Rakhmetov is the hero of the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky "What to do?"
Central to the novel is the image of Rakhmetov - not only “new”, but also a “special person”, a “higher nature”, in which the best features of the progressive people of N.G.’s era merged. Chernyshevsky. Being an aristocrat by birth, he becomes a democrat in his views on life and life ideals. Rakhmetov is a professional revolutionary, revolutionary leader. This is a “knight without fear and reproach”, a man as if forged from pure steel. There are few people like him. “I have met,” notes Chernyshevsky, “so far only eight specimens of this breed...”
Rakhmetov did not immediately become a “special person.” The rapprochement with Kirsanov, who introduced Rakhmetov to the teachings of the utopian socialists and the philosophy of Feuerbach, was the impetus for his transformation into a “special person.” “He listened greedily to Kirsanov on the first evening, cried, interrupted his words with exclamations of curses for what should perish, blessings for what should live.” Rakhmetov, having studied the theory of socialism, soon moves on to revolutionary action, becomes a revolutionary, a man of a “special breed.” “He is more important than all of us here, taken together,” Kirsanov says about him. Rakhmetov expands his range of activities with amazing speed after he switches to revolutionary activities. At twenty-two, “he was already a man of very remarkably thorough learning.” Rakhmetov read only “original” works, and this is because, in his opinion, “there are very few major works on each subject; in all the rest it only repeats, dilutes, spoils what is contained much more fully and clearly in these few works. You need to read only them; any other reading is just a waste of time.” Realizing that the strength of a leader lies in his closeness to the people, Rakhmetov studies the life of workers. He traveled all over Russia on foot, was a woodcutter, a sawyer, a stone cutter, and together with barge haulers pulled barges along the Volga. Because of his strength, the barge haulers nicknamed him Nikitushka Lomov in memory of the legendary Volga hero. Rakhmetov prepared himself for revolutionary activity; he knew that he would have to endure hardships, torments, and perhaps even torture. And he tempers his will in advance, accustoming himself to withstand physical suffering.
Rakhmetov is distinguished by his rare ability to work. “He managed to do an awful lot, because at the disposal of time he placed upon himself exactly the same curbing of whims as in material things. He didn’t waste a quarter of an hour a month on entertainment; he didn’t need rest.” His activities were varied, and changing them was a rest for Rakhmetov. Chernyshevsky, for obvious reasons, could not speak openly about Rakhmetov’s secret revolutionary work. He only mentions that Rakhmetov “had an abyss of things to do, and all the things that didn’t concern him personally; He had no personal affairs, everyone knew that... He was at home little, he kept walking and driving around, walking more. But he... had people... often he was not at home for several days. Then, instead of him, one of his friends sat and received visitors, devoted to him in soul and body and silent as the grave.” Rakhmetov, knowing that the revolution needs devoted and knowledgeable people, takes care of the training of revolutionary personnel: his fellows study at several universities, preparing for underground activities. Rakhmetov seems to be a stern and gloomy person. He himself says: “You see sad things, how can you not be a gloomy monster.” But its severity is only external. “For all his phenomenal rudeness, he was, in essence, very delicate,” notes Chernyshevsky. “What a gentle and kind person he is,” Vera Pavlovna thinks about him.
Rakhmetov refuses personal happiness in the name of revolutionary work. “I must suppress love in myself,” he says to the woman he loves, “love for you would tie my hands, they won’t be untied soon anyway - they are already tied. But I'll untie it. I shouldn’t love... people like me don’t have the right to connect someone else’s fate with theirs.” Rakhmetov fights for the happiness of the people, and this struggle becomes the work of his whole life. “They are few, but with them the life of all flourishes; without them it would have stalled, gone sour; There are few of them, but they allow all people to breathe, without them people would suffocate. There are a great number of honest and kind people, but such people are few; but they are... the salt of the earth.”
Although the literary Rakhmetov had, according to Chernyshevsky, real prototypes, it should be noted that the novel “What is to be done?” has the characteristics of a utopia. This statement applies not only to the image of Rakhmetov, to the image of Vera Pavlovna and her activities, but to the introduction of new forms of labor organization. In the novel, the author created the image of a revolutionary who completely abandoned his personal life. He is merciless to himself. But will he be merciless to others? Abstract humanism, gaining strength, can turn into its opposite when, militantly, it imposes happiness on people. The literary image of a person selflessly serving the utopian idea became an ideal for many revolutionaries; this image was worshiped by lone terrorists, individual revolutionary groups and entire parties.
Roman by N. G. Chernyshevsky"What to do?" It was written in the Peter and Paul Fortress. It was started on December 14, 1862 and completed on April 4, 1863. It was written during the era of the rise of the revolutionary movement in Russia. The hero of the novel, Rakhmetov, is a revolutionary. He is a nobleman by birth. His father was a rich man. But the free life did not keep Rakhmetov on his father’s estate. He left the province and entered the Faculty of Science in St. Petersburg. Rakhmetov easily became close to progressive-minded people in the capital. I met Kirsanov, from whom I learned a lot of new and advanced things in political relations. I started reading a lot. Six months later, he stopped reading books and said: “Now reading has become a secondary matter for me. I am ready for life on this side.” He began to give orders to himself and to carry out these orders exactly on time. Next, Rakhmetov began to harden his body. He took on the hardest work. He was even a little boy. He did all this in preparation for great revolutionary deeds. Rakhmetov moved along the path he had chosen once and for all.
He only ate what ordinary people ate, although they had the opportunity to eat better. He explained it simply: “This is necessary - it gives respect and love from ordinary people. This is useful, it may come in handy. Rakhmetov refused to marry a rich young widow. He explained it this way: “... I must suppress love in myself: love for you would tie my hands, they will not be resolved soon for me - they are already tied. Chernyshevsky, in the image of Rakhmetov, portrayed a revolutionary leader, a special person. The author wrote about such people: “... These are the colors of the best people, these are the engines of engines, these are the salt of the earth.” Rakhmetov is a knight without fear or reproach, a man who seems to be forged from steel. He expands his circle of knowledge with amazing speed and carefully studies life.
As a character Rakhmetov appears in the chapter "Special Person". In other chapters his name is only mentioned. But one feels that this image is Central, Rakhmetov is the main character of the novel “What is to be done?” The chapter “A Special Person” forms, as it were, a small independent story in a novel, the idea of which would not be complete and understandable without it. When talking about Rakhmetov, Chernyshevsky deliberately shifts the time frame and does not provide a consistent description and biography. He uses hints and innuendo, interweaving what was “known” about him with what was “found out” later. Therefore, every stroke of the biography is of fundamental importance. For example, origin. Indeed, why does the sacristan Chernyshevsky make the main character of a socio-political novel a nobleman whose pedigree goes back centuries? Perhaps, according to the writer, the image of a revolutionary nobleman made the idea of revolution more convincing and attractive. Since the best representatives of the nobility are giving up their privileges, it means that a crisis is ripe. Rakhmetov's rebirth began in his early youth. His family was obviously a serf family. This is indicated by the terse phrase: “Yes, and he saw that it was in the village.” Observing the cruelty of serfdom, the young man began to think about justice. “Thoughts began to wander through him, and Kirsanov was to him what Lopukhov was to Vera Pavlovna. On the very first evening, he “listened greedily” to Kirsanov, “interrupted his words with shouts and curses of what should perish, blessings of what should live.” Rakhmetov differs from Lopukhov and Kirsanov not only by his aristocratic pedigree, but also by the fact that he has exceptional strength of character, which is manifested in the constant hardening of body and spirit, but especially by his tenacity in preparing for the revolutionary struggle. This is a man of ideas in the highest sense of the word. For Rakhmetov, the dream of a revolution is a guide to action, a guideline for his entire personal life.
The desire for rapprochement with ordinary people is clearly manifested in Rakhmet. This is evident from his travels around Russia, physical labor, and severe self-restraint in his personal life. The people nicknamed Rakhmetov Mikitushka Lomov, thereby expressing their love for him. Unlike the commoner Bazarov, who spoke condescendingly to the “thick-bearded” men, the nobleman Rakhmetov does not look at the people as a mass to be studied. He believes that the people are worthy of respect and are trying to experience at least part of the weight that hangs on the peasants' shoulders. Chernyshevsky shows Rakhmetova as a “very liquid” person, “a special breed”, but at the same time as a typical person, belonging to a new social group, albeit a small one. The writer endowed the “special person” with severe demands on himself and others, even with a gloomy appearance.
Vera Pavlovna first finds him “very boring. “Lopukhov and Kirsanov, and everyone who was not afraid of anyone or anything, felt time and some cowardice in front of him ... except for Masha and her equals or those who surpassed her in the simplicity of their souls and dresses. But Vera Pavlovna, who got to know Rakhmetov better, says about him: “... What a gentle and kind person he is.” Rakhmetov is a rigorist, that is, a person who never deviates from the accepted rules of behavior in anything. He prepares himself for the revolutionary struggle both morally and physically. Having slept the night on nails, he explains his action, smiling broadly and joyfully: “Test. Need to. It’s implausible, of course, but it’s necessary just in case. I see I can." This is probably how Chernyshevsky saw the leader of the revolutionaries. To the question “What to do?” Nikolai Gavrilovich responds with the image of Rakhmetov and the words placed in the epigraph. The figure of this rigorist influenced subsequent generations of Russian and foreign revolutionaries. This is evidenced by the confessions of these people; their “favorite was especially Rakhmetov. I like Rakhmetov. He has the qualities that Bazarov lacks. I admire his tenacity, will, endurance, ability to subordinate his life to his chosen ideal, courage, strength. I want to be at least a little like this hero.
poured on Rakhmetov. I like Rakhmetov. He has the qualities that Bazarov lacks. I admire his tenacity, will, endurance, ability to subordinate his life to his chosen ideal, courage, strength. I want to be at least a little like this hero.
Rakhmetov is the hero of the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky "What to do?"
Central to the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” is the image of Rakhmetov - a “special person”, “a superior nature”. His image merged the best features of the progressive people of Chernyshevsky’s era.
An aristocrat by birth, he becomes a democrat in his outlook on life and way of behavior. Rakhmetov is a professional revolutionary, revolutionary leader. This is a “knight without fear and reproach,” a man as if forged from pure steel. There are few people like him. “I have met,” notes Chernyshevsky, “so far only eight examples of this breed (including two women)...”
Rakhmetov did not immediately become a “special person.” He came to St. Petersburg as an ordinary decent young man. A rapprochement with Kirsanov, who introduced Rakhmetov to the teachings of the utopian socialists and the philosophy of Feuerbach, was the impetus for his transformation into a “special person.” “He listened greedily to Kirsanov on the first evening, cried, interrupted his words with exclamations of curses for what should perish, blessings for what should live.” Gifted with extraordinary abilities, Rakhmetov, having studied the theory of socialism, soon moves on to revolutionary actions, becomes a revolutionary, a man of a “special breed.” “He is more important than all of us here, taken together,” Kirsanov says about him. Rakhmetov expands his knowledge with amazing speed. At twenty-two years old, “he was already a man of very remarkably thorough learning.” Rakhmetov reads only “original” works, which, in his opinion, “there are very few major works on each subject; in all the rest it only repeats, dilutes, spoils what is contained much more fully and clearly in these few works. You need to read only them; any other reading is just a waste of time.” Realizing that the strength of a leader lies in his closeness to the people, Rakhmetov closely studies the life of the working people. He traveled all over Russia on foot, was a woodcutter, sawyer, stonecutter, and pulled the strap together with barge haulers. For an ordinary person, he is his own, dear person. No wonder the barge haulers nicknamed him Nikitushka Lomov in memory of the legendary Volga hero-barge hauler.
Rakhmetov, preparing himself for revolutionary activity, knows that he will have to endure hardships, torment, and perhaps torture from the tsarist jailers. And he strengthens his will and body in advance, accustoms himself to endure physical suffering, and renounces all luxury. Rakhmetov is distinguished by his rare ability to work. “He managed to do things terribly with me, because in the disposal of time he placed upon himself exactly the same curbing of whims as in material things. He didn’t waste an hour a month on Thursdays for entertainment; he didn’t need rest.” His activities are varied, and changing them is a rest for Rakhmetov. Chernyshevsky, for obvious reasons, could not speak openly about Rakhmetov’s secret revolutionary work. He only dully mentions that Rakhmetov “had an abyss of things to do, and all the things that didn’t concern him personally; He had no personal affairs, everyone knew that... He was at home little, he kept walking and driving around, walking more. But he... had people... often he was not at home for several days. Then, instead of him, one of his friends sat with him and received visitors, devoted to him in soul and body and silent as the grave.” Rakhmetov, knowing that the revolution needs devoted and knowledgeable people, takes care of the training of revolutionary personnel: his fellows study at several universities, preparing for underground activities. Rakhmetov seems to be a stern and gloomy person. He himself says: “You see sad things, how can you not be a gloomy monster.” But his severity is only external; behind it lies a tender and loving nature. “For all his phenomenal rudeness, he was, in essence, very delicate,” notes Chernyshevsky. “What a gentle and kind person he is,” Vera Pavlovna thinks about him. In order to help the oppressed, Rakhmetov refuses personal happiness in the name of revolutionary work. “I must suppress love in myself,” he says to the woman he loves, “love for you would tie my hands, they will not be untied soon, they are already tied. But I'll untie it. I shouldn’t love... people like me don’t have the right to connect someone else’s fate with theirs.”
Rakhmetov fights for the happiness of the people, and this struggle becomes the work of his whole life. The path that Rakhmetov follows is not easy, but it is rich in happiness and joy. The importance of the Rakhmetovs for life is enormous. “They are few, but with them the life of all flourishes; without them it would stall, it would turn sour, there are few of them, but they give all people to breathe, without them people would suffocate. There are a great number of honest and kind people, but such people are few; but they are in it... a bouquet in noble wine; from them its strength and aroma; it is the color of the best people, it is the engines of engines, it is the salt of the earth.” For many generations of revolutionary fighters, the image of Rakhmetov was an example of behavior and imitation, a source of inspiration, from whom they drew strength and courage.
RAKHMETOV
RAKHMETOV is the central character of N.G. Chernyshevsky’s work “What to do? From stories about new people" (1863).
R. differs from other heroes of the novel in the same way as Chernyshevsky’s novel itself differs from traditional psychological novels. In the magazine “Epoch”, published by M.M. and F.M. Dostoevsky, they wrote about R. as “some kind of armchair myth, traveling as easily through faculties as throughout Europe” (N. Soloviev). In the artistic hierarchy of the novel, he occupies the highest level, being the only representative of “special” people - in proportion to how in life the author, in his words, “has so far met only eight examples of this breed.” Some trait “already united them into one breed and separated them from all other people,” simply put - participation in underground revolutionary work. Without knowing Chernyshevsky’s “Aesopian language”, it is impossible to understand why R. led “the harshest lifestyle”, “was involved in other people’s affairs or no one’s affairs in particular”, in the “gathering points” of his friends “he only met people who had influence on others” , “I wasn’t at home much, I kept walking and driving around.”
A “special person” differs from “new people” in many ways. By origin, he is not a commoner, but a nobleman, “from a family known since the 13th century”; It is not circumstances, but only the strength of his convictions that forces him to go against his Environment. He remakes both his mental and physical nature, maintains “exorbitant strength within himself,” because “this gives respect and love from ordinary people.” He completely renounces personal benefits and intimate life, so that the struggle for complete enjoyment of life is a struggle “only according to principle, and not out of passion, out of conviction, and not out of personal need.” Hence R.’s nickname - “rigorist” (from the Latin “rigore” - cruelty, hardness), under which he first appears in section VI of the third chapter of the book. The rigorism of life follows from the rigorism of thought: “All the great theorists were people of extreme opinions,” Chernyshevsky wrote in the article “Count Cavour.” R. serves as a living embodiment of the theory of “calculation of mutual benefits,” realizing the potential inherent in “new people.” It is also important that R.’s closest literary predecessor is Bazarov from Turgenev’s novel “Fathers and Sons.” While maintaining some stylistic continuity, Chernyshevsky at the same time showed that R. differs from Bazarov in having a positive point of application of his forces and has the opportunity to act among like-minded people.
R.'s image is built on a paradoxical combination of incompatible things. The extreme chronological specificity of his biography, which serves as a starting point for many other events in the book, is adjacent to significant event gaps; a secondary character, he turns out to be “more important than all... taken together”; an extreme materialist in his views, he lives and fights only for an idea. However, this inconsistency results in stylistic diversity, characteristic of the menippea genre, to which the novel is close.
Despite all the visible extraneousness of R.’s image to the main plot of the book, he occupies a pivotal position in it, performing the functions of an intermediary: between the “open” (family) and “hidden” (political-revolutionary) parts of the plot, that is, between the worlds visible and invisible to the ordinary reader : between that world and this (when he gives Vera Pavlovna notes from Lopukhov, who “left for America”); between the past, present and future (when from an “ordinary kind and honest young man” RAKHMETOV, a nobleman, a man of the past, becomes a “special person” of the future and knows the onset of this future to within a year); between different parts of this world (when traveling in Russia and abroad). The highest manifestation of R.'s messianic properties is the anticipation of his arrival on the eve of a “change of scenery.” The obvious mythological subtext of this image is associated with the structure of the novel, organized according to the principle of the “world tree”: R. and a few other “special people” descend from its upper, heavenly tier to the sinful earth to purify it. The hagiographical and legendary features of R.’s biography, referring to the “Life of Alexy, the Man of God,” to epics about heroes and to the newest legends about the barge hauler Nikitushka Lomov, to romantic images of supermen, in combination with everyday detail, are intended to emphasize his universality and absolute reality.
Among the prototypes of R., they are most often called P.A. Bakhmetev (according to Chernyshevsky himself), who studied with Chernyshevsky at the Saratov gymnasium and, after unfinished studies at the agricultural institute, went to Europe and then to Oceania to create a new social system there. The image of R., as befits any hagiographic image, gave rise to many imitations. He became the standard of a professional revolutionary, as D.I. Pisarev pointed out in his article “The Thinking Proletariat” (1865), calling R. a “historical figure”: “In the general movement of events, there are moments when people like Rakhmetov are necessary and irreplaceable ..."
Lit.: Pisarev D.I. Thinking proletariat
//Pisarev D.I. Essays. In three volumes. 1.1. L., 1982; Skaftymov A.P. Chernyshevsky's artistic works written in the Peter and Paul Fortress
//Skaftymov A.P. Moral quests of Russian writers. M., 1972; Bakhtin M.M. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. M., 1972; Lebedev A.A. Reasonable egoists of Chernyshevsky. M., 1973; Ta-marchenko G.E. Chernyshevsky is a novelist. L., 1976; Naumova N.N. Roman N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?” L., 1978; Rudenko Yu.K. Novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?”: Aesthetic originality and artistic method. L., 1979; Pinaev M.T. Roman N.G. Chernyshevsky “What to do?”: Commentary. Book for teachers. M., 1988; Paperno I. Semiotics of behavior: Nikolai Chernyshevsky - a man of the era of realism. M., 1996.
M.A. Dzyubenko
Literary heroes. - Academician. 2009 .
See what "RAKHMETOV" is in other dictionaries:
One of the most significant characters in N. G. Chernyshevsky’s novel “What to do?” (1863) Rakhmetov, Salavat Kipaevich See also Akhmetov ... Wikipedia
RAKHMATOV RAKHMATULLIN RAKHMETOV Rakhmat, Rakhmet Turkic names. From the Arabic word rahmat, thank you, gratitude. (F). Rakhmatullin the mercy of Allah. (E). (Source: “Dictionary of Russian surnames.” (“Onomasticon”)) RAKHMETOV Like Rakhmatov, the surname ... ... Russian surnames
Rakhmetov- the hero of Chernyshevsky's novel What to do? , a type of ascetically selfless fighter. In the person of Rakhmetov, the image of the future revolutionary Narodnaya Volya is given... Historical reference book of Russian Marxist
Wikipedia has articles about other people with this surname, see Rakhmetov. The style of this article is non-encyclopedic or violates the norms of the Russian language. The article should be corrected according to the stylistic rules of Wikipedia... Wikipedia
- - son of Gabriel Ivanovich Ch., publicist and critic; genus. July 12, 1828 in Saratov. Gifted by nature with excellent abilities, the only son of his parents, N. G. was the subject of intense care and concern for the whole family. But… … Large biographical encyclopedia
- (eng. Rock climbing) a sport and type of active recreation, which consists of climbing on natural (rocks) or artificial (climbing wall) terrain. Originating as a type of mountaineering, rock climbing is currently ... ... Wikipedia
Competitions in difficulty climbing Difficulty climbing is a type of rock climbing ... Wikipedia
It’s no secret that at one time Chernyshevsky’s novel “What is to be done?” caused a real stir in public circles. A novel about “new people” is how this work is usually called, which had a colossal influence on the minds of Russian youth in the 60s of the 19th century. But who are these “new people”?
One of them is Rakhmetov, a character who plays a special role in this novel. “A special person” is what the author calls him. Rakhmetov is a collective image of people of the highest “breed” of that time. What is he like?
Rakhmetov is a revolutionary democrat, a nobleman by birth. As a young man, he entered the university, where he became close to Kirsanov. He greatly influenced Rakhmetov’s views, after which the young man began to study revolutionary literature. However, he did not read everything: he declared that he read only “original” things. Rakhmetov believed that every science has its own textbook sources, and only they are truly worthy of attention. Accordingly, he studied only the most original works, primary sources, because they freed him from the need to study hundreds of similar books.
Some characters call Rakhmetov a rigorist - a man who unswervingly followed his principles and internal guidelines. And indeed it is. Being an aristocrat by birth, Rakhmetov did not allow himself to live in grand style: he ate, apart from beef, only the cheapest foods, and slept on felt. “I have no right to spend money on a whim that I can do without,” he declared. Moreover, Rakhmetov worked hard for a long time in order to experience first-hand all the hardships, difficulties and deprivations that befall poor people. This is the essence of his asceticism: he believed that he could not live differently from the way the common people lived.
Rakhmetov devoted himself entirely to the cause for the good of the people: he never wasted time, studied relevant literature, and even spent no more time communicating with people than was necessary. This reflects one of the main traits of his character - rationality. At times his rationality went to the extreme: he once fell in love with a woman, but did not start a serious relationship with her - in his words, this could have “tied his hands.” He meant that love would be an obstacle to his revolutionary activities. Therefore, he left his beloved; For several months after the breakup, I tried to suppress the feeling of love in myself; I walked around depressed and gloomy. And this is just one of the cases of his self-restraint and self-sacrifice.
It is obvious that Rakhmetov is a character to look up to. Unwavering will, firm adherence to principles, rationality, honesty - these are the qualities that each of us should strive to acquire.
Option 2
Rakhmetov appears before us in the chapter “A Special Person,” but it is felt that he was the most important in the work.
We see that the hero began to be reborn as a young man. His household were serfs, and therefore, noticing and experiencing the morals of serfdom, our character began to think about the truth. Rakhmetov differed from Lopukhov and Kirsanov, first of all, in his strong will and strong character, which manifested themselves in the process of preparatory actions in the revolutionary struggle. When he dreamed of a revolution, he began to have more and more thoughts about how to act. He actively sought rapprochement with ordinary people. This is noticeable from his trips around his native expanses, physical labor, and restrictions in his personal life.
People called Rakhmetov Nikitushka Lomov, thereby showing sympathy for him. He believes that peasants and workers need to be respected and tries to understand the difficulties that they bear on their shoulders. The author awarded the main character with severity towards himself and an inconspicuous appearance. Vera Pavlovna at first considers him a gloomy person, but after getting to know him better, she began to claim that he exudes kindness and tenderness.
Rakhmetov never deviates from accepted norms of behavior. His preparation of himself for the revolutionary struggle is felt both from the moral and physical side. After spending the whole night on nails, he decided to test himself whether he could do this or not. Coming from a noble family, the hero sells his inheritance because he does not want to accept the interests of aristocratic society. Possessing great courage, he refuses happiness and love. It was precisely such a person that Chernyshevsky saw as the leader of the revolutionaries. His image influenced subsequent generations of people with new and progressive views in Russia and the West.
The image of Rakhmetov is close and interesting to me, because he has those qualities that Bazarov did not have. I especially admire his independence, stability and, of course, the fact that he knew how to subordinate his life to his chosen ideal.
Rakhmetov's essay in the novel What to do?
The image of Rakhmetov is in some sense truly unique and amazing. It was the highest pure nature, which embodied the features of the era. Chernyshevsky admires the character of his character, he is deeply sympathetic to him. Rakhmetov is endowed with incredible character traits.
This man was an aristocrat by origin, his ideas and thoughts were of a democratic nature. Chernyshevsky himself says about his hero that there are very few such people left.
It is worth noting that Chernyshevsky’s character was not immediately endowed with all of the above traits. When he first arrived in St. Petersburg, he was an ordinary young man without any bright ideas, plans for the future, or dreams, but then Rakhmetov met Kirsanov. It was he who introduced our character to the teachings of the utopian socialists. This teaching literally turned Rakhmetov’s entire worldview upside down, and it made him a special person. The teachings of Feuerbach, who also impressed him with his ideas, also played an important role.
Rakhmetov incredibly quickly masters and remembers what he is told, he amazes Kirsanov with his abilities. He has an inquisitive mind, he is observant, Rakhmetov works in a wide variety of fields, he does not shy away from any work. The barge haulers even nicknamed Rakhmetov after the Volga hero, he was so close to the people.
He limits himself in many things, deliberately forcing himself to endure physical suffering. In secret, Rakhmetov was preparing for the revolution; he even had several people who were interested in revolutionary activities. For the sake of the revolution, he was even able to abandon the woman he loved. He believed that his direct responsibility was work and activity, and he could not afford to associate himself with a woman. His most important task was to fight for the well-being and happiness of the people. And, it’s worth noting, he did it very well. Many people drew strength from Rakhmetov, admired him, and he served as an example for them. He himself was incredibly interested in exploring their lives, observing, studying their lives.
Perhaps, at a certain period in our country there have always been people who were distinguished by their intelligence, ability to foresee certain circumstances, and perspicacity. Unfortunately, we cannot say that there are many such people, but you need to listen to them, think about every word, and be extremely attentive.
