Rakhmetov is a “special person” of his time. The image and characteristics of Rakhmetov in the novel What to Do by Chernyshevsky essay

RAKHMETOV IS A SPECIAL PERSON

Here is a genuine person who is special
but now Russia needs it, take it from him
example and whoever is able and able, follow
along his path, for this is the only
path that is suitable for you, which can lead
towards the desired goal.

N.G. Chernyshevsky.

As a character, Rakhmetov appears in the chapter “Special
great man." In other chapters his name is only mentioned. But
one feels that the image is placed in the center of the reader’s attention,
that Rakhmetov is the main character of the novel “What is to be done?” Chapter "Oso-
a beaten man" forms, as it were, a small independent
message in a novel, the idea of which would not be complete and understandable without it.
Noah.
When talking about Rakhmetov, Chernyshevsky deliberately shifts
temporary order of facts, and does not give a definitely consistent
characteristics and biography. He uses hints and understatements
rumors, intertwining what they “knew” about him with what they “found out”
subsequently. Therefore, every stroke of the biography has a principle
nal meaning. For example, origin. Indeed, why
the commoner Chernyshevsky makes the main character socially -
political novel by a nobleman whose pedigree goes back to
centuries ago? Perhaps, according to the writer, the image of a revolutionary
ra-nobleman made the idea of revolution more convincing and attractive
boiler room Since the best representatives of the nobility refuse
their privileges to live at the expense of the people, which means a crisis is ripe.
Rakhmetov's rebirth began in his early youth. Family
his was obviously serfdom. This is what the stingy says
phrase: “Yes, and he saw that it was in the village.” Watching the cruelty
serfdom, the young man began to think about justice.
"Thoughts began to wander in him, and Kirsanov was for him what
Lopukhov for Vera Pavlovna." On the first evening he "greedily served
shal "Kirsanov," interrupted his words with exclamations and curses -
blessings to what must perish, blessings to what must
but to live."
Rakhmetov differs from Lopukhov and Kirsanov not only
its aristocratic pedigree, but also its exceptional strength
character, which manifests itself in the constant hardening of the body and spirit
ha, but especially in his preoccupation with preparing for the revolutionary
no fight. This is a man of ideas in the highest sense of the word.
The dream of revolution for Rakhmetov is a guide to action, ori-
entir of all personal life.
Rakhmetov’s desire for rapprochement with
ordinary people. This can be seen from his travels around Russia, busy
physical labor, severe self-restraint in personal life
neither. The people nicknamed Rakhmetov Nikitushka Lomov, expressing this
your love for him. Unlike the commoner Bazarov, who
talked condescendingly to “thick-bearded” men, two
The Russian citizen Rakhmetov does not look at the people as a mass subject to
study. For him, people are worthy of respect. He's trying to test
to steal at least part of the weight that hangs on peasant shoulders.
Chernyshevsky shows Rakhmetova as a person “very
rare", "special breed", but at the same time as a typical face,
belonging to a new social group, albeit slightly
numerical. The writer endowed the “special person” with severe
respect for oneself and others, and even a gloomy appearance.
Vera Pavlovna at first finds him “very boring.” "Lopukhov and
Kirsanov, and everyone who was not afraid of anyone or anything, felt...
at times there is also some cowardice... except for Masha and
equal or superior to her in simplicity of soul and dress."
But Vera Pavlovna, having gotten to know Rakhmetov better, says about him:
"...what a gentle and kind person he is."
Rakhmetov is a rigorist, that is, a person who never
in which it does not deviate from the accepted rules of conduct. He's cooking
themselves to the revolutionary struggle both morally and physically. Overslept
night on nails, he explains his action, broadly and joyfully
smiling: “Test. Necessary. Implausible, of course: however
just in case you need it. I see, I can." So, probably, Cherny-
Shevsky saw the leader of the revolutionaries. To the question: “What should I do?”
Nikolai Gavrilovich responds with the image of Rakhmetov and words, placing
whelped in the epigraph. The figure of this rigorist had a huge impact
influence on subsequent generations of Russian and foreign revolutionaries
Zioners. This is evidenced by the confessions of these people that they are “loved-
This was especially true for Rakhmetov."
I like Rakhmetov. He has those qualities that
Bazarov lacks a lot. I admire his tenacity, will,
endurance, the ability to subordinate one’s life to the chosen ideal,
courage, strength. I want to be at least a little like
Rakhmetova.

Chernyshevsky created his novel “What is to be done?” during the era of the rise of the revolutionary movement in Russia. The hero of the novel, Rakhmetov, was more suitable for revolutionary activity than anyone else. Rakhmetov is distinguished by toughness, asceticism, iron will, and hatred of the people's oppressors. It was not without reason that the Bolshevik leader V.I. Lenin set this literary hero as an example to his comrades, saying that only with such people is a revolutionary coup in Russia possible.
Who is this special person who still attracts the attention of those who crave social upheaval for the common good today? Rakhmetov is a nobleman by origin. His father was a very rich man. But the free life did not keep Rakhmetov on his father’s estate. He left the province and entered the Faculty of Science in St. Petersburg.
Without difficulty, Rakhmetov became close to progressive-minded people in the capital. Chance brought him together with Kirsanov, from whom he learned a lot of new and politically advanced things. He began to read books voraciously. It seems that he measured out a time period for himself and stuck to it exactly. After just six months, Rakhmetov put the books aside and said: “Now reading has become a secondary matter for me; in this regard, I am ready for life.” In these words of the hero one can discern something beyond the scope of a normally developing person.
Rakhmetov began to accustom his physical essence to obey the spiritual, that is, he began to order himself and carry out these orders accurately and on time. Next, he began to harden the body. He took on the hardest work. He was even a barge hauler.
He did all this in preparation for great revolutionary deeds. He brilliantly managed to create himself as a physically powerful and spiritually strong person. Rakhmetov fanatically followed the path he had chosen once and for all. He ate only what ordinary people ate, although he had the opportunity to eat better. He explained it simply: “It’s necessary - it gives respect and love from ordinary people. It’s useful, it can come in handy.” Apparently, in order to emphasize his extreme revolutionary spirit, Chernyshevsky forced his hero to abandon personal human happiness for the sake of the ideals of the revolutionary struggle. Rakhmetov refused to marry a rich young widow. He explained it this way: “I must suppress love in myself; love for you would tie my hands, they won’t be untied for me any time soon - they are already tied.”
A democratic writer, Chernyshevsky in the image of Rakhmetov portrayed a revolutionary leader, a special person. The author wrote about such people: “This is the color of the best people, these are the engines of engines, this is the salt of the earth.”
But time has shown the inconsistency of Bolshevik ideas. And now it’s clear to me why the leaders of the October Revolution chose Rakhmetov as their ideal. They developed those Rakhmetov-like qualities with which it was convenient for them to carry out cruel deeds: they did not spare themselves, much less others, they carried out orders with the chilling, thoughtless clarity of an iron engine, they treated dissenters as supermen treat subhumans. As a result, Russia was drenched in blood, and the world was shocked by the brutality of revolutionary actions.
Our society is again on the path to a civilized future. And personally, I dream that in this future of ours there will be fewer “special” people, and more ordinary people: kind, smiling, living their own lives. I want this future to become reality.

New!
Chernyshevsky's novel "What to do?" and our modernity. Chernyshevsky was a real revolutionary, a fighter for the happiness of the people. He believed in a revolutionary coup, after which only, in his opinion, could life change...

Russian literature has always considered one of its most important tasks to be a reflection of the changes and problems that were observed in society. The development of literature has always gone hand in hand with the development of social thought. Moreover, the largest Russian writers themselves...

The novel by N. G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” was created within the walls of the Peter and Paul Fortress. It became the writer’s political testament, addressed to modern times. The unusual structure of the book, its two-dimensionality, was due to the need for encryption. For the first...

A very important character in the novel, the chapter “A Special Person” is dedicated to him. He himself comes from a noble rich family, but leads an ascetic lifestyle. By the time of the action indicated in the novel, R. is 22 years old. He became a student at the age of 16, studied natural...

Rakhmetov appears as a character in the chapter “A Special Person.” In other chapters his name is only mentioned. But one feels that this image is central, that Rakhmetov is the main character of the novel “What is to be done?”

The chapter “A Special Person” forms, as it were, a small independent story in a novel, the idea of which would not be complete and understandable without it. When talking about Rakhmetov, Chernyshevsky deliberately shifts the time frame and does not give a consistent description and biography. He uses hints and innuendo, intertwining what was “known” about him with what was “found out” later. Therefore, every stroke of the biography is of fundamental importance. For example, origin. Indeed, why does the commoner Chernyshevsky make the main character of a socio-political novel a nobleman whose pedigree goes back centuries? Perhaps, according to the writer, the image of a revolutionary nobleman made the idea of revolution more convincing and attractive. Since the best representatives of the nobility are giving up their privileges, it means that a crisis is ripe.

Rakhmetov's rebirth began in his early youth. His family was obviously a serf family. This is indicated by the terse phrase: “Yes, and he saw that in the village.” Observing the cruelty of serfdom, the young man began to think about justice. “Thoughts began to wander through him, and Kirsanov was to him what Lopukhov was to Vera Pavlovna.” On the first evening, he “listened greedily” to Kirsanov, “interrupted his words with exclamations and curses on what should perish, blessings on what should live.” Rakhmetov differs from Lopukhov and Kirsanov not only in his aristocratic pedigree, but also in his exceptional strength of character, which is manifested in the constant hardening of body and spirit, but especially in his absorption in the matter of preparing for the revolutionary struggle. This is a man of ideas in the highest sense of the word. The dream of revolution for Rakhmetov is a guide to

action, a guideline for your entire personal life.

Rakhmetov’s desire for rapprochement with ordinary people is clearly manifested. This is evident from his travels around Russia, physical labor, and severe self-restraint in his personal life. The people nicknamed Rakhmetov Nikitushka Lomov, thereby expressing their love for him. Unlike the commoner Bazarov, who spoke condescendingly to the “thick-bearded” men, the nobleman Rakhmetov does not look at the people as a mass to be studied. He believes that the people are worthy of respect and is trying to experience at least part of the weight that hangs on the peasants’ shoulders.

Chernyshevsky shows Rakhmetov as a person of a “very rare”, “special breed”, but at the same time as a typical person, belonging to a new social group, albeit a small one. The writer endowed the “special person” with severe demands on himself and others and even a gloomy appearance. Vera Pavlovna at first finds him “very boring.” “Lopukhov and Kirsanov, and everyone who was not afraid of anyone or anything, felt at times a certain cowardice in front of him... except for Masha and those who were equal to her or superior to her in the simplicity of their soul and dress.” But Vera Pavlovna, having gotten to know Rakhmetov better, says about him: “...What a gentle and kind person he is!”

Rakhmetov is a rigorist, that is, a person who never deviates from the accepted rules of behavior in anything. He prepares himself for the revolutionary struggle both morally and physically. Having slept the night on nails, he explains his action, smiling broadly and joyfully: “Test. Need to. It’s implausible, of course: but it’s necessary, just in case. I see I can." This is probably how Chernyshevsky saw the leader of the revolutionaries. To the question “What should I do?” Nikolai Gavrilovich responds with the image of Rakhmetov and the words placed in the epigraph.

The figure of this rigorist had a huge influence on subsequent generations of Russian and foreign revolutionaries. This is evidenced by the confessions of these people that “Rakhmetov in particular was their favorite.”

I like Rakhmetov. He has the qualities that Bazarov lacks. I admire his tenacity, will, endurance, ability to subordinate his life to his chosen ideal, courage, strength. I want to be at least a little like this hero.

Here is a genuine person who is especially needed now in Russia, take his example and, whoever is able and able, follow his path, for this is the only path for you that can lead to the desired goal.

N.G. Chernyshevsky.

Rakhmetov appears as a character in the chapter “A Special Person.” In other chapters his name is only mentioned. But it is felt that the image is placed in the center of the reader’s attention, that Rakhmetov is the main character of the novel “What is to be done?” The chapter “A Special Person” forms, as it were, a small independent story in a novel, the idea of which would not be complete and understandable without it.

When talking about Rakhmetov, Chernyshevsky deliberately shifts the temporal order of facts, and does not give a definitely consistent description and biography. He uses hints and innuendo, intertwining what was “known” about him with what was “found out” later. Therefore, every stroke of the biography is of fundamental importance. For example, origin. Indeed, why does the commoner Chernyshevsky make the main character of a socio-political novel a nobleman whose pedigree goes back centuries? Perhaps, according to the writer, the image of a revolutionary nobleman made the idea of revolution more convincing and attractive. Since the best representatives of the nobility renounce their privileges to live at the expense of the people, it means that a crisis is ripe.

Rakhmetov's rebirth began in his early youth. His family was obviously a serf family. This is indicated by the terse phrase: “Yes, and he saw that it was in the village.” Observing the cruelty of serfdom, the young man began to think about justice.

“Thoughts began to wander in him, and Kirsanov was for him what Lopukhov was for Vera Pavlovna.” On the very first evening, he “listened greedily” to Kirsanov, “interrupted his words with exclamations and curses on what should perish, blessings on what should live.”

Rakhmetov differs from Lopukhov and Kirsanov not only in his aristocratic pedigree, but also in his exceptional strength of character, which is manifested in the constant hardening of body and spirit, but especially in his absorption in the matter of preparing for the revolutionary struggle. This is a man of ideas in the highest sense of the word.

For Rakhmetov, the dream of revolution is a guide to action, a guideline for his entire personal life.

The desire for rapprochement with ordinary people is clearly manifested in Rakhmetov. This is evident from his travels around Russia, physical labor, and severe self-restraint in his personal life. The people nicknamed Rakhmetov Nikitushka Lomov, thereby expressing their love for him. Unlike the commoner Bazarov, who spoke condescendingly to the “thick-bearded” men, the nobleman Rakhmetov does not look at the people as a mass to be studied. For him, people are worthy of respect. He is trying to experience at least part of the weight that hangs on the peasant's shoulders.

Vera Pavlovna at first finds him “very boring.” “Lopukhov and Kirsanov, and everyone who was not afraid of anyone or anything, felt at times a certain cowardice in front of him... except for Masha and those who were equal to her or superior to her in the simplicity of their soul and dress.”

But Vera Pavlovna, having gotten to know Rakhmetov better, says about him: “...what a gentle and kind person he is.”

Rakhmetovrigorist, that is, a person who never deviates from the accepted rules of behavior in anything. He prepares himself for the revolutionary struggle both morally and physically. Having slept the night on nails, he explains his action, smiling broadly and joyfully: “A test. It’s necessary. Implausible, of course: however, it’s necessary just in case. I see, I can.” This is probably how Chernyshevsky saw the leader of the revolutionaries. To the question: “What to do?” Nikolai Gavrilovich answers with the image of Rakhmetov and the words placed in the epigraph. The figure of this rigorist had a huge influence on subsequent generations of Russian and foreign revolutionaries. This is evidenced by the confessions of these people that “Rakhmetov, in particular, was their favorite.”

action, a guideline for your entire personal life.