, there was a story in Rus' that a visiting person asked a villager: “Why do you have so many red-haired children in your village?” - “So our women are confessed by a red-haired priest!” - answered the villager, quite surprised at the naivety of the visitor.

As evidence of the moral and spiritual degradation of the nobility, one can cite indisputable facts from their life in Western countries, where they emigrated after the Great October Revolution. If “their nobility” had strong moral principles, then, being in a foreign land, many nobles would lead a completely indecent lifestyle. After all, these former gentlemen did not even disdain pimping, prostitution, fraud... and other vile deeds. Could a change in the moral character of the “gentlemen” of the nobles have happened so dramatically? - Of course not! In emigration, the moment of truth came for the nobles... and many of them with extraordinary ease stepped over the moral taboo and began to do what it was typical for lackey offspring to do.

In addition, this emigrant public, with its constant whining, defamation of everything Russian, its vile deeds, debauchery, which captured the imagination of even representatives of Western society - far from being puritanical - caused enormous moral harm to our Fatherland. This emigrant bastard, a burp of the Russian nation, assured the whole world of the incapacity of the entire Russian people. We are still reaping the fruits of their criminal activities, for the peoples of the world judge us, the current ones, by those degraded elements of the worst part of the Russian people. Of course, among the representatives of the nobility there were also outstanding people - the color and pride of the Russian nation. But with rare exceptions, all of them were not hereditary nobles, but came from the common people.

I will not describe the atrocities committed by nobles and landowners in pre-revolutionary Russia, because plenty has been written about these atrocities. Read at least school history textbooks from Soviet times, or even better, read the works of great Russian writers and poets, delve into the essence of the paintings of artists who created in those vile pre-revolutionary times. I will only say one thing: people always distinguish the head of state, especially the Monarch, with some special nickname. This is how Russia was ruled by the Wise, Great... and even Terrible Monarchs. But only one of the Monarchs received the nickname Bloody. Starting with King Rurik, not a single ruler of Rus' was awarded such an “honorable” nickname. Why did people call the last Russian Monarch Nicholas the Bloody? -Every person can answer this question, but at the same time let him keep in mind the folk wisdom: in still waters there are certainly devils.

To verify this fair statement, I will cite only one undisputed fact from the life of Nicholas II - the Bloody: from a young age until his death, this Monarch frantically indulged in bloody passion, from which he received indescribable pleasure. I mean his passion for killing defenseless animals, such as dogs, cats, birds... and other living creatures, which throughout his worthless life he destroyed countless numbers. And those who have cultivated an irresistible passion for killing defenseless animals very easily switch to killing people. And does anyone really think that the famous “Bloody Resurrection” that happened on January 9, 1905, that is, the demonstrative mass execution of working people in the square in front of the Winter Palace of the capital of the Russian Empire, was not sanctioned by Nicholas the Bloody? Or does someone, a complete simpleton, sincerely believe in the holiness of Nicholas the Bloody, now canonized by the Orthodox priests, who put many millions of Russian people under the knife?

Of course, I can already hear the lamentations of the dwarfs of the spirit about the innocently murdered “liberator” kings... and other soul-stirring nonsense, designed for simpletons who accept at face value any fable voiced by false historians. Let then these wailing spiritual dwarfs honestly answer a simple question: who drove the Russian people into centuries-old slavery? And isn’t that how robbers and nouveau riche “have mercy”? “First they will rob the people, and then, touched by their “mercy,” with tears in their eyes, they will throw a penny to whomever they please. By the way, the Slavic tribes and peoples for many tens of thousands of years did not even know that slavery existed, because they were free community members. The Slavs always had kings, but they never had serfdom. But one should not think that King Rurik drove the Slavs into serfdom. No, the Founder of the Russian state showed salvation to the Slavic peoples, because by the time of Rurik’s accession to the throne, the very existence of the Slavs, due to internal strife, was under great threat. The weakness of the Slavs, who by that time did not have a powerful Spiritual Leader, would have been taken advantage of by the bloodthirsty steppe tribes and spiritually degenerate Western peoples - the Slavs would have disappeared from the face of the Earth. And without the Slavs, the further evolution of humanity on this planet is impossible.

From the brief analysis I have given of the spiritual and moral state of the pre-revolutionary society of the Russian Empire, a conclusion follows that had long been made by the classic of the Great Revolution: the morally corrupted “tops” could no longer rule the state, and the “bottoms”, that is, the simple ones, were oppressed to the extreme by the “cream” of society. The Russian people categorically did not want to tolerate such a blatant violation of Justice.

The so-called February Revolution of 1917 in fact was not such, for it was a successfully accomplished conspiracy that aggravated the collapse and death of the Russian Empire. Yes, the successfully carried out February conspiracy brought to power the proteges of the leaders of the Western Zionglitsky civilization. I will say more: the February conspiracy carried out by the sworn enemies of Russia in 1917 and the “Yeltsin” August coup of 1991 are twin brothers. These two conspiracies are the work of the same dark forces on the planet. True, the “Yeltsin” coup was carried out at a more sophisticated and vile level.

Well, to the question of what is the difference between the February conspiracy of the shopkeepers of the spirit and the Great October Revolution, carried out by the re-energized people under the leadership of the Leader of the peoples Lenin, it is not difficult to answer. Revolution is a necessary cleansing measure to influence the decayed Matter from which everything is created, including the people of this planet. Of course, this severe measure is applied only when Matter is plunged into a hopelessly gangrenous state. Yes, this is exactly the case: when for some reason Evolution breathes its dying breath, Revolution is used to revive it.

Let me explain this idea: many people already know that lightning cleanses the atmosphere. I will say more: Life on this planet would immediately perish without the presence of powerful and never-ending discharges of electricity in its atmosphere. Just as lightning cleanses the atmosphere of the planet, so revolutions cleanse human societies of elements unsuitable for further life. A revolution gives a shift in consciousness to an entire people or even all of humanity on Earth. The Great October Revolution of 1917 was just that - all of humanity rose to a new higher level of Evolution. After all, all humanity on this planet, both civilized and uncivilized, benefited from the fruits of the October Revolution. The first type of humanity introduced into its midst the progressive social gains of the October Revolution, and the second type of humanity threw off the colonial yoke imposed on it by the predatory imperialist countries of the West. Of course, in fact, the pressure of the yoke was only weakened, because to this day the countries of the Western world continue to fatten due to the robbery of the countries of the East, and now at the expense of democratized Russia, playing the role of a raw material appendage to the dying Zionist civilization.

And the February conspiracy of 1917, carried out by the shopkeepers of the spirit, on the contrary, threw the Russian people to the opposite pole of Evolution - into involution, that is, to the accelerated degradation of the consciousness of the masses. Yes, the history of our Fatherland has repeated itself. But, as usual, already in the form of a farce. Therefore, the attempts of those in power to create a class-estate society and this entire current religious boom, which are killing the Russian nation, are doomed to complete failure.

I believe that the current unrest in our Fatherland is 1985-201? y., much longer in time, is a larger-scale copy of the February 1917 conspiracy. Therefore, we can conclude: the cleansing October is just around the corner. There can be no other outcome. For the destruction of the Russian nation, and this is the totality of all peoples living in Russia, is equivalent to the destruction of all humanity. But such an outcome, as I already said, cannot happen.

Lies and truths of Russian history Baimukhametov Sergei Temirbulatovich

Degradation of the nobility Is it possible to be free among slaves?

Degradation of the nobility

Is it possible to be free among slaves?

And it is clear that on the long journey, one way or another, we talked about the nobility (young officers are always partial to this topic, it seems to them that gold shoulder straps somehow bring them closer to the noble class), about the merits of the nobility, about whether it is possible in modern times, the revival of the aristocracy...

Is it possible to credit the nobility for all those cultural achievements that are called the Golden and Silver Age of the country? Don't know. Probably, for the ruling class, creating culture is as natural as breathing. There seems to be no special merit here. But where efforts were needed, perhaps even a moral and political feat, the Russian nobility was not up to the task. I believe that it was the nobles who led monarchical Russia to collapse. The responsibility for the revolution lies with them. Like the ruling class.

Let us remember the sweet formula of the relationship between landowners and serfs: “You are our fathers, we are your children...” But if in one historical moment the children cut, killed, and shot their fathers, and their father’s estates were plundered, polluted and burned, then who is to blame? So this is what the fathers were like?..

Russia is the only country in the world where official slave system, official slavery existed until the second half of the 19th century! Four hundred years!

And slavery, in my opinion, led monarchical Russia to a terrible revolutionary explosion.

Think about it, in London in 1860 a subway was already being built. And we tore infants away from their parents, we lost entire villages at cards, we exchanged human children for greyhound puppies, we used the right of the first night. At the same time, they pretended to be enlightened, tried to write historical treatises with one hand, and poured molten lead into the throats of serfs with the other hand.

It’s funny to think that the Russian peasant raised the tsarist power with bayonets in 1917 because he was imbued with the ideas of Marx - Engels - Lenin. No, the man felt in his gut that The sweet opportunity to avenge centuries of humiliation had finally arrived. And he took fierce revenge! Including yourself. But that's another conversation...

Now many people write that there were no special prerequisites for the revolution, that life was getting better and Russia was getting richer. And they write correctly. There were no prerequisites. And this only confirms my idea that it was not because of direct, today’s oppression that the revolution broke out. The past exploded, the burning hatred accumulated over centuries of slavery exploded.

After all, they read Pushkin! That our good people will pull a cat out of a burning house, risking themselves. And at the same time, he burns the landowner in the same house, laughing evilly. We read... But it feels like no one understood anything. I didn't want to understand. Not sometime in the dark times, but already in the 20th century, in 1907, the last emperor of Russia wrote about himself: “Master of the Russian land.” In the 20th century, humanity received everything it lives with today. Nuclear energy, television, electronics, computers. But in the same century, in Russia, one person said about himself: “Master of the Russian land.” And not jokingly or half-jokingly, but in an official document, during the population census, he wrote this in the “occupation” column...

That's why it was late. Although the industrial revolution has already won in the country. Although political freedoms had already been granted. Although Stolypin brought the men out to free farming.

But it was too late.

Even half a century ago, in I860, it was too late to abolish the shameful slavery. The boiler has overheated. Not the children, but the grandchildren of the serfs became the so-called commoners. That is, they became masters. It was they who could not forgive the authorities for the slavery of their fathers and grandfathers. It was they, the educated ones, who called Rus' to the axe. The cup of hatred has overflowed. And the country moved inexorably towards the Seventeenth Year.

And when she arrived, she shuddered at herself, at her appearance. Let's remember Bunin's "Cursed Days".

I can testify: when Ivan Bunin’s “Cursed Days” was released for the first time in the Soviet Union in 1990 in the wake of glasnost, my reaction was... difficult. No matter how much I denied the communist idea, no matter how critically I viewed the events of 1917 in Russia, after reading the book I felt somehow... heavy. No enemy of the revolution has ever written about the people like that. How much horror there is mixed with disgust, physical disgust and grave hatred for all these soldiers, sailors, “these animals”, “these convict gorillas”, men, boors, who suddenly became the masters of life and death, for all the revolutionary cattle:

“I close my eyes and see as if alive: ribbons at the back of a sailor’s cap, trousers with huge bells, ballroom shoes from Weiss on my feet, teeth clenched tightly, playing with the nodules of my jaws... Now I will never forget, I will turn over in my grave! »

And here's another excerpt:

“How many faces... with strikingly asymmetrical features among these Red Army soldiers and among the Russian common people in general - how many of them, these atavistic individuals... And just from them, from these very Russians, since ancient times glorious for their antisocial , who gave so many “daring robbers”, so many tramps, runners, and then Khitrovites, tramps, it was from them that we recruited the beauty, pride and hope of the Russian social revolution. Why be surprised at the results?..”

“In peacetime, we forget that the world is teeming with these degenerates; in peacetime they sit in prisons, in yellow houses. But now the time comes when the “sovereign people” triumphed. The doors of prisons and yellow houses open, the archives of the detective departments are burned - an orgy begins.”

And Ivan Alekseevich wonders where they came from, and does not find an answer. In addition to all the same, they are born criminals, from the same breed of born ones from which their national hero Stenka Razin came.

And throughout the entire book, Ivan Alekseevich Bunin never thinks about his role, about the role of his ancestors in this bloody Russian bacchanalia. But these born criminals, Ivan Alekseevich, came from the fortress villages of your grandfathers and great-grandfathers. From slavery. And they terribly and for a long time ruined the whole fate of Russia because they could not do otherwise. Because a slave is not a person.

When a person becomes a slave, then everything human falls from above like husks, and from the inside, from the soul, is burned to the ground.

A slave is a cattle, that is, a beast. And since I’m a brute, then anything is possible, nothing is scary and nothing is ashamed. That is, there is nothing at all. No foundations. In the current language of criminals - complete chaos. And so children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, and great-great-grandchildren grew up and were brought up... Four hundred years of slavery. Almost twenty generations, born and raised in the yoke, knowing nothing in their upbringing except the vile science of servile survival.

So if only four hundred years! And the previous six hundred years - did they pass under the Declaration of Human Rights? According to Yaroslav the Wise’s “Russian Truth”, a few hryvnias as a punishment for murdering a stinker is freedom? Of course, freedom. Freedom to kill men with almost impunity, according to the law...

So what did we expect from our people then, Ivan Alekseevich?! You yourself write: “This is their satanic power, that they were able to step over all limits, all boundaries of what is permitted, to make every amazement, every indignant cry naive, stupid.”

So there were no limits. In centuries, in ancestors.

It is no coincidence that in ancient times in the East they believed that after a slave was set free, seven generations of his descendants should grow up in freedom, and only then would the blood of the slave be purified...

That’s why it was already too late in Russia long ago...

Perhaps we should have started in 1825. Together with Ryleev, Pestel and their comrades.

These nobles, having defeated Napoleon, marched across Europe with arms in hand, suddenly saw how ordinary peasants lived there. And their hearts were filled with shame and pain for their loved ones. And they went out to Senate Square.

Yes, the path chosen was bloody. But in that era, society did not know, had not yet developed other forms of protest. There were none.

But why didn’t the other nobles, having gathered one by one, turn to the tsar and tell him that the Decembrists were not against the tsar, but against slavery? Not convinced. Finally, they did not put him before public opinion.

The nobles did not do this. They watched as the executioner hanged their best comrades on the Kronverk curtain...

The nobles probably understood what the Decembrists were encroaching on. Holy shit! The right of each of them to be a king and a god in their hunger strikes and fire strikes, the right to execute and pardon, to rape serf maidens, to drag them from under the crown into their bed in front of the serf grooms.

And they, the nobles, did not want to part with these vile rights for anything!

That is why the nobles were silent then.

Slavery corrupts both slaves and slave owners. The nation is deteriorating. The country, in this case Russia, is being destroyed on both sides at once. We know what the people did. Where were the nobles looking? After all, sparks were already flying! The atmosphere of Russia at that time was literally electrified with a premonition of disaster. This was felt especially acutely by the marginalized. In modern language, this word has acquired a negative meaning: homeless, lumpen, asocial element... In a broad sense, it means something that goes beyond the edge of the field (“margo” - edge, hence “marginalia” - notes in the margins). Any person who goes beyond the edge of his field - ethnic, class, professional, etc. - is already marginal. And in this sense, the biggest marginalized people are probably poets. Not nobles, not commoners, not workers and not factory owners, not military employees, and not civil servants, and not even mere mortals, but poets... They, the marginal poets, perceived with particular sensitivity the state of the millions of marginal masses, what Blok later called music of the revolution. He, Alexander Blok, warned everyone long before the events in a poem prophetically called “Retribution.” Following him, Mayakovsky pointed out to the nearest year: “The Sixteenth Year is coming in the crown of thorns of revolutions...” Velimir Khlebnikov in public speeches wrote on sheets of paper: “Someone 1916...”

Alas. None of those who were obligated listened or understood... The tsar noted day after day in his diaries how well he ate and walked... The ruling classes did not think or tried not to think, confident that in extreme cases the Cossacks would come and disperse and they will whip the rebellious cattle with whips, as was the case in 1905...

How did gentlemen intellectuals behave? They giggled, were angry, called for rebellion! Didn't they understand how dangerous it is to rock the boat during a war? What can we say, when in the very first days of the February Revolution none other than one of the great princes of the Romanov family put a red bandage on his sleeve and took to the streets of St. Petersburg! Is this not degradation?

I’ll grit my teeth and try to understand and explain the behavior of the Grand Duke and the common intelligentsia. Explain irresponsibility. When there is no direct responsibility on your shoulders for the editorial board, team, enterprise, organization, state, country, people, then your thoughts soar with extraordinary ease. This is such a syndrome of teenage consciousness. Destructive syndrome.

But here is a group of people who were obliged and could not help but realize at that time the grave responsibility that lay on their shoulders. These are the generals who command the fronts.

They, the military people, understood, could not help but understand that during war, during hostilities, the emperor and commander-in-chief are not overthrown. Horses are not changed at the crossing. They, the front commanders, should have nipped in the bud any weakest attempt at this

What did the front commanders do?

They all, as one, sent telegrams to the sovereign emperor demanding his abdication of the throne!

What is this if not degradation?

And that’s why I’m sad when nowadays people often talk about the revival of the nobility, often there are descendants, and so on, and so on. (To deflect the reproach of class antipathies, I will inform you: on my father’s side, in the eighteenth generation, I am a direct descendant of the ancient Karakesek family, and my ancestor on my mother’s side is mentioned in the Nikon Chronicle.) I don’t know whether it is possible to step into the same river a second time. Aren’t all these attempts funny, don’t they irritate people! But the saddest thing is that, speaking about the revival of the best traditions of the departed nobility, none of the current descendants ever spoke about the monstrous guilt of the nobility before the country and the people, no one spoke about repentance.

Quote:

“Power is a profession like any other. If the coachman gets drunk and does not fulfill his duties, he is sent away... We drank and sang too much. We were driven away."

(V.V. SHULGIN. “Three Capitals”)